Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

New insight into two-step near-infrared quantum cutting in Pr3+ singly doped oxyfluoride glass-ceramics

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Efficient near-infrared (NIR) quantum cutting (QC) in RE3+/Yb3+ requires the UV-blue photon excited RE3+ donor has intermediate energy level to separate the energy gaps (~10000 cm−1) resonant to Yb3+absorption. Thus the unique Pr3+/Yb3+ resonant QC at low Yb3+content (room temperature) essentially requires Pr3+-doping features distinctive NIR radiative transitions: in our prepared Pr3+-doped oxyfluoride glass-ceramics containing CaF2 nanocrystals, a two-photon NIR-QC from blue-photon excited 3Pj (j = 0, 1, 2) states takes place efficiently with 1G4 acting as an intermediate level. The underlying energy transfer mechanisms involving the two-step sequential transitions of 3P01G4 ~915 nm and 1G43H4 ~990 nm (crucial resonant routes for the further 1Pr3+→2Yb3+), as well as the 1D23F2 ~873 nm and 1D23F3,4 ~1040 nm, are rationally distinguished by means of photoemission, excitation, and time-resolved fluorescence spectra.

© 2015 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

The initial reports on quantum cutting (QC) in Pr3+-doped fluorides not only experimentally demonstrated the Dexter theory of ‘photon splitting’ in single activator [1,2], but opened up the study on efficient luminescent materials with quantum yield (QY) greater than unit. This interesting process, involving the absorption of a vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) photon and the sequential emission of two visible photons, can be potentially applied in lighting and display [3,4]. Based on the insight on visible QC mechanisms of Pr3+, another activator like Mn2+ [5], Eu3+ [6], Cr3+ [7], Er3+ [8] is further codoped to resonantly convert the near-UV photon emission of Pr3+ (first-step radiation ~400 nm, invisible to the human eye) to the green/red photon emission, where an appreciable QY was evaluated to be 143% for Pr3+/Mn2+ couple [5]. As an exciting scenario, efficient visible QC of Gd3+/Eu3+ couple was realized via two Eu3+ activators resonantly absorbing the two part energies of VUV-excited Gd3+ separated by 3Pj intermediate level [9,10]. This Gd3+/Eu3+ visible QC with QY ~190% has been strongly promoting the development of QC in experiment (various reports in other systems) and in theory (resonant energy transfer (ET) mechanism, sensitization, etc.) [4,9,11].

Recently the QC study was extended to near-infrared (NIR) emission region, which, with QY more than 100%, potentially enhance the photo-response of solar cells by cutting an incident UV-blue photon into two NIR photons [11–14]. Within the series of RE3+/Yb3+ (RE = Tb, Tm, Pr, Er, Ho, Nd) codoping systems [15–25], only the Pr3+/Yb3+ species, at room temperature (RT), yields efficient NIR-QC at low Yb3+ content (QY ~200%) via resonant ET from Pr3+ to Yb3+ [19,23]. Additionally inspired by the ET mechanisms in Pr3+/Mn2+ [5], Gd3+/Eu3+ [9,10], etc., it is concluded that the occurrence of resonant QC essentially requires the donor ions feature effective intermediate levels like Pr3+: 1D2 and Gd3+: 6Pj for visible QC, and Pr3+: 1G4 (lying at ~10000 cm−1) for NIR-QC in Pr3+/Yb3+. However, in stark contrast, Er3+ with 4I11/2 ~10000 cm−1 intermediate level still cannot make NIR-QC efficient in Er3+/Yb3+ due to the nonradiative quenching of Er3+: 4I11/2 at RT, especially in hosts with maximum phonon energy (ħωmax) more than 180 cm−1 (ħωmax of bromides) [20,26]. In practice, the stable intermediate levels of donors, closely dependent on the vibration frequency of host lattice, determine if the resonant NIR-QC occurs efficiently as codoped with acceptors like Yb3+. Thus the Pr3+, as a resonant donor, should feature unique spectroscopic properties in the NIR region around 1000 nm (feasibly resonant to Yb3+ absorption), and the resonant ET mechanisms of NIR-QC should not be simply declared for Pr3+/Yb3+ systems by ignoring the influence of phonon energy. Despite the importance of these issues, the multiplexed NIR emission bands around 1000 nm and ET mechanisms of Pr3+ are not well understood indeed.

In the current paper, we report on the observation of several NIR emission bands around 1000 nm in Pr3+-doped oxyfluoride glass-ceramics (GCs) containing CaF2 nanocrystals. The involving emission and ET mechanisms, as well as the two-step NIR-QC (splitting an absorbed blue photon into two NIR photons with QY greater than unit), are investigated in details according to the photoluminescence and time-resolved spectra. These Pr3+-doped GCs are the resonant NIR-QC candidates once Yb3+ codoped into, thereby potential to be the downconverting layer to increase Si solar cell efficiency.

2. Experimental

Pr3+-doped oxyfluoride glasses were prepared by melting the well-mixed batches of raw materials with nominal molar compositions of 45SiO2-25Al2O3-10Na2O-20CaF2-xPrF3 (denoted as PGPrx; x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1), and the GCs, denoted as GCPrx relative to PGPrx, are obtained via a further heat treatment (see all the details in [27]). Microstructures of the samples were identified by means of X-ray powder diffractometer (Philips PW1830, Cu ) and transmission electron microscope (JEM-2010) fitted with the selected-area electron diffraction. Absorption spectra were recorded in 300-2400 nm on a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 900 UV/VIS/NIR spectrometer.

Emission and excitation spectra were measured using Edinburgh FLS920 fluorescence spectrophotometer with a 450 W xenon lamp as excitation resource and by single photon counting technology. Decay curves and time-resolved emission spectra are detected with FL920 system equipped with a microsecond μF900 xenon lamp as the pulsed excitation resource and by time-correlated single photon counting technology. Herein, a Hamamatsu R928 red-sensitive photomultiplier tube (PMT) was applied for visible emission measurements in the wavelength range of 400-780 nm, and a liquid nitrogen-cooled R5509-72 PMT was employed for NIR fluorescence measurements in 770-1150 nm.

3. Results and discussion

The characterization and analysis of the fabricated PGPrx and GCPrx were systematically performed by Chen et al. in our group [27], which indicated that the CaF2:Pr3+nanocrystals were well crystallized from the glass matrix. Moreover, the GCPr0.1 is demonstrated to have the optimal fluorescence properties under excitation of blue photons in 430-480 nm [27], which is just utilized for our current research.

Figure 1 shows the visible-NIR emission spectra of GCPr0.1 under excitation of 440 and 585 nm, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1(a), a series of visible emissions of Pr3+ are typically obtained with peaks at 482 nm (3P03H4), 524 nm (3P1,03H5), 605 nm (1D23H4/3P03H6),642 nm (3P03F2), and 725 nm (3P03F3,4) [27–34], respectively. Interestingly, within the 800-1100 nm wavelength range, there also exist several NIR emission bands that overlap with each other [Fig. 1(a)]. Reviewing some previous reports, the broad emission peak at ~873 nm with a distinct shoulder was always ascribed to the 3P1,01G4 transition of Pr3+ only [27–30], and the other broad emission band at ~1040 nm is simply taken as one single emission from 1D23F3,4 or from 1G43H4 of Pr3+ [29–31,34]. Indeed the energy differences of 3P1,01G4 (10928~11522 cm−1), 1D23F3,4 (9817~10291 cm−1), 1D23F2 (~11636 cm−1), and 1G43H4 (~9997 cm−1) of Pr3+ are almost equivalent such that their corresponding NIR radiations are well overlapped and hardly distinguished from each other [27–32]. However, as an important result in the current paper, the multiple NIR fluorescent compositions of Pr3+ in 800-1100 nm should comprise the electronic transitions of 1D23F2 peaked at 873 nm, 3P01G4 at 915 nm, 1G43H4 at 990 nm and 1D23F3,4 at 1040 nm, respectively. Notably, the overlapped emission bands in 934-1150 nm (curve a) can be feasibly fitted by a sum of two Gauss functions, as plotted in Fig. 1(a). The fitted curve (curve 0) is well consistent with the experimental curve a (Goodness of fit value, R2, ~0.9979), and two broad fluorescence fitting compositions emerge with maxima at about 990 nm (peak 1, curve 1) with full width at half maximum (FWHM) about 62 nm and that at 1040 nm (peak 2, curve 2) with FWHM about 55 nm.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Visible-to-NIR emission spectra of GCPr0.1 under excitation of (a) 440 nm and (b) 585 nm, respectively. In Fig. 1(a), curve a represents NIR emission band centered at ~1040 nm in 934-1150 nm, curve 0 is Gauss fit of curve a, and curves 1 and 2 are Gauss fit peaks 1 and 2, respectively. In Fig. 1(b), curve a′ refers to NIR emission at ~1040 nm in 927-1150 nm, curve 0′ is Gauss fit of curve a′, and curves 1′ and 2′ are Gauss fit peaks 1′ and 2′, respectively. In comparison with visible emissions, the NIR emissions of Pr3+are extremely feeble as measured under the same conditions, which shown in Fig. 1(a) was recorded by enlarging bandwidth of monochromator slits for clarity.

Download Full Size | PDF

To further explore the NIR fluorescence of Pr3+, spectrum of GCPr0.1 is relatively detected upon 585 nm excitation [Fig. 1(b)]. As expected, all the NIR emission bands are still observed except the distinct emission shoulder at 915 nm (3P01G4). The FWHM of 873 nm broad emission band is estimated to be about 55 nm. Besides, the 990 nm emission band becomes a non-negligible shoulder superposed on the dominant 1040 nm emission band, as shown in Fig. 1(b). A sum of two Gauss functions is also used to fit the NIR emission band in 927-1150 nm (curve a′), revealing that the fitted curve (curve 0′) is well in line with the experimental curve a′ (R2 ~0.9986), and the two broad fluorescence compositions are gained with peaks at ~990 nm (peak 1′, curve 1′) and at ~1040 nm (peak 2′, curve 2′), respectively. These results well agree with the deductions in Fig. 1(a) and would be spectroscopically validated by the following time-resolved fluorescence.

Energy level diagram of Pr3+ in Fig. 2 schematically illustrates the proposed NIR emission and ET mechanisms in GCPr. Following fast nanoradiative relaxation (NR) from the excited 3P2 state, the energy of populated 3P0 states not only yields various visible photons to excite 3Fj and 3Hj states, but also radiates NIR photon at about 915 nm via the 3P01G4 transition. Due to lower phonon energy environment around Pr3+ in CaF2 nanocrystals (325 cm−1) [27], the below 1D2 state would be populated mainly by cross-relaxation (CR) between 3P1,01D2 (~4600 cm−1) and 3H43H6 (~4200 cm−1), CR1 [34–36]. Then the energy in excited 1D2 state would effectively de-excite to the lower 3F2 and 3F3,4 via photon emitting at about 873 and 1040 nm, respectively. Meanwhile, once Pr3+: 1G4 state effectively populated by the 3P01G4 or by a feasible CR of 1D21G4 (~6840 cm−1) + 3H43F3 (~6600 cm−1), CR2 [27,34–36], it can be de-excited to the 3H4 ground state by generating NIR photon around 990 nm. Here a two-step NIR-QC occurs from Pr3+: 3P0 excited state with 1G4 intermediate level: the first-step 3P01G4 at ~915 nm (step 1) and the second-step 1G43H4 at ~990 nm (step 2) [1,37]. In sharp contrast, as GCPr excited at 585 nm (Fig. 2), only the 1D23F2, 1D23F3,4 and 1G43H4 transitions are induced following the population of 1D2 and 1G4 states, respectively.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Simplified energy-level diagram of Pr3+ illustrating the visible-to-NIR emission mechanisms, significantly undergoing the process of a sequential two-step NIR-QC: 1) the first-step 3P01G4 at 915 nm, and 2) the second-step 1G43H4 at 990 nm. Solid arrows represent optical transitions and short-dotted arrows are NR processes.

Download Full Size | PDF

To study the ET dynamics of Pr3+, time-resolved emission spectra of GCPr0.1 are measured in 770-1150 nm under pulsed light excitation of 440 and 580 nm, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3(a), only one NIR emission band around 915 nm emerges initially (~7.5 μs), directly visualizing that the 3P01G4 transition of Pr3+ does occur preferentially once the 3P0 state nonradiatively populated by the energy in excited 3P2 state. With delay time increase, the 915 nm emission intensity increases rapidly but with the band broadening asymmetrically, which is caused by the weak contribution of another NIR fluorescence band around 900 nm. Meanwhile, another emission peak at ~1040 nm begins to appear weakly at delay time of 8.0 μs, and its intensity rises markedly as delay time increases [Fig. 3(a)]. At delay time ~10.5 μs, the 915 nm emission reaches its maximum but with a distinguishable shoulder at about 873 nm, and also, the NIR emission band around 1040 nm intensely presents with a continuous increment trend [Fig. 3(a)]. Furthermore, as delay time increases from 19.5 μs, the fluorescence shoulder at ~873 nm becomes more obvious, and its intensity rise strongly relative to the 915 nm emission intensity. These observations suggest that, with the gradual growth of delay time, the lower 1D2 state would be populated nonradiatively from its above excited states, and does yield 873 nm and 1040 nm photons mainly via the 1D23F2 and 1D23F3,4 of Pr3+, respectively. Till delay time ~25.5 μs, the 873 nm emission band becomesdominant only with a quite weak fluorescence shoulder at ~915 nm, and finally at longer delay time ~57.5 μs, only the 873 nm emission can be recorded. On the other hand, an extra emission shoulder at ~990 nm presents at delay time around 19.5 μs, and, by increasing delay time, it exhibits more obvious increment tendency even if it is completely superposed with the intense 1040 nm emission band [Fig. 3(a)]. These results reveal that the later appearance of 990 nm emission does originate from the 1G4 state excited effectively by the first-step 3P01G4 or NR from the above 3Pj and 1D2 states of Pr3+, as schematically depicted in Fig. 2.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Time-resolved emission spectra of GCPr0.1 upon (a) 440 and (b) 585 nm pulsed light excitation, respectively. In the inset of Fig. 3(b), curve a′′ indicates the corresponding emission band in 920-1150 nm recorded at 19.5 μs delay time, curve 0′′ is Gauss fit of curve a′′, and curves 1′′ and 2′′ are Gauss fit peaks 1′′ and 2′′ for curve a′′, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

Besides, as comparatively shown in Fig. 3(b), there does not present the 915 nm emission and any other obvious NIR emissions at the initial delay time ~7.5 μs upon 585 nm pulsed light excitation, which, absolutely distinct from that in Fig. 3(a), further validates that the emission peak at ~915 nm is resulted from the 3P01G4 transition only. At longer delay time of 8.0 μs, the two NIR luminescence bands centered at 873 and 1040 nm emerge clearly, and then their intensities both raise with an almost identical trend as delay time increases, as plotted in Fig. 3(b). These phenomena confirm that the NIR emissions at 873 nm and 1040 nm do originate from the same excited 1D2 state, easily dedicated to the 1D23F2 and 1D23F3,4 transitions of Pr3+, respectively. Well consistent with that shown in Fig. 3(a), the emission shoulder around 990 nm becomes more obvious in Fig. 3(b) as decay time increases. Furthermore, the broad NIR emission band in 920-1150 nm (curve a′′) recorded at delay time ~19.5 μs is fitted by a sum of two Gauss functions: as exhibited in the inset of Fig. 3(b), the fitted curve (curve 0′′) well matches with the experimental curve a′′ (R2 ~0.9926), and two broad peaks are derived with maxima at about 990 nm (peak 1′′, curve 1′′) and 1040 nm (peak 2′′, curve 2′′), respectively. These results demonstrate that the NIR emission at ~990 nm just comes from the lower 1G43H4 transition of Pr3+, completely overlapping with the broad 1040 nm emission band as an indistinguishable shoulder [Figs. 1(a-b)].

Figure 4 shows fluorescence decay curves of 482, 873, 915, 990 and 1040 nm of GCPr0.1 under pulsed light excitation of 440 nm. Interestingly, the decay curves of 482 and 915 nm basically have an identical single-exponential behavior with shorter lifetime, those of 990 and 1040 nm generally display single-exponential features with longer lifetime, whereas that of 873 nm obviously shows nonexponential characteristic. The fitting function, calculated decay time, R-squared (R2), FWHM, and the corresponding electronic transitions of Pr3+ are summarized in Table 1. It can be found that: i) the calculated lifetime of 482 nm (~14.8 μs) is almost equivalent to that of 915 nm (~13.5 μs) [33,38], which further confirms that, same to the 482 nm characteristic emission from the 3P0 state, the 915 nm emission originates from the excited 3P0 state via the 3P01G4 [35]; ii) the lifetime of 1040 nm emission is typically estimated to be ~134.1 μs [33] and that of 873 nm have a similar long decay component of 129.1 μs (notably the short 29.6 μs decay component should be attributed to the overlapped emission like about 915 nm from Pr3+:3P0 state as Pr3+activators occupy the E′, O, P, Q sites in the CaF2 cluster structures [38]), suggesting that the broad emission bands centered at 873nm and that at 1040 nm dominantly result from the 1D23F2 and 1D23F3,4, respectively [29–31,35]; iii) the fluorescence shoulder located at about 990 nm has a distinct lifetime of about 107.8 μs, which is contributed from the 1G43H4 of Pr3+ [36] (noted that the 990 nm decay curve performs the slight deviation of a mono-exponential decline likely due to the partial contribution of broad 1040 nm emission). Additionally, there present comparably long temporal evolutions within both 990 and 1040 nm decay dynamics, which confirms the ET dynamics from the excited 3P0 state to the lower-lying 1D2 and 1G4 states of Pr3+, respectively [33]. By comparing the radiative lifetimes of 3P0 state of Pr3+ (50 μs) calculated by Judd-Ofelt parameters [27], the energy efficiency of 3P0 state is obtained to be about 30% in GCPr0.1, which is much low readily because of the efficient CR1 between Pr3+ ions, multiphonon relaxation caused in the partial Pr3+ undoped into CaF2 host lattice, poor crystallinity of CaF2:Pr3+ nanocrystals, defects and/or impurities around Pr3+ ions. Correspondingly, the numerous optimization works should be further done during this GC fabrication for its potential downconverting layer to enhance the photo-response of solar cell.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Luminescence decay curves of GCPr0.1 monitoring at 482, 873, 915, 990 and 1040 nm under excitation of 440 nm pulsed light. The dot lines represent the experimental data, and the solid lines are the fitting results.

Download Full Size | PDF

Tables Icon

Table 1. Decay curves of emission peaks, fitting function, R-squared (R2), calculated decay time, electronic transitions and FWHM of Pr3+ in GCPr0.1 upon 440 nm pulsed light excitation

Herein the distinct ET dynamics of Pr3+ in the GC sample are analyzed to comprise the sequential two-step NIR-QC of Pr3+ with 1G4 intermediate level, i.e., the 3P01G4 step 1 and the 1G43H4 step 2. Generally, QY can be determined by the ratio of number of photons re-emitted over the number of photons that are being absorbed, just involving visible regime (ηVis) and NIR regime (ηNIR) for NIR-QC system [4,15]. Using Judd-Ofelt parameters (Ω2 = 2.10 × 10−20 cm2, Ω4 = 2.88 × 10−20 cm2, Ω6 = 2.01 × 10−20 cm2) calculated from the absorption spectrum of GCPr0.1 (see details in Ref [27].), the internal QY of GCPr0.1,ηPr3+, can be theoretically evaluated in terms of luminescence branching ratios (β) [2,23,37],

ηPr3+=ηVis+ηNIR=ηP30+(βP30D12+βP30G14)ηP30ηG14
where QY for the excited 3P0 (1G4) state, ηP30 (ηG14), is set to be unity by neglecting NR processes. Branching ratios of transitions from 3P0 to all terminal levels can be estimated from β(aJ;bJ')=A(aJ;bJ')aJ'A(aJ;bJ')(A refers to the radiative transition probability of aJbJ′ transition) [27]. As a result, ηPr3+is calculated to be about 104%. It should be noted that, though the two-step NIR-QC of 3P01G4 (~915 nm) and 1G43H4 (~990 nm) are relatively feeble with a small 104% QY for Pr3+-doped GC sample, it, in Pr3+/Yb3+ codoping system, will become the crucial ET routes to resonantly excite Yb3+ for efficient QC [19,23,27,34]: with the introduction of Yb3+ acceptors, the first CR process between Pr3+: 3P01G4 and Yb3+: 2F7/22F5/2 can resonantly compete with the spontaneous visible-NIR emissions and NR processes from the excited 3P0 state by efficiently emitting 1000 nm NIR photon, and the sequential CR process between Pr3+: 1G43H4 and Yb3+: 2F7/22F5/2 would effectively transfer the energy of excited Pr3+: 1G4 state to Yb3+: 2F7/2 state, thereby radiating another 1000 nm photon [19,23,27,34]. Experimentally, by increasing Yb3+-doping concentration, the two-step resonant ET processes would become more and more efficient, finally obtaining the high efficient NIR-QC materials co-activated by Pr3+/Yb3+ couple [19,23,27,34]. Herein, the optimization of Pr3+ concentration is of great importance, otherwise the readily CR1 of 3P1,01D2 + 3H43H6 would mostly quench the energy of excited Pr3+: 3P1,0 states [34,36]. Besides, if the NIR emission of 1G43H4 does not occur likely due to the large phonon energy and the influence of host structure (in hosts with ħωmax more than 700 cm−1, the multiphonon relaxation rate of 1G4 state, ≥ 7.1 × 103 s−1, will dominate over the radiative transition rate) [16,17,39], namely, no presence of resonant ET approaches in some cases, NIR-QC of Pr3+/Yb3+ would typically proceed through cooperative ET of Pr3+: 3P0→ 2Yb3+: 2F5/2 doubly emitting 1000 nm NIR photons. However, in the extreme case of certain host lattices or complexes with too large phonon energy or with too high Pr3+ concentration, the excited 3P1,0 states are nonradiatively decayed to the underlying 1D2 state due to the relatively small energy gap of 3P01D2, NIR 1000 nm emission in Pr3+/Yb3+ should be resulted dominantly from the one-step resonant CR of Pr3+: 1D23F2,3,4 + Yb3+: 2F7/22F5/2 but not the two-photon NIR-QC conversion [34].

4. Conclusion

In this paper, Pr3+-doped transparent GCs containing CaF2 nanocrystals are prepared by the melting-and-quenching technique. The well overlapped NIR fluorescence bands of Pr3+ in 800-1100 nm are distinguished by photo emission and time-resolved spectra. Two-step sequential two-photon NIR-QC takes place feasibly with 1G4 acting as an intermediate level in the GCPrx samples via the 3P01G4 transition at about 915 nm and the sequential 1G43H4 transition at about 990 nm. The total internal QY of the two-photon NIR-QC reaches approximately 104% in this Pr3+ singly doped GC sample. Undoubtedly, the two-step NIR-QC transitions of Pr3+ would become the resonant ET routes once Yb3+ codoped into the system. It is believed that the new insight into ET dynamics and NIR luminescence mechanisms of Pr3+ would provide the rational principle and feasible approach to design and obtain the high efficient NIR-QC materials co-activated by Pr3+/Yb3+ couple.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51125005, 51472088). We greatly thank Prof. Andries Meijerink for his valuable suggestions.

References and links

1. D. L. Dexter, “Possibility of luminescent quantum yields greater than unit,” Phys. Rev. 108(3), 630–633 (1957). [CrossRef]  

2. W. W. Piper, J. A. De Luca, and F. D. Ham, “Cascade fluorescent decay in Pr3+-doped fluorides: Achievement of a quantum yield greater than unity for emission of visible light,” J. Lumin. 8(4), 344–348 (1974). [CrossRef]  

3. C. Feldmann, T. Jüstel, C. R. Ronda, and P. J. Schmidt, “Inorganic luminescent materials: 100 years of research and application,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 13(7), 511–516 (2003). [CrossRef]  

4. Q. Y. Zhang and X. Y. Huang, “Recent progress in quantum cutting phosphors,” Prog. Mater. Sci. 55(5), 353–427 (2010). [CrossRef]  

5. Y. H. Chen, C. S. Shi, W. Z. Yan, Z. M. Qi, and Y. B. Fu, “Energy transfer between Pr3+ and Mn2+ in SrB4O7:Pr,Mn,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 88(6), 061906 (2006). [CrossRef]  

6. P. Vergeer, V. Babin, and A. Meijerink, “Quenching of Pr3+ 1S0 emission by Eu3+ and Yb3+,” J. Lumin. 114(3–4), 267–274 (2005). [CrossRef]  

7. Z. Nie, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, X. Ren, X. J. Wang, and G. Zhang, “Evidence for visible quantum cutting via energy transfer in SrAl12O19:Pr,Cr,” Opt. Lett. 32(8), 991–993 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. X.-J. Wang, S. Huang, L. Lu, W. M. Yen, A. M. Srivastava, and A. A. Setlur, “Energy transfer in Pr3+- and Er3+-codoped CaAl12O19crystal,” Opt. Commun. 195(5–6), 405–410 (2001). [CrossRef]  

9. R. T. Wegh, H. Donker, K. D. Oskam, and A. Meijerink, “Visible quantum cutting in LiGdF4:Eu3+ through downconversion,” Science 283(5402), 663–666 (1999). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. R. T. Wegh, E. V. D. van Loef, and A. Meijerink, “Visible quantum cutting via downconversion in LiGdF4:Er3+,Tb3+ upon Er3+ 4f11→4f105d excitation,” J. Lumin. 90(3–4), 111–122 (2000). [CrossRef]  

11. B. M. van der Ende, L. Aarts, and A. Meijerink, “Lanthanide ions as spectral converters for solar cells,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11(47), 11081–11095 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. T. Trupke, M. A. Green, and P. Würfel, “Improving solar cell efficiencies by down-conversion of high-energy photons,” J. Appl. Phys. 92(3), 1668–1674 (2002). [CrossRef]  

13. B. S. Richards, “Luminescent layers for enhanced silicon solar cell performance: Down-conversion,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90(9), 1189–1207 (2006). [CrossRef]  

14. O. M. ten Kate, M. de Jong, H. T. Hintzen, and E. van der Kolk, “Efficiency enhancement calculations of state-of-the-art solar cells by luminescent layers with spectral shifting, quantum cutting, and quantum tripling function,” J. Appl. Phys. 114(8), 084502 (2013). [CrossRef]  

15. P. Vergeer, T. J. H. Vlugt, M. H. F. Kox, M. I. den Hertog, J. P. J. M. van der Eerden, and A. Meijerink, “Quantum cutting by cooperative energy transfer in YbxY1-xPO4:Tb3+,” Phys. Rev. B 71(1), 014119 (2005). [CrossRef]  

16. Q. Y. Zhang, G. F. Yang, and Z. H. Jiang, “Cooperative downconversion in GdAl3(BO3)4:RE3+,Yb3+ (RE=Pr, Tb, and Tm),” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(5), 051903 (2007). [CrossRef]  

17. D. Chen, Y. Wang, Y. Yu, P. Huang, and F. Weng, “Near-infrared quantum cutting in transparent nanostructured glass ceramics,” Opt. Lett. 33(16), 1884–1886 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. G. Lakshminarayana and J. R. Qiu, “Near-infrared quantum cutting in RE3+/Yb3+ (RE=Pr, Tb, and Tm): GeO2-B2O3-ZnO-LaF3 glasses via downconversion,” J. Alloys Compd. 481(1–2), 582–589 (2009). [CrossRef]  

19. B. M. van der Ende, L. Aarts, and A. Meijerink, “Near-infrared quantum cutting for photovoltaics,” Adv. Mater. 21(30), 3073–3077 (2009). [CrossRef]  

20. J. J. Eilers, D. Biner, J. T. van Wijngaaerden, K. Krämer, H.-U. Güdel, and A. Meijerink, “Efficient visible to infrared quantum cutting through downconversion with the Er3+-Yb3+ couple in Cs3Y2Br9,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96(15), 151106 (2010). [CrossRef]  

21. J.-M. Meijer, L. Aarts, B. M. van der Ende, T. J. H. Vlugt, and A. Meijerink, “Downconversion for solar cells in YF3:Nd3+,Yb3+,” Phys. Rev. B 81(3), 035107 (2010). [CrossRef]  

22. D. C. Yu, X. Y. Huang, S. Ye, and Q. Y. Zhang, “Efficient first-order resonant near-infrared quantum cutting in β-NaYF4:Ho3+,Yb3+,” J. Alloys Compd. 509(41), 9919–9923 (2011). [CrossRef]  

23. J. T. van Wijngaarden, S. Scheidelaar, T. J. H. Vlugt, M. F. Reid, and A. Meijerink, “Energy transfer mechanism for downconversion in the (Pr3+,Yb3+) couple,” Phys. Rev. B 81(15), 155112 (2010). [CrossRef]  

24. K. Deng, T. Gong, L. Hu, X. Wei, Y. Chen, and M. Yin, “Efficient near-infrared quantum cutting in NaYF4: Ho3+, Yb3+ for solar photovoltaics,” Opt. Express 19(3), 1749–1754 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

25. D. C. Yu, S. Ye, X. Y. Huang, and Q. Y. Zhang, “Enhanced three-photon near-infrared quantum splitting in β-NaYF4:Ho3+ by codoping Yb3+,” AIP Adv. 2(2), 022124 (2012). [CrossRef]  

26. L. Aarts, S. Jaeqx, B. M. van der Ende, and A. Meijerink, “Downconversion for the Er3+,Yb3+ couple in KPb2Cl5-A low-phonon frequency host,” J. Lumin. 131(4), 608–613 (2011). [CrossRef]  

27. Q. J. Chen, W. J. Zhang, X. Y. Huang, G. P. Dong, M. Y. Peng, and Q. Y. Zhang, “Efficient down- and up-conversion of Pr3+-Yb3+ co-doped transparent oxyfluoride glass ceramics,” J. Alloys Compd. 513(5), 139–144 (2012).

28. A. Guille, A. Pereira, G. Breton, A. Bensalah-Ledoux, and B. Moine, “Energy transfer in CaYAlO4:Ce3+,Pr3+ for sensitization of quantum-cutting with the Pr3+-Yb3+couple,” J. Appl. Phys. 111(4), 043104 (2012). [CrossRef]  

29. A. Jaffrès, B. Viana, and E. van der Kolk, “Photon management in La2BaZnO5:Tm3+,Yb3+ and La2BaZnO5: Pr3+,Yb3+ by two step cross-relaxation and energy transfer,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 527(27), 42–46 (2012). [CrossRef]  

30. J. X. Hu, H. P. Xia, H. Y. Hu, Y. P. Zhang, H. C. Jiang, and B. J. Chen, “Synthesis and efficient near-infrared quantum cutting of Pr3+/Yb3+ co-doped LiYF4 single crystals,” J. Appl. Phys. 112(7), 073518 (2012). [CrossRef]  

31. J. J. Zhou, Y. Teng, S. Ye, G. Lin, and J. R. Qiu, “A discussion on spectral modification from visible to near-infrared based on energy transfer for silicon solar cells,” Opt. Mater. 34(5), 901–905 (2012). [CrossRef]  

32. S. Q. Man, H. L. Zhang, Y. L. Liu, J. X. Meng, E. Y. B. Pun, and P. S. Chung, “Energy transfer in Pr3+/Yb3+ codoped tellurite glasses,” Opt. Mater. 30(2), 334–337 (2007). [CrossRef]  

33. G. Özen, O. Forte, and B. Di Bartolo, “Downconversion and upconversion dynamics in Pr-doped crystals,” J. Appl. Phys. 97(1), 013510 (2005). [CrossRef]  

34. G. J. Gao and L. Wondraczek, “Near-infrared downconversion in Pr3+/Yb3+ co-doped boro-alumino silicate glasses and LaBO3 glass ceramics,” Opt. Mater. Express 3(5), 633–644 (2013). [CrossRef]  

35. Y. Li, Q. L. Yu, L. Huang, J. Wang, and Q. Su, “Near ultraviolet and visible-to-near-infrared spectral converting properties and energy transfer mechanism of Sr2SiO4:Ce3+,Pr3+ phosphor,” Opt. Mater. Express 4(2), 227–233 (2014). [CrossRef]  

36. B. Zhou, L. Tao, Y. H. Tsang, W. Jin, and E. Y.-B. Pun, “Superbroadband near-IR photoluminescence from Pr3+-doped fluorotellurite glasses,” Opt. Express 20(4), 3803–3813 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

37. D. C. Yu, X. Y. Huang, S. Ye, M. Y. Peng, Q. Y. Zhang, and L. Wondraczek, “Three-photon near-infrared quantum splitting in β–NaYF4:Ho3+,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 99(16), 161904 (2011). [CrossRef]  

38. B. M. Tissue and J. C. Wright, “Site-selective laser spectroscopy of CaF2:Pr3+ and CaF2:Pr3+, R3+ (R3+ =Y3+, Gd3+, Nd3+),” Phys. Rev. B 36(18), 9781–9789 (1987). [CrossRef]  

39. K. Soga, W. Z. Wang, R. E. Riman, J. Bryan Brown, and K. R. Mikeska, “Luminescent properties of nanostructured Dy3+- and Tm3+-doped lanthanum chloride prepared by reactive atmosphere processing of sol-gel derived lanthanum hydroxide,” J. Appl. Phys. 93(5), 2946–2951 (2003). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Visible-to-NIR emission spectra of GCPr0.1 under excitation of (a) 440 nm and (b) 585 nm, respectively. In Fig. 1(a), curve a represents NIR emission band centered at ~1040 nm in 934-1150 nm, curve 0 is Gauss fit of curve a, and curves 1 and 2 are Gauss fit peaks 1 and 2, respectively. In Fig. 1(b), curve a′ refers to NIR emission at ~1040 nm in 927-1150 nm, curve 0′ is Gauss fit of curve a′, and curves 1′ and 2′ are Gauss fit peaks 1′ and 2′, respectively. In comparison with visible emissions, the NIR emissions of Pr3+are extremely feeble as measured under the same conditions, which shown in Fig. 1(a) was recorded by enlarging bandwidth of monochromator slits for clarity.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Simplified energy-level diagram of Pr3+ illustrating the visible-to-NIR emission mechanisms, significantly undergoing the process of a sequential two-step NIR-QC: 1) the first-step 3P01G4 at 915 nm, and 2) the second-step 1G43H4 at 990 nm. Solid arrows represent optical transitions and short-dotted arrows are NR processes.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Time-resolved emission spectra of GCPr0.1 upon (a) 440 and (b) 585 nm pulsed light excitation, respectively. In the inset of Fig. 3(b), curve a′′ indicates the corresponding emission band in 920-1150 nm recorded at 19.5 μs delay time, curve 0′′ is Gauss fit of curve a′′, and curves 1′′ and 2′′ are Gauss fit peaks 1′′ and 2′′ for curve a′′, respectively.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Luminescence decay curves of GCPr0.1 monitoring at 482, 873, 915, 990 and 1040 nm under excitation of 440 nm pulsed light. The dot lines represent the experimental data, and the solid lines are the fitting results.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Decay curves of emission peaks, fitting function, R-squared (R2), calculated decay time, electronic transitions and FWHM of Pr3+ in GCPr0.1 upon 440 nm pulsed light excitation

Equations (1)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

η Pr 3+ = η Vis + η NIR = η P 3 0 +( β P 3 0 D 1 2 + β P 3 0 G 1 4 ) η P 3 0 η G 1 4
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.