Abstract
We provide a theoretical analysis of the nature of the orbital angular momentum (OAM) modal fields in a multilayered fiber, such as the step-index fiber and the ring-core fiber. In a detailed study of the vector field solutions of the step-index fiber (in the exponential basis), we discover that the polarization-induced field component is a modified scalar OAM field (as opposed to a standard OAM scalar field) with a shifted intensity pattern in the weakly guiding approximation (WGA); the familiar intensity donut pattern is reduced or increased in radius depending upon whether it is a case of spin-alignment or anti-alignment with the OAM. Such a shift in the intensity pattern appears to be a general feature of the field of a multilayered fiber as seen from an extension to the ring-core fiber. Additionally, we derive a general expression for the polarization-correction to the scalar propagation constant, which includes, for the first time, the contribution of the polarization-induced field. All the analytic expressions are illustrated and validated numerically with application to a step-index fiber, whose analytic solutions are well-known.
1. Introduction
Because of the possibility of a multifold increase in data-carrying capacity on an optical fiber, research in orbital angular momentum propagation (OAM) mode propagation in a fiber has proliferated. The orthogonality of the OAM modes makes possible the augmentation of fiber capacity by stacking different streams of data on different OAM modes, characterized by a unique set of topological charge, radial index number, and polarization, but possessing the same wavelength. The topological charge, usually denoted $l$, is representative of the orbital angular momentum $l\hbar$ per photon carried by the mode.
The vector OAM modes are the solutions, $HE_{l+1,m}$ and $EH_{l-1,m}$, of the vector wave equation when solved directly in the $e^{\pm il\theta }$ basis [1], where $\theta$ is the azimuthal angle in the cylindrical polar coordinates (this is in sharp contrast to the $\cos l\theta ,\sin l\theta$ basis, traditionally used within the optics community, which by and large treats wave propagation in terms of even and odd modes as in [2]; in this basis, the OAM solutions are subsequently constructed through linear combinations of the even $\cos (l\theta )$ and odd $\sin (l\theta )$ solutions; see, e.g., [3–5]). In what follows, we suppress the radial index $m$ for convenience; however, all numerical calculations assume $m=1$. The transverse fields of the vector OAM modes, $HE_{l+1}$ and $EH_{l-1}$, denoted $\vec {e}^{(l+1)}_t$ and $\vec {e}^{(l-1)}_t$, respectively, satisfy the wave equation
In this paper, we derive the exact analytic expressions for the vector fields in multilayered fibers such as the step-index fiber and the ring-core fiber (Fig. 1), and subject them to close scrutiny for their OAM contents. The structure of the polarization-induced OAM field is especially studied. Subsequently, we ascertain its impact on the polarization correction to the propagation constant of the scalar modes. We begin in Section 2 with the basic definitions and concepts, constructing in the process the general OAM composition of the vector fields of a circular fiber, along with the related concept of the total angular momentum, $J=L+S$. Subsequently (in Section 3), we derive an analytic form of the vector field solutions for the step-index fiber, which is then examined for its OAM contents and features; the extracted features are then numerically simulated and validated. This analysis is followed by a discussion of the extension to the multilayered fiber. The ramifications of the findings are explored in Section 4 for polarization corrections, leading to a general expression for a multilayered fiber (step-index or the three-layered ring-core fiber). This general expression includes the explicit impact of the polarization-induced field component. Analytic expressions specific to the step-index fiber are subsequently derived for illustrative purposes and numerically simulated. Section 5 is the summary and discussion.
2. General OAM composition of the vector fields in a fiber
We begin by writing the generic form of the vector fields expressed directly in the $e^{\pm il\theta }$ basis used in the solution of the vector wave equation:
Similar results are obtained for the associated magnetic field, denoted $\vec {h}_t^{(l\pm 1)}$:
These solutions in conjunction with the $z$ field components, $\vec {e}_z^{(l\pm 1)}$ and $\vec {h}_z^{(l\pm 1)}$, are identified with the familiar vector modes, $HE_{l+1}$ and $EH_{l-1}$, expressed in the exponential basis [14].
In what follows, we determine the exact forms of the two components in Eq. (7) for the step-index fiber and the ring-core fiber (see Fig. 1) using the analytic expressions for the radial and the azimuthal components of the electric fields. In particular, we study the OAM characteristics of the fields in a step-index fiber in detail.
3. OAM modal fields in a multilayered fiber
We consider the step-index fiber (two layers) first followed by an extension of the technique to more than two-layers.
3.1 Step-index fiber
In a standard manner of solving for the fields within a step-index fiber [15], we consider the steady-state solutions: $\vec {E}^{(l)}(\vec {r}, t)=\vec {e}^{(l)}(r,\theta )e^{i(\beta _l z-\omega t)}$ and $\vec {H}^{(l)}(\vec {r}, t)=\vec {h}^{(l)}(r,\theta )e^{i(\beta _l z-\omega t)}$, where $\beta _l$ is the propagation constant of the mode and $\omega =k/\sqrt {\epsilon _0 \mu _0}$ is the angular frequency. We subsequently apply the Maxwell’s equations, starting with $E_z^{(l)}(r,\theta ) = e_z^{(l)}(r)e^{il\theta }$, where $e_z^{(l)}(r)=A_lJ_l(p_lr)$, and $H_z^{(l)}(r,\theta ) = h_z^{(l)}(r)e^{il\theta }$, where $h_z^{(l)}(r)=B_lJ_l(p_lr)$, within the fiber core of radius $a$; similarly, for the cladding region ($r\ge a)$, we write $E_z^{(l)}(r,\theta ) = e_z^{(l)}(r)e^{il\theta }$, where $e_z^{(l)}(r)=C_lK_l(q_lr)$, and $H_z^{(l)}(r,\theta ) = h_z^{(l)}(r)e^{il\theta }$, where $h_z^{(l)}(r)=D_lK_l(q_lr)$. The results for the radial profiles, $e_r^{(l)}$ and $e_\theta ^{(l)}$, comprising the transverse field (see Eq. (5)) are
3.1.1 Analysis of the $J=l+1$ case
Changing $l$ to $l+1$ in Eq. (13) and inserting the resulting expressions in Eq. (7), we obtain for the fields within the core
Equation (15) is a very general result, and a remarkable one because the spatial forms in Eq. (15) resemble the scalar field amplitudes (solutions of the scalar wave equation). Parameter $p_{l+1}$ in the argument of the Bessel functions, $J_l$ and $J_{l+2}$, is given by $p^2_{l+1}=k^2n_1^2-\beta _{l+1}^2$. The corresponding counterpart $\tilde {p}_{ l}$ in the solution of the scalar wave equation, $\vec {\tilde e}^{(l)}_t\sim J_{l}(\tilde {p}_l r)e^{ il\theta }\vec {\epsilon }_{+}$ (see Eq. (2)), is similarly related by $\tilde {p}_l^2=k^2n_1^2-\tilde {\beta }_l^2$. Consequently, $\tilde {p}_l^2- p_{l+1}^2=\beta _{l\pm 1}^2 - \tilde \beta _{l}^2= \delta \beta _{l\pm 1}^2$, which is of order $\Delta <<1$ in WGA and therefore very small. Thus, $p_{l+1}$ in the argument of $J_l$ in Eq. (15) can be replaced with $\tilde {p}_{ l}$, implying we may identify the first term in Eq. (15) with the field of the traditional scalar $OAM_l$ mode possessing a topological charge $l$ and an amplitude $O_{l}(r,\theta ) =J_{l}(\tilde {p}_l r)e^{ il\theta }$ [1] (see also Appendix A). Peak intensity defined as the square of the magnitude of $O_{l}$ occurs at the first maximum of the $J_l (\tilde {p}_l r)$ function. If we define $r=r^{(l)}_{max}$ as this maximum, then $r^{(l)}_{max}=x_{max}/\tilde {p}_l$, where $x_{max}$ is the first maximum of $J_l(x), l>0$. Since the Bessel function rises from its zero value with increase in its argument value, the intensity of this mode as a function of the radial distance $r$ is the familiar donut pattern, often observed in experimental data (see, e.g, [5]).
The second term in Eq. (15), however, does not correspond to the field of the traditional scalar $OAM_{l+2}$ mode because its radial profile, $J_{l+2}(p_{l+1}r)\approx J_{l+2}(\tilde {p}_{l}r)$ is not the same as the profile, $J_{l+2}(\tilde {p}_{l+2}r)$ of the traditional $OAM_{l+2}$ scalar mode. This is due to the fact that $\tilde {p}_{l+2}\ne \tilde {p}_{l}$. In fact, $\tilde {p}_{l+2}> \tilde {p}_{l}$ (see Table 1) because $\tilde {\beta }_{l+2}< \tilde {\beta }_{l}$. As a result, the second term in Eq. (15) is a modified $OAM_{l+2}$ modal field, whose predicted intensity maximum occurs at $r=r'^{(l+2)}_{max}$, where
$r^{(l+2)}_{max}$ is the radial distance at which the intensity of the traditional $OAM_{l+2}$ mode reaches its maximum. Because $\tilde {p}_{l+2}> \tilde {p}_{l}$, this maximum is shifted outward in the characteristic donut shaped intensity pattern, even beyond $r=a$ (see Table 1). However, because the fields drop off exponentially into the cladding region (being given by Eq. (14) for $r>a$), the maximum consequently occurs at $r=a$. The relatively low intensity region (the dark region of the donut), nevertheless, scales by a factor of $f^+_l=\tilde {p}_{l+2}/\tilde {p}_{l}>1$. Figure 2 shows the predicted intensity pattern (within the core) of the modified scalar OAM modal field (on the right) contrasted with the corresponding traditional scalar mode (on the left) for $l=3$ (top row) and $l=5$ (bottom row); the the step-index fiber is described by $n_1=1.461,~ n_2=1.444$, core radius $a=25~\mu m$; wavelength $\lambda =1.55 \mu m$ is assumed.3.1.2 Analysis of the $J=l-1$ case
Changing $l$ to $l-1$ in Eq. (13) and substituting in Eq. (7), we obtain
The field corresponds to the $EH_{l-1}$ mode. In WGA, $\beta _{l-1}\approx \tilde {\beta }_l$, the corresponding solution of the scalar wave equation (see Section 1); consequently, $p_{l-1}\approx \tilde {p}_l$. So, the first term corresponds to the traditional scalar mode with the radial profile, $J_{l}(\tilde {p}_{l}r)$, while the second term is a modified scalar modal field because the associated radial function, $J_{l-2}(p_{l-1}r)\approx J_{l-2}(\tilde {p}_l r)$, is different from $J_{l-2}(\tilde {p}_{l-2})r$, the radial profile of the scalar OAM mode characterized by topological charge $l-2$ . The donut intensity pattern here has a radius
which is reduced since $\tilde {p}_{l-2}<\tilde {p}_l$, i.e., an intensity pattern as determined solely by the modified modal field, would be shifted inward towards the center by a factor $f^-_l\approx \tilde {p}_{l-2}/\tilde {p}_{l}$; see Table 2 and Fig. 3; the intensity pattern here displays the secondary maxima not present in the traditional scalar $OAM_{l-2}$ fields.3.1.3 Relative amplitude of the modified scalar modal field
We need to evaluate the coefficients, $\gamma ^{(l+1)}_\pm$ (see Eqs. (15) and (16)) and $\gamma ^{(l-1)}_\pm$ (see Eqs. (18) and (19)). We first note that
In the limit, $n_2\rightarrow n_1$, the above characteristic equation reduces to the characteristic equation for the scalar modes [2,15], assuming $\beta _l\approx kn_1$. In a real fiber, $n_2$ and $n_1$ are not exactly equal, being related by $n_2^2=n_1^2(1-2\Delta )$, where $\Delta$ is usually a small fraction. Inserting this expression in Eq. (22) then leads to the following relationship:
In terms of the above parameters, Eq. (21) can be rewritten as
which further upon substitution of Eq. (23) yieldsWe change $l$ to $l+1$ in Eq. (28) and insert the resulting expression for $B_{l+1}/A_{l+1}$ with a negative sign, in Eq. (16) to obtain
When $\Delta ~<<1$ (e.g., $\Delta \approx 0.01$ in a standard commercial multimode step-index fiber and $\approx 0.02$ in considered ring-core fibers [6,7]), we can expand Eqs. (29) and (30) to first order in $\Delta$; further, using the fact that $\beta _{l+1}\approx kn_1$, we arrive at
and leading to the relative amplitudeHere we change $l$ to $l-1$ in Eq. (28) and insert the resulting expression (with the positive sign) in Eq. (19). This yields the following expressions:
Retaining the first term in the binomial expansion of Eqs. (34) and (35) in $\Delta (<<1)$, and using the fact that $\beta _{l-1}\approx kn_1$, we arrive at
and which implies that the relative polarization-induced field coefficient, denoted $\mu _{l-1}$, here is given by3.2 Numerical validation
Here we compare the exact solution of the vector wave equation with the results derived on the basis of $\Delta <<1$; in the latter case, we recast the results in terms of the solutions of the scalar wave equation. Consequently, focusing first on the $J=l+1$ case, we insert Eqs. (31) and (32) (or (33)) into Eq. (15), and set $\beta _{l+1}\approx \tilde {\beta }_l$, $p_{l+1} \approx \tilde {p}_l$, and $q_{l+1}\approx \tilde {q}_l$, results valid in WGA. Subsequently, we arrive at
For our calculations done in MATLAB in double precision, we consider a multimode fiber with the same parameters as those used in Tables 1 and 2. Table 3 shows the results of numerical integration done for $I^{'(J)}_V$ and $I^{'(J)}_S$, where $J=l\pm 1$; for the former, we used two different characteristic equations, one corresponding to the $HE_{l+1}$ modes and the other to the $EH_{l-1}$ modes, while for $I^{'(J)}_S$, we used the single characteristic equation corresponding to the scalar modes [2]. The differences are of the order of a tenth percent or less, corroborating the veracity of our results expressed in terms of the scalar parameters. Furthermore, we observed that, using parameter $\tilde {p}_{l+2}$, instead of $\tilde {p}_l$, in the argument of $J_{l+2}$ in Eq. (39), causes %diff in Table 3 (for the $l+1$ case) to increase by a factor of 2 to 9 in magnitude, supporting the fact that the polarization-induced component of the electric field is indeed the field of a modified scalar OAM mode of topological charge $l+2$ as described in Section 3.1, and not the field of a traditional scalar mode of the same topological charge. Similar worsening of the results (although less dramatic) occurs in the $J= l-1$ case, when $\tilde {p}_l$ in the argument of the Bessel function, $J_{l-2}$, is replaced with $\tilde {p}_{l-2}$.
3.3 Extension to a multilayered fiber
In extending the above theoretical concepts to a cylindrical waveguide with more than two layers, we observe that, within each layer of the waveguide, the field solutions are, in general, a linear combination of the Bessel functions: $J_l(\alpha _i r)$ and $Y_l(\alpha _i r)$, when $\alpha _i^2=(k^2n_i^2-\beta _l^2)$ is positive, and a linear combination of the modified Bessel functions: $I_l(\alpha _i r)$ and $K_l(\alpha _i r)$, when $\alpha _i^2$ is negative. For the 3-layer fiber, defined by a ring core of radii $a$ and $b (>a)$, refractive index $n_1$, and inner and outer cladding refractive index of $n_2<n_1$ (Fig. 1), the z component of the field is expressible in the azimuthal exponential basis as
Within the ring, $a\le r\le b$, where the fields are primarily concentrated, we obtain, using Maxwell’s equations (as in the step-index fiber case) and the appropriate Bessel function recursion relations, the following expression:
4. General form of the polarization correction
In this section, we evaluate the impact of the second component (the modified scalar modal field) on the polarization correction to the propagation constant of a scalar mode. Prior work [2,8–10] has not considered it, partly due to the lack of an analytic expression as discussed in Section 1. We first derive a generic form for polarization correction of propagation constant in a mutlilayered fiber. This form includes the explicit contribution of the polarization-induced component (the second component) in Eq. (7). We also assume the WGA so that we can write the polarization-induced field correction (see Eq. (4) and Eq. (7)) as
For multilayered fibers such as the step-index fiber and the three-layer ring-core fiber, characterized by a core refractive index of $n_1$ and a cladding refractive index of $n_2$ (see Fig. 1), the function $G_{l\pm 2}(r)=G_{l\pm 2}(p_{l+1}r)$, where the parameter $p_{l+1}^2=k^2n_1^2-\beta _{l+1}^2$. Recalling $\vec {\tilde {e}}_t^{(l)}=F_{l}(r)e^{il\theta }\vec {\epsilon }_\pm$, we substitute $\vec {e}^{(l\pm 1)}_t= \vec {\tilde e}^{(l)}_t + \delta \vec {e}^{(l\pm 1)}_t$ into Eq. (1). After taking scalar products and performing the necessary integrations (see Appendix B), we arrive at the general form for polarization correction
The radial amplitudes, $F_l(r)$ and $G_{l\pm 2}(r)$, are characteristic of the multilayered fiber under consideration. The first integral is identified with the familiar polarization correction [2,8,10]; the second integral is the correction due to the polarization-induced field component. Furthermore, $\Delta$ being less than one allows us to make an expansion of $ln(n^2)$ in the parameter $\Delta$ (Section 1). The function $G_{l\pm 2}$ in the second term of Eq. (45) is of order $\Delta$, so an expansion of $ln (n^2)$ to first order in $\Delta$ yields a result quadratic in $\Delta$.
4.1 Expression valid up to second order in $\Delta$
To obtain the expression valid up to second order in $\Delta <<1$, we note that $n^2=n_1^2(1-2\Delta f(r))$ and use the expansion, $ln(1-x)=-x-x^2/2+\cdots$ in Eq. (45) to arrive at
If we ignore the second term and replace $1+2\Delta f(r)$ by unity in Eq. (46), we obtain the result in [2,10], which is the correction to first order in $\Delta$. We consider now, for illustrative purposes, the step-index fiber.
4.2 Application to a step-index fiber
$n^2=n_1^2(1-2\Delta f(r))$, where $\Delta <<1$. As a consequence, to first order in $\Delta$, $\partial ln(n^2)/\partial r=-2\Delta \partial f(r)/\partial r=-2\Delta \delta (r-a)$, the last step following from the fact that $f(r)$ is a step function at $r=a$. Therefore, Eq. (46) reduces to
4.3 Numerical results
For numerical simulation we chose the multimode step-index fiber with parameters: $n_1=1.461, n_2=1.444, a=25 \mu m$, and $\lambda = 1.55 \mu m$. The index profile height parameter $\Delta =0.011568$. We first calculated $\delta \beta _{l+1}^{(CE)}=\beta _{l+1}-\tilde {\beta _l}$ and $\delta \beta _{l-1}^{(CE)}=\beta _{l-1}-\tilde {\beta }_l$, where $\beta _{l+1}$ and $\beta _{l-1}$ were determined from the characteristic equations for the $HE_{l+1}$ and the $EH_{l-1}$ modes, respectively, while the propagation constant, $\tilde {\beta }_l$ was determined from the characteristic equation for the scalar modes [2]. Values are displayed in Table 4 for $l=2$ to $l=5$. $\delta \beta _{l\pm 1}$, calculated directly from Eq. (50), is in agreement with the characteristic equation-based values $\delta \beta _{l\pm 1}^{(CE)}$ within a fraction of a percent. The fifth and the ninth columns are the contributions of the polarization-induced OAM components, denoted $\delta \beta _{l\pm 1}^{(p)}$, which is calculated from the second term in Eq. (50). It is observed to be about 1% of the total, which is of the order of $\Delta$, as expected. The fractional differences (%$diff$) are likely due to higher order terms not considered here. All numerical calculations were done in MATLAB in double precision.
4.4 Extension to ring-core fiber
A similar calculation can also be carried out for the ring-core-fiber (see Fig. 1) once the function $G_{l\pm 2}(r)$ has been extracted from the expression, Eq. (43); the refractive index function here is given by $n^2(r)=n_1^2(1-2\Delta f(r))$, where $f(r)=g(r-a)+h(r-b); g(r-a)= 1$ for $r<a$ and equal to zero for $r\ge a$, and $h(r-b)=1$ for $r\ge b$ and equal to zero for $r<b$. For $\partial f(r)\partial r$ needed in Eq. (46), we note here that $\partial h(r-b)/\partial r= \delta (r-b)$ and $\partial g(r-a)/\partial r =-\delta (r-a)$.
5. Summary and discussion
We have critically investigated the nature of the transverse OAM fields in a multilayered cylindrical waveguide. In particular, in a detailed study of the step-index fiber (two-layered fiber), we have identified the polarization-induced component of the vector modal field as a modified scalar OAM mode, a hitherto unknown result. The intensity peak of this nontraditional OAM mode occurs at a larger or smaller radial distance in the characteristic donut intensity pattern, depending upon whether the spin is aligned with OAM or antialigned with OAM as in the transverse fields of the $HE_{l+1}$ or the $EH_{l-1}$ mode, respectively. An extension to other multilayered fibers such as the ring-core fiber shows the modified scalar field as a general feature of the polarization-induced component. The amplitude of this modified scalar mode is of order $\Delta$, the index profile height parameter; thus larger the value of $\Delta$, larger this amplitude. We also have developed analytic expressions for the contribution of this component to polarization correction, not done before. Specifically, we have applied these expressions to the case of a step-index fiber to illustrate their impact numerically. Such expressions along with the insight they provide can be useful in the analysis and design of fibers. Note also that, while the treatment here pertains to the multilayered fibers, the result of a polarization-induced component being a modified scalar modal field is a generic result that will manifest in any type of fiber (graded-index, or otherwise), simply because $\tilde {p}_l \ne \tilde {p}_{l\pm 2}$ in general.
Appendix
A. Reduction of the vector OAM modes to their scalar forms for the step-index fiber in weakly guiding approximation (WGA)
We first note that setting $n_2=n_1$ and $\beta _l=kn_1$ in the characteristic equation for the vector modes (Eq. (22)) yields
Equations (9) and (10) can be recast as
Inserting Eq. (53) with the $+$ sign and invoking the identity: $J_l'(x)=-J_{l+1}(x)+\frac {l}{x}J_l(x)$, one arrives at
where the constant $A'_l$ is given byNow $\beta _l/p_l >>1$ because $p_l=(k^2n_1^2-\beta _l^2)^{1/2}$ is very small compared to $\beta _l \approx kn_1$. Consequently, $e_z^{(l)}=A_lJ_{l}(p_lr)$ is very small compared to $e^{(l)}_r$ and $e^{(l)}_\theta$, and thus neglected generally. Note that $e^{(l)}_r$ and $e^{(l)}_\theta$ have the same magnitude but differ in phase by $\pi /2$. Substituting Eqs. (56) and (57) in Eq. (6), we obtain
Changing $l \rightarrow l-1$,
which can be rewritten as where $O_l$ is the amplitude of the scalar OAM mode with topological charge $l$; it is the solution of the scalar wave equation (Eq. (2)) to which the vector wave equation (Eq. (1)) reduces in the limit $\Delta \rightarrow 0$; parameter $\tilde {p}_l^2=k^2n_1^2-\tilde {\beta }_l^2$. Eq. (61) signifies a field with a total angular momentum $J=L+S = l-1$, since the polarization $\vec {\epsilon }_-$ corresponds to a spin $S=-1$. It is a case of spin-OAM nonalignment.HE modes
Taking the negative sign in Eq. (53), and following the same steps as for the EH mode, but invoking the identity: $J_l'(x)=J_{l-1}(x)-\frac {l}{x}J_l(x)$, one arrives at
and with $e_z^{(l)}<<e_r^{(l)}, e_\theta ^{(l)}$ in magnitude. Inserting the above expressions in Eq. (6), we obtain which implies furtherHere the total angular momentum $J=L+S=l+1$ , i.e., we have a mode with spin-OAM alignment; $J_l(\tilde {p}_{l}r)e^{il\theta }$ is the scalar spatial OAM amplitude $O_l$.
B. Derivation of the general expression for polarization correction
The transverse vector field can be written in the weakly guiding approximation (WGA) as (see Eq. (4))
where $\vec {\tilde e}^{(l)}_t$ is the corresponding scalar field and $\delta \vec {e}^{(l\pm 1)}_t$, the polarization-induced field, can be expressed asSubstituting Eq. (67) in Eq. (1) and invoking Eq. (2), we obtain
Inserting Eq. (70) into Eq. (69) yields
Here we have assumed $\vec {\tilde {e}}_t^{(l)}$ is normalized, i.e., $<\vec {\tilde {e}}_t^{(l)} |\vec {\tilde {e}}_t^{(l)} >=1$; the bra ($<$) and ket ($>$) notation indicates a scalar product. Substitution of $\vec {e}^{(l\pm 1)}_t =\vec {\tilde e}^{(l)}_t+\delta \vec {e}^{(l\pm 1)}_t$ in Eq. (72) splits the integral into two integrals:
Substituting further $\vec {\tilde {e}}_t=F_le^{il\theta }\vec {\epsilon }_\pm$ and $\delta \vec {e}^{(l\pm 1)}_t=G_{l\pm 2}(r)e^{i(l\pm 2)\theta )}\vec {\epsilon }_\mp$ (Eq. (68)), performing integration by parts, and noting that $F_l(r)$ and $G_{l\pm 2} (r)$ vanish at the end points of the integral, $r=0$ and $r=\infty$, we arrive at Eq. (45):
Disclosures
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1. R. Bhandari, “Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) Mode Mixing in a Bent Step Index Fiber in Perturbation Theory,” IEEE Photonics J. 11(3), 1–21 (2019). [CrossRef]
2. A. W. Snyder and D. Love John, Optical Waveguide Theory (Chapman and Hall, 1983).
3. G. Guerra, M. Lonardi, A. Galtarossa, L. A. Rusch, A. Bononi, and L. Palmieri, “Analysis of modal coupling due to birefringence and ellipticity in strongly guiding ring-core OAM fibers,” Opt. Express 27(6), 8308–8326 (2019). [CrossRef]
4. S. Ramachandran and P. Kristensen, “Optical Vortices in Fiber,” Nanophotonics 2(5-6), 455–474 (2013). [CrossRef]
5. H. Huang, G. Milione, M. P. J. Lavery, G. Xie, Y. Gongxiong Ren, Y. Cao, N. Ahmed, T. A. Nguyen, D. A. Nolan, M. Li, M. Tur, R. R. Alfano, and A. E. Willner, “Mode division multiplexing using an orbital angular momentum sorter and MIMO-DSP over a graded-index fibre,” Sci. Rep. 5(1), 14931 (2015). [CrossRef]
6. C. Brunet, B. Ung, P. Bélanger, Y. Messaddeq, S. LaRochelle, and L. A. Rusch, “Vector Mode Analysis of Ring-Core Fibers: Design Tools for Spatial Division Multiplexing,” J. Lightwave Technol. 32(23), 4648–4659 (2014). [CrossRef]
7. Y. Yue, Y. Yan, N. Ahmed, J. Yang, L. Zhang, Y. Ren, H. Hung, K. M. Birnbaum, B. I. Erkmen, S. Dolinar, M. Tur, and A. E. Willner, “Mode Properties and Propagation Effects of Optical Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) Modes in a Ring Fiber,” IEEE Photonics J. 4(2), 535–543 (2012). [CrossRef]
8. A. V. Volyar, V. Z. Zhilaitis, and V. G. Shvedov, “Optical Eddies in Small-Mode Fibers: II. The Spin-Orbit Interaction,” Opt. Spectrosc. 86, 593–598 (1999).
9. C. N. Alexeyev, M. S. Soskin, and A. V. Volyar, “Spin-orbit interaction in a generic vortex field transmitted through an elliptic fiber,” Semicond. Phys., Quantum Electron. Optoelectron. 3(4), 500–513 (2000). [CrossRef]
10. R. Bhandari, “Spin Orbit and Contact interactions in Orbital Angular Momentum Modes in a Fiber,” Proc. of OSA-Frontiers in Optics/Laser Science, September 2019, Paper JW4A.122.
11. R. Bhandari, “Polarization-Induced Interaction as a Perturbation in Orbital Angular Momentum (OAM) Modes in an Optical Fiber,” (under preparation).
12. P. Gregg, P. Kristensen, A. Rubano, S. Golowich, L. Marurucci, and S. Ramachandran, “Enhanced Spin Orbit Interaction of Light in Highly Confining Optical Fibers for Mode Division Multiplexing,” Nat. Commun. 10(1), 4707 (2019). [CrossRef]
13. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics (Pergamon Press, 1977).
14. R. Bhandari, “Polarization-Induced Orbital Angular Momentum Field in a Multilayered Fiber,” Proc. of OSA-Frontiers in Optics, September 2020, Paper JW6B.9.
15. A. Yariv and P. Yeh, Photonics, 6th Edition (Oxford Unversity Press, 2007).
16. J. A. Buck, Fundamentals of Fiber Fibers (Wiley, 2004).