Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

500 W rod-type 4 × 4 multicore ultrafast fiber laser

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We present a coherently combined femtosecond fiber chirped-pulse-amplification system based on a rod-type, ytterbium-doped, multicore fiber with 4 × 4 cores. A high average power of up to 500 W (after combination and compression) could be achieved at 10 MHz repetition rate with excellent beam quality. Additionally, < 500 fs pulses with up to 600 µJ of pulse energy were also realized with this setup. This architecture is intrinsically power scalable by increasing the number of cores in the fiber.

© 2022 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

Introduction. Fiber laser systems employed for the amplification of ultrashort pulses have seen a rapid power evolution in recent decades. Today, average powers at the kW level and peak powers of multiple GW are available [1,2]. However, increasing the performance of ultrafast laser systems even further is challenging. In the case of fiber amplifiers, the effect of transverse mode instability is the most severe average-power-limiting effect [3,4]. On the other hand, the combination of the self-focusing limit and the maximum achievable stretched pulse duration in the chirped-pulse-amplification (CPA) regime (restricted due to the footprint and grating size of the stretcher/compressor) hinder further peak-power scaling. On top of this, the maximum extractable energy from a single-core fiber also provides a hard limit on performance scaling when taking the stretched pulse duration into account.

The coherent combination of pulses emitted from multiple spatially separated amplifiers is considered a promising path to overcome these limitations [5]. This concept allows the achievable average power and peak power to be increased linearly in proportion to the number of amplifiers. In particular, the actual achievable combined power value depends on the combination efficiency and, in the best case, is equal to the number of amplifier channels. In recent years, significant progress has been made in implementing this technology in state-of-the-art laser systems, which has resulted in record performance values of more than 10 kW average power [6] and multi-mJ pulse energy emission [7]. In these systems, the footprint and the component count grow linearly with the number of combined amplifiers, and the size of a single amplifier is the main determinant of the system’s overall size. Thus, the scaling of such architectures by multiple orders of magnitude is a challenging task. In order to realize systems with a very large number of channels in the future, densely scalable architectures must be developed. This can be achieved by moving from single-channel components to integrated multi-channel components. The integration of multiple amplification channels into a multicore fiber (MCF), with subsequent coherent combination of the beams, has already been investigated for tiled-aperture and filled-aperture combinations in low-power experiments [8,9]. A first combination experiment with a flexible 4 × 4 MCF and picosecond pulses with compact beam splitters, beam combiners, and a channel count-scalable phase stabilization system has been presented [10]. Additionally, spectral beam combination with MCFs has been demonstrated [11,12].

To reach the performance level of the previously mentioned state-of-the-art laser systems with multiple discrete amplifiers, advanced high-power-compatible fiber designs can be utilized. In this Letter, we present an all-glass, rod-type, MCF with 4 × 4 ytterbium-doped cores and an embedded fluorine-doped layer for pump light guidance. Filled-aperture coherent combination of the output beams enables a CPA system that can deliver up to 500 W of compressed average power and, in a lower repetition rate configuration, up to 600-µJ-energy femtosecond pulses.

Experimental setup. In the experimental setup, the ultrashort pulses are generated in a frontend system comprising a femtosecond fiber oscillator, chirped fiber Bragg gratings (CFBGs) for pulse stretching, multiple preamplifiers, a spectral phase-shaping system, and an acousto-optic modulator (AOM) to set the pulse repetition rate. This frontend emits stretched femtosecond pulses of 1 ns duration with an average power of some tens of milliwatts depending on the repetition rate. These pulses are seeded to the final preamplifier, which delivers 3 W of average power.

The output beam is then guided to the main amplifier stage as shown in Fig. 1. It is split into a 4 × 4 beam array with 4 mm of pitch between adjacent beams using segmented-mirror splitters (SMS) [10,13,14]. After that, the array is guided towards a monolithic piezo array with attached mirrors used for beam phasing in a double-pass configuration by setting the quarter-wave plate (λ/4) to an angle of 45°. As the pitch of the piezo array is 9 mm, the incident beam array has to be magnified and, after reflection, demagnified again using a telescope. A lens array with 90 mm focal length is placed in front of the piezo array to compensate for static (the largest component) and dynamic tilts of the mirrors attached to the piezos. Additionally, glass plates of different thicknesses are inserted into the beam paths to compensate for differences in the optical path lengths between individual cores of the fiber (200 µm peak-to-peak difference); this was optimized after installation of the fiber.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Schematic setup of the rod-type, 4 × 4 multicore amplifier with added components for beam splitting, beam combination, and phase stabilization as well as for path-length adaptation and polarization control. An image of the fiber end facet is shown on the left.

Download Full Size | PDF

Afterwards, two wave-plate arrays with small quarter-wave and half-wave plates are placed in the path of the beam array to compensate for polarization changes in the fiber. Finally, the beam array is imaged using two 4f telescopes onto the end facet of the rod-type 4 × 4 fiber, thus coupling the beam array into the fiber cores. The employed MCF is produced using an all-glass preform with an integrated octagonal fluorine-doped cladding (NA 0.22) that provides pump guidance. Using deep-hole drilling of the fiber preform, the 4 × 4 structure for the cores is realized with a pitch-to-core-size ratio of 2.5. This is sufficient to avoid optical and thermal coupling effects between the cores [15]. After that, rods made out of ytterbium-doped glass material [16] were inserted into the stretched preform before the fiber was drawn. This manufacturing results in a cost-effective and highly scalable manufacturing process. A variety of fiber sizes were drawn from this preform by varying the drawing speed. A fiber with 21 µm core diameters (NA 0.04), a cladding diameter of 310 µm and a 1 mm outer diameter (see Fig. 1) was chosen for this experiment. This size offers a good compromise between a sufficiently large core diameter for energy extraction and fundamental mode operation. The fiber has a length of 1.1 m, fused-silica endcaps, and is mounted into a water-cooled module that allows for efficient heat removal. The fiber is counter-pumped using a fiber-coupled pump diode emitting a maximum of 800 W at 976 nm (pump absorption 50 dB/m). For some of the experiments, an additional 600 W pump diode was used to bi-directionally pump the fiber.

In the described configuration, an optical-to-optical efficiency of 70% from total pump power to MCF output power is achieved at 1 kW output power measured directly at the fiber output (see Fig. 2). After amplification, the emitted beam array is magnified again with two 4f telescopes to achieve a beam array with a pitch of 4 mm (the same as on the seed side). A thin-film polarizer (TFP) is inserted to filter out any residual emission in the wrong polarization state. Finally, the beams are recombined using SMS elements in a configuration analogous to that of the beam-splitting stage. At this point, the non-combining parts of the beam are reflected from the SMS elements as a 3 × 4 array in the first combination step and a 1 × 3 array in the second combination step. A fraction of these beams are guided towards two photodiode arrays with a matching number of detectors. A sequential locking scheme, as described in [10], is employed with modulation frequencies of 6 kHz for the first row of beams and 4 kHz for the other ones. Finally, the combined beam propagates through a grating compressor with a total efficiency of around 90%. In the next sections we describe the experimental results obtained at two different repetition rates and discuss the observed effects in both operating regimes.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Slope of the output power directly measured behind the fiber.

Download Full Size | PDF

High-repetition-rate operation. At a high repetition rate of 10 MHz, nonlinear effects in the amplifiers can be neglected. At first, the waveplate array was optimized in the passive state (i.e., no amplification) to optimize the transmission through the TFP. With a seed power of 3 W, the average power emitted by the system was then measured at different points: behind the TFP (i.e., in front of the combination elements), after the combination stage, and finally after compression. The combination efficiency was determined by dividing the average power after the combination stage by the average power behind the TFP. On the other hand, the compressor efficiency was calculated using the relation between the average power in front of and the average power behind the compressor. The pump power of the counter-pumping diode was then increased up to the maximum value.

In Fig. 3, both relations are shown as a function of the compressed combined average power for this operating regime. As can be seen, a combination efficiency of around 85% was sustained throughout. To increase the average power even further, a co-pumping diode was also employed. However, coupling the transmitted pump light backpropagating into the diode modules, resulting in lasing at shifted wavelengths, limited the maximum pump power in the bi-directionally pumped scheme. Hence, only a fraction of the available pump power of the second diode was employed. In this configuration, 507 W of average power were achieved at a combination efficiency of approximately 85%. Hence, further average power scaling will be possible if laser diodes with higher power (and brightness) are employed, a fiber with a larger cladding diameter is chosen, or this lasing mechanism is suppressed. In addition to the average power, the quality of both the beam and the pulses is of major importance. Figure 4 shows the M2 measurement at full average power.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Combination efficiency as a function of the compressed combined output power for both the high-repetition-rate (upper solid line) and the high-pulse-energy (lower solid line) regimes. Additionally, the compressor efficiency is shown for the first case (dashed line).

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. M2 measurement at the output of the compressor at 507 W average power, and output intensity profile of the combined beam (left inset) and the non-combining emission at the first beam combiner (right inset).

Download Full Size | PDF

A near-diffraction-limited beam quality of less than 1.1 × 1.1 was achieved. Measuring this value for the individual beams emitted by the fiber resulted values of about 1.2–1.4. Hence, the coherent combination process results in an improvement in the output beam quality. This also explains the modest combination efficiency achieved, since the higher-order mode content of the individual cores is filtered out, as can be seen in the right inset, thus resulting in a penalty for this performance parameter. After optimization with a phase shaper, the AC duration of the combined pulse in the frontend was 400 fs (see Fig. 5), close to the transform (TF) limit calculated from the spectrum of 375 fs.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Autocorrelation traces (and spectra in the inset) at the maximum output power in the high-average-power and high-pulse-energy regimes.

Download Full Size | PDF

The stability of the system was determined by measuring a photodiode trace of the system output over 20 s. A low-pass filter with a 2 MHz cutoff frequency was used to filter out the pulse repetition rate while preserving high-frequency noise components.

An accumulated RMS value of 0.32% was measured at full average power (see Fig. 6). A large part of this value (about 0.1%) was caused by a peak at 450 kHz, which was directly emitted from the frontend system and was not related to the main amplifier itself. Hence, further improvements should be possible in the future.

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Noise spectrum of the output signal behind the compressor (upper curve) and dark current of the photodiode (lower curve). The lower plot is the integrated amplitude noise.

Download Full Size | PDF

High-pulse-energy operation. In a second experiment, higher pulse energies were targeted by reducing the repetition rate to 687 kHz. This causes nonlinear effects to become more prominent, which manifests itself in different observations.

On the one hand, nonlinear polarization rotation was observed in the cores, reducing the TFP throughput from 92% in the high-repetition-rate case to 86%. This was compensated with the wave-plate array by optimizing the transmission through the TFP again at the targeted average power and pulse energy regime. While this results in the same output polarization for each core, the input polarizations will be different. Therefore, the polarization states during propagation and the encountered nonlinearities are different for each core. Hence, their accumulated B-integrals are different, which results in an additional loss of combination efficiency. Multicore fibers with polarization-maintaining structures will provide a solution to this issue in the future. On the other hand, the absolute B-integral imprints a spectral phase on each pulse, which has to be compensated by the phase shaper to maintain acceptable pulse quality. An AC duration of 420 fs (385 fs TF limit) was achieved after this optimization at the highest pulse energy. Figure 3 shows the combination efficiency for 687 kHz operation. Please note that only single-side pumping was employed in this configuration, as the pump diode lasing threshold occurs earlier and results in only a small improvement. This is caused by the lower amplification efficiency due to the higher pulse energy extraction, which results in more transmitted pump light. As can be seen, the combination efficiency drops slightly. Nevertheless, a value of 83% was achieved at 412 W average power, corresponding to 600 µJ of total output pulse energy.

Summary. In summary, we have built a femtosecond fiber CPA system based on coherent combination of the output of an all-glass 4 × 4 multicore fiber. This system allows for compressed output average powers of up to 500 W. Additionally, pulse energies of up to 600 µJ could be achieved at 410 W average power. To the best of our knowledge, these are the highest performance values for a multicore-fiber-based coherently combined femtosecond laser system to date. A maximum combination efficiency of 85% was measured, which dropped slightly to 83% when the system was operated at higher pulse energies.

Performance scaling of this architecture can be achieved by increasing the core count and/or the core diameter of the fiber. In this respect, while the pulse energy scaling potential is clearly given by the total mode area (determined by the total number of cores and their area), the average power scaling potential is less obviously linked to the number of cores. However, a favorable average power scaling dependency on the number of cores up to the multi-kW regime has already been theoretically predicted [17]. This paves the way to the development of high-power, high-energy ultrafast fiber laser systems in the future.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (259607349, 416342637); Thüringer Aufbaubank (TAB-FGR0074); Free State of Thuringia and the European Social Fund (RATI); European Research Council (835306); Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Advanced photon sources (CAPS); Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (13N15244).

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this Letter are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

1. S. Eidam, E. Hanf, T. V Seise, T. Andersen, C. Gabler, T. Wirth, J. Schreiber, A. Limpert, and Tünnermann, Opt. Lett. 35, 94 (2010). [CrossRef]  

2. T. Eidam, J. Rothhardt, F. Stutzki, F. Jansen, S. Hädrich, H. Carstens, C. Jauregui, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, Opt. Express 19, 255 (2011). [CrossRef]  

3. A. V. Smith and J. J. Smith, Opt. Express 19, 10180 (2011). [CrossRef]  

4. C. Jauregui, C. Stihler, and J. Limpert, Adv. Opt. Photonics 12, 429 (2020). [CrossRef]  

5. T. Y. Fan, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 11, 567 (2005). [CrossRef]  

6. M. Müller, C. Aleshire, A. Klenke, E. Haddad, F. Légaré, A. Tünnermann, and J. Limpert, Opt. Lett. 45, 3083 (2020). [CrossRef]  

7. H. Stark, J. Buldt, M. Müller, A. Klenke, A. Tünnermann, and J. Limpert, Opt. Lett. 44, 5529 (2019). [CrossRef]  

8. L. P. Ramirez, M. Hanna, G. Bouwmans, H. El Hamzaoui, M. Bouazaoui, D. Labat, K. Delplace, J. Pouysegur, F. Guichard, P. Rigaud, V. Kermène, A. Desfarges-Berthelemot, A. Barthélémy, F. Prévost, L. Lombard, Y. Zaouter, F. Druon, and P. Georges, Opt. Express 23, 5406 (2015). [CrossRef]  

9. F. Prevost, L. Lombard, J. Primot, L. P. Ramirez, L. Bigot, G. Bouwmans, and M. Hanna, Opt. Express 25, 9528 (2017). [CrossRef]  

10. A. Klenke, M. Müller, H. Stark, F. Stutzki, C. Hupel, T. Schreiber, A. Tünnermann, and J. Limpert, Opt. Lett. 43, 1519 (2018). [CrossRef]  

11. P. Rigaud, V. Kermene, G. Bouwmans, L. Bigot, A. Desfarges-Berthelemot, D. Labat, A. Le Rouge, T. Mansuryan, and A. Barthélémy, Opt. Express 21, 13555 (2013). [CrossRef]  

12. P. Rigaud, V. Kermene, G. Bouwmans, L. Bigot, A. Desfarges-Berthelemot, and A. Barthélémy, Opt. Express 23, 27448 (2015). [CrossRef]  

13. R. Harney and J. Schipper, “Passive and Active Pulse Stacking Scheme for Pulse Shaping,” U.S. patent 4059759 (1977).

14. L. Shimshi, A. A. Ishaaya, V. Ekhouse, N. Davidson, and A. A. Friesem, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 041103 (2006). [CrossRef]  

15. H.-J. Otto, A. Klenke, C. Jauregui, F. Stutzki, J. Limpert, and A. Tünnermann, Opt. Lett. 39, 2680 (2014). [CrossRef]  

16. E. Mobini, S. Rostami, M. Peysokhan, A. Albrecht, S. Kuhn, S. Hein, C. Hupel, J. Nold, N. Haarlammert, T. Schreiber, R. Eberhardt, A. Tünnermann, M. Sheik-Bahae, and A. Mafi, Commun. Phys. 3, 134 (2020). [CrossRef]  

17. A. Steinkopff, C. Jauregui, C. Aleshire, A. Klenke, and J. Limpert, Opt. Express 28, 38093 (2020). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this Letter are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Schematic setup of the rod-type, 4 × 4 multicore amplifier with added components for beam splitting, beam combination, and phase stabilization as well as for path-length adaptation and polarization control. An image of the fiber end facet is shown on the left.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Slope of the output power directly measured behind the fiber.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Combination efficiency as a function of the compressed combined output power for both the high-repetition-rate (upper solid line) and the high-pulse-energy (lower solid line) regimes. Additionally, the compressor efficiency is shown for the first case (dashed line).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. M2 measurement at the output of the compressor at 507 W average power, and output intensity profile of the combined beam (left inset) and the non-combining emission at the first beam combiner (right inset).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Autocorrelation traces (and spectra in the inset) at the maximum output power in the high-average-power and high-pulse-energy regimes.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Noise spectrum of the output signal behind the compressor (upper curve) and dark current of the photodiode (lower curve). The lower plot is the integrated amplitude noise.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.