Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Scintillation and photoluminescence property of SiO2 cladding YAP:Ce optical fiber via modified rod-in-tube method

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A SiO2 glass-cladding YAP:Ce crystal fiber (SYCF) was fabricated using the modified rod-in-tube method. The inter-diffusion of Ce3+ between the YAP:Ce core and SiO2 glass cladding is investigated by an energy dispersive spectrometer and a refractive index profiler. Photoluminescence (PL) properties of both SYCF and fiber fabrication materials are compared. A wide PL band from 320 to 600 nm in SYCF is observed showing a different response when compared to YAP:Ce crystal material. The radiative life time of SYCF at 370 and 486 are approximately 29 and 61 ns, respectively. We confirm the PL center belongs to the Ce3+ in two types of YAP:Ce and SiO2 host using decay kinetics. In addition, the competition mechanism of Ce3+ ion transition from YAP to SiO2 is explained using a microstructural model. The scintillation and luminescence properties of SYCF indicate promising potential applications in remote radiative environment monitoring and in radiotherapy.

© 2017 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Scintillating optical fiber sensors have been used to detect high energy particles, such as gamma ray, X-ray, or thermal neutrons in many applications including environmental monitoring around nuclear waste sites, geophysical exploration, brachytherapy, and diagnostic radiology [1–9]. Base on the mechanisms of detection, these sensors can be classified as: intrinsic sensors and extrinsic sensors. In extrinsic sensors, the optical fiber is used only to transmit an optical signal to the detector while coupled to an external scintillator. These types of sensors are based on thermoluminescence [1], optically stimulated luminescence [10]. However, they normally require extra components to the measurement facility which increase the complexity of the system for radiation dosimetry. In intrinsic sensors, the scintillating optical fiber with rare-earth ions doping is able to act as both the sensing medium and the signal transmission medium. Mechanisms such as the radiation induced luminescence and radiation induced absorption are used to detect ionizing radiations [11, 12]. Such sensors have clear advantage of structural and refractive index properties similar to commercial optical fibers, making its very useful in low loss remote dosimetry where direct access is denied [13]. Moreover, simultaneous remote and real-time measurement can be implemented.

In particular, Ce3+ ion doped YAG and YAP single crystal fibers have been fabricated using laser heated pedestal growth [14], micro-pulling down [15] due to its important scintillation properties of the crystal materials, such as high light yield, fast decay time, and good energy resolution. There are several oxygen vacancy and anti-site defects (AD) of Y3 + Al (Y3+ cations in a-sites of Al3+ cations) to relate luminescence [16, 17]. However, most of these fibers have been unclad leading to increases of the scattering loss of scintillation signal. In the mean time, the smaller core diameter and the uniformity of the fiber diameter provide obstacles to meet the requirements of remote fiber optic dosimeter systems. Although Ce3+ doped SiO2 optical fibers have been investigated by sol-gel and powder in tube method [18], the concentration of activator ions is difficult to improve due to ease of volatilization and oxidation under high temperature. To improve the characteristic of the single crystal fibers, SiO2 glass-cladding crystal fibers have been fabricated by employing a tower-drawing with the rod-in-tube (RIT) technique [19]. It is worth noting that the spectral characteristics of the rare-earth ion are strongly host-dependent [20]. A number of point defects can be created in various lattice sites by the high temperature of fiber fabrication due to the presence of both complex cation sublattices and cations of equal charge state [17]. Meanwhile, SiO2 glass material provides a lot of defects as recombination centers because of the short-range order and the absence of long-range order with an extended three-dimensional network which lacks symmetry and periodicity in silica [20]. One needs to notice that the dependency of scintillating and optical properties on single crystal and silica glass host is still not well understood.

In this paper, the scintillating and optical properties of the SiO2 glass-cladding YAP:Ce crystal fibers (SYCF) fabricated by a modified RIT (m-RIT) method [21] are studied. We report the photoluminescence (PL) and decay properties of SYCF with YAP:Ce crystal and pure SiO2 glass based fiber fabrication materials. A recombination competition mechanism of Ce3+ ion between YAP and SiO2 substrate utilizing a microstructure model is used to explain the results. All measurements are directly made using the SYCF samples at room temperature. The origins of recombination center defects, created during the fiber fabrication, are discussed.

2. Fabrication of SYCF optical fiber

The preform of SYCF was fabricated using the m-RIT technique. For a more detailed description of the fabrication procedure see ref [21]. The preform core material was a commercial YAP:Ce crystal rod. A pure SiO2 glass tube was prepared as the preform cladding. Due to the different thermal expansion coefficients between YAP crystal and silica glass, the preform went through the graphite furnace gradually to guarantee efficient melting. The slow drawing speed could also help prevent crack during the fiber fabrication process. The preform was drawn into the SYCF using a drawing tower at an slow pulling rate of 0.4 m/min and the lower temperature of the graphite furnace with approximately 2000°C than conventional RIT [19, 22].

The compositions of the SYCF sample in core area are analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscope (JSM-6700F cold field emission SEM, Japan) combining with Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) (SEM-EDS, MX80-EDS, OXFORD, England) as shown in Fig. 1. The concentration of Ce ion is approximately 0.21 at% and slightly lower than 0.3 at% of Ce ion in YAP crystal source rod, and the concentration of Si ion is about 29.50 at% and lower than 45.63 at% in SiO2 glass tube. The components of Y and Al belong to YAP host is also obtained, as listed in Fig. 1 inset table. The discrepancy in Ce and Si concentration can be attributed to the effective inter-diffusion of Ce ion between YAP:Ce based core and SiO2 based cladding.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 The EDS spectrum and concentration of compositions in the fabricated SYCF core. The inset is the magnified spectrum of Ce component in the red dotted line enclosed frame.

Download Full Size | PDF

To further analyze the characteristic of the effective inter-diffusion via m-RIT method at different fabrication temperature, the refractive index difference (RID) between the SYCF core and the cladding is measured by a commercial refractive index profiler (S14, Photon Kinetics Inc.) and reported in Fig. 2. The fiber sample (denoted as SYCF #1) was fabricated using the above condition mentioned at section 2. For comparison, another fiber sample (denoted as SYCF #2) was fabricated at the heating temperature of about 2100°C in air via RIT method. RID of the SYCF #1 is Δn = 0.0756. The numerical aperture is calculated to be 0.85 at 633 nm. The core and cladding diameters were approximately 50 and 120 μm, respectively. Moreover, the RID of SYCF #2 is only 0.0439 which is still one order of magnitude higher than that of commercial single mode fiber (SMF). Due to the intensified inter-diffusion at high temperature, the boundary between the core and the cladding is not steep but gradually change. Combining with EDS analysis, the variation of RID is much clearer indicating the inter-diffusion can be controlled by the fabrication procedure. The flat refractive index distribution of SYCF #1 fiber core demonstrates that optimized temperature can improve the structure of the crystal fiber and SiO2 cladding during the fiber fabrication procedure.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 RID of the SYCF and SMF samples.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Experimental results and discussion

3.1 PL properties of the SYCF materials

PL spectral measurement was recorded by a fluorescence spectrometer (FS980, Edinburgh Instruments) with xenon lamp excitation. The emission range was set from 300 to 600 nm. The excitation range from 230 to 370 nm was set up to meet the emission. In order to increase the intensity of luminescence, all of the SYCF samples with a typical length of about 30 mm were cleaved, polished and placed horizontally on the sample holder. It is worth noting that the fiber materials were under the influence of high temperature and inter-diffusion during the fiber fabrication. The optical transmission spectrum of such type of fiber has been investigated in our previous work [21]. The measured PL spectra of SYCF, crystal source rod and SiO2 glass-tube, are shown in Figs. 3(a)-3(c), respectively. The emission spectrum of SYCF covers the 320-600 nm range with a primary peak at ~370 nm under 306 nm excitation, as shown in Fig. 3(a). Three decomposed Gaussian components are laid at 348, 381 and 434 nm and denoted as region I, II, III, respectively. The R-square value, namely the coefficient of determination, of the fitting line was 0.9994. It is clearly higher than 0.9963 for two Gaussian fittings. We assume that the three regions are tentatively related to Ce3+ ions in YAP and SiO2 host. The emissions of region I and II originates with a 5d-4f1 transition of the Ce3+ ion in SYCF and YAP [23]. The separation width with approximately 2489 cm−1 is in agreement with the faint energy difference from 2000 to 2500 cm−1 in different host lattices by the spin-orbit coupling interaction [24–26]. On the other hand, the emission peaks at 210 nm (5.9 eV) and 295 nm (4.2 eV) in undoped YAP crystal were reported and belonged to self-trapped excitons and a recombination center, respectively (see Ref [27]. and references there in). Therefore, the impurity Ce3+ ions usually acted as “crystal-modifying” element to occupy YAP lattice. The shoulder peak in region III of the SYCF is cooperating with SiO2 rather than the YAP lattice. This is because there does not exist a peak longer than 430 nm in YAP:Ce crystal [28]. Moreover, the excitation spectra of the SYCF and YAP:Ce rod appears a broad band peaking at ~300 nm attributing to 4f→5d orbital transition of Ce3+ ion, which belongs to Ce3+ ions substitute for Y3+ in sites with C1h symmetry in YAP:Ce crystal [23, 29]. The 5d sublevels of Ce3+ ion in YAP:Ce crystal are experimentally laid at 244, 270, 292, 303 nm as shown in Fig. 3(b). The 244 nm band is ascribed to charge transfer (CT), analogous to those reported for the perovskite host [30]. The peak below 250 nm in SYCF disappeared when compare with YAP:Ce. This is because the AD increase can be aggravated as an inevitable consequence of the high temperature during fiber fabrication [17].

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Optical properties of SYCF (a), YAP:Ce crystal rod (b) and pure SiO2 glass (c). (a) Emission spectrum of SYC fiber by the 306 nm excitation and excitation spectrum of SYC fiber monitored at 370 nm; (b) emission spectrum by the 303 nm excitation and excitation spectrum monitored at 377 nm in YAP:Ce crystal rod; (c) emission spectrum of SiO2 glass by the 240 nm excitation and excitation spectrum monitored at 397 nm. Regions I and II relate to Ce3+ 5d2F5/2and 5d2F7/2, respectively, and region III relates to Ce3+ in SiO2 host.

Download Full Size | PDF

Specially, the shoulder of the emission in SYCF extended to 600 nm is a new recombination center rather than composition from YAP and SiO2 host. The energy level diagram from the measured PL spectrum fitted by Gaussian function is presented in Fig. 4. This result suggests that the emission spectrum of the fiber is not directly overlapped. The β luminescence band at 400 nm [31, 32] and the 470 nm band [33] have been reported and is ascribed to oxygen vacancies defect in pure bulk SiO2 and on the nano-sized silica surface. The formation mechanism to which whether the emission belongs Ce3+ doped or pure SiO2 is still questionable. We shall discuss the possible origin of these mechanisms in the following section.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Energy-level diagram of SYC fiber.

Download Full Size | PDF

3.2 Decay kinetics

To take further insight into the luminescence mechanism of the SYCF, YAP:Ce crystal and pure SiO2, the decay kinetics of the three samples were investigated as shown in Fig. 5. Due to the difference in decay time and excitation wavelength, two measurement setups in the ns time and μs time range were employed. In the ns range, the decay spectra of the 370 and 486 nm emission were performed by a microscopic fluorescence lifetime measurement system (MFLMS) (QM/TM/NIR, Photon Technology International) under excitation of 320 nm laser and FS980 under excitation with 405 nm laser, respectively. The decay life of the μs time range was measured by employing FS980 with xenon excitation. The decay time curves were fitted using the exponential equation I(t)=Aexp(t/τ)+B.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Measured PL decay time of SYCF materials, including YAP:Ce crystal, pure SiO2 and SYCF. (a) Nanosecond order decay time of SYCF and YAP:Ce; (b) microsecond order decay time of pure SiO2.

Download Full Size | PDF

In Fig. 5(a), the main components of decay times of SYCF and YAP:Ce samples are all about 30 ns around 370 nm that is related to the 5d-4f transition of Ce3+ ion in YAP host. This is in good agreement with previous reports [28, 34, 35], and merely a few ns difference is probably due to the ion-pair resonance of energy transfer in rare earth crystal [36]. Meanwhile, in order to distinguish the mechanism of region III, the decay curve of SYCF at 486 nm is obtained by an excitation laser at 405 nm. The 61 ns decay time is clearly longer than that of the emission at 370nm. The presence of this result is an inevitable consequence of Ce3+ diffusion from YAP to SiO2 host because of two reasons: first, the decay of emission peak at 486 nm does not originate from the d-f radiative transition of Ce3+ ion in YAP but similar to SiO2, which is much close to the results reported in bulk SiO2:Ce by Vedda and Chiodini [18, 37]. The slow decay of Ce3+ ion might be obtained at time scale longer than several hundreds ns [37], but the corresponding luminescence intensity of the SYCF are very weak therefore cannot be detected by the microscopic fluorescence lifetime measurement system. In fact, the decay time of SiO2 material without Ce3+ doping varies from 1 μs to 10 ms at different wavelength from 288 to 826 nm [38]. It is worth noting that the scintillation decay shows a noticeable action of fast components originating from radiative recombination of Ce3+ centers [17]. In particular, the rare earth ions play an important role as activators of luminescence doped in different materials. As a comparison, the decay component of a pure undoped SiO2 sample with emission peak at 397 nm is τ = 5.8 μs as shown in Fig. 5(b). The results above illustrate that incorporation of Ce3+ ions in SYCF are the result of effective inter-diffusion of Ce3+ from YAP to SiO2 lattice. It is well known that the decay kinetics response is mainly determined by the radiative transition. Hence, the PL decay time of SYCF from 370 to 486 nm validates the above hypothesis of Ce3+ doped in YAP and SiO2 host.

3.3 Competition of Ce3+ ion between YAP and SiO2 microstructure

The result obtained at the study of PL and decay component allowed us to consider possible mechanisms of luminescence center between YAP and SiO2 host. The optical properties are affected by the total crystal field splitting under different lattice. Crystal field splitting is confirmed by the size and shape of the first anion coordination polyhedron structure around Ce3+ [29]. In this case, SiO2 material as fiber glass tube has no long-range order so that a short-range order atomic arrangement in glass is characterized by an extended three-dimensional network which lacks of symmetry and periodicity [20]. The unique amorphous network of SiO2 is able to create ample space allowing the inter-diffusion of Ce3+ from YAP to SiO2. Meanwhile, the competition mechanism of Ce3+ between YAP and SiO2 is the perturbing defect form by the high temperature in the preform and fiber fabrication. Growth of stable single crystal YAP:Ce is difficult due to decreased stability of the perovskite phase during the single crystal growth process [39]. Pauling’s rules [40], i.e., the minimum free energy principle, in crystal chemistry for the ionic structure can be utilized to evaluate the coordination of the rare-earth ions in crystal. According the rules, the number of coordination anions around the rare-earth cations can be determine by the rare-earth ion to ligand ionic radius ratio. The radius ratio range of 0.414-0.732 should occupy a six-coordinated site to form a octahedron structure [20]. The Y3+ cation (0.97 Å) [41] with radius ratio (RY3+/RO2- = 0.643<0.732) should be six-coordinated by O2- ion. In YAP structure, the Al3+ cations are distributed over the octahedron a-position formed by six oxygen anions O2-, whereas Y3+ cations are located in the spaces between the octahedrons created by twelve nearest O2- anions [16]. The Ce3+ ion radius (1.01Å) is similar to the Y3+ ion radius so that it easily replaces Y3+ site to form Y3 + Al AD in the YAP lattice. To obtain a more precise idea how the mechanism of inter-diffusion of Ce3+ are related to the hosts, we compare SiO2 and YAP:Ce octahedron arrangement, as the models of SiO2 and YAP:Ce based on the minimum free energy principle are schematically shown in Fig. 6. Anion and cation vacancies and the AD with the impurity can be realized. The perturbation of structure will aggravate with the Ce3+ into YAP. On the other hand, Ce3+ ion from YAP:Ce crystal as fiber core material to SiO2 as fiber cladding is increase with the high temperature of fabrication about 2000°C. This is the reason for the PL of SYCF extends to 600 nm that indicates Ce3+ ion has been successfully deposited on SiO2 networks.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 Idealized fragment of SiO2 and YAP:Ce crystal structure.

Download Full Size | PDF

The Si-O distribution functions have revealed that the network system is randomly scattered but homogeneously distributed in the matrix [42]. The network structure can be characterized in terms of rings using the shortest path analysis (see Ref [43], and references there in), which closed paths containing nSi-O segments are referred to as n-membered rings (MRs). In recent years, we reported [42, 44, 45] that the 3-MRs and 4-MRs microstructure models are found to be the most common types in the silica optical fiber materials. In our previous works, the 3-MR segment model of the amorphous silica network has been investigated to calculated the electronic transitions, oscillator strengths and configurations using TDDFT//b3lyp//RECPs [42, 46]. Based on the relationship between the fluorescence characteristics and the oscillator strength, the decay time τ for spontaneous emission is given by the Einstein transition probabilities according to the following formula (in au) [47]

τ=c32(EFlu)2f
where c is the velocity of light, EFlu is the transition energy, f is the oscillator strength. Here EFlu is 2.5514 eV, and f is 0.0548 [46]. Therefore, the decay time τ of Ce-3MR is 64.6 ns at 486 nm. From the preceding discussion, it is clear that the optical properties of SYCF are in well accordance with the experimental results. Combining with the structural analysis and literatures reported, we can conclude the recombination center of Ce3+ in YAP and SiO2 lattice, which is able to characterize the scintillation property of SYCF for remote radiation applications.

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, we investigated the optical properties of the Ce3+-doped SiO2 glass-cladding fiber fabricated by m-RIT method. EDS and RID analysis indicates that the concentration of Ce3+ is decrease due to the successful inter-diffuse effect of Ce3+ ion from YAP:Ce crystal core to SiO2 glass-cladding in the SYCF. The PL properties, including three excitation peaks at 270, 292, 303 nm and a wide emission peaks at 370 nm, are related to the Ce3+ ion d-f transition. Meanwhile, a long shoulder of emission extends to 600 nm is observed that is significantly distinguished to the luminescence feature in YAP:Ce crystal. Moreover, using decay kinetics method, the decay times of emission bands at 370 and 486 nm in SYCF sample are 29 and 61 ns, respectively. The results illustrate an impossibility of luminescence lifetime (>μs) in pure silica material. According to previous works and the minimum free energy principle, we calculate the decay time (peak at 486 nm) of Ce-3MR for the SYCF, which is in good agreement with our experiment results. Therefore, the band extends to 600 nm is still Ce3+ scintillation center. This study provides a microstructural understanding for the SiO2 cladding YAP:Ce optical fiber. We believe that such fiber with fast radiative life, super wide luminescence band, better optical guiding capability, high temperature resistances can provide practical applications in the remote radiative environment monitoring and in radiotherapy.

Funding

National Nature Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (11575108, 61227012, 61605107); Young Eastern Scholar Program at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning (QD2015027); “Young 1000 Talent Plan” Program of China.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Chunlei Yu and Dr. Suya Feng at Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Mr. Xuan Zhang at Edinburgh Instruments Co. for the fluorescence lifetime measurement.

References and links

1. A. L. Huston, B. L. Justus, and T. L. Johnson, “Fiber-optic-coupled, laser heated thermoluminescence dosimeter for remote radiation sensing,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 68(24), 3377–3379 (1996). [CrossRef]  

2. L. Pidol, A. Kahn-Harari, B. Viana, B. Ferrand, P. Dorenbos, J. T. M. Haas, C. W. E. Eijk, and E. Virey, “Scintillation properties of Lu 2 Si2 O7:Ce 3+, a fast and efficient scintillator crystal,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 15(12), 2091–2102 (2003). [CrossRef]  

3. L. M. Moutinho, I. F. Castro, L. Peralta, M. C. Abreu, and J. F. C. A. Veloso, “Development of a scintillating optical fiber dosimeter with silicon photomultipliers,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 735, 640–643 (2014). [CrossRef]  

4. D. McCarthy, S. O. Keeffe, E. Lewis, D. G. Sporea, A. Sporea, I. Tiseanu, P. Woulfe, and J. Cronin, “Radiation dosimeter using an extrinsic fiber optic sensor,” IEEE Sens. J. 14(3), 673–685 (2014). [CrossRef]  

5. W. J. Yoo, D. Jeon, J. K. Seo, S. H. Shin, K.-T. Han, W. S. Youn, S. Cho, and B. Lee, “Development of a scintillating fiber-optic dosimeter for measuring the entrance surface dose in diagnostic radiology,” Radiat. Meas. 48, 29–34 (2013). [CrossRef]  

6. K. W. Jang, T. Yagi, C. H. Pyeon, W. J. Yoo, S. H. Shin, T. Misawa, and B. Lee, “Feasibility of fiber-optic radiation sensor using Cerenkov effect for detecting thermal neutrons,” Opt. Express 21(12), 14573–14582 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. M. Carrara, C. Cavatorta, M. Borroni, C. Tenconi, A. Cerrotta, C. Fallai, G. Gambarini, A. Vedda, and E. Pignoli, “Characterization of a Ce3+ doped SiO2 optical dosimeter for dose measurements in HDR brachytherapy,” Radiat. Meas. 56, 312–315 (2013). [CrossRef]  

8. D. Di Francesca, A. Boukenter, S. Agnello, S. Girard, A. Alessi, P. Paillet, C. Marcandella, N. Richard, F. M. Gelardi, and Y. Ouerdane, “X-ray irradiation effects on fluorine-doped germanosilicate optical fibers,” Opt. Mater. Express 4(8), 1683–1695 (2014). [CrossRef]  

9. J. A. Tanyi, S. P. Krafft, T. Ushino, A. L. Huston, and B. L. Justus, “Performance characteristics of a gated fiber-optic-coupled dosimeter in high-energy pulsed photon radiation dosimetry,” Appl. Radiat. Isot. 68(2), 364–369 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. G. V. M. Williams and S. G. Raymond, “Fiber-optic-coupled RbMgF3:Eu2+ for remote radiation dosimetry,” Radiat. Meas. 46(10), 1099–1102 (2011). [CrossRef]  

11. D. Sporea, L. Mihai, I. Vâţă, D. McCarthy, S. O’Keeffe, and E. Lewis, “Characterization of Scintillating X-ray Optical Fiber Sensors,” Sensors (Basel) 14(2), 3445–3457 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. J. Jin, R. Xu, J. Liu, and N. Song, “Experimental investigation of the factors influencing temperature dependence of radiation-induced attenuation in optical fiber,” Opt. Fiber Technol. 20(2), 110–115 (2014). [CrossRef]  

13. A. V. Kir’yanov, S. Ghosh, M. C. Paul, Y. O. Barmenkov, V. Aboites, and N. S. Kozlova, “Ce-doped and Ce/Au-codoped alumino-phospho-silicate fibers: Spectral attenuation trends at high-energy electron irradiation and posterior low-power optical bleaching,” Opt. Mater. Express 4(3), 434–448 (2014). [CrossRef]  

14. C. D. Nie, S. Bera, and J. A. Harrington, “Growth of single-crystal YAG fiber optics,” Opt. Express 24(14), 15522–15527 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. M. Alshourbagy, S. Bigotta, D. Herbert, A. Del Guerra, A. Toncelli, and M. Tonelli, “Optical and scintillation properties of doped YAlO3 crystal fibers grown by -pulling down technique,” J. Cryst. Growth 303(2), 500–505 (2007). [CrossRef]  

16. Y. Zorenko, V. Gorbenko, T. Voznyak, T. Zorenko, M. Nikl, and K. Nejezchleb, “Luminescence of La3+ and Sc3+ impurity centers in YAlO3 single-crystalline films,” J. Lumin. 128(4), 595–602 (2008). [CrossRef]  

17. V. V. Laguta, M. Nikl, A. Vedda, E. Mihokova, J. Rosa, and K. Blazek, “Hole and electron traps in the YAlO3 single crystal scintillator,” Phys. Rev. B 80(4), 045114 (2009). [CrossRef]  

18. A. Vedda, N. Chiodini, D. Di Martino, M. Fasoli, S. Keffer, A. Lauria, M. Martini, F. Moretti, G. Spinolo, M. Nikl, N. Solovieva, and G. Brambilla, “Ce3+-doped fibers for remote radiation dosimetry,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85(26), 6356–6358 (2004). [CrossRef]  

19. C. N. Liu, Y. C. Huang, Y. S. Lin, S. Y. Wang, P. L. Huang, T. T. Shih, S. L. Huang, and W. H. Cheng, “Fabrication and characteristics of Ce-doped fiber for high-resolution OCT source,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 26(15), 1499–1502 (2014). [CrossRef]  

20. J. Wang, W. S. Brocklesby, J. R. Lincoln, J. E. Townsend, and D. N. Payne, “Local structures of rare-earth ions in glasses: the ‘crystal-chemistry’ approach,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 163(3), 261–267 (1993). [CrossRef]  

21. Q. Guo, C. Mou, L. He, W. Luo, S. Huang, G. D. Peng, and T. Wang, “SiO2 glass-cladding YAP:Ce scintillating fiber for remote radiation dosimeter,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 29(2), 251–254 (2017). [CrossRef]  

22. Y.-C. Huang, J.-S. Wang, Y.-K. Lu, W.-K. Liu, K.-Y. Huang, S.-L. Huang, and W.-H. Cheng, “Preform fabrication and fiber drawing of 300 nm broadband Cr-doped fibers,” Opt. Express 15(22), 14382–14388 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. E. Mihóková, M. Nikl, M. Bacci, M. Dušek, and V. Petříček, “Assignment of 4f-5d absorption bands in Ce-doped RAlO3 (R=La, Gd, Y, Lu) perovskites,” Phys. Rev. B 79(19), 195130 (2009). [CrossRef]  

24. R. R. Jacobs, W. F. Krupke, and M. J. Weber, “Measurement of excited-state-absorption loss for Ce3+ in Y3Al5O12 and implications for tunable 5d→4f rare-earth lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 33(5), 410–412 (1978). [CrossRef]  

25. C. Canevali, M. Mattoni, F. Morazzoni, R. Scotti, M. Casu, A. Musinu, R. Krsmanovic, S. Polizzi, A. Speghini, and M. Bettinelli, “Stability of Luminescent Trivalent Cerium in Silica Host Glasses Modified by Boron and Phosphorus,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127(42), 14681–14691 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

26. G. Blasse and A. Bril, “Investigation of some Ce3+-activated phosphors,” J. Chem. Phys. 47(12), 5139–5145 (1967). [CrossRef]  

27. V. Babin, P. Fabeni, A. Krasnikov, K. Nejezchleb, M. Nikl, G. P. Pazzi, T. Savikhina, and S. Zazubovich, “Irregular Ce3+and defect-related luminescence in YAlO3 single crystal,” J. Lumin. 124(2), 273–278 (2007). [CrossRef]  

28. T. B. de Queiroz, C. R. Ferrari, D. Ulbrich, R. Doyle, and A. S. S. de Camargo, “Luminescence characteristics of YAP:Ce scintillator powders and composites,” Opt. Mater. 32(11), 1480–1484 (2010). [CrossRef]  

29. P. Dorenbos, “5d-level energies of Ce3+ and the crystalline environment. IV. Aluminates and “simple” oxides,” J. Lumin. 99(3), 283–299 (2002). [CrossRef]  

30. M. Nikl, K. Kamada, V. Babin, J. Pejchal, K. Pilarova, E. Mihokova, A. Beitlerova, K. Bartosiewicz, S. Kurosawa, and A. Yoshikawa, “Defect engineering in Ce-doped aluminum garnet single crystal scintillators,” Cryst. Growth Des. 14(9), 4827–4833 (2014). [CrossRef]  

31. A. Anedda, C. M. Carbonaro, R. Corpino, and A. Serpi, “Low temperature time resolved photoluminescence of the 3.1 and 4.2 eV emission bands in Ge-doped silica,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 216, 19–25 (1997). [CrossRef]  

32. G. Q. Xu, Z. X. Zheng, W. M. Tang, and Y. C. Wu, “Multi-peak behavior of photoluminescence of silica particles heat-treated in hydrogen at elevated temperature,” J. Lumin. 126(1), 43–47 (2007). [CrossRef]  

33. H. Z. Song, X. M. Bao, N. S. Li, and X. L. Wu, “Strong ultraviolet photoluminescence from silicon oxide films prepared by magnetron sputtering,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 72(3), 356–358 (1998). [CrossRef]  

34. L. Hongiun, Z. Guangjun, S. Liangbi, J. Yunxia, Z. Guoqing, and X. Jun, “Spectroscopic properties of Ce:YAP scintillation crystal grown by temperature gradient technique,” J. Rare Earths 25(5), 596–600 (2007). [CrossRef]  

35. S. Baccaro, K. Blaẑek, F. de Notaristefani, P. Maly, J. A. Mares, R. Pani, R. Pellegrini, and A. Soluri, “Scintillation properties of YAP:Ce,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 361(1), 209–215 (1995). [CrossRef]  

36. F. Varsanyi and G. H. Dieke, “Ion-pair resonance mechanism of energy transfer in rare earth crystal fluorescence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 7(12), 442–443 (1961). [CrossRef]  

37. N. Chiodini, M. Fasoli, M. Martini, E. Rosetta, G. Spinolo, A. Vedda, M. Nikl, N. Solovieva, A. Baraldi, and R. Capelletti, “High-efficiency SiO2:Ce3+ glass scintillators,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 81(23), 4374–4376 (2002). [CrossRef]  

38. Y. Sakurai and K. Nagasawa, “A study of the PL emission mechanisms in silica glass by considering the growth of the PL,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 291(1–2), 86–92 (2001). [CrossRef]  

39. K. Blazek, A. Krasnikov, K. Nejezchleb, M. Nikl, T. Savikhina, and S. Zazubovich, “Luminescence and defects creation in Ce3+-doped YAlO3 and Lu0.3Y0.7AlO3 crystals,” Phys. Status Solidi 242(6), 1315–1323 (2005). [CrossRef]  

40. L. Pauling, “The principles determining the structure of complex ionic crystals,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 51(4), 1010–1026 (1929). [CrossRef]  

41. R. D. Shannon, “Radii for All Species, ” http://abulafia.mt.ic.ac.uk/shannon/radius.php.

42. Y. Dong, J. Wen, F. Pang, Z. Chen, J. Wang, Y. Luo, G. Peng, and T. Wang, “Optical properties of PbS-doped silica optical fiber materials based on atomic layer deposition,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 320, 372–378 (2014). [CrossRef]  

43. A. Pasquarello and R. Car, “Identification of Raman defect lines as signatures of ring structures in vitreous silica,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 80(23), 5145–5147 (1998). [CrossRef]  

44. T. Y. Wang, J. X. Wen, W. Y. Luo, Z. Y. Xiao, and Z. Y. Chen, “Influences of irradiation on network microstructure of low water peak optical fiber material,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 356(25–27), 1332–1336 (2010). [CrossRef]  

45. J. Wen, T. Wang, F. Pang, X. Zeng, Z. Chen, and G.-D. Peng, “Photoluminescence characteristics of Bi (m +) -doped silica optical fiber: structural model and theoretical analysis,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 52(12R), 122501 (2013). [CrossRef]  

46. X. Sun, J. Wen, Q. Guo, F. Pang, Z. Chen, Y. Luo, G. Peng, and T. Wang, “Fluorescence properties and energy level structure of Ce-doped silica fiber materials,” Opt. Mater. Express 7(3), 751–759 (2017). [CrossRef]  

47. V. Lukeš, A. Aquino, and H. Lischka, “Theoretical study of vibrational and optical spectra of methylene-bridged oligofluorenes,” J. Phys. Chem. A 109(45), 10232–10238 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 The EDS spectrum and concentration of compositions in the fabricated SYCF core. The inset is the magnified spectrum of Ce component in the red dotted line enclosed frame.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 RID of the SYCF and SMF samples.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Optical properties of SYCF (a), YAP:Ce crystal rod (b) and pure SiO2 glass (c). (a) Emission spectrum of SYC fiber by the 306 nm excitation and excitation spectrum of SYC fiber monitored at 370 nm; (b) emission spectrum by the 303 nm excitation and excitation spectrum monitored at 377 nm in YAP:Ce crystal rod; (c) emission spectrum of SiO2 glass by the 240 nm excitation and excitation spectrum monitored at 397 nm. Regions I and II relate to Ce3+ 5d2F5/2and 5d2F7/2, respectively, and region III relates to Ce3+ in SiO2 host.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Energy-level diagram of SYC fiber.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Measured PL decay time of SYCF materials, including YAP:Ce crystal, pure SiO2 and SYCF. (a) Nanosecond order decay time of SYCF and YAP:Ce; (b) microsecond order decay time of pure SiO2.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Idealized fragment of SiO2 and YAP:Ce crystal structure.

Equations (1)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

τ = c 3 2 ( E F l u ) 2 f
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.