Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Two-dimensional periodic structure induced by single-beam femtosecond laser pulses irradiating titanium

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A novel two-dimensional (2-D) periodic structure on the ablated hole wall is formed by using the method of single-beam femtosecond laser pulses irradiating a titanium target. This 2-D structure on the ablated surface, after consecutive irradiation of 10000 pulses, presents different spatial periods which characters a 1500 nm period along the hole wall in the vertical direction and a 400 nm period in the azimuthal direction of the hole. The reported experimental results can be well interpreted by a prophetic theoretical model of Bonch-Bruevich (A. M. Bonch-Bruevich et al., Opt. Eng. 31, 718 (1992)).

©2009 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Periodic structures (also termed ripples or nanogratings) induced by single-beam femtosecond laser ablating solids, have attracted extensive attention [16], including their distinguishing features [79], formation mechanism [1014] and potential applications [1518]. In majority of the publications, the ripples frequently appeared on the materials surface or at the bottom of the shallow crater are one-dimension periodic structures [118]. Recent, one-dimensional ripple-like structures on the ablated hole wall are also observed on some different materials, such as copper [19] and some semiconductors in liquid environment [20]. However, to the best of our knowledge, until now there has been no observation of the 2-D ripple-like periodic structure generated on the hole wall of some metal just by a single laser beam, and its formation mechanism has not been fully understood. In this paper, we have observed a 2-D ripple structure on the ablated hole wall of the titanium irradiated by a single beam 800nm femtosecond laser pulses in the air. This phenomenon is interpreted as the interference between the incident light field and the excited surface plasmons. And it was confirmed by the relevant elevation angle measurement of the 2-D structure on the hole wall with a confocal laser scanning microscope. Additional a fine cone structure with size of 400 nm was also observed on an ablated hole under different laser fluence.

2. Experiments

In our experiment, an amplified Ti:sapphire laser system(Legend Elite-USP-HE, Coherent Corp.) operating at a central wavelength λ L = 800nm and 1 kHz repetition rate was used as the irradiation source. The pulse energy and pulse duration were kept constant at 3.5mJ and 35fs, respectively. The linear polarized laser beam was focused onto a vertically standing sample with a 40-cm-focal-length lens at normal incidence. The sample was mounted on a three-dimensional translation stage. The laser spot size on the sample was approximately 70 μm. The number of laser pulses, N, applied to the sample is selected by an electromechanical shutter. A half-wave plate and polarizer assembly was used to control the laser fluence, F. The laser fluence is determined by F = P/[f rep × π × (d/2)2], where P is the laser power, d is the diameter of the focused spot which is measured by a beam quality diagnostics (LaserCam-HR(RoHS), Coherent Corp.), and f rep is the repetition frequency of the femtosecond laser. After mechanical polished, a pure titanium bulk sample (99.999%) was used in this experiment. All experiments were performed in air.

The morphology of femtosecond laser-induced surface modifications and the character of the holes wall were inspected by using an ultrahigh resolution field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM). To give a better description, the wall of the ablated hole is which covers the 2-D periodic structure is an important parameter to evaluate the interaction between the laser and hole wall. To obtain this angle, a confocal laser scanning microscope was used to reconstruct the three-dimensional profile of the ablated hole. A suitable section plane corresponding to the location of the SEM studied 2-D periodic structure was created to extract a profile curve and to calculate the relevant elevation angle of the hole wall. The relationship between the relevant elevation angle and the laser incident angle on the hole wall are shown in Fig. 1(b) .

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 (a) Schematic drawing of the different areas on the hole wall. The arrow indicates the incident laser polarization direction. (b) Analysis schematic for the structure formation on the central zone of the area 1 where the laser is p-polarization incident.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Results and discussion

At the laser fluence of 3.54J/cm2, single laser pulse can ablate the material. As the number of pulses increases, more materials were ablated and ejected out of the surface. After the Ti surface irradiated with N = 10000 pulses, a main hole with depth of 100μm was formed in the laser irradiation zoom, as shown in Fig. 2(a) . At the bottom of this main hole, a small hole is formed as shown in the Fig. 3(b) . Figure 2(b) shows a pronounced 2-D ripple structure on the central zone of the area 1.These two inter-perpendicular ripples show different spatial frequencies and different orientations. The spatial period d 1 of the high-spatial-frequency structure (HSFS) is about 400nm, and the spatial period d 2 of the low-spatial-frequency structure (LSFS) is about 1500nm. The details of the relative orientation of these two ripple structures can refer to the Fig. 1 and Fig. 2(b). The LSFS is along the hole wall in the vertical direction, and the HSFS is in the azimuthal direction of the hole. For the 2-D ripple structure on the central zone of the area 1, the grating vector of its HSFS is parallel to the incident light polarization, and the grating vector of its LSFS is perpendicular to the incident light polarization. Different to the structure on the central zone of the area 1, there is just one-dimensional ripple structure appeared on the center zone of the area 2, which is shown in Fig. 2(c). In sharp contrast to the ripple structure, the nanocone structure was found on a small hole wall at bottom of main hole, which is shown in Fig. 2(d).

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 SEM images of Ti hole irradiated by 800-nm femtosecond laser with a fluence of 3.54J/cm2. (a) The hole formation after N = 10000 pulses. The arrow indicates the incident laser polarization direction. (b) Two dimensional ripple structure on the central zone of the area 1. The coordinate axis here corresponds to that in the Fig. 1(b). (c) One dimensional ripple structure on the central zone of the area 2. (d) Cone structure on a small hole wall at the bottom.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 (a) Texture image of the hole which measured by a confocal microscope. The red section is used for measuring the elevation angle of the plate of the two-dimension ripple-like structure on the wall. (b) The contour line of the hole. The green triangle is used to measure the elevation angle, and the elevation angle is 68°.

Download Full Size | PDF

The periodic structure on the ablated hole wall is a special case of the periodic surface structure induced by laser at an obliquely incident angle. As pointed out earlier, the formation of periodic ripple-like structure on the metal surface is due to the interference between the incident laser wave and the excited surface plasmons [21,22], and this interference causes a periodic intensity variation in the surface and gives rise to the formation of the periodic surface structure. In the case of p-polarized laser light and at a range of incident angles greater than 50°, the inter-perpendicular ripples have been observed. For a smooth planar metal surface, the periodic structure with grating vector parallel to the incident light polarization and the type-c periodic structure with grating vector perpendicular to the incident light polarization have been simultaneously obtained in the irradiating area [7]. In most case, the type-c structure is only observed in the peripheral area of the beam spot and the other ripple structure is in the central area [7]. Thus, it is hard to observe the crossed ripples. However, the ablated hole wall is curved surface, and at different area on the hole wall the laser polarization is different. It makes the exciting of the plasmons become more complex. A large numbers of surface plasmons may be excited and propagate along the curved surface. For 2-D ripple structure observed in this experiment, the laser induced two inter-perpendicular ripples is due to two plasmons strongly excited by p-polarized laser with peak efficacy factor [21].

For p-polarized laser light, the spatial period d 1 and d 2 of the inter-perpendicular ripples can be written as [22]

HSFS: d1=λ/(η±sinθ) with g1E
LSFS: d2=λ/(η2sin2θ)1/2 with g2E
where λ is the laser wavelength, θ is the angle of incidence of the laser on the hole wall, η = k s/k = Re[ε/(ε + 1)]1/2 is the effective refractive index of the air-metal interface for surface plasmons, k s is the wave vector of surface plasmon polariton, k is the incident laser wave vector, ε is the dielectric constant of the metal, g is the grating vector and E is the electrical field vector of the incident wave. For a vacuum-metal interface, η is calculated to be 1.004 at λ = 800nm for Ti (ε = (3.15 + i4.01)2) [23].Owing to the presence of ripple with grating vector parallel to the incident light polarization is 400nm which is shorter than the laser wavelength and the η for solid Ti is about 1, d 1 should choose λ/(η + sinθ) to evaluate. From the data d 1 = 400nm, d 2 = 1500nm and λ = 800nm, we deduced that η ≈1.0711, θ ≈68°. When the laser normally irradiates a metal surface, for the ablated hole wall, the incident angle is equal to the elevation angle of the hole wall, as shown in the Fig. 1(b). For the location of the SEM which is shown in Fig. 2(b), the local elevation angle is about 68° as shown in Fig. 3. The incident angle estimated by this experimental method is in good agreement with those obtained by using the theoretical model [21]. Meanwhile, η is calculated to be 1.004 at λ = 800nm for Ti [23] and it is also in reasonable agreement with the results from solving the two equations above [22]. In fact, it's reasonable that a little change of the value of the effective refractive index due to intense laser pulse heating and increasing of surface roughness on the metal surface [24]. Thus, the experimental results are well explained by the analytical model [22].

It is worth noting that 2-D ripple structure cannot cover all of the hole wall. When a linear polarized laser irradiated the material surface, the laser polarization characteristic is different

in different areas of the hole wall. Two-dimensional ripple structure can be form on the wall where the laser polarization has a p-polarized component. And one-dimensional ripple was observed at the location where laser is s-polarized light. It means that different polarized character of the laser on the hole wall will cause different ripple characters. Besides the laser polarization, the laser fluence is also an important parameter to determine the feature of the structure on the hole wall. For example, when the laser fluence is 0.354J/cm2 and N = 100, periodic ripple structure is well formed on the metal surface as shown in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b). However when N = 10000, instead of the ripple structure, there is full of the cone structure covered on the ablated hole, which is show in Fig. 4(c) and 4(d). Different to the micrometer cones on the metal surface [25,26], the size of this cone structure is about 400nm. The reason of the structure change in our experiment is still uncertain.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 (a) Surface patterns on Ti at laser fluence of 0.354J/cm2 following 100 pulses. (b) Detail view of the surface ripple structure. (c) Morphology of the ablation hole of Ti at laser fluence of 0.354J/cm2 following 10000 pulses. (d) Detail view of the ablative hole wall.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusions

In summary, we presented a 2-D ripple-like periodic structure on the ablated hole wall of a titanium, which was induced by single-beam femtosecond laser pulses with linear-polarized electric field. This 2-D structure on the ablated hole wall can be seen as a surface structure induced by femtosecond laser at a large angle of incidence. The measured spatial periods of the 2-D structure are successfully interpreted by the model of the interference between the incident light wave and the excited surface plasmons. In addition to the ripple structure, the nanocone structure on the ablated hole wall are also generated by linear polarized femtosecond laser. These different surface structures on the hole wall and how to control them would be potentially of interest to a variety scenarios including laser lithography, laser drilling holes for vias in electronics, microfluidics and applications requiring certain adhesion properties and wettability of the surface.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Prof. Yuan Ji for assistance with SEM images and Dr. Yinzhou Yan for assistance with confocal scanning laser microscope measurement. This research is financially supported by Beijing Municipal Education Commission of Scientific Research under Grant No. 1010005466903.

References and links

1. T. Tomita, Y. Fukumori, K. Kinoshita, S. Matsuo, and S. Hashimoto, “Observation of laser-induced surface waves on flat silicon surface,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(1), 013104 ( 2008). [CrossRef]  

2. E. M. Hsu, T. Crawford, C. Maunders, G. A. Botton, and H. K. Haugen, “Cross-sectional study of periodic surface structures on gallium phosphide induced by ultrashort laser pulse irradiation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(22), 221112 ( 2008). [CrossRef]  

3. M. Huang, F. L. Zhao, Y. Cheng, N. S. Xu, and Z. Z. Xu, “Mechanisms of ultrafast laser-induced deep-subwavelength gratings on graphite and diamond,” Phys. Rev. B 79(12), 125436 ( 2009). [CrossRef]  

4. D. Dufft, A. Rosenfeld, S. K. Das, R. Grunwald, and J. Bonse, “Femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures revisited: a comparative study on ZnO,” J. Appl. Phys. 105(3), 034908 ( 2009). [CrossRef]  

5. J. M. Li and J. T. Xu, “Self-organized nanostructure by a femtosecond laser on silicon,” Laser Phys. 19(1), 121–124 ( 2009). [CrossRef]  

6. M. Shinoda, R. R. Gattass, and E. Mazur, “Femtosecond laser-induced formation of nanometer-width grooves on synthetic single-crystal diamond surfaces,” J. Appl. Phys. 105(5), 053102 ( 2009). [CrossRef]  

7. J. C. Wang and C. L. Guo, “Formation of extraordinarily uniform periodic structures on the metals induced by femtosecond laser pulses,” J. Appl. Phys. 100(2), 023511 ( 2006). [CrossRef]  

8. Q. Z. Zhao, S. Malzer, and L. J. Wang, “Formation of subwavelength periodic structures on tungsten induced by ultrashort laser pulses,” Opt. Lett. 32(13), 1932–1934 ( 2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. R. Le Harzic, H. Schuck, D. Sauer, T. Anhut, I. Riemann, and K. König, “Sub-100 nm nanostructuring of silicon by ultrashort laser pulses,” Opt. Express 13(17), 6651–6656 ( 2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. T. Q. Jia, H. X. Chen, M. Huang, F. L. Zhao, J. R. Qiu, R. X. Li, Z. Z. Xu, X. K. He, J. Zhang, and H. Kuroda, “Formation of nanogratings on the surface of a ZnSe crystal irradiated by femtosecond laser pulses,” Phys. Rev. B 72(12), 125429 ( 2005). [CrossRef]  

11. Q. H. Wu, Y. R. Ma, R. C. Fang, Y. Liao, Q. X. Yu, X. L. Chen, and K. Wang, “Femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structure on diamond film,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 82(11), 1703–1705 ( 2003). [CrossRef]  

12. G. Seifert, M. Kaempfe, F. Syrowatka, C. Harnagea, D. Hesse, and H. Graener, “Self-organized structure formation on the bottom of femtosecond laser ablation craters in glass,” Appl. Phys., A Mater. Sci. Process. 81(4), 799–803 ( 2005). [CrossRef]  

13. V. R. Bhardwaj, E. Simova, P. P. Rajeev, C. Hnatovsky, R. S. Taylor, D. M. Rayner, and P. B. Corkum, “Optically produced arrays of planar nanostructures inside fused silica,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(5), 057404 ( 2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. S. Sakabe, M. Hashida, S. Tokita, S. Namba, and K. Okamuro, “Mechanism for self-formation of periodic grating structures on a metal surface by a femtosecond laser pulse,” Phys. Rev. B 79(3), 033409 ( 2009). [CrossRef]  

15. A. Y. Vorobyev, V. S. Makin, and C. L. Guo, “Brighter light sources from black metal: significant increase in emission efficiency of incandescent light sources,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(23), 234301 ( 2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. A. Y. Vorobyev and C. L. Guo, “Colorizing metals with femtosecond laser pulses,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(4), 041914 ( 2008). [CrossRef]  

17. Y. Yang, J. J. Yang, C. Y. Liang, and H. S. Wang, “Ultra-broadband enhanced absorption of metal surfaces structured by femtosecond laser pulses,” Opt. Express 16(15), 11259–11265 ( 2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. N. Yasumaru, K. Miyazaki, and J. Kiuchi, “Control of tribological properties of diamond-like carbon films with femtosecond-laser-induced nanostructuring,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 254(8), 2364–2368 ( 2008). [CrossRef]  

19. A. Weck, T. Crawford, D. S. Wilkinson, H. K. Haugen, and J. S. Preston, “Ripple formation during deep hole drilling in copper with ultrashort laser pulses,” Appl. Phys., A Mater. Sci. Process. 89(4), 1001–1003 ( 2007). [CrossRef]  

20. W. W. Gong, Z. H. Zheng, J. J. Zheng, H. F. Zhao, X. G. Ren, and S. Z. Lu, “Femtosecond laser induced submicrometer structures on the ablation crater walls of II-VI semiconductors in water,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 255(7), 4351–4354 ( 2009). [CrossRef]  

21. J. F. Young, J. F. Preston, H. M. van Driel, and J. E. Sipe, “Laser-induced periodic surface structure. II. Experiments on Ge, Si, Al and brass,” Phys. Rev. B 27(2), 1155–1172 ( 1983). [CrossRef]  

22. A. M. Bonch-Bruevich, M. N. Libenson, V. S. Makin, and V. V. Trubaev, “Surface electromagnetic waves in optics,” Opt. Eng. 31(4), 718–730 ( 1992). [CrossRef]  

23. P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical constants of transition metals: Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Pd,” Phys. Rev. B 9(12), 5056–5070 ( 1974). [CrossRef]  

24. A. Y. Vorobyev and C. L. Guo, “Femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structure formation on tungsten,” J. Appl. Phys. 104(6), 063523 ( 2008). [CrossRef]  

25. A. Y. Vorobyev and C. L. Guo, “Femtosecond laser structuring of titanium implants,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 253(17), 7272–7280 ( 2007). [CrossRef]  

26. V. Oliveira, S. Ausset, and R. Vilar, “Surface micro/nanostructuring of titanium under stationary and non-stationary femtosecond laser irradiation,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 255(17), 7556–7560 ( 2009). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a) Schematic drawing of the different areas on the hole wall. The arrow indicates the incident laser polarization direction. (b) Analysis schematic for the structure formation on the central zone of the area 1 where the laser is p-polarization incident.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 SEM images of Ti hole irradiated by 800-nm femtosecond laser with a fluence of 3.54J/cm2. (a) The hole formation after N = 10000 pulses. The arrow indicates the incident laser polarization direction. (b) Two dimensional ripple structure on the central zone of the area 1. The coordinate axis here corresponds to that in the Fig. 1(b). (c) One dimensional ripple structure on the central zone of the area 2. (d) Cone structure on a small hole wall at the bottom.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a) Texture image of the hole which measured by a confocal microscope. The red section is used for measuring the elevation angle of the plate of the two-dimension ripple-like structure on the wall. (b) The contour line of the hole. The green triangle is used to measure the elevation angle, and the elevation angle is 68°.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 (a) Surface patterns on Ti at laser fluence of 0.354J/cm2 following 100 pulses. (b) Detail view of the surface ripple structure. (c) Morphology of the ablation hole of Ti at laser fluence of 0.354J/cm2 following 10000 pulses. (d) Detail view of the ablative hole wall.

Equations (2)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

d 1 = λ / ( η ± sin θ )
d 2 = λ / ( η 2 sin 2 θ ) 1 / 2
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.