Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Tunable terahertz perfect absorber with a graphene-based double split-ring structure

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

In this paper, we describe a tunable perfect absorber based on a graphene metamaterial. It consists of a square split graphene ring and a round split graphene ring. Using silicon as the base, gold, silicon dioxide, and graphene are placed layer by layer in sequence. The results of simulations performed using CST Microwave Studio indicate that the double split-ring structure possesses two absorption peaks at 10.96 THz and 12.71 THz, with absorption efficiencies of 99.7% and 99.4%, respectively, which approach perfect absorption. The permittivity of graphene can be controlled by the plus gate voltage, which results in dynamic control over the absorption peaks. Furthermore, owing to the small impact on the resonance frequency, the relaxation time may be applied to manipulate the absorption peaks. In addition, we also discuss how different structural parameters affect absorption. Lastly, we conclude that the proposed graphene-based absorber has a wide-angle incoming characteristic and great potential in infrared, filter, and terahertz detection.

© 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

The rapid development of terahertz technology has been aided by the emergence of metamaterials, which played an important role in promoting them [16]. However, several technical problems are yet to be solved [7]. The resonant frequency of traditional metamaterials absorbers remains unchanged owing to their fixed structural parameters and resonant structures and limits their scope for application [8]. Recently, graphene has attracted considerable attention owing to its unique electromagnetic properties [9], which can be changed by external factors such as the external voltage; thereby achieving control over the absorption frequency [7,10]. As a two-dimensional material consisting of carbon atoms arranged in a honeycomb lattice [1116], graphene has extensive applications in filters [17], modulators [18], switches, photodetectors [19,20], sensors, solar cells, and so on [21] owing to its electromagnetic properties.

Circuit theory can explain the fact that when a graphene layer is periodically formed on the substrate with an appropriate design and the equivalent input impedance of the absorber structure is matched to the medium [2224], the absorber has no reflection. In this work, we propose a tunable terahertz perfect absorber with a graphene-based double split-ring structure. In this absorber, gold, silicon dioxide, and graphene are placed layer by layer in sequence, with silicon as the base. We have not only discussed the impact of different Fermi energies and the disparate relaxation times on the regulation of absorption, but also explored the optimal structure parameters required for achieving perfect absorption. Compared to other metamaterial absorbers, our design has the advantages of absorption of a wide range of tunable dual-bands, thin, wide operation, simple configuration and so on. We believe that this design will enrich the THz absorber family and inspire practical applications such as sensing and imaging.

2. Structure design

A tunable terahertz perfect absorber with a graphene-based double split-ring structure is shown in Fig. 1. Figure 1(a) depicts the top view of the graphene-based absorber. Here, we set the outside and interior lengths of the square split ring at 1800nm and 1600 nm, respectively. The inner and outer radii of the interior round split ring are 500 nm and 600 nm, respectively. In order to achieve better resonance, we set the split width (a) to 100 nm. The absorber elements have a period of 2450 nm. Silicon forms the base on which gold, silicon dioxide, and graphene are placed layer by layer in order, as shown in Fig. 1(b). The silicon dioxide layer sandwiched between the metals and graphene can capture more light energy to produce ohmic loss and achieve perfect absorption. This layer is 4200 nm thick, and its permittivity is selected as 3.9. Transmission can be eliminated by ensuring that the thickness of the gold layer exceeds the skin depth of the electromagnetic wave [2527]. In this work, we determined the thickness of the gold layer and its electrical conductivity to be 450 nm and $\sigma = \textrm{4}\textrm{.56} \times \textrm{1}{\textrm{0}^7}$S/m, respectively. In order to achieve better absorption, the thickness and relative permittivity of the silicon layer were set at 2000nm and 11.9, respectively.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. (a) Top view of a unit cell of the absorber. (b)Schematic representation of a unit cell of graphene-based perfect absorber with the relevant geometric parameters.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Simulation and discussions

The permittivity of graphene, ${\varepsilon _g},$ can be expressed as [28,29]

$${\varepsilon _g} = 1 + j\frac{{\sigma (\omega )}}{{{\varepsilon _0}\omega {t_g}}}$$
where the thickness of the graphene sheet (${t_g}$) used is 1 nm, the permittivity in vacuum (${\varepsilon _0}$) is $\textrm{8}\textrm{.85} \times \textrm{1}{\textrm{0}^{\textrm{ - 12}}}\textrm{F/m}$, and $\omega $ represents the frequency of the incident light. The real part of the permittivity of graphene represents the phase modulation while the imaginary part represents amplitude modulation. Applying the random phase approximation (RPA) in the local limit, the surface conductivity $\sigma (\omega )$ of monolayer graphene can be expressed as follows [28,29]:
$$\sigma (\omega )= {\sigma _{\textrm{intra}}} + {\sigma _{\textrm{inter}}}$$

Here, ${\sigma _{\textrm{intra}}}$ and ${\sigma _{\textrm{inter}}}$, in the Kubo formula represent the intraband and interband conductivities, defined in the following [30]:

$${\sigma _{\textrm{intra}}} ={-} j\frac{{{e^2}{k_B}T}}{{\pi {\hbar ^2}({\omega - j\Gamma } )}}\left( {\frac{{{E_f}}}{{{k_B}T}} + 2ln({e^{ - \frac{{{E_f}}}{{{k_B}T}}}} + 1)} \right)$$
$${\sigma _{\textrm{inter}}} ={-} j\frac{{{e^2}}}{{4\pi \hbar }}\ln \left( {\frac{{2{E_f} - ({\omega - j\Gamma } )\hbar }}{{2{E_f} + ({\omega - j\Gamma } )\hbar }}} \right)$$
where e represents the charge of an electron, ${k_B}$ is the Boltzmann constant, ${E_f}$ is the chemical potential of graphene, Γ represents the phenomenological scattering rate, and T is the temperature (here T = 300 K). Following Pauli’s exclusion principle, when the energy of the photon $\hbar \omega \; \ll \; {E_f}$, the contribution of the interband conductivity to the surface conductivity can be ignored, especially in the terahertz region [28,29]. The surface conductivity of monolayer graphene ($\sigma (\omega )$) is similar to the Drude model, which can be expressed as follows [30]:
$$\sigma (\omega )= \frac{{i{e^2}{E_f}}}{{\pi {\hbar ^2}\left( {\omega + \frac{i}{\tau }} \right)}}$$

Here $\tau ,$ the relaxation time, depends on the Fermi energy, Fermi velocity ${V_F} = \textrm{1}{\textrm{0}^6}\; m/s$, and carrier mobility $\mu = 1{m^2}/Vs$ as $\tau = {E_f}\mu /({eV_f^2} )$ [29,30]. In this work, the Fermi energy and relaxation time were assumed to be 0.9 eV and 1.1 ps, respectively. Under these circumstances, owing the nearly perfect impedance matching condition, the absorption can reach a maximum.

The absorption of the double split-ring absorber was simulated using CST Microwave Studio. From Fig. 2(a), it is obvious that the absorber reaches 99.7% and 99.4% at 10.96 THz and 12.71 THz, respectively, i.e., nearly perfect absorption. To better illustrate the physical mechanism of perfect absorption, we simulated the distribution of the electric fields at 10.96 THz and 12.71 THz. As shown in Fig. 2(b), the electric field is mainly concentrated in the outer rectangular split ring at 10.96 THz. As the frequency of the electromagnetic waves increases, the electric field is concentrated on the middle circular split ring in Fig. 2(c) at 12.71 THz. In Fig. 2(d), we can get that the structure we designed has a good absorption effect, clearly. Owing to the plasma resonance of the local surface in the graphene array, there are two electric dipole resonances at 10.96 THz and 12.71 THz. The electric dipole resonance and the lower metal film will have a strong coupling effect. The lower metallic layer produces a current opposite to the surface graphene, leading to a magnetic dipole resonance in the structure. Therefore, this strong electromagnetic resonance can produce nearly 100% absorption [30].

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. (a) Absorption in the terahertz region as a function of the frequency. (b) Electric field distribution when the resonance frequency is 10.96 THz. (c) Electric field distribution when the resonance frequency is 12.71 THz. (d) out-of-plane field distribution respectively at 10.96 THz and 12.71 THz

Download Full Size | PDF

It is known that the application of a gate voltage and chemical dropping can effectively control the surface conductivity of graphene. The relation between the Fermi energy and gate voltage can be expressed as [31,32]

$${E_f} = \hbar {V_f}{({\pi {\varepsilon_0}{\varepsilon_r}V/({e{t_s}} )} )^{\frac{1}{2}}}$$

In the above formula, ${V_f}$ is the Fermi velocity, V is the gate voltage, ${t_s}$ is the thickness of the plasma, ${\varepsilon _0}$ is the dielectric constant, and ${\varepsilon _r}$ is the relative dielectric constant., We set the Fermi velocity as ${V_f} = {10^6}$m/s to simplify the calculation. Figure 3(a) clearly illustrates the relationship between the Fermi energy and absorption. It is seen that when the Fermi energy increases from 0.7 eV to 1.0 eV, the absorption peak shifts until ${E_f}$ = 0.9 eV where the absorption approaches 100%. Figure 3(b) shows the schematic representation of the gate voltage for controlling the Fermi energy of graphene. The current flows through the brain and source. From Eq. (6), it is obvious that the Fermi energy increases as the gate voltage V is increased. Thus, tuning can be achieved easily by controlling the gate voltage.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. (a) Absorption spectra for different Fermi energies. (b) Schematic representation of the gate voltage for controlling the Fermi energy of graphene.

Download Full Size | PDF

Since the placement of organic molecules on graphene can effectively enhance the carrier mobility and hence, the relaxation time [31,32], we studied the impact of the relaxation time on the absorption. As shown in Fig. 4, when $\tau $ = 1.1 ps and ${E_f}$ = 0.9 eV, the charge carriers are conductive to plasma oscillation absorption, which leads to the peak attaining a maximum value. If the relaxation time is continuously increasing because most of the energy of the microwave will be reflected, which leads to a reduction in absorption instead of consistent growth, and the absorption peak gradually declines [3032]. In addition, it is significant that as the relaxation time increases, the absorption peak is no longer nearly perfect.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Absorption spectra for different relaxation times with other parameters set up

Download Full Size | PDF

As for the polarization performance of designed structure, we stimulated the different angles θ from 0° to 50° and ϕ from 0° to 45°. And θ is an angle between incident of electromagnetic wave and normal incident, and ϕ is express as the angle between H and Y directions [33]. With the increase of the θ, the absorption rate of absorber become lower in Fig. 5(a). Moreover, the reduction is not significant, which means the absorber has a very great wide-angel incoming characteristic. As shown in Fig. 5(b), the impact of the change of θ on the absorption performance of the structure is relatively large. So, the absorber is polarization-sensitive, and it has an application on filtering.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Simulate absorptivity with different (a)θ, (b) ϕ (TM polarization)

Download Full Size | PDF

As the outer length of the square split ring increases, as shown in Fig. 6(a), the absorption peak shifts towards shorter outer length, it will disturb the impedance matching condition. This is the reason why the absorption peak declines as we increase the length. As shown in Fig. 6(b), the absorption peak blueshifts as the interior length of the square (L2) increases from 1400 nm to 1600 nm. When L2 increases to 1600 nm, the absorption peak reaches a maximum owing to impedance matching. The diminished absorption peak observed when L2 = 1700 nm arises from mismatched impedances. To further investigate the relationship between the structural parameters and the absorption, we considered different radii of the interior split ring, as shown in Fig. 6(c) and (d). In Fig. 6(c), as the outer radius of the split ring increases, double absorption peaks, located at 10.96 THz and 12.71 THz, emerge gradually. Then, owing to the resonance condition transformed, as the outer radius of the split ring is continuously increased, the distance between the double absorption peaks gradually widens. As depicted in Fig. 6(d), as the radius (r2) gradually increases, double absorption peaks emerge at r2 = 500 nm. If the radius is increased further, the two peaks will disappear. Under these conditions, impedance matching is no longer satisfied.

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Absorption rates at (a) different outer lengths of the square split ring (1700 nm - 1850 nm), (b) different interior lengths of the square split ring (1400 nm - 1700 nm), (c) different radii of the outer round split ring (550 nm - 750 nm), (d) different radii of the interior round split ring (400 nm - 550 nm) keeping other parameters unchanged.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, we have discussed a tunable terahertz perfect absorber consisting of a graphene-based double split-ring structure and presented the results obtained using CST Microwave Studio. The simulated results illustrate that the double absorption peaks reach 99.7% and 99.4% at 10.96 THz and 12.71 THz, respectively. By controlling the gate voltage, we can indirectly adjust the Fermi energy of graphene to tune the absorption peak. Furthermore, the relaxation time may be used to manipulate the absorption peak owing to the small impact on the resonance frequency. When the parameters of the proposed absorber structure are properly adjusted, the impedance may be mismatched so that it cannot reach perfect absorption.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY20F050001).

Acknowledgement

The research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LY20F050001)

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. C. Cen, Z. Chen, D. Xu, L. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Yi, P. Wu, G. Li, and Y. Yi, “High quality factor, high sensitivity metamaterial graphene-perfect absorber based on critical coupling theory and impedance matching,” Nanomaterials 10(1), 95 (2020). [CrossRef]  

2. L. A. J. Falkovsky, “Optical properties of graphene,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 129, 012004 (2008). [CrossRef]  

3. P. Genevet, F. Capasso, F. Aieta, M. Khorasaninejad, and R. Devlin, “Recent advances in planar optics: from plasmonic to dielectric metasurfaces,” Optica 4(1), 139 (2017). [CrossRef]  

4. Z. Yi, J. Chen, C. Cen, X. Chen, Z. Zhou, Y. Tang, X. Ye, S. Xiao, W. Luo, and P. Wu, “Tunable graphene-based plasmonic perfect metamaterial absorber in the THz region,” Micromachines 10(3), 194 (2019). [CrossRef]  

5. Z. Yi, H. Lin, G. Niu, X. Chen, Z. Zhou, X. Ye, T. Duan, Y. Yi, Y. Tang, and Y. Yi, “Graphene-based tunable triple-band plasmonic perfect metamaterial absorber with good angle-polarization-tolerance,” Results Phys. 13(2), 102149 (2019). [CrossRef]  

6. Z. Yi, C. Liang, X. Chen, Z. Zhou, Y. Tang, X. Ye, Y. Yi, J. Wang, and P. Wu, “Dual-band plasmonic perfect absorber based on graphene metamaterials for refractive index sensing application,” Micromachines 10(7), 443 (2019). [CrossRef]  

7. H. Gao, P. L. Li, and S. D. Yang, “Tunable multichannel optical absorber based on coupling effects of optical Tamm states in metal-photonic crystal heterostructure-metal structure,” Opt. Commun. 457, 124688 (2020). [CrossRef]  

8. C. Cen, Z. Yi, G. Zhang, Y. Zhang, C. Liang, X. Chen, Y. Tang, X. Ye, Y. Yi, J. Wang, and J. Hua, “Theoretical design of a triple-band perfect metamaterial absorber in the THz frequency range,” Results Phys. 14(6), 102463 (2019). [CrossRef]  

9. L. W. Qi and C. Liu, “Broadband multilayer graphene metamaterial absorbers,” Opt. Mater. Express 9(3), 1298–1309 (2019). [CrossRef]  

10. Z. Yi, L. Liu, L. Wang, C. Cen, X. Chen, Z. Zhou, X. Ye, Y. Yi, Y. Tang, Y. Yi, and P. Wu, “Tunable dual-band perfect absorber consisting of periodic cross-cross monolayer graphene arrays,” Results Phys. 13(3), 102217 (2019). [CrossRef]  

11. P. Q. Liu, I. J. Luxmoore, S. A. Mikhailov, N. A. Savostianova, F. Valmorra, J. Faist, and G. R. Nash, “Highly tunable hybrid metamaterials employing split-ring resonators strongly coupled to graphene surface plasmons,” Nat. Commun. 6, 8969 (2015). [CrossRef]  

12. C. Liu, L. M. Qi, and X. Zhang, “Broadband graphene-based metamaterial absorbers,” AIP Adv. 8(1), 015301 (2018). [CrossRef]  

13. A. Ahmadivand, R. Sinha, M. Karabiyik, P. K. Vabbina, B. Gerislioglu, S. Kaya, and N. Pala, “Tunable THz wave absorption by graphene-assisted plasmonic metasurfaces based on metallic split ring resonators,” J. Nanopart. Res. 19(1), 3 (2017). [CrossRef]  

14. G. Yao, F. Ling, J. Yue, C. Luo, J. Ji, and J. Yao, “Dual-band tunable perfect metamaterial absorber in the THz range,” Opt. Express 24(2), 1518 (2016). [CrossRef]  

15. A. Andryieuski and A. V. Lavrinenko, “Graphene metamaterials based tunable terahertz absorber: effective surface conductivity approach,” Opt. Express 21(7), 9144–9155 (2013). [CrossRef]  

16. H. Zhang, F. Ling, H. Wang, Y. Zhang, and B. Zhang, “A water hybrid graphene metamaterial absorber with broadband absorption,” Opt. Commun. 463(1), 125394 (2020). [CrossRef]  

17. M. Y. Yan, B. J. Xu, Z. C. Sun, Z. D. Wu, and B. R. Wu, “Terahertz Perfect Absorber Based on Asymmetric Open-Loop Cross-Dipole Structure,” Chinese Phys. Lett. 37(6), 3–7 (2020).

18. B. J. Xu, C. Wu, Z. Y. Wei, Y. C. Fan, Z. P. Wang, and H. Q. Li, “Near-diffraction-limited focusing with gradient high-impedance metasurface,” Opt. Mater. Express 7(4), 1141–1146 (2016). [CrossRef]  

19. B. J. Xu, C. Wu, Z. Y. Wei, Y. C. Fan, and H. Q. Li, “Generating an orbital-angular-momentum beam with a metasurface of gradient reflective phase,” Opt. Mater. Express 6(12), 3940–3945 (2017). [CrossRef]  

20. Z. D. Wu, B. J. Xu, M. Y. Yan, B. R. Wu, Z. C. Sun, P. Cheng, X. Tong, and S. Y. Ruan, “Broadband Microwave Absorber with a Double-Split Ring Structure,” Plasmonics 15(6), 1863–1867 (2020). [CrossRef]  

21. Q. Cheng, T. J. Cui, W. X. Jiang, and B. G. Cai, “An omnidirectional electromagnetic absorber made of metamaterials,” New J. Phys. 12(6), 063006 (2010). [CrossRef]  

22. V. Sorathiya and V. Dave, “Numerical study of a high negative refractive index based tunable metamaterial structure by graphene split ring resonator for far infrared frequency,” Opt. Commun. 456, 124581 (2020). [CrossRef]  

23. S. K. Patel, S. Charola, J. Parmar, M. Ladumor, Q. M. Ngo, and V. Dhasarathan, “Broadband and efficient graphene solar absorber using periodical array of C-shaped metasurface,” Opt. Quantum Electron. 52(5), 250 (2020). [CrossRef]  

24. R. M. Gao, Z. C. Xu, C. F. Ding, L. Wu, and J. Q. Yao, “Graphene metamaterial for multiband and broadband terahertz absorber,” Opt. Commun. 356, 400–404 (2015). [CrossRef]  

25. O. M. Daraei, K. Goudarzi, and M. Bemani, “A tunable ultra-broadband terahertz absorber based on two layers of graphene ribbons,” Opt. Laser Technol. 122, 105853 (2020). [CrossRef]  

26. S. C. Song, Q. Chen, L. Jin, and F. H. Sun, “Great light absorption enhancement in a graphene photodetector integrated with a metamaterial perfect absorber,” Nanoscale 5(20), 9615–9619 (2013). [CrossRef]  

27. P. Jain, S. Bansal, K. Prakash, N. Sardana, N. Gupta, S. Kumar, and A. K. Singh, “Graphene-based tunable multi-band metamaterial polarization-insensitive absorber for terahertz applications,” J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 31(14), 11878–11886 (2020). [CrossRef]  

28. Y. J. Cai, J. F. Zhu, and Q. H. Liu, “Tunable enhanced optical absorption of graphene using plasmonic perfect absorbers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 106(4), 043105 (2015). [CrossRef]  

29. P. Yu, L. V. Besteiro, Y. Huang, J. Wu, L. Fu, H. H. Tan, C. Jagadish, G. P. Wiederrecht, A. O. Govorov, and Z. Wang, “Broadband Metamaterial Absorbers,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 7(3), 1800995 (2019). [CrossRef]  

30. Y. Zhang, Y. J. Feng, B. Zhu, J. M. Zhao, and T. Jiang, “Graphene based tunable metamaterial absorber and polarization modulation in terahertz frequency,” Opt. Express 22(19), 22743–22752 (2014). [CrossRef]  

31. B. Vasić and R. Gajić, “Graphene induced spectral tuning of metamaterial absorbers at mid-infrared frequencies,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 103(26), 261111 (2013). [CrossRef]  

32. M. Y. Yan, Z. C. Sun, B. R. Wu, P. Cheng, and B. J. Xu, “Reflective focusing based on few-layer gradient metasurface element array,” Front. Phys. 8, 46 (2020). [CrossRef]  

33. Y. Liu, B. Zhang, J. Duan, and Y. Xu, “Flexible ultrawideband microwave metamaterial absorber with multiple perfect absorption peaks based on the split square ring: publisher’s note,” Appl. Opt. 58(12), 3115 (2019). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a) Top view of a unit cell of the absorber. (b)Schematic representation of a unit cell of graphene-based perfect absorber with the relevant geometric parameters.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) Absorption in the terahertz region as a function of the frequency. (b) Electric field distribution when the resonance frequency is 10.96 THz. (c) Electric field distribution when the resonance frequency is 12.71 THz. (d) out-of-plane field distribution respectively at 10.96 THz and 12.71 THz
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a) Absorption spectra for different Fermi energies. (b) Schematic representation of the gate voltage for controlling the Fermi energy of graphene.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Absorption spectra for different relaxation times with other parameters set up
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Simulate absorptivity with different (a)θ, (b) ϕ (TM polarization)
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Absorption rates at (a) different outer lengths of the square split ring (1700 nm - 1850 nm), (b) different interior lengths of the square split ring (1400 nm - 1700 nm), (c) different radii of the outer round split ring (550 nm - 750 nm), (d) different radii of the interior round split ring (400 nm - 550 nm) keeping other parameters unchanged.

Equations (6)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

ε g = 1 + j σ ( ω ) ε 0 ω t g
σ ( ω ) = σ intra + σ inter
σ intra = j e 2 k B T π 2 ( ω j Γ ) ( E f k B T + 2 l n ( e E f k B T + 1 ) )
σ inter = j e 2 4 π ln ( 2 E f ( ω j Γ ) 2 E f + ( ω j Γ ) )
σ ( ω ) = i e 2 E f π 2 ( ω + i τ )
E f = V f ( π ε 0 ε r V / ( e t s ) ) 1 2
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.