Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Room-temperature visible upconversion luminescence of Ni2+ sensitized by Yb3+ in transparent glass ceramics

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Upconversion luminescence of transition metal Ni2+ ions is seldom at room temperature (RT) due to large non-radiative transition probability. Here, a green Ni2+ upconversion luminescence at RT is obtained by the near-infrared excitation of Yb3+ 2F7/22F5/2 at 980 nm in Ni2+/Yb3+ codoped transparent wide bandgap semiconductor γ-Ga2O3 glass ceramics, which can be assigned to the Ni2+ 1T2(1D) → 3A2(3F) transition. Lifetime measurement and upconversion power dependence data reveal energy transfer upconversion as the underlying upconversion mechanism for the Yb3+-Ni2+ systems incorporated into the γ-Ga2O3 nanocrystals. It is suggested that the low thermal quenching effect of the wide bandgap semiconductor γ-Ga2O3 and resonant sensitizing of the Yb3+ 2F5/2 state to the Ni2+ upconversion 3T2(3F) intermedia state are responsible for the achievement of room-temperature upconversion luminescence of Ni2+. The results demonstrate that wide bandgap semiconductor nanocrystal (γ-Ga2O3, TiO2, SnO2, et al.) glass ceramics may be a good candidate for hosting Ni2+ room-temperature upconversion luminescence.

© 2018 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Since the first discovery in 1966 [1], photon upconversion (UC), the nonlinear optical process of converting two or more low-energy photons into high-energy photons has attracted much interest, both from the fundamental and practical applications. UC luminescence is a common phenomenon in Ln3+-doped bulk hosts and nanomaterials, and has been extensively studied in the past several decades. Such materials have found a variety of applications in displays [2,3], photovoltaics [4], bio-imaging [5,6] and theranostics [7,8]. Transition-metal (TM) ions (specifically d-block element ions with unfulfilled d orbitals) can also produce UC emission. Unfortunately, UC behavior are seldom reported for most TM ions (except Mn2+ and Cr3+ ions) at room temperature (RT) because the non-radiative transition probability in the UC process becomes serious as the temperature increases, which results in UC luminescence quenching at RT [9]. For example, the UC emission of Ni2+ ions were observed in crystalline chlorides and bromides at cryogenic temperature [10–14], and only Ni2+-doped KZnF3 crystal exhibited a green UC emission at RT so far [15], not to mention noncrystalline hosts. However, the great advantage of such TM ions compared to Ln3+ ions is that their single-band UC behavior is very sensitive to their ligand field environments, which facilitate a tuning of the UC properties of TM ions by changing the surrounding chemical variation. Therefore, it is absolutely necessary to search for appropriate hosts for such TM ions to achieve UC emission at RT for practical applications.

In the past two decades, Ni2+-doped transparent glass ceramics (GCs) with broad near-infrared (NIR) luminescence have received considerable attention for potential applications in tunable lasers and broad-band optical amplifiers [16–27]. Furthermore, Yb3+ ions as sensitizers were also introduced into Ni2+-doped transparent GCs and enhanced the NIR luminescent properties of Ni2+ ions [28,29]. Transparent GCs are usually produced by controlled crystallization, and consist of both fine-grained nanocrystals and residual glass matrix. The nanocrystals can provide the active sites for the incorporation of Ni2+ ions in octahedral coordination and the consequent activation of broad-band NIR luminescence of Ni2+ ions, meanwhile the glass matrix holds the easy fabrication and processing advantages of glasses. Although the NIR luminescent properties of Ni2+ in transparent GCs have been extensively studied, the room-temperature UC emission of Ni2+ has not been observed. In this letter, we will, for the first time, present the room-temperature UC emission of Ni2+ in Yb3+ sensitized Ni2+-doped transparent GCs containing wide bandgap semiconductor γ-Ga2O3 nanocrystals. The underlying UC mechanism is discussed by power dependence and lifetime measurement.

2. Experimental method

Glass with composition of 13Li2O-23Ga2O3-64SiO2-0.1NiO-0.75Yb2O3 (in mol %) as well as NiO or Yb2O3 single-doped and undoped glasses were prepared by a conventional melt-quenching method [17,29]. The mixtures of analytical reagents of SiO2, Ga2O3, Li2CO3, Yb2O3 and high purity NiO (99.99%) were melt in a platinum crucible at 1600 °C for 2 h and then was cast onto a stainless steel plate. The glass transition temperature Tg = 630 °C and the crystallization temperature Tx = 718 °C were estimated according to differential thermal analysis. An annealing temperature of 680 °C between Tg and Tx and an annealing time of 10 h were chosen to obtain transparent GCs. The glass and GC samples were cut and polished for optical measurements.

The crystallite phase and microstructure of the GCs were examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using Cu/Kα1 radiation and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL 2010) operated at 200 kV. The optical absorption spectra of the samples were measured on JASCO V-570 spectrophotometer. The visible UC luminescent spectra were obtained on ZOLIX SBP300 spectrophotometer with a 980-nm laser diode (LD) as excitation source. The lifetime decay curves were recorded using a storage digital oscilloscope (Tektronix TDS3052) by exciting the samples with a modulated 980 nm LD. All the measurements were carried out at RT.

3. Results and discussion

XRD patterns of the glass and GCs are shown in Fig. 1(a). The broad unstructured feature of the glass XRD curve indicates its amorphous nature. In contrast, after the heat treatment the sole crystallization of γ-Ga2O3 occurs in the GC samples by comparing the diffraction peaks with the stand γ-Ga2O3 crystal (JCPDF# 20-0426). It should be noted that LiGa5O8 (JCPDF# 76-0199) and γ-Ga2O3 (JCPDF# 20-0426) have similar crystal structure, but it can be identified that the nanocrystal phase in the GC is γ-Ga2O3 by comparing the relative diffraction intensity of the (311) and (400) peaks at 36.19° and 44.14° or the (440) and (511) peaks at 64.18° and 58.4°, respectively [19,30]. It is also found that the undoped and doped GCs have indistinguishable diffraction peak positons and widths, indicating that the sizes of γ-Ga2O3 in these GCs are similar. Typical TEM image in Fig. 1(b) shows that the precipitated γ-Ga2O3 nanocrystals with a relatively uniform size of about 10 nm are dispersed in the glass matrix. Indexed bright rings in the inserted electron diffraction pattern in Fig. 1(b) further confirm the presence of the γ-Ga2O3 polycrystalline phase.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 (a) XRD patterns of Ni2+/Yb3+ codoped glass and undoped, Ni2+-doped, Yb3+-doped and Ni2+/Yb3+ codoped GCs. XRD patterns of other glasses are very similar to the Ni2+/Yb3+ codoped one, and thus not repeated here. The standard JCPDF card of γ-Ga2O3 is also presented. (b) Typical TEM image of the GC. The inset is the selected-area electron diffraction pattern.

Download Full Size | PDF

Absorption spectra of the glass and GCs are compared in Fig. 2(a). The absorption spectra of undoped and Yb3+-doped glasses are indistinguishable from the corresponding GC ones, and thus not presented here. The undoped glass and GC show no observable absorption character. The absorption features of Ni2+ in the Ni2+- and Ni2+/Yb3+-doped glasses resemble those of Ni2+ in trigonal bipyramid fivefold and tetrahedral fourfold coordination in other glass systems, whereas the typical absorption of Ni2+ in octahedral sites is observed in the GC and indicates that Ni2+ ions has been incorporated into the γ-Ga2O3 nanocrystals of the GCs, similar to those reported previously [16–19,23]. The broad absorption bands of Ni2+ peaking at 1060, 630, and 382 nm in the GCs are assigned to the Ni2+ transitions from the 3A2(3F) ground state to the 3T2(3F), 3T1(3F), and 3T1(3P) excited states, respectively, and two weak absorption shoulder bands at 750 and 455 nm are attributed to the 1E(1D) and 1T2(1D) states. It is also found that the strong and sharp absorption corresponding to 2F7/22F5/2 transition of Yb3+ is almost unchanged in the Yb3+- and Ni2+/Yb3+-doped glasses and GCs due to the shielding effect of the outer shell electrons of Yb3+, and thus it is difficult to distinguish the distribution of Yb3+ ions in the GCs by the absorption spectra. Recently the distribution of Yb3+ ions in the same γ-Ga2O3 GC as our case were studied by Gao et al., and it was found that portion of Yb3+ ions (≈70%) were incorporated into γ-Ga2O3 nanocrystals and substituted the octahedral Ga3+ sites or cation vacancies at the octahedral sites [31,32]. Therefore, Ni2+ and most of Yb3+ ions are all incorporated into the γ-Ga2O3 nanocrystals in the GCs. The resulting energy level diagram of the Ni2+/Yb3+ codoped GC is shown in Fig. 2(b).

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) Absorption spectra of undoped GC, Ni2+-doped glass and GC, Yb3+-doped GC, and Ni2+/Yb3+ codoped glass and GC. (b) Energy level diagram of Ni2+/Yb3+ codoped GC which shows energy transfer upconversion process of Ni2+. Solid and curly arrows represent radiative and nonradiative energy transfer processes respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

Visible emission spectra of the glasses and GCs excited by 980 nm LD are shown in Fig. 3(a). For undoped glass and GC, any signal cannot be detected in the visible wavelength range (data not shown). For doped glasses, Ni2+-doped glass shows no visible emission, while Yb3+- and Ni2+/Yb3+-doped glasses show a blue emission at 474 nm, originating from the well-known cooperative UC process of Yb3+ pairs [33]. Although a broad NIR emission corresponding to the Ni2+ 3T2(3F) → 3A2(3F) transition has been observed in Ni2+-doped γ-Ga2O3 GCs [17,19,29,32], no emission is detected for Ni2+-doped γ-Ga2O3 GCs in the visible range under the excitation of 980 nm. For Yb3+-doped γ-Ga2O3 GC, like Yb3+- and Ni2+/Yb3+-doped glasses, the same blue emission at 474 nm appears, and can be ascribe to cooperative UC emission of Yb3+ pairs from Yb3+ ions in both the nanocrystals and the glass matrix. And in the Ni2+/Yb3+ codoped GC a green luminescence centered at 497 nm due to Ni2+ 1T2(1D) → 3A2(3F) UC emission is observed, accompanied by an emission shoulder at 474 nm. The luminescent photographs of Yb3+- and Ni2+/Yb3+-doped GCs are shown in the inset of Fig. 3(a). It has shown that the average distance between Ni2+ and Yb3+ ions in the γ-Ga2O3 nanocrystals was shorter than the critical distance for energy transfer [32]. Therefore, an energy transfer involving a Ni2+-Yb3+ pair in the γ-Ga2O3 nanocrystals will occur, as observed in the previous studies [14,28,29,32]. The UC mechanism will be discussed later. The emission shoulder at 474 nm can be ascribed to the cooperative UC luminescence of Yb3+ pair from Yb3+ ions in the glass matrix which do not involve the energy transfer to Ni2+ ions. The decay curves of Yb3+- and Ni2+/Yb3+-doped GCs under the 980-nm excitation are exhibited in Fig. 3(b). The UC emission of Yb3+ pairs in Yb3+-doped GC shows a single exponential decay with a lifetime of about 328 μs. In contrast, the decay of Ni2+/Yb3+-doped GC can be well fitted by a two-exponential function, with a fast component τ1 of 42 μs and a slow component τ2 of 292 μs. τ1 and τ2 can be assigned to the decays of Ni2+ and cooperative Yb3+ pair UC emissions in the codoped GC, respectively, consistent well with the observed two emission centers in the emission spectrum. Furthermore, it is seen that the fitted curves for the UC emission of Yb3+ pairs in Yb3+- and Ni2+/Yb3+-doped GCs are parallel, indicating they have a similar origin, in good agreement with their measured decay lifetime.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 (a) Visible emission spectra of Ni2+-, Yb3+- and Ni2+/Yb3+-doped glasses and GCs excited at 980 nm. The inset shows the luminescent photographs of Yb3+- and Ni2+/Yb3+-doped GCs. (b) Decay curves of Yb3+- and Ni2+/Yb3+-doped GCs under 980 nm excitation. Green and blue lines represent single- and two-exponential fitting respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

The energy level diagram in Fig. 2(a) shows the possible energy transfer upconversion (ETU) process between Ni2+ and Yb3+ in γ-Ga2O3 nanocrystals. By 980 nm LD excitation Ni2+ is excited to the intermediate 3T2(3F) state either by direct absorption of a laser photon or by energy transfer from a neighboring Yb3+ ion, which subsequently serves as the initial state for a Yb3+ 2F5/2 energy transfer to be brought to the 1T2(1D) upper emitting state followed by the Ni2+ UC emission, and at the same time the excited 3T2(3F) state will also back to the 3A2(3F) ground state producing a NIR luminescence. Furthermore, due to the perfect resonance between the Yb3+ 2F5/2 state and Ni2+ 3T2(3F) state, very efficient energy transfer will take place, which can be verified by emission spectrum of Ni2+/Yb3+-doped GC under the excitation at 382 nm, as shown in Fig. 4. After direct Ni2+ 3T1(3P) excitation at 382 nm the photons populated from the ground state 3A2(3F) to the excitated state 3T2(3P) will nonradiatively relax to the Ni2+ 3T2(3F) state, and then not only Ni2+ but also Yb3+ NIR luminescence is observed, which is the experimental evidence for an energy transfer between Ni2+ 3T2(3F) and Yb3+ 2F5/2 states. Furthermore, the emission spectrum in visible range when excited at 382 nm was also recorded, but down conversion emission from Ni2+ was not detected. The reason is deserved to be explored later. Combined with large Yb3+ absorption cross-section, the Ni2+ 3T2(3F) intermediate state will be populated with a high state density and its lifetime was also increased from 480 μs in Ni2+-doped GC to 920 μs in Ni2+/Yb3+-doped GC [29]. From the absorption spectrum shown in Fig. 2, it can be deduced that an excitation energy provided by Yb3+ is sufficient to bring the excited Ni2+ in the 3T2(3F) intermediate state to the upper emitting level 1T2(1D). All these will vastly facilitate the ETU of Ni2+ ions.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Emission spectrum of Ni2+/Yb3+-doped GC excited at 382 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

One feature of ETU mechanism is that there is a rise in the time-evolution of UC emission after a short pulse excitation. In an ETU process the intermediate state serves as an energy reservoir to store all the excitation during the laser pulse. ETU then starts and is followed by the decay of the upper emitting state. Thus the ETU transient exhibits a rise and a decay part. A rapid rise (about 4.5 μs) is clearly seen in Fig. 3(b), suggesting an ETU-like character. Another fingerprint of ETU mechanism can be found in the power dependence of UC luminescence. A theoretical model predicted that for a two-photon ETU process the slope of the power dependence of UC luminescence will reduce from 2 in low power limit to 1 in high power limit [34]. Figure 5 shows the power dependence of Ni2+ UC luminescence in Ni2+/Yb3+-doped GC, which is in good agreement with the theoretical model. Based on the above experimental evidence the mechanism behind the Ni2+ UC luminescence in Ni2+/Yb3+-doped GC can ascribe to ETU.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Excitation power dependence of Ni2+ 1T2(1D) UC luminescence at 494 nm under 980 nm excitation. Red lines are the linear fitting.

Download Full Size | PDF

The room-temperature visible UC emission of Ni2+ in Ni2+/Yb3+-doped γ-Ga2O3 GC can mainly attribute to the low thermal quenching effect of wide bandgap semiconductor γ-Ga2O3 nanocrystals. The mechanisms of temperature-dependent nonradiative processes are referred to as thermal quenching. Wide bandgap semiconductors are good host materials for Ln3+ ions because the thermal quenching effects are inversely proportional to their bandgaps [35,36]. For example, the thermal quenching of Er3+ photoluminescence is much less in wide bandgap semiconductor hosts than in smaller bandgap semiconductors [35], and only a small reduction of Er3+ photoluminescence intensity in wide bandgap semiconductor host was observed as the temperature increased from 10 K to 300K [37]. γ-Ga2O3 has a low photon energy compared to other oxide crystals such as MgAl2O4, ZnAl2O4 and Al2O3, and is a wide bandgap semiconductor with the bandgap of as high as ~5eV [38], and thus non-radiative transition probability during the Ni2+ UC process in Ni2+/Yb3+-doped γ-Ga2O3 GC will be reduced. Furthermore, the Ni2+ 3T2(3F) intermediate state with high population and long lifetime induced by Yb3+ sensitizing also facilitate the UC emission. As a result, the room-temperature visible UC emission of Ni2+ is observed. In contrast, we did not observe any visible Ni2+ UC emission in Ni2+/Yb3+ codoped oxide nanocrystal (such as MgAl2O4, ZnAl2O4) GCs.

4. Conclusions

In summary, room-temperature visible UC luminescence of Ni2+ in Ni2+/Yb3+-doped transparent wide bandgap semiconductor γ-Ga2O3 GC have been observed and characterized. Upon Yb3+ sensitizer excitation at 980 nm, the GC exhibit green Ni2+ 1T2(1D) UC luminescence at RT. Lifetime measurement in combination with power dependence data distinguish the potential UC mechanism as ETU. It is believed that the low thermal quenching effect of wide bandgap semiconductor γ-Ga2O3 and Ni2+ 3T2(3F) intermedia state with high population and long lifetime induced by Yb3+ sensitization facilitate room-temperature UC luminescence of Ni2+. Our study may provide a new platform-wide bandgap semiconductor nanocrystal GCs to activate Ni2+ room-temperature UC luminescence. Experiments in other wide bandgap semiconductor nanocrystal GCs (such as TiO2 and SnO2 with available octahedral sites for Ni2+ [39,40]) are also interestingly executed to explore visible UC luminescence of Ni2+ for the potential applications from wavelength-tunable light sources to displays.

Funding

National Nature Science Foundation of China (11674099, 61378033 and 11621404); Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (16ZR1409400); Shuguang Program (15SG22); Shanghai International Cooperation Project (16520710600); National Special Funds for the Development of Major Scientific Research Instruments and Equipment (61227902); 111 Project (B12024).

References

1. F. Varsanyi and G. H. Dieke, “Ion-pair resonance mechanism of energy transfer in rare earth crystal fluorescence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 7(12), 442–443 (1961). [CrossRef]  

2. E. Downing, L. Hesselink, J. Ralston, and R. A. Macfarlane, “Three color, solid-state, three-dimensional display,” Science 273(5279), 1185–1189 (1996). [CrossRef]  

3. R. Deng, F. Qin, R. Chen, W. Huang, M. Hong, and X. Liu, “Temporal full-colour tuning through non-steady-state upconversion,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 10(3), 237–242 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. X. Huang, S. Han, W. Huang, and X. Liu, “Enhancing solar cell efficiency: the search for luminescent materials as spectral converters,” Chem. Soc. Rev. 42(1), 173–201 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. H. Dong, S. R. Du, X. Y. Zheng, G. M. Lyu, L. D. Sun, L. D. Li, P. Z. Zhang, C. Zhang, and C. H. Yan, “Lanthanide nanoparticles: from design toward bioimaging and therapy,” Chem. Rev. 115(19), 10725–10815 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. Y. Liu, Y. Lu, X. Yang, X. Zheng, S. Wen, F. Wang, X. Vidal, J. Zhao, D. Liu, Z. Zhou, C. Ma, J. Zhou, J. A. Piper, P. Xi, D. Jin, P. Xi, and D. Jin, “Amplified stimulated emission in upconversion nanoparticles for super-resolution nanoscopy,” Nature 543(7644), 229–233 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. N. M. Idris, M. K. Gnanasammandhan, J. Zhang, P. C. Ho, R. Mahendran, and Y. Zhang, “In vivo photodynamic therapy using upconversion nanoparticles as remote-controlled nanotransducers,” Nat. Med. 18(10), 1580–1585 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. G. Chen, H. Qiu, P. N. Prasad, and X. Chen, “Upconversion nanoparticles: design, nanochemistry, and applications in theranostics,” Chem. Rev. 114(10), 5161–5214 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. S. Ye, E. H. Song, and Q. Y. Zhang, “Transition metal-involved photon upconversion,” Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 3(12), 1600302 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. O. S. Wenger, R. Valiente, and H. U. Güdel, “Optical spectroscopy of the Ni2+-doped layer perovskites Rb2MCl4 (M=Cd, Mn): Effects of Ni2+- Mn2+ exchange interactions on the Ni2+ absorption, luminescence, and upconversion properties,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 64(23), 235116 (2001). [CrossRef]  

11. O. S. Wenger and H. U. Güdel, “Photon upconversion properties of Ni2+ in magnetic and nonmagnetic chloride host lattices,” Inorg. Chem. 40(1), 157–164 (2001). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. O. S. Wenger, G. M. Salley, R. Valiente, and H. U. Güdel, “Luminescence upconversion under hydrostatic pressure in the 3d-metal systems Ti2+: NaCl and Ni2+: CsCdCl3,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 65(21), 212108 (2002). [CrossRef]  

13. O. S. Wenger, S. Bénard, and H. U. Güdel, “Crystal field effects on the optical absorption and luminescence properties of Ni2+-doped chlorides and bromides: crossover in the emitting higher excited state,” Inorg. Chem. 41(23), 5968–5977 (2002). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. S. García-Revilla, P. Gerner, H. U. Güdel, and R. Valiente, “Yb3+-sensitized visible Ni2+ photon upconversion in codoped CsCdBr3 and CsMgBr3,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 72(12), 125111 (2005). [CrossRef]  

15. J. Grimm, O. S. Wenger, and H. U. Güdel, “Broadband green upconversion luminescence of Ni2+ in KZnF3,” J. Lumin. 102–103, 380–385 (2003). [CrossRef]  

16. B. N. Samson, L. R. Pinckney, J. Wang, G. H. Beall, and N. F. Borrelli, “Nickel-doped nanocrystalline glass-ceramic fiber,” Opt. Lett. 27(15), 1309–1311 (2002). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. T. Suzuki, G. S. Murugan, and Y. Ohishi, “Optical properties of transparent Li2O-Ga2O3-SiO2 glass-ceramics embedding Ni-doped nanocrystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 86(13), 131903 (2005). [CrossRef]  

18. B. Wu, J. Qiu, N. Jiang, S. Zhou, J. Ren, D. Chen, X. Jiang, and C. Zhu, “Optical properties of transparent alkali gallium silicate glass-ceramics containing Ni2+-doped β-Ga2O3 nanocrystals,” J. Mater. Res. 22(12), 3410–3414 (2007). [CrossRef]  

19. S. Zhou, N. Jiang, H. Dong, H. Zeng, J. Hao, and J. Qiu, “Size-induced crystal field parameter change and tunable infrared luminescence in Ni2+-doped high-gallium nanocrystals embedded glass ceramics,” Nanotechnology 19(1), 015702 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

20. B. Wu, S. Zhou, J. Ruan, Y. Qiao, D. Chen, C. Zhu, and J. Qiu, “Energy transfer between Cr3+ and Ni2+ in transparent silicate glass ceramics containing Cr3+/Ni2+ co-doped ZnAl2O4 nanocrystals,” Opt. Express 16(4), 2508–2513 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

21. S. Zhou, N. Jiang, B. Wu, J. Hao, and J. Qiu, “Ligand-driven wavelength-tunable and ultra-broadband infrared luminescence in single-ion-doped transparent hybrid materials,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 19(13), 2081–2088 (2009). [CrossRef]  

22. S. Zhou, N. Jiang, K. Miura, S. Tanabe, M. Shimizu, M. Sakakura, Y. Shimotsuma, M. Nishi, J. Qiu, and K. Hirao, “Simultaneous tailoring of phase evolution and dopant distribution in the glassy phase for controllable luminescence,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132(50), 17945–17952 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. V. N. Sigaev, N. V. Golubev, E. S. Ignat’eva, V. I. Savinkov, M. Campione, R. Lorenzi, F. Meinardi, and A. Paleari, “Nickel-assisted growth and selective doping of spinel-like gallium oxide nanocrystals in germano-silicate glasses for infrared broadband light emission,” Nanotechnology 23(1), 015708 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. G. Gao, S. Reibstein, E. Spiecker, M. Peng, and L. Wondraczek, “Broadband NIR photoluminescence from Ni2+-doped nanocrystalline Ba–Al titanate glass ceramics,” J. Mater. Chem. 22(6), 2582–2588 (2012). [CrossRef]  

25. S. Zhou, C. Li, G. Yang, G. Bi, B. Xu, Z. Hong, K. Miura, K. Hirao, and J. Qiu, “Self-limited nanocrystallization-mediated activation of semiconductor nanocrystal in an amorphous solid,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 23(43), 5436–5443 (2013). [CrossRef]  

26. C. Lin, C. Liu, Z. Zhao, L. Li, C. Bocker, and C. Rüssel, “Broadband near-IR emission from cubic perovskite KZnF3:Ni2+ nanocrystals embedded glass-ceramics,” Opt. Lett. 40(22), 5263–5266 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

27. X. Liu, J. Zhou, S. Zhou, Y. Yue, and J. Qiu, “Transparent glass-ceramics functionalized by dispersed crystals,” Prog. Mater. Sci. 97, 38–96 (2018). [CrossRef]  

28. B. Wu, S. Zhou, J. Ruan, Y. Qiao, D. Chen, C. Zhu, and J. Qiu, “Enhanced broadband near-infrared luminescence from transparent Yb3+/Ni2+ codoped silicate glass ceramics,” Opt. Express 16(3), 1879–1884 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

29. B. Wu, J. Ruan, J. Ren, D. Chen, C. Zhu, S. Zhou, and J. Qiu, “Enhanced broadband near-infrared luminescence in transparent silicate glass ceramics containing Yb3+ ions and Ni2+-doped LiGa5O8 nanocrystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(4), 041110 (2008). [CrossRef]  

30. V. N. Sigaev, N. V. Golubev, E. S. Ignat’eva, B. Champagnon, D. Vouagner, E. Nardou, R. Lorenzi, and A. Paleari, “Native amorphous nanoheterogeneity in gallium germanosilicates as a tool for driving Ga2O3 nanocrystal formation in glass for optical devices,” Nanoscale 5(1), 299–306 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

31. Z. Gao, X. Lu, Y. Chu, S. Guo, L. Liu, Y. Liu, S. Sun, J. Ren, and J. Yang, “The distribution of rare earth ions in a γ-Ga2O3 nanocrystal-silicate glass composite and its influence on the photoluminescence properties,” J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. Opt. Electron. Devices 6(12), 2944–2950 (2018). [CrossRef]  

32. Z. Gao, S. Guo, X. Lu, J. Orava, T. Wagner, L. Zheng, Y. Liu, S. Sun, F. He, P. Yang, J. Ren, and J. Yang, “Controlling selective doping and energy transfer between transition metal and rare earth ions in nanostructured glassy solids,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6(13), 1701407 (2018). [CrossRef]  

33. R. J. Wiglusz, G. Boulon, Y. Guyot, M. Guzik, D. Hreniak, and W. Strek, “Structural and spectroscopic properties of Yb3+-doped MgAl2O4 nanocrystalline spinel,” Dalton Trans. 43(21), 7752–7759 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

34. J. F. Suyver, A. Aebischer, S. García-Revilla, P. Gerner, and H. U. Güdel, “Anomalous power dependence of sensitized upconversion luminescence,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 71(12), 125123 (2005). [CrossRef]  

35. P. N. Favennec, H. L’Haridon, M. Salvi, D. Moutonnet, and Y. Le Guillou, “Luminescence of erbium implanted in various semiconductors: IV, III-V and II-VI materials,” Electron. Lett. 25(11), 718–719 (1989). [CrossRef]  

36. P. Gollakota, A. Dhawan, P. Wellenius, L. M. Lunardi, J. F. Muth, Y. N. Saripalli, H. Y. Peng, and H. O. Everitt, “Optical characterization of Eu-doped β-Ga2O3 thin films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88(22), 221906 (2006). [CrossRef]  

37. J. D. MacKenzie, C. R. Abernathy, S. J. Pearton, U. Hömmerich, J. T. Seo, R. G. Wilson, and J. M. Zavada, “Er doping of GaN during growth by metalorganic molecular beam epitaxy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 72(21), 2710–2712 (1998). [CrossRef]  

38. S. Jin, W. Lu, P. C. Stanish, and P. V. Radovanovic, “Compositional control of the photocatalytic activity of Ga2O3 nanocrystals enabled by defect-induced carrier trapping,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 706, 509–514 (2018). [CrossRef]  

39. F. H. Margha, M. E. M. Ali, and T. A. Gad-Allah, “Transparent nanocrystalline glass-ceramic system for organic pollutants degradation,” Silicon 10(1), 123–129 (2018). [CrossRef]  

40. J. D. Castillo, V. D. Rodríguez, A. C. Yanes, J. Méndez-Ramos, and M. E. Torres, “Luminescent properties of transparent nanostructured Eu3+ doped SnO2–SiO2 glass-ceramics prepared by the sol–gel method,” Nanotechnology 16(5), S300–S303 (2005). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a) XRD patterns of Ni2+/Yb3+ codoped glass and undoped, Ni2+-doped, Yb3+-doped and Ni2+/Yb3+ codoped GCs. XRD patterns of other glasses are very similar to the Ni2+/Yb3+ codoped one, and thus not repeated here. The standard JCPDF card of γ-Ga2O3 is also presented. (b) Typical TEM image of the GC. The inset is the selected-area electron diffraction pattern.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) Absorption spectra of undoped GC, Ni2+-doped glass and GC, Yb3+-doped GC, and Ni2+/Yb3+ codoped glass and GC. (b) Energy level diagram of Ni2+/Yb3+ codoped GC which shows energy transfer upconversion process of Ni2+. Solid and curly arrows represent radiative and nonradiative energy transfer processes respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a) Visible emission spectra of Ni2+-, Yb3+- and Ni2+/Yb3+-doped glasses and GCs excited at 980 nm. The inset shows the luminescent photographs of Yb3+- and Ni2+/Yb3+-doped GCs. (b) Decay curves of Yb3+- and Ni2+/Yb3+-doped GCs under 980 nm excitation. Green and blue lines represent single- and two-exponential fitting respectively.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Emission spectrum of Ni2+/Yb3+-doped GC excited at 382 nm.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Excitation power dependence of Ni2+ 1T2(1D) UC luminescence at 494 nm under 980 nm excitation. Red lines are the linear fitting.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.