Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Enhanced asymmetric transmissions attributed to the cavity coupling hybrid resonance in a continuous omega-shaped metamaterial

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

In this paper, the infinite-length metallic bar is folded to a continuous omega-shaped resonator and then arranged as a bi-layer metamaterial, which presents a hybrid resonance and a Fabry–Perot-like cavity mode. The asymmetric transmission (AT) for linearly polarized light is powerfully enhanced at a near-infrared regime by strongly coupling the hybrid resonance to the cavity, with the maximum value of the high-efficiency AT effect reaching 0.8 at around 1364 nm. At this near-infrared band, such a high-efficiency AT effect has never been realized previously by a bi-layer metamaterial. More importantly, we demonstrate that our design is robust to the misalignments, which greatly decreases the difficulties in sample fabrications. Accordingly, the proposed omega-shaped metamaterial provides potential applications in designing polarization filters, polarization switches, and other nano-devices.

© 2018 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Metamaterials have become an important research field for nano-optical applications, attributed to the intriguing electromagnetic phenomena that do not exist in natural materials, as well as flexible designs of geometric shape and size [1]. Since metamaterials were proposed, many novel structures have been reported ranging from microwave to optical regime, such as I-shaped metamaterials, split-ring resonators, L-shaped metallic antenna and S-shaped holes [2–6]. From then on, many works have paid attention on manipulating the polarization state, phase and direction of electromagnetic waves [7,8]. In 2007, J. Hao et al. showed an I-shape metamaterial to manipulate the electromagnetic polarization and got a complete conversion between two perpendicular linear polarizations [6]. In the same year, unidirectional surface plasmon polariton was realized by nanoslit couplers [9]. In addition, many other unidirectional effects have also been leading-edge topic, in terms of the potential applications in filter, sensor and highly compact integrated nanophotonic devices. For example, the unidirectional reflectionless propagation and asymmetric transmission (AT) effect [10,11]. It is well known that the AT phenomena for linearly and circularly polarized lights have been investigated both in the microwave and optical regimes with kinds of symmetry-broken metastructures [12–14]. Microwave metamaterials are consisted of perfect electric conductors (PEC) at the dimensions of micrometers without Ohmic losses. Here, the micrometer-level dimensions of these metamaterials provide convenience for experiments, and PEC can lead to loss-free electromagnetic responses and thus strong structural resonances [15]. Then the AT effect has been presented excellently in microwave metamaterials. For example, a dual-band AT effect was realized by bilayer chiral metamaterial with the dual transmission differences around 11 GHz and 15 GHz, respectively [16].

Compared with PEC metamaterials for microwave applications, metamaterials at the near-infrared band are designed by nanostructured metals, for which regime the plasmonics merges photonics and electronics at nanoscale dimensions. However, the nanoscale dimensions limit the flexibility of sample fabrication and the plasmon dissipation leads significant Ohmic losses at optical wavelengths [17]. As a result, AT effect usually shows a small value, which restricts the applications of metamaterial at near-infrared band. As we know, near-infrared regime is one of the key operation bands for nanodevice applications, such as polarization rotators and circulators [11]. Therefore, it is important to increase the efficiency of AT at near-infrared band. From 2014, the AT phenomena for linear polarization have been realized by kinds of bi-layer metamaterials, while the maximum Δ was only about 0.35 resulting from the resonance of these symmetry-broken metastructures [13,18–21]. Recently, highly efficient AT effect of linearly and circularly polarized lights have been realized in trilayer chiral metamaterials, with optical cavity effect involved in [11,22,23]. Though the multi-layer chiral metamaterials can enhance the AT effect, it increases the complexity and difficulty in fabrication process. In addition, the optical cavity has also been proposed to enhance the optical magnetic field localization and optical polarization conversion in bi-layer metamaterials [24–26].

In this paper, we design the infinite-length metal bar to a bi-layer continuous omega-shaped metamaterial, and then both a hybrid resonance and a Fabry–Perot-like cavity mode are induced at near-infrared band. We demonstrate that the AT effect of linearly polarized light is enhanced attributed to strongly coupling of the hybrid resonance with the optical cavity mode. Besides, the bi-layer metamaterial design has a good robustness to misalignment between layers, which facilitates the fabrication process and provides potential applications in the optical communication field.

2. Structure and theory

Figure 1(a) presents the schematic diagram of the bi-layer continuous omega-shaped metamaterial. The perspective view of a unit cell of the metamaterial is shown in Fig. 1(b), which consists of two layers of omega-shaped structure embedded in a silicon-oxide dielectric environment (εsio2=2.1). In contrast to the first layer, the structure in second layer is rotated clockwise by 90 about the z-axis, and then AT could be realized by linearly polarized incident lights [27,28]. Here, the omega-shaped structure is considered as gold with the Drude-type dispersion, for which the plasma frequency ωp=1.367×1016rad/s and collision frequency γ=4.0715×1013rad/s [29]. The elevation and side views of the unit cell are shown in Figs. 1(c) and 1(d) with period L = 500 nm. Other geometric parameters of the structure are set as: a = 330 nm, b = 330 nm, w = 80 nm, t = 40 nm and d = 70 nm. Here, the continuous design avoids the diffraction of boundaries, which can decrease the losses and thus enhance the resonance [6]. In this work, the CST Microwave Studio is used for numerical simulations, where periodic boundary conditions are applied to ±x and ±y directions with Px=Py=L=500nmto account for the continuous omega-shaped metamaterial, while open boundary conditions are used in the directions of propagation (±z directions). Here, the mesh cells are more than 1.5 millions and the lower and upper distances in –z and + z directions are both 1500 nm, which are longer then a wavelength. All the designs guarantee the accuracy of simulation results. Then, x- and/or y-polarized incidences are set to propagate along forward ( + z) and/or backward (-z) directions, in order to study the asymmetric characteristic of transmittance.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 (a) Schematic diagram of bi-layer continuous metamaterial embedded in a silicon-oxide dielectric environment. (b) A perspective view of the unit cell. (c) and (d) The elevation and side views of the unit cell.

Download Full Size | PDF

As we know, the incident and transmitted electric fields for x- and y-polarized electromagnetic waves can be described as follows, when they propagate along + z direction [28,30,31]:

Ei(r,t)=(IxIy)ei(kzwt)
Et(r,t)=(TxTy)ei(kzwt)
where w and k are the frequency and wave vector, Ix, Iy and Tx, Ty are the complex amplitudes of the incident and transmitted waves, respectively. Accordingly, the transmission coefficients can be shown by the Jones matrix
Tf=(TxxfTxyfTyxfTyyf)
where the superscript f indicates that the incident waves propagate along forward direction, and the subscript ij (i = x,y; j = x,y) means that the j-polarized incident wave is transformed into i-polarized transmission. According to the Lorentz reciprocity theorem, the Jones matrix for backward propagations can be described by

Tb=(TxxbTxybTyxbTyyb)=(TxxfTyxfTxyfTyyf)

3. Result and discussion

In our numerical calculations, the transmittance is determined by tij=|Tij|2. Figure 2 shows the simulated transmittances tij of our continuous omega-shaped metamaterial for linearly polarized incident lights propagating along forward and backward directions. For forward propagations [Fig. 2(a)], both the co-polarization transmittance txxf/tyyf and the cross-polarization transmittance txyf keep values lower than 0.1 in the wavelength range from 985 nm to 1530 nm, while the other cross-polarization transmittance tyxf increases to a resonant peak with a maximum of tyxf=0.8 at around 1364 nm. It means that the x-polarized incident light is completely transformed to y-polarized transmittance, while the y-polarized incident light is almost prevented by the bi-layer continuous omega-shaped metamaterial. For backward propagations the conditions are reversed, i.e. the y-polarized incident light is transformed to an x-polarized transmittance with txyb=0.8 around 1364 nm, but the x-polarized incident light is prevented when it propagates along the backward direction [Fig. 2(b)]. Take x-polarized incident light along the forward propagation for example, the polarization conversion rate (PCR) can be defined as PCR=tyxf/(tyxf+txyf) [5,21,32]. Around 1364 nm, the transmittances satisfy tyxf=0.8andtxxf=0.016, therefore, we can get the PCR as high as 0.98. Analogously, the PCR is also 0.98 for y-polarized incident along the backward propagation. As a result, we get the high-efficiency asymmetric polarization conversions (i.e. the continuous omega-shaped metamaterial can act as a polarization converter converting x/y-polarized light to y/x-polarized one along forward/backward direction.).

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Simulated transmittances for bi-layer continuous omega-shaped metamaterial, when x- and y-polarized lights incident along (a) forward and (b) backward directions, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

Based on above discussions, we get that the co-polarization and cross-polarization transmittances satisfy txx=tyyand txytyx. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) present the total transmittances along the forward and backward propagations, calculated by t=tij+tjj. The result shows clearly that txf=tyb and it reaches a maximum of 0.82 around 1364 nm, but for tyf(=txb) the value decreases to 0.02. Such a high intensity contrast between forward and backward directions has not been reported in previous bi-layer metamaterials [1,18,19]. As a result, the x-polarized incident light is mostly transmitted in forward propagation, while the y-polarized incident light is significantly prevented. Inversely, the y-polarized incident light could be transmitted in the backward direction. Mathematically, AT parameters (Δlin) for linearly polarized incident waves are presented as follows [3]:

Δx=txftxb=(txxf+tyxf)(txxb+tyxb)=txxf+tyxftyyftxyf=tyxftxyf=-Δy
as shown in Fig. 3(c). With the increase in wavelength, the AT parameter for x- or y-polarized incident light reaches a maximum of |Δx|or|Δy|=0.8 at the resonant wavelength 1364 nm. According to Eq. (5), the high-efficiency AT effect comes from the difference of cross-polarization, when x- and y-polarized incident light propagates along forward or backward direction. In addition, since the operation window of AT effect covers the optical fiber communication wavelengths (1.3 μm and 1.55 μm), our bi-layer continuous omega-shaped metamaterial is advantageous to be used as diode-like device in optical communication systems [11].

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 The calculated total transmittances for forward and backward propagation directions with (a) x- and (b) y-polarized incident lights, respectively. (c) AT effect for the designed bi-layer metamaterial. Blue solid and green bashed lines correspond to AT of x- and y-polarized lights, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

To understand the physical mechanism of the enhanced AT effect, we start studying the resonance induced by the bi-layer continuous omega-shaped metamaterial. We present the electric-field distributions on the first and second layers, at the resonant wavelength of 1364 nm for x- and y-polarized incident wave along the + z direction, respectively (Fig. 4). Figure 4(a) show that, when x-polarized wave incident normally on the first layer, a hybrid resonance mode is induced, including the parallel electric-field distributions in x-axis arms and antiparallel electric-field distributions in y-axis arms. Note that this hybrid resonance in such folded metal bars is totally different from any mode existed in straight metal bars. More importantly, for our bilayer omega-shaped design most of the electromagnetic wave is coupled into the second layer and the similar hybrid resonant mode can be observed on the second layer [Fig. 4(b)] [18]. Consequently, the chiral arrangement of this bi-layer metamaterial and strongly coupling effect result in a high intensity cross-polarized resonance with tyx = 0.8, and thus the x-polarized incident light is transformed to y-polarized transmittance. Meanwhile, Figs. 4(c) and 4(d) show that there are hardly any resonances induced by the continuous omega-shaped metamaterial, for y-polarized incidences. Besides, the wavelength (1364 nm) here is much larger than the structural gaps, then the y-polarized incident light cannot pass through the metamaterial directly. As a result, there is nearly no transmittance for y-polarized incident wave. However, the inverse phenomenon can be observed when x- and y-polarized lights are incident along the -z direction. At the last, we can conclude that the enhanced cross-polarization conversion and AT effect are realized at near-infrared band.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Electric-field magnitude distributions at resonant wavelength for continuous omega-shaped metamaterial. (a) and (b) correspond to the x-polarized wave incident along the + z direction, (c) and (d) correspond to the y-polarized wave incident along the + z direction.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 5(a) shows that the continuous omega-shaped metamaterial is separated by a gap (g = 60 nm), which breaks the hybrid resonance in continuous metamaterial. Interestingly, the forward transmittances in Fig. 5(a) under x- and y-polarized incident lights is completely different from Fig. 2(a), which implies that the gap plays an important role in the structural resonance of this uncontinuous omega-shaped metamaterial. The transmittances in Fig. 5(a) show that the enhanced cross-polarized resonance around 1364 nm is lost. Moreover, different resonant modes are induced and the values of cross-polarization tyx can only reach 0.3. Inversely, the co-polarizations txx and tyy show a relatively large transmittance. For the uncontinuous omega-shaped metamaterial, the co-polarization transmittances satisfy txx=tyywith a maximum value about 0.47, and for the cross-polarization transmittances (txytyx), it is obvious that tyx can only reach up to 0.3 and txy is approximately 0. Accordingly, the AT parameter is not more than 0.3, as presented in Fig. 5(b).

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 (a) Simulated transmittance when the continuous omega-shaped metamaterial is separated (not connected with each other) with a gap g = 60 nm. Inset: Schematic diagram of bi-layer uncontinuous omega-shaped metamaterial. (b) The corresponding AT parameter Δx.

Download Full Size | PDF

Then, we studied the cavity coupling effect by adjust the cavity length d. Figure 6(a) shows that the enhanced AT effect as a function of cavity length d and the AT value can reach up to a maximum at d = 70 nm, when x-polarized incident light propagates along the forward direction. Figures 6(b) and 6(c) show the electric vector distributions for x- and y-polarized light incident along the + z direction. Figure 6(b) shows clearly that, for x-polarized incidence, the hybrid resonance is strongly coupled to the bilayer cavity and enhanced the transmittance of tyx, when d = 70 nm. At this case, the x-polarized light almost completely passes through the bi-layer metamaterial, with its polarization transformed to the y-direction. While for y-polarized incident light, the hybrid resonance cannot be induced, and there is no cavity coupling phenomenon [Fig. 6(c)]. Then, the y-polarized incident light almost completely reflected by the continuous omega-shaped metamaterial.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 (a) The AT parameter as a function of cavity length d. (b) and (c) Electric vector distributions of the bi-layer omega-shaped metamaterial, corresponding to d = 70 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

For this work, we consider the proposed bilayer structure as a Fabry-Perot-like cavity to explain the enhanced AT effect further [3,11]. Here, the hybrid plasmonic resonance in the folded bar structure is coupled to the bilayer cavity in deep subwavelength, which contributes to the novelty of our cavity as compared with a traditional Fabry-Perot-type cavity. Figures 7(a) and 7(b) present the schematic of the Fabry-Perot-like resonance. It shows clearly that when x-polarized wave incident normally on the metamaterial, the transmission, reflection, and coupling at resonant wavelength can be enhanced in the cavity. Here, the comparison between reflectance and transmittance are presented in Fig. 7(c), and it clearly demonstrates that the reflectances for cross-polarization (ryx) and co-polarization (rxx) keep lower than 0.02 around 1364 nm. However, the transmittance for cross-polarization (tyx) reaches up to 0.8 in contrast to a low co-polarization transmittance (txx). Then, most of the x-polarized lights are transformed to y-polarization and pass through the second layer while nearly none of the x-polarized lights are reflected by this metamaterial. In addition, the y-polarized light is almost completely reflected when it is incident on the first layer of the metamaterial, which results in the weak interaction in cavity and nearly zero transmittance [Fig. 7(b)]. Figure 7(d) shows that co-polarization reflectance (ryy) keeps about 0.9 in a broad band covering the resonant range, and the other components both for reflectance and transmittance can be considered as 0. As a result, the bi-layer continuous omega-shaped metamaterial just acts as a reflected mirror [Fig. 7(b)].

 figure: Fig. 7

Fig. 7 (a) and (b) Schematic diagram of Fabry–Perot-like resonance based on the bi-layer omega-shaped metamaterial. Note the solid lines mean strong transmission/reflection processes, while the dotted lines mean weak ones. (c) and (d) the transmittance and reflectance for the bi-layer metamaterial, when x- and y-polarized lights incident along the + z direction.

Download Full Size | PDF

As we know, for a bi-layer metamaterial, there are kinds of fabrication errors and misalignments to influence the AT efficiency. Then we modulate the geometric parameters and bilayer misalignments, for which the results are presented in Fig. 8. When parameter a increases from 280 nm to 450 nm, the capacitance increases, and thus the resonant frequencies suffer from a large redshift while keeping the high-efficiency AT. However, when b increases from 280 nm to 450 nm, the period of the infinite-length omega-shaped metamaterial is changed, which influenced the intensity of hybrid resonance. Then resonant peaks reach a maximum at b = 330 nm, but the resonant frequencies change moderately. In addition, the resonant peaks reach a maximum at w = 80 nm with w increasing from 40 nm to 140 nm. Figure 8(d) shows that when the transversal and longitudinal misalignments are increased from 25 nm to 50 nm, the maximum AT values have a slightly decrease from 0.8 to 0.75. And, when the transversal and longitudinal misalignments reach δx=δy=50nm, the AT parameter still has 0.7. Therefore, it is safe to evaluate that the AT effect is insensitive to transversal and longitudinal misalignments. To the last, the collision frequency γ of the considered metal (gold) is modulated to account for the unexpected material absorption in experiments. We increase γ from 4.1×1013to 12.2×1013and find that the AT parameter occurs a decrease from originally 0.8 to 0.56 without resonant frequencies changing [Fig. 8(e)]. At near-infrared region, 0.56 can also be considered as an efficient AT parameter comparing with previous reports [13,18–21].

 figure: Fig. 8

Fig. 8 Calculated AT parameter Δx of the bilayer chiral metamaterial for different a, b, w, the misalignments δx, δy and the collision frequency γ.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

In this paper, we proposed a bi-layer continuous omega-shaped metamaterial, which highly enhanced the AT effect for linearly polarized light at near-infrared communication band. Here, the continuous omega-shaped metamaterial provides a hybrid resonant mode and the bi-layer design presents a Fabry–Perot-like cavity. By considering the strongly coupling between the hybrid resonance and Fabry–Perot-like cavity, we optimize the parameters of our structure. as a result the maximum parameter of AT is up to 0.8, which destroys the limitation that only tri-layer or multi-layer designs could realize such high AT effect at the near-infrared band. Moreover, the bi-layer continuous omega-shaped metamaterial provides a great convenience in experiments, and then it has potential applications in designing polarization rotators and switches in optical communication systems.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Nos. 11374049, 11511140278); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University and Jiangsu Innovation Project (Grant No. KYLX16_0180); and the Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University (No. YBJJ1668).

References and links

1. M. Kang, J. Chen, H.-X. Cui, Y. Li, and H.-T. Wang, “Asymmetric transmission for linearly polarized electromagnetic radiation,” Opt. Express 19(9), 8347–8356 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. S. Wu, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, K. Zhang, L. Zhou, X. Zhang, and Y. Zhu, “Enhanced rotation of the polarization of a light beam transmitted through a silver film with an array of perforated S-shaped holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(20), 207401 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. Z. Y. Xiao, D. J. Liu, X. L. Ma, and Z. H. Wang, “Multi-band transmissions of chiral metamaterials based on Fabry-Perot like resonators,” Opt. Express 23(6), 7053–7061 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. Z. Wei, Y. Cao, Y. Fan, X. Yu, and H. Li, “Broadband polarization transformation via enhanced asymmetric transmission through arrays of twisted complementary split-ring resonators,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 99(22), 221907 (2011). [CrossRef]  

5. Q. Lévesque, M. Makhsiyan, P. Bouchon, F. Pardo, J. Jaeck, N. Bardou, C. Dupuis, R. Haïdar, and J.-L. Pelouard, “Plasmonic planar antenna for wideband and efficient linear polarization conversion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 104(11), 111105 (2014). [CrossRef]  

6. J. Hao, Y. Yuan, L. Ran, T. Jiang, J. A. Kong, C. T. Chan, and L. Zhou, “Manipulating electromagnetic wave polarizations by anisotropic metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99(6), 063908 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. L. Cong, N. Xu, J. Gu, R. Singh, J. Han, and W. Zhang, “Highly flexible broadband terahertz metamaterial quarter-wave plate,” Laser Photonics Rev. 8(4), 626–632 (2014). [CrossRef]  

8. N. K. Grady, J. E. Heyes, D. R. Chowdhury, Y. Zeng, M. T. Reiten, A. K. Azad, A. J. Taylor, D. A. Dalvit, and H. T. Chen, “Terahertz Metamaterials for Linear Polarization Conversion and Anomalous Refraction,” Science 340(6138), 1304–1307 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. F. L. -Tejeira, S. G. Rodrigo, L. M. -Moreno, F. J. G. -Vidal, E. Devaux, T. W. Ebbesen, J. R. Krenn, I. P. Radko, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, M. U. González, J. C. Weeber, and A. Dereux, “Efficient unidirectional nanoslit couplers for surface plasmons,” Nat. Phys. 3, 324–328 (2007).

10. X. Gu, R. Bai, C. Zhang, X. R. Jin, Y. Q. Zhang, S. Zhang, and Y. P. Lee, “Unidirectional reflectionless propagation in a non-ideal parity-time metasurface based on far field coupling,” Opt. Express 25(10), 11778–11787 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. R. Ji, S. W. Wang, X. Liu, and W. Lu, “Giant and broadband circular asymmetric transmission based on two cascading polarization conversion cavities,” Nanoscale 8(15), 8189–8194 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. L. Zhang, P. Zhou, H. Chen, H. Lu, H. Xie, L. Zhang, E. Li, J. Xie, and L. Deng, “Ultrabroadband design for linear polarization conversion and asymmetric transmission crossing X- and K- Band,” Sci. Rep. 6(1), 33826 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. G. Kenanakis, A. Xomalis, A. Selimis, M. Vamvakaki, M. Farsari, M. Kafesaki, C. M. Soukoulis, and E. N. Economou, “Three-dimensional infrared metamaterial with asymmetric transmission,” ACS Photonics 2(2), 287–294 (2015). [CrossRef]  

14. W. Fan, Y. Wang, R. Zheng, D. Liu, and J. Shi, “Broadband high efficiency asymmetric transmission of achiral metamaterials,” Opt. Express 23(15), 19535–19541 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. K. Song, Y. Liu, C. Luo, and X. Zhao, “High-efficiency broadband and multiband cross-polarization conversion using chiral metamaterial,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 47(50), 505104 (2014). [CrossRef]  

16. J. Shi, X. Liu, S. Yu, T. Lv, Z. Zhu, H. Feng Ma, and T. Jun Cui, “Dual-band asymmetric transmission of linear polarization in bilayered chiral metamaterial,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 102(19), 191905 (2013). [CrossRef]  

17. J. Li, Y. Zhang, R. Jin, Q. Wang, Q. Chen, and Z. Dong, “Excitation of plasmon toroidal mode at optical frequencies by angle-resolved reflection,” Opt. Lett. 39(23), 6683–6686 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. Y. Xu, Q. Shi, Z. Zhu, and J. Shi, “Mutual conversion and asymmetric transmission of linearly polarized light in bilayered chiral metamaterial,” Opt. Express 22(21), 25679–25688 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. M. Kang, H. T. Wang, and W. Zhu, “Dual-band unidirectional circular polarizer with opposite handedness filtration using hybridized metamaterial,” Opt. Express 22(8), 9301–9306 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

20. Z. Li, S. Chen, C. Tang, W. Liu, H. Cheng, Z. Liu, J. Li, P. Yu, B. Xie, Z. Liu, J. Li, and J. Tian, “Broadband diodelike asymmetric transmission of linearly polarized light in ultrathin hybrid metamaterial,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 105(20), 201103 (2014). [CrossRef]  

21. Z. C. Li, S. Q. Chen, W. W. Liu, H. Cheng, Z. C. Liu, J. X. Li, P. Yu, B. Y. Xie, and J. G. Tian, “High performance broadband asymmetric polarization conversion due to polarization-dependent reflection,” Plasmonics 10(6), 1703–1711 (2015). [CrossRef]  

22. D. F. Tang, C. Wang, W. K. Pan, M. H. Li, and J. F. Dong, “Broad dual-band asymmetric transmission of circular polarized waves in near-infrared communication band,” Opt. Express 25(10), 11329–11339 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. C. Pfeiffer, C. Zhang, V. Ray, L. J. Guo, and A. Grbic, “High performance bianisotropic metasurfaces: asymmetric transmission of light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(2), 023902 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. J. Chen, T. Zhang, C. Tang, P. Mao, Y. Liu, Y. Yu, and Z. Liu, “Optical magnetic field enhancement via coupling magnetic plasmons to optical cavity modes,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 28(14), 1529–1531 (2016). [CrossRef]  

25. T. Li, S. M. Wang, J. X. Cao, H. Liu, and S. N. Zhu, “Cavity-involved plasmonic metamaterial for optical polarization conversion,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97(26), 261113 (2010). [CrossRef]  

26. Y.-J. Chiang and T.-J. Yen, “A composite-metamaterial-based terahertz-wave polarization rotator with an ultrathin thickness, an excellent conversion ratio, and enhanced transmission,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 102(1), 011129 (2013). [CrossRef]  

27. C. Huang, Y. Feng, J. Zhao, Z. Wang, and T. Jiang, “Asymmetric electromagnetic wave transmission of linear polarization via polarization conversion through chiral metamaterial structures,” Phys. Rev. B 85(19), 195131 (2012). [CrossRef]  

28. K. Chen, Y. Feng, L. Cui, J. Zhao, T. Jiang, and B. Zhu, “Dynamic control of asymmetric electromagnetic wave transmission by active chiral metamaterial,” Sci. Rep. 7, 42802 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

29. M. Kim, K. Yao, G. Yoon, I. Kim, Y. Liu, and J. Rho, “A broadband optical diode for linearly polarized light using symmetry-breaking metamaterials,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 5(19), 1700600 (2017). [CrossRef]  

30. Y.-H. Wang, J. Shao, J. Li, M.-J. Zhu, J. Li, L. Zhou, and Z.-G. Dong, “Broadband asymmetric transmission by rotated bilayer cross-shaped metamaterials,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 48(48), 485306 (2015). [CrossRef]  

31. C. Menzel, C. Helgert, C. Rockstuhl, E. B. Kley, A. Tünnermann, T. Pertsch, and F. Lederer, “Asymmetric transmission of linearly polarized light at optical metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(25), 253902 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

32. W. Liu, S. Chen, Z. Li, H. Cheng, P. Yu, J. Li, and J. Tian, “Realization of broadband cross-polarization conversion in transmission mode in the terahertz region using a single-layer metasurface,” Opt. Lett. 40(13), 3185–3188 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (8)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a) Schematic diagram of bi-layer continuous metamaterial embedded in a silicon-oxide dielectric environment. (b) A perspective view of the unit cell. (c) and (d) The elevation and side views of the unit cell.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Simulated transmittances for bi-layer continuous omega-shaped metamaterial, when x- and y-polarized lights incident along (a) forward and (b) backward directions, respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 The calculated total transmittances for forward and backward propagation directions with (a) x- and (b) y-polarized incident lights, respectively. (c) AT effect for the designed bi-layer metamaterial. Blue solid and green bashed lines correspond to AT of x- and y-polarized lights, respectively.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Electric-field magnitude distributions at resonant wavelength for continuous omega-shaped metamaterial. (a) and (b) correspond to the x-polarized wave incident along the + z direction, (c) and (d) correspond to the y-polarized wave incident along the + z direction.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 (a) Simulated transmittance when the continuous omega-shaped metamaterial is separated (not connected with each other) with a gap g = 60 nm. Inset: Schematic diagram of bi-layer uncontinuous omega-shaped metamaterial. (b) The corresponding AT parameter Δ x .
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 (a) The AT parameter as a function of cavity length d. (b) and (c) Electric vector distributions of the bi-layer omega-shaped metamaterial, corresponding to d = 70 nm.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7 (a) and (b) Schematic diagram of Fabry–Perot-like resonance based on the bi-layer omega-shaped metamaterial. Note the solid lines mean strong transmission/reflection processes, while the dotted lines mean weak ones. (c) and (d) the transmittance and reflectance for the bi-layer metamaterial, when x- and y-polarized lights incident along the + z direction.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8 Calculated AT parameter Δ x of the bilayer chiral metamaterial for different a, b, w, the misalignments δx, δy and the collision frequency γ.

Equations (5)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

E i ( r ,t)=( I x I y ) e i(kzwt)
E t ( r ,t)=( T x T y ) e i(kzwt)
T f =( T xx f T xy f T yx f T yy f )
T b =( T xx b T xy b T yx b T yy b ) = ( T xx f T yx f T xy f T yy f )
Δ x = t x f t x b =( t xx f + t yx f )( t xx b + t yx b ) = t xx f + t yx f t yy f t xy f = t yx f t xy f =- Δ y
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.