Multi-port admittance model for quantifying the scattering response of loaded plasmonic nanorod antennas: erratum

Anastasios H. Panaretos; Douglas H. Werner

doi:10.1364/OE.24.000365

Abstract

This erratum corrects Fig. 5 in [Opt. Express 23(4), 4459–4471 (2015) [CrossRef] [PubMed] ].

It has come to our attention that during the submission of the revised and final version of manuscript [1], Fig. 4 was inadvertently used for Fig. 5 as well. Below is provided the correct version of Fig. 5.

Fig. 5 (a) Extinction and scattering efficiencies of loaded nanorod when $ε_{r L 1} = 2.4$ . (b) Input admittance of loaded nanorod. (c) Electric and magnetic field distribution calculated at the first four resonance peaks as shown in 5(a). Top to bottom plots correspond to 319 THz, 511 THz, 569 THz, and 676 THz respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

References and links

1. A. H. Panaretos and D. H. Werner, “Multi-port admittance model for quantifying the scattering response of loaded plasmonic nanorod antennas,” Opt. Express 23(4), 4459–4471 (2015). [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Previous Article Next Article

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.

Figures (1)

Fig. 5

Fig. 5 (a) Extinction and scattering efficiencies of loaded nanorod when

ε_{r L 1} = 2.4

. (b) Input admittance of loaded nanorod. (c) Electric and magnetic field distribution calculated at the first four resonance peaks as shown in 5(a). Top to bottom plots correspond to 319 THz, 511 THz, 569 THz, and 676 THz respectively.

View in Article | Download Full Size | PDF

Abstract

References and links

Cited By

Figures (1)

Optics Express