Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Positive and negative phototunability of chalcogenide (AMTIR-1) microdisk resonator

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We demonstrate externally photo-induced partially-reversible tuning of the resonance of a microdisk made of AMTIR-1 (Ge33As12Se55). We have achieved for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, both positive and negative shift in a microresonator with external tuning. A positive resonance shift of 1 nm and a negative resonance shift of 0.5 nm on a single microdisk has been measured. We have found that this phenomenon is due to initial photo-expansion of the microdisk followed by the photo-bleaching of the AMTIR-1. The observed shifts and the underlying phenomenon is controllable by varying the illumination power (i.e. the low power illumination suppresses the photobleaching process). We measure a loaded quality factor of 1.2x105 at 1550nm (limited by the measuring instrument). This holds promise for non-contact low power reversible-tunning of photonic circuit elements.

© 2015 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Whispering gallery mode (WGM) resonators are an appealing platform due to their high quality factor (Q) of up to a few billion [1]. Achieving a high-Q resonator on-chip has been possible with novel planar designs such as microdisks [2, 3], which have applications, amongst others, in sensing, signal processing and frequency metrology [4–6]. However, these resonators suffer from unavoidable fabrication errors which cause variations in dimensions that change the resonance frequencies substantially. Of the few recently proposed post-processing techniques to compensate for the fabrication tolerances [7–10], in situ photo-tuning of the material properties has gained significant interest as a non-contact process [9]. For this method to be efficient, nano-devices based on highly photosensitive material are required.

There have been few reports on photoinduced cavity formation based on commonly available silica [11]. This is due, in part, to the large light intensity required when using the photosensitivity of silica. The chalcogenide glass family, on the other hand, exhibits more than a million times higher photosensitive response [12–14], and this drastically lowers the laser intensity required for post-tuning.

Chalcogenide glasses display a wide range of photoinduced effects including photo-darkening, photo-crystallization, photo-contraction and photo-expansion [15]. This has led to applications in fiber bragg gratings [16] as well as photowritten high-Q bottle and photonic crystal cavities [17, 18]. Recently post-trimming of the resonance wavelength of the coupled ring resonators [9] and weak cavity enhanced resonance tuning on a microdisk based on As2S3 has been demonstrated [10, 19].

In this work we demonstrate post-tuning of the resonance frequency of an AMTIR-1 (Ge33As12Se55, Eg = 1.95eV) microdisk with a Q factor of 1.2x105. We show for the first time that both positive and negative shift can be produced on a single microresonator. We have achieved 1 nm positive and 0.5 nm negative tuning. This observation opens avenues for tuning of the resonances of an optical cavity with partial reversibility to compensate for the fabrication tolerances. For example, the FSR requirements of the cavity modes for mechanical mode generation from interference of stokes and pump resonant modes can be relaxed [20, 21].

AMTIR-1 glass is a readily available and attractive platform for integrated photonics because of its relatively higher Kerr nonlinearity (3 x As2S3, 350 x silica); excellent long wavelength transparency (0.7-12µm), limited by the presence of impurities higher glass transition temperature (362 C) compared with As-Se binary glasses due to its three-dimensional network structure caused by the presence of four-fold coordinated germanium [22, 23].

2. Experimental setup and Results

We fabricated microdisks from a 300nm thick AMTIR-1 film deposited by thermal evaporation onto an oxidized silicon wafer, using photolithograhy and ICP etching. The amorphicity and composition of the sample was analysed with X-ray diffraction (XRD) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) respectively which was identical to the bulk sample, within measurement error of 1% [24]. After patterning the samples were isotropically wet-etched with HF to remove the silica underlayer controllably to yield a ~2µm high pedestal which supported the microdisk. The samples used here were not annealed, and we note that annealing could induce behaviour different to that of an as-deposited sample [25].

To couple light into the microdisk a silica fibre taper was fabricated using CO2 laser heating and pulling with motorised stages. The final waist diameter was around 1.5µm with an insertion loss of 0.1dB. The TE waves were launched from an SWS (swept wavelength system - C + L band, dynamic range > 70dB and ~3pm resolution), into the fibre taper which was then side-coupled to the microdisk as shown in Fig. 1. The tapered fiber contacted the rim of the microdisk due to the unavoidable flexing caused by electrostatic forces as the taper was brought close to the edge of the disk. A reference spectrum was first taken without the microdisk and this was subtracted from the in–contact spectrum to get the final resonance spectrum shown in Fig. 2(a). The coupled modes were of higher radial order due to a significant phase mismatch between the fundamental mode of silica taper and the coupled resonant mode of the AMTIR-1 microdisk [18], which can be avoided with a chalcogenide taper based coupling. The radial and azimuthal order for the coupled mode (Qload = 1.2x105) shown in the inset in Fig. 2(a) are 13 and 362, as shown in Fig. 2(b), as calculated using COMSOL multiphysics.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Experimental setup with an SWS (swept wavelength system). A band edge 633 nm laser source is irradiating (with a spot size ~280 µm) a 50 µm radius microdisk sitting over a 2 µm silica pedestal on a 0.5 mm silicon substrate.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) Resonance spectrum of a 50 µm radius AMTIR-1 microdisk with several higher order modes coupling is shown. In the inset, a lorentzian fitting of the resonance dip of the higher order mode gives a loaded Q ~1.2x105. (b) Cross-sectional view of the disk with the estimated coupled mode intensity profile of the resonant mode, radially spanning about ~12 µm from the rim of the disk, having radial and azimuthal order 13 and 362 respectively. (c) Optical image of the microdisk evanescently coupling to the silica taper.

Download Full Size | PDF

To study the photoinduced effects, the whole microdisk was illuminated with band-edge light (at 633nm), as shown in Fig. 1. The microdisk was exposed constantly for up to 150 mins, and the position of the resonance monitored periodically, gave rise to the evolution in spectral shift as shown in Fig. 3.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Resonance wavelength shift of the microdisk (measured at 1534.5nm of radial and azimuthal order 13 and 361 respectively), with 633nm light exposure. Red shift (1nm) and blue shift (0.5nm) are observed for high power case 10mW/mm2, while mainly red shift (0.4nm) is observed for low power case, 1mW/mm2. Note the dashed line is shown to discern the trend.

Download Full Size | PDF

With high power exposure, 10mW/mm2, the material shows a rapid red shift, δλ~1nm, saturating around 40 mins which is followed by a slow blue shift, δλ~0.5nm. Whilst with the 1 mW/mm2 exposure a red shift of δλ~0.4nm is observed. The observed existence of red and blue shifts can be caused by processes such as a change in index and/or a change in volume since δλ/λ = (δr/r, δn/n), where r and n are the radius and index of the disk. The observed shifts were stable over the monitoring period of 24 hrs.

To identify the dominant processes, we measured the thin film response to the band edge illumination. The film was prepared from high purity element using conventional melt-quenching technique which was used as starting material for thermal evaporation. Prior to deposition the chamber was evacuated to 10−6 Torr, and then the substrates were irradiated by a 50eV, 1A Ar+ beam from an ion gun for 3 minutes to improve adhesion of the AMTIR-1 film to the oxidised silicon substrate. A film of ~960nm thickness was deposited at a rate of 2-5Ǻ/sec. The chemical composition and amorphicity of the film was analysed with EDX and XRD in a 2θ scan and no evidence of crystallization was found [24].

The film was then exposed with a red laser to monitor evolution of refractive index as a function of fluence using spectroscopic reflectometer (SCI FilmTek 4000). The measured data on index is shown for comparison with the microdisk resonance shift in Fig. 4. The thickness could also be monitored and showed a gradual expansion but due to a high measurement error a reliable absolute value was hard to determine.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 The measured refractive index change (measured at 1550nm) of the film (a thickness of 960nm was chosen for an accurate measurement by the spectroscopic reflectometer) and resonance shift (as taken from Fig. 3) of the microdisk as a function of fluence is shown. Here we observe a positive shift in the resonance of the microdisk for the same amount of fluence that causes a decrease in the film index. This indicates the expansion of the microdisk dominates the initial positive shift in the microdisk resonance, which is followed by a negative resonance shift mainly governed by the reduction in refractive index. The dashed line is shown to discern the trend. Inset: Stretch exponential function fitting.

Download Full Size | PDF

We observed a gradual drop in the refractive index of the film by up to 2% due to photobleaching effect for the same fluence for which we observed a 1nm red shift in the resonance, as shown in Fig. 4. This suggest that for small exposure the volume expansion in the material likely dominates [26], especially since the freely standing microdisk on a pedestal is unrestrained, compared with the film on a substrate. For an index driven resonance shift, a 0.1% positive shift would be required, which is not consistent with the thin film measurements. In Fig. 3, we see after 2400 seconds of irradiation of the disk the expansion slows down and is followed by a blue shift due to the photobleaching process becoming dominant. Photobleaching in germanium based chalcogenide materials is caused by the creation of coordination defects which involves breaking the existing chemical bonds by light followed by rebonding in a different arrangement as the defects relax. This allows the system to evolve towards a state which represent the lowest potential energy associated with the chemical bonds [24]. In the low power case however, only the initial expansion causes the resonance shift as the power is too low for the photobleaching process [27].We have also calculated the temperature increase in the sample to be < 2 C for the high power case which has a negligible effect on the change in refractive index [28]. For a disorder matrix of glass such as chalcogenide, a phenomenological description of the kinetics of the photobleaching processes can be defined by the stretched exponential function [29],

δn=Cb[exp{(t/τb)βb}]

Where δn, Cb (2.65), τb(1.4x109), t and βb (0.44) are the index shift, initial index, effective response time, illumination time and stretched exponential parameter respectively which were used in the fitting shown in the inset in Fig. 4.

In Table 1 the calculated and measured parameters of the microdisk is presented where the change in band gap energy, Eg was estimated through an empirical relation for amorphous semiconductors (Ravindra’s model, an approximation of Penn’s model was applied) [30].

Tables Icon

Table 1. Calculated parameters of the thin film and the microdisk with the measured loaded Q obtained in this study.

In the experiment the input signal was low enough that we didn’t observe any photoinduced effects due to the resonating modes, which we monitored by comparing several spectra (without an external illumination) taken at different time intervals while the input signal was on. However, we expect the presence of thermal effects as well as photoxidation as the experiments were performed just below the room temperature in air in a dark room [31, 32]. The contact length of the tapered fibre waist and the disk was roughly between 10 and 15 µm, measured from an optical microscope, which would cause a negligible change in the illumination area (0.06-0.09%). This would hardly have any effects considering the higher order mode coupling into the microdisk, whose energy lies well away from the rim, close to the centre of the disk.

3. Conclusion

In summary, we have demonstrated for the first time an efficient way of positive and negative tuning of the resonance of the cavity modes of a microdisk (or any resonator to the best of our knowledge) based on AMTIR-1, with Q ~120,000 (of a higher radial order mode, which was limited by the measuring instrument). We observe that these positive and negative shifts in the resonance are occurring due to the photo-expansion and photo-bleaching effects of the material in accordance with the change in refractive index of the thin film exposed with a band-edge laser. Also, we observe that shift is directly dependent on the applied intensity of the incident laser light, and for the low power exposure of the microdisk we don’t observe a negative shift (Photobleaching effect). In addition, a good fit between the observed refractive index change of the film and calculated stretch exponential model is shown. The proposed technique can be useful for in situ non-contact low power compensation of the fabrication tolerances.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council's (ARC) Laureate Fellowship (FL120100029), Future Fellowship (FT110100853), Discovery Project (DP130100086), Centre of Excellence (CUDOS, CE110001018), and Discovery Early Career Researcher Award (DE130101033) schemes.

References and links

1. K. J. Vahala, “Optical microcavities,” Nature 424(6950), 839–846 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. M. Soltani, S. Yegnanarayanan, and A. Adibi, “Ultra-high Q planar silicon microdisk resonators for chip-scale silicon photonics,” Opt. Express 15(8), 4694–4704 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. D. K. Armani, T. J. Kippenberg, S. M. Spillane, and K. J. Vahala, “Ultra-high-Q toroid microcavity on a chip,” Nature 421(6926), 925–928 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. P. Del’Haye, A. Schliesser, O. Arcizet, T. Wilken, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, “Optical frequency comb generation from a monolithic microresonator,” Nature 450(7173), 1214–1217 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. S. Y. Cho and N. M. Jokerst, “A Polymer Microdisk Photonic Sensor Integrated Onto Silicon,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 18(20), 2096–2098 (2006). [CrossRef]  

6. J. Hu, N. Carlie, L. Petit, A. Agrawal, K. Richardson, and L. C. Kimerling, “Cavity-Enhanced IR Absorption in Planar Chalcogenide Glass Microdisk Resonators: Experiment and Analysis,” J. Lightwave Technol. 27(23), 5240–5245 (2009). [CrossRef]  

7. A. H. Atabaki, E. Shah Hosseini, A. A. Eftekhar, S. Yegnanarayanan, and A. Adibi, “Optimization of metallic microheaters for high-speed reconfigurable silicon photonics,” Opt. Express 18(17), 18312–18323 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. S. I. Shopova, Y. Sun, A. T. Rosenberger, and X. Fan, “Highly sensitive tuning of coupled optical ring resonators by microfluidics,” Microfluid. Nanofluid. 6(3), 425–429 (2009). [CrossRef]  

9. A. Canciamilla, S. Grillanda, F. Morichetti, C. Ferrari, J. Hu, J. D. Musgraves, K. Richardson, A. Agarwal, L. C. Kimerling, and A. Melloni, “Photo-induced trimming of coupled ring-resonator filters and delay lines in As2S3 chalcogenide glass,” Opt. Lett. 36(20), 4002–4004 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. J. Hu, M. Torregiani, F. Morichetti, N. Carlie, A. Agarwal, K. Richardson, L. C. Kimerling, and A. Melloni, “Resonant cavity-enhanced photosensitivity in As2S3 chalcogenide glass at 1550 nm telecommunication wavelength,” Opt. Lett. 35(6), 874–876 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. M. Sumetsky, D. J. DiGiovanni, Y. Dulashko, X. Liu, E. M. Monberg, and T. F. Taunay, “Photo-induced SNAP: fabrication, trimming, and tuning of microresonator chains,” Opt. Express 20(10), 10684–10691 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. T. F. S. Büttner, I. V. Kabakova, D. D. Hudson, R. Pant, E. Li, and B. J. Eggleton, “Multi-wavelength gratings formed via cascaded stimulated Brillouin scattering,” Opt. Express 20(24), 26434–26440 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. K. O. Hill, Y. Fujii, D. C. Johnson, and B. S. Kawasaki, “Photosensitivity in optical fiber waveguides: application to reflection filter fabrication,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 32(10), 647–649 (1978). [CrossRef]  

14. D. K. W. Lam and B. K. Garside, “Characterization of single-mode optical fiber filters,” Appl. Opt. 20(3), 440–445 (1981). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. B. J. Eggleton, B. L. Davies, and K. Richardson, “Chalcogenide photonics,” Nat. Photonics 5(3), 141–148 (2011).

16. R. Ahmad, M. Rochette, and C. Baker, “Fabrication of Bragg gratings in subwavelength diameter As2Se3 chalcogenide wires,” Opt. Lett. 36(15), 2886–2888 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. M. W. Lee, C. Grillet, S. Tomljenovic-Hanic, E. C. Mägi, D. J. Moss, B. J. Eggleton, X. Gai, S. Madden, D. Y. Choi, D. A. P. Bulla, and B. Luther-Davies, “Photowritten high-Q cavities in two-dimensional chalcogenide glass photonic crystals,” Opt. Lett. 34(23), 3671–3673 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. A. L. Watts, N. Singh, C. G. Poulton, E. C. Magi, I. V. Kabakova, D. D. Hudson, and B. J. Eggleton, “Photoinduced axial quantization in chalcogenide microfiber resonators,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30(12), 3249–3253 (2013). [CrossRef]  

19. A. Faraon, D. Englund, D. Bulla, B. Luther-Davies, B. J. Eggleton, N. Soltz, P. Petroff, and J. Vučković, “Local tuning of photonic crystal cavities using chalcogenide glasses,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(4), 043123 (2008). [CrossRef]  

20. J. Li, H. Lee, and K. J. Vahala, “Microwave synthesizer using an on-chip Brillouin oscillator,” Nat. Commun. 4(2097), 2097 (2013). [PubMed]  

21. G. Bahl, J. Zehnpfennig, M. Tomes, and T. Carmon, “Stimulated optomechanical excitation of surface acoustic waves in a microdevice,” Nat. Commun. 2(403), 403 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. D. Y. Choi, S. Madden, A. Dode, R. Wang, and B. L. Davies, “Fabrication of low loss Ge33As12Se55 (AMTIR-1) planar waveguides,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 91(1), 011115 (2007). [CrossRef]  

23. A. Prasad, C. J. Zha, R. P. Wang, A. Smith, S. Madden, and B. Luther-Davies, “Properties of GexAsySe1-x-y glasses for all-optical signal processing,” Opt. Express 16(4), 2804–2815 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. X. Su, R. Wang, B. Luther-Davies, and L. Wang, “The dependence of photosensitivity on composition for thin films of GexAsySe1–x–y chalcogenide glasses,” Appl. Phys., A Mater. Sci. Process. 113(3), 575–581 (2013). [CrossRef]  

25. R. P. Wang, D. Y. Choi, A. V. Rode, S. J. Madden, and B. Luther-Davies, “Rebonding of Se to As and Ge in Ge33As12Se55 films upon thermal annealing: Evidence from x-ray photoelectron spectra investigations,” J. Appl. Phys. 101(11), 113517 (2007). [CrossRef]  

26. M. W. Lee, C. Grillet, C. L. Smith, D. J. Moss, B. J. Eggleton, D. Freeman, B. Luther-Davies, S. Madden, A. Rode, Y. Ruan, and Y. H. Lee, “Photosensitive post tuning of chalcogenide photonic crystal waveguides,” Opt. Express 15(3), 1277–1285 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

27. M. W. Lee, C. Grillet, C. Monat, E. Mägi, S. Tomljenovic-Hanic, X. Gai, S. Madden, D. Y. Choi, D. Bulla, B. Luther-Davies, and B. J. Eggleton, “Photosensitive and thermal nonlinear effects in chalcogenide photonic crystal cavities,” Opt. Express 18(25), 26695–26703 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

28. K. Weiser, R. J. Gambino, and J. A. Reinhold, “Laserbeam writing on amorphous chalcogenide films: crystallization kinetics and analysis of amorphizing energy,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 22(1), 48–49 (1973). [CrossRef]  

29. K. Shimakawa, N. Nakagawa, and T. Itoh, “The origin of stretched exponential function in dynamic response of photodarkening in amorphous chalcogenides,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(5), 051908 (2009). [CrossRef]  

30. N. M. Ravindra, P. Ganapathy, and J. Choi, “Energy gap refractive index relations in semiconductors-An overview,” Infrared Phys. Technol. 50(1), 21–29 (2007). [CrossRef]  

31. A. R. Barik, K. V. Adarsh, R. Naik, R. Ganesan, G. Yang, D. Zhao, H. Jain, and K. Shimakawa, “Role of rigidity and temperature in the kinetics of photodarkening in Ge(x)As(45-x)Se55 thin films,” Opt. Express 19(14), 13158–13163 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

32. Q. Yan, H. Jain, J. Ren, D. Zhao, and G. Chen, “Effect of Photo-Oxidation on Photobleaching of GeSe2 and Ge2Se3 Films,” J. Phys. Chem. C 115(43), 21390–21395 (2011). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Experimental setup with an SWS (swept wavelength system). A band edge 633 nm laser source is irradiating (with a spot size ~280 µm) a 50 µm radius microdisk sitting over a 2 µm silica pedestal on a 0.5 mm silicon substrate.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) Resonance spectrum of a 50 µm radius AMTIR-1 microdisk with several higher order modes coupling is shown. In the inset, a lorentzian fitting of the resonance dip of the higher order mode gives a loaded Q ~1.2x105. (b) Cross-sectional view of the disk with the estimated coupled mode intensity profile of the resonant mode, radially spanning about ~12 µm from the rim of the disk, having radial and azimuthal order 13 and 362 respectively. (c) Optical image of the microdisk evanescently coupling to the silica taper.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Resonance wavelength shift of the microdisk (measured at 1534.5nm of radial and azimuthal order 13 and 361 respectively), with 633nm light exposure. Red shift (1nm) and blue shift (0.5nm) are observed for high power case 10mW/mm2, while mainly red shift (0.4nm) is observed for low power case, 1mW/mm2. Note the dashed line is shown to discern the trend.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 The measured refractive index change (measured at 1550nm) of the film (a thickness of 960nm was chosen for an accurate measurement by the spectroscopic reflectometer) and resonance shift (as taken from Fig. 3) of the microdisk as a function of fluence is shown. Here we observe a positive shift in the resonance of the microdisk for the same amount of fluence that causes a decrease in the film index. This indicates the expansion of the microdisk dominates the initial positive shift in the microdisk resonance, which is followed by a negative resonance shift mainly governed by the reduction in refractive index. The dashed line is shown to discern the trend. Inset: Stretch exponential function fitting.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Calculated parameters of the thin film and the microdisk with the measured loaded Q obtained in this study.

Equations (1)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

δn= C b [exp{ (t/ τ b ) β b }]
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.