Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

OAM vortex wave interaction with phase modulated metasurface

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Phase modulated metasurface (PMM) can control the transmission state of electromagnetic (EM) wave through phase modulation scheme on the interface. Orbital angular momentum (OAM) vortex wave is denoted by the helical phase distribution of the wave front. The interaction between OAM vortex wave and PMM is investigated in this paper. The mathematical model is firstly established according to the array theory. Whereafter, two typical PMMs of chessboard metasurface (CBM) and phase gradient metasurface (PGM) are exploited as examples to uncover the scattering characteristics under illumination of OAM vortex wave. For CBM, the phase cancellation scheme is found to be broken when the OAM order l equals to ±2 under both normal incidence and oblique incidence. It reveals that the OAM vortex wave is a promising approach for metasurface stealth target detection. For PGM, the scattered wave still keeps the OAM feature but is deflected to the non-specular direction, which reveals that the generalized Snell’s law is also suitable to OAM vortex wave. The discoveries of this paper may find applications in radar detection fields using OAM vortex wave.

© 2024 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

In the traditional meaning, the information modulation methods mainly focus on the time domain, frequency domain, and polarization domain. With the rapid development of information technology, a new degree of freedom has been exploited, which is the orbital angular momentum (OAM) of the electromagnetic (EM) wave. The wave front of EM wave carrying OAM is in helical shape so that it is called OAM vortex wave. The phase of OAM vortex wave equals to l times of its azimuthal angle, where l represents the OAM order. The OAM vortex waves with different orders are orthogonal to each other and can transfer information independently [1]. Thus, it is expected to enhance the communication capacity using OAM multiplexing [25]. Due to its promising application prospect, the generation method of OAM vortex wave has drawn lots of attentions. At present, array antenna [68], traveling wave antenna [9,10], and metasurface antenna [7,1114] etc. are the main approaches for OAM vortex wave generation at microwave bands. It is not a problem any more to generate OAM vortex wave.

Along with the deepening of research, the scattering characteristic of OAM vortex wave has gradually attracted attentions. The special wave front structure makes the interaction between the targets and OAM vortex wave quite different from the plane wave. In [15], the target scattering characteristics for OAM-based radar was discussed. The OAM-based radar cross section (ORCS) was defined by modifying the conventional radar equation. Analytical studies demonstrated that the mirror-reflection phenomenon disappeared and peak values of ORCS were in the non-specular direction for metal plate and cylinder targets. In [16], the backward scattering characteristics of the perfect electrical conductor (PEC) sphere and PEC cone were studied. It was concluded that given a specific propagation direction, compared to plane waves, more information would be offered by the OAM beams for object detection and recognition. In [17], experiments showed that different radar cross sections (RCSs) of a specific complex target can be obtained by different OAM waves and the signal-to-noise ratio gain can be achieved due to the appropriate OAM mode selection. OAM vortex waves were decomposed into plane waves in the spectral domain with different elevation and azimuth angles in [18]. The results revealed that the RCS of the dielectric cylinder increased for the OAM wave incidence compared with plane wave incidence, and OAM mode number had a significant effect on the RCS. Therefore, it was concluded that the OAM can promisingly be used to enhance the radar target detection capability. Besides these conventional targets, metamaterial target is also taken into consideration. In [19], the scattering of OAM vortex wave by a perfect electromagnetic conductor (PEMC) sphere using Mie Theory was conducted. The result showed that the co and cross polarized RCS always showed opposite behavior for PEMC sphere. Accordingly, Laguerre–Gaussian (LG) beam scattering by a PEMC cylinder coated with a metamaterial was analyzed in [20]. This research work contained enough information to calculate the RCS by metamaterials for an incident LG beam. The research in [21] focused on the metasurface stealth target (MST). It was found that the echo of MST had a strong correlation with OAM order l. Moreover, a chessboard metasurface (CBM) was taken as an example to illustrate the backscattering enhancement phenomenon by OAM detection approach compared to the plane wave incidence case. This work uncovered the promising application for MST detection using OAM vortex wave.

Phase modulated metasurface (PMM) such as CBM and phase gradient metasurface (PGM) is broadly used to control the transmission state of EM waves. In [22], a polarization-insensitive PGM was proposed to deflect the different LP incident waves to the same direction. In addition, by introducing phase-corrected gradient (PCG) on the metasurface platform, lossless transformation from the incidence to far-field patterns was obtained in [23]. However, the research on PMM is mainly focused on its interaction with plane wave. In this paper, we have further studied the interaction between PMM and the OAM vortex wave. In comparison to [21], the mathematical model has been modified by taking into consideration of oblique incidence case, which is more common in real scenarios. Then, the scattering characteristics of CBM and PGM are analyzed under incidence of OAM vortex wave with different angles and OAM orders. The interaction between PMM and OAM vortex wave may find promising applications in radar detection field, especially for MST detection problem.

2. Mathematical model

The interaction scenario between OAM vortex wave and PMM is shown in Fig. 1. The metasurface is composed of M × N unit cells denoted by (m, n). A vortex source radiating OAM vortex wave is located above the metasurface. As shown in the figure, θinc and φinc represent the incident elevation and azimuthal angle of OAM vortex wave, respectively. θ(m, n) is the angle between the axis of the vortex source and unit cell (m, n). The direction of scattered wave is $\mathrm{\hat{u}}$ and it can be calculated by $\hat{u} = {\hat{e}_x}\sin \theta \cos \varphi + {\hat{e}_y}\sin \theta \sin \varphi + {\hat{e}_z}\cos \theta$, where θ and φ are the elevation angle and azimuthal angle in global xyz coordinate system, respectively.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. The interaction scenario between OAM vortex wave and PMM.

Download Full Size | PDF

According to the array antenna theory, the total scattered wave is the superposition of the waves reflected by all the unit cells of the metasurface. Thus, it is obtained that

$${E_s}(\hat{u}) = \sum\limits_{m = 0}^{M - 1} {\sum\limits_{n = 0}^{N - 1} {{E_r}(m,n,\hat{u})} }$$
where ${E_s}(\hat{u})$ is the total scattered wave and ${E_r}(m,n,\hat{u})$ is the reflected wave of unit cell (m,n) at $\mathrm{\hat{u}}$ direction. The excitation of unit cell (m,n) is the incoming wave of the vortex source. Assuming the reflection amplitude is 1, the reflected wave can be expressed as
$$\begin{aligned} {E_r}(m,n,\hat{u}) &= I(m,n) \cdot {E_{rad}}(\hat{u}) \cdot {e^{i\phi (m,n)}}\\ &= I(m,n) \cdot ({\cos ^q}\theta \cdot {e^{ik\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}} \over r} (m,n) \cdot \hat{u}}}) \cdot {e^{i\phi (m,n)}} \end{aligned}$$
where $I(m,n)$ is the excitation function and ${E_{rad}}(\hat{u})$ is the radiation pattern of the unit cell (m,n), which is approximated by ${\cos ^q}\theta$. In the simulation, q = 1.5 is adopted. ${e^{i\phi (m,n)}}$ represents the modulated phase caused by PMM. It is difficult to compute $I(m,n)$ directly under arbitrary incident angle $({\theta _{inc}},{\varphi _{inc}})$. Nevertheless, we can turn to compute its orthogonal projection with respect to the vortex source axis. Assuming the coordinate of unit cell (m,n) is $(x,y,0)$, then the corresponding unit cell $(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})$ denoted by $(x^{\prime},y^{\prime},z^{\prime})$ in the projected PMM with respect to the vortex source axis is determined by
$$\left[ {\begin{array}{{c}} {x^{\prime}}\\ {y^{\prime}}\\ {z^{\prime}} \end{array}} \right] = \left[ {\begin{array}{{ccc}} {\cos {\varphi_{inc}}}&{ - \sin {\varphi_{inc}}}&0\\ {\sin {\varphi_{inc}}}&{\cos {\varphi_{inc}}}&0\\ 0&0&1 \end{array}} \right] \cdot \left[ {\begin{array}{{ccc}} {\cos {\theta_{inc}}}&0&{\sin {\theta_{inc}}}\\ 0&1&0\\ { - \sin {\theta_{inc}}}&0&{\cos {\theta_{inc}}} \end{array}} \right] \cdot \left[ {\begin{array}{{c}} x\\ y\\ 0 \end{array}} \right]$$

Then, we can obtain

$$\begin{aligned} I(m^{\prime},n^{\prime}) &= E_{inc}^{OAM}(m^{\prime},n^{\prime}) \cdot {E_{rec}}(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})\\ &= E_{inc}^{OAM}(m^{\prime},n^{\prime}) \cdot {\cos ^q}\theta (m^{\prime},n^{\prime}) \end{aligned}$$
where $E_{inc}^{OAM}(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})$ is the incoming OAM vortex wave and ${E_{rec}}(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})$ is the receiving pattern of unit cell $(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})$, which is also approximated by cosine model. $\theta (m^{\prime},n^{\prime})$ denotes the incoming direction of OAM vortex wave at unit cell $(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})$. In this way, the arbitrary angle between the axis of OAM vortex wave and PMM is turned into 0 in terms of the projected PMM. Hence, the correspondence between the incoming wave and unit cell (m,n) of the original PMM can be established through computing the incoming wave of unit cell $(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})$.

When a uniform circular array (UCA) is adopted as the vortex source, the incoming wave at unit cell $(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})$ can be expressed as [21]

$$\begin{aligned} E_{inc}^{OAM}(m^{\prime},n^{\prime}) &= {\cos ^{{q_e}}}\theta (m^{\prime},n^{\prime})\sum\limits_{w = 0}^{W - 1} {\frac{1}{{\left|{\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}} \over r} (m^{\prime},n^{\prime}) - {{\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}} \over r} }_w}} \right|}}} {e^{ik\left|{\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}} \over r} (m^{\prime},n^{\prime}) - {{\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}} \over r} }_w}} \right|}}{e^{il{\varphi _w}}}\\ &\approx {\cos ^{{q_e}}}\theta (m^{\prime},n^{\prime})\frac{{{e^{ikR(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})}}}}{{R(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})}}\sum\limits_{w = 0}^{W - 1} {{e^{ - i(k\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}} \over r} (m^{\prime},n^{\prime}) \cdot {{\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}} \over r} }_w} - l{\varphi _w})}}} \\ &\approx {\cos ^{{q_e}}}\theta (m^{\prime},n^{\prime})W{i^{ - l}}\frac{{{e^{ikR(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})}}}}{{R(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})}}{e^{il\varphi (m^{\prime},n^{\prime})}}{J_l}(ka\sin \theta (m^{\prime},n^{\prime})) \end{aligned}$$

In (5), W is the number of the elements in UCA, $\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}} \over r} (m^{\prime},n^{\prime})$ and ${\mathord{\buildrel{\lower3pt\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle\rightharpoonup$}} \over r} _w}$ are the position vector of unit cell $(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})$ and wth element of UCA, respectively. ${\varphi _w} = 2\pi w/W$ is the azimuthal angle of wth element with respect to the axis and a is the radius of the UCA. $R(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})$ is the distance between vortex source center and unit cell $(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})$. ${J_l}$ is the lth order Bessel function of the first kind and ${\cos ^{{q_e}}}\theta (m^{\prime},n^{\prime})$ is the element pattern at unit cell $(m^{\prime},n^{\prime})$, where qe = 1. Using (1)∼(5), the scattering characteristic can be analyzed in detail.

3. Scattering characteristic of CBM

CBM is usually used to reduce the RCS of a target due to the phase cancellation scheme. A CBM divided into four regions is adopted to study the scattering characteristic as shown in Fig. 2. The modulated phase of the adjacent regions is coded by “0” and “1”, of which the phase difference is π. There are 30 × 30 unit cells in total and each area contains 15 × 15 of them. The period of each unit cell is 20mm. A UCA composed of 16 microstrip antenna elements with the radius of 3λ is utilized to generate OAM vortex waves, where λ is the wavelength at the working frequency of 4.8GHz. The distance between the UCA and CBM is 10λ.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. The structure of a CBM.

Download Full Size | PDF

The scattering patterns of the CBM under different incident angle ${\theta _{inc}}$ (${\varphi _{inc}} = 0$) and OAM orders are shown in Fig. 3. The first row of the figure represents the plane wave case of l = 0. When the incident angle ${\theta _{inc}} = {0^\textrm{o}}$, the scattering pattern has four peaks around the normal direction of the metasurface due to the phase cancellation scheme. As a result, the monostatic RCS can be reduced significantly. With the increase of ${\theta _{inc}}$, the four scattering peaks still exist but they are deflected to the specular direction. The same deflection phenomenon can be observed for other cases as shown in each row of the figure. In the first column, the incident angle keeps unchanged while the OAM order l grows bigger from above to below. There are still four peaks for the scattering patterns of l = ±1, ± 3, and ±4, which reveals that the phase cancellation scheme still works for these OAM modes. Compared to plane wave case, the peaks are extended to four arms and these arms become bigger with the increasing of OAM order. This is reasonable because the divergence level increases with the growing of OAM order. For ${\theta _{inc}} = {15^\textrm{o}}$ and ${\theta _{inc}} = {30^\textrm{o}}$, these arms are deflected to the specular direction and become more and more disordered. However, for l = ±2 case, only one scattering peak is observed instead of four. This peak appears at the normal direction for ${\theta _{inc}} = {0^\textrm{o}}$, indicating that there is strong backward scattering energy. This phenomenon is against the stealth scheme of CBM. It can be inferred that the monostatic RCS will be increased to a great extent. The reason of such phenomenon lies in the phase superposition of CBM and the OAM vortex wave of l = ±2 [21]. For ${\theta _{inc}} = {15^\textrm{o}}$ and ${\theta _{inc}} = {30^\textrm{o}}$, the scattering pattern still has only one peak occurring at the specular direction, manifesting that the scattering energy is also focused instead of dispersed. It indicates that the bistatic RCS of the CBM can be enhanced greatly.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. The normalized scattering pattern of CBM under illumination of OAM vortex wave with different orders and incident angles. (a)-(c) l = 0, (d)-(f) l = ±1, (g)-(i) l = ±2, (j)-(l) l = ±3, (m)-(o) l = ±4.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Scattering characteristic of PGM

PGM can realize abnormal reflection by the phase gradient at certain direction, which obeys the generalized Snell’s law. A typical PGM with the phase difference of π/3 is shown in Fig. 4. According to the generalized Snell’s law, the incident angle ${\theta _{inc}}$ and reflection angle ${\theta _{ref}}$ satisfy

$${n_{inc}}\sin {\theta _{ref}} - {n_{inc}}\sin {\theta _{inc}} = \frac{\lambda }{{2\pi }}\frac{{d\phi }}{{dx}}$$
where ${n_{inc}} = 1$ is the refractive index of the air and $\frac{{d\phi }}{{dx}}$ is the phase gradient.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. The PGM with phase difference of π/3.

Download Full Size | PDF

The scattering pattern of this PGM with OAM vortex wave incidence under different orders and incident angles are shown in Fig. 5, including the magnitude and phase distributions. In the simulation, $d\phi = \pi /3$, $dx = 100mm$ and the working frequency is 4.8GHz. When the incident angle ${\theta _{inc}} = {0^\textrm{o}}$, the scattered waves are deflected away from the normal direction due to the phase gradient of the metasurface. For l = 0, the scattered wave has one peak, which are in accord with the plane wave case. For l ≠ 0, the scattered waves still keep the characteristic of doughnut-like shape and helical phase. However, the energy and phase distributions get disturbed with the increase of OAM order l and incident angle ${\theta _{inc}}$. The two-dimensional scattering patterns at $\varphi = 0$ plane are depicted in Fig. 6. Notice that all the patterns are normalized to the l = 0 case. It is found that the scattered beams are deflected by 6° and 22° for ${\theta _{inc}} = {0^\textrm{o}}$ and ${\theta _{inc}} = {15^\textrm{o}}$, respectively. The theoretical deflection angle is 6° and 21° according to (6). The results obtained by mathematical model agree well with the theoretical prediction, which demonstrates that the generalized Snell’s law is also suitable to the OAM vortex wave.

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. The PGM scattering patterns of normalized magnitude and phase under OAM vortex wave with different orders and incident angles. (a)-(d) l = 0, (e)-(h) l = ±1, (i)-(l) l = ±2, (m)-(p) l = ±3, (q)-(t) l = ±4.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. The two-dimensional scattering patterns at plane of φ=0 under the incidence angles of (a) ${\theta _{inc}} = {0^\textrm{o}}$ and (b) ${\theta _{inc}} = {15^\textrm{o}}$.

Download Full Size | PDF

5. Conclusion

The scattering characteristic of OAM vortex wave at radio bands has gradually attracted attentions. The interaction targets include the metal plate, PEC cone, PEMC and so on. We furtherly studied the interaction between PMM and OAM vortex wave in this paper. The array theory was adopted to establish the mathematical model, which can be utilized to compute the scattering pattern under arbitrary incident angles and OAM orders. CBM and PGM are taken as examples to study the scattering characteristics. For CBM, it is found that the stealth scheme can be broken when OAM order l equals to ±2 under both normal incidence and oblique incidence. For PGM, the computed results demonstrate that we can still use the generalized Snell’s law to predict the reflection direction of OAM vortex wave and the reflected wave still keeps the OAM features. Although the scattering characteristics are only considered for CBM and PGM, the proposed method can also be used for other types of PMM. The findings of this paper have enriched the scattering scenario of OAM vortex wave and may find applications for PMM targets detections.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (62201614).

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Data availability

Data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

1. F. Tamburini, E. Mari, A. Sponselli, et al., “Encoding many channels on the same frequency through radio vorticity: first experimental test,” New J. Phys. 14(3), 033001 (2012). [CrossRef]  

2. Y. Zhang and J. Li, “An orbital angular momentum-based array for in-band full-duplex communications,” Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 18(3), 417–421 (2019). [CrossRef]  

3. L. Wang, W. Park, C. Yang, et al., “Wireless communication of radio waves carrying orbital angular momentum (OAM) above an infinite ground plane,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 62(5), 2257–2264 (2020). [CrossRef]  

4. R. Wang, M. T. Wang, Y. F. Zhang, et al., “Generation of orbital angular momentum multiplexing millimeter waves based on a circular traveling wave antenna,” Opt. Express 31(3), 5131–5139 (2023). [CrossRef]  

5. R. Chen, J. X. Zhou, W. X. Long, et al., “Hybrid circular array and luneberg lens for long-distance OAM wireless communications,” IEEE Trans. Commun. 71(1), 485–497 (2023). [CrossRef]  

6. U. Yesilyurt and H. K. Polat, “Helical circular array configurations for generation of orbital angular momentum beams,” Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 22(5), 1139–1143 (2023). [CrossRef]  

7. D. Zhang, X. Y. Cao, J. Gao, et al., “A Shared Aperture 1 Bit Metasurface for Orbital Angular Momentum Multiplexing,” Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 18(4), 566–570 (2019). [CrossRef]  

8. J. U. Yoo and H. W. Son, “Quad-mode radial uniform circular array antenna for OAM multiplexing,” IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 14(8), 728–733 (2020). [CrossRef]  

9. Z. Zhang, S. Zheng, X. Jin, et al., “Generation of plane spiral OAM waves using traveling-wave circular slot antenna,” Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 16, 8–11 (2017). [CrossRef]  

10. W. T. Zhang, S. L. Zheng, X. N. Hui, et al., “Four-OAM-mode antenna with traveling-wave ring-slot structure,” Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 16, 194–197 (2017). [CrossRef]  

11. G. S. Huang, S. J. Li, Z. Y. Li, et al., “Multifunctional coding-feeding metasurface based on phase manipulation,” Materials 15(19), 7031 (2022). [CrossRef]  

12. K. Y. Liu, G. M. Wang, T. Cai, et al., “Dual-frequency geometric phase metasurface for dual-mode vortex beam generator,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52(25), 255002 (2019). [CrossRef]  

13. D. Zhang, C. H. He, L. Hong, et al., “Dual-mode dual-polarization orbital angular momentum metasurface antenna with in-band radar cross-section reduction,” Int J RF Mic Comp-Aid Eng 32(10), e23304 (2022). [CrossRef]  

14. Q. Feng, X. D. Kong, M. M. Shan, et al., “Multi-orbital-angular-momentum-mode vortex wave multiplexing and demultiplexing with shared-aperture reflective metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. Applied 17(3), 034017 (2022). [CrossRef]  

15. K. Liu, Y. Gao, X. Li, et al., “Target scattering characteristics for OAM-based radar,” AIP Adv. 8(2), 25002 (2018). [CrossRef]  

16. K. Liu, H. Y. Liu, W. E. I. Sha, et al., “Backward scattering of electrically large standard objects illuminated by OAM beams,” Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 19(7), 1167–1171 (2020). [CrossRef]  

17. C. Zhang, X. F. Jiang, and D. Chen, “RCS promotion in orbital angular momentum imaging radar with rotational antenna,” IET Radar Sonar Navig. 13(12), 2140–2144 (2019). [CrossRef]  

18. X. X. Zhang, X. Su, Z. S. Wu, et al., “Analysis of electromagnetic scattering from typical targets for orbital-angular-momentum waves: Theoretical model,” IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 16(11), 699–708 (2022). [CrossRef]  

19. M. Arfan, A. Ghaffar, Majeed A.S. Alkanhal, et al., “Orbital angular momentum wave scattering from perfect electromagnetic conductor (PEMC) sphere,” Optik 253, 168562 (2022). [CrossRef]  

20. M. Arfan, A. Ghaffar, M. Y. Naz, et al., “Laguerre–Gaussian beam interaction by a metamaterial coated perfect electromagnetic conductor (PEMC) cylinder,” Opt. Quant. Electron. 55(3), 252 (2023). [CrossRef]  

21. D. Zhang, J. W. Chen, C. H. He, et al., “Backscattering enhancement of a chessboard metasurface based on the orbital angular momentum detection approach,” Opt. Mater. Express 13(7), 1947–1955 (2023). [CrossRef]  

22. J. X. Li, Y. Y. Yuan, Q. Wu, et al., “Bi-isotropic Huygens’ metasurface for polarization-insensitive cross-polarization conversion and wavefront manipulation,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 72(3), 2445–2454 (2024). [CrossRef]  

23. Y. X. Wang, Y. Y. Yuan, Y. Liu, et al., “Extreme diffraction management in phase-corrected gradient metasurface by Fourier harmonic component engineering,” Laser Photonics Rev. 17(7), 2300152 (2023). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. The interaction scenario between OAM vortex wave and PMM.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. The structure of a CBM.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. The normalized scattering pattern of CBM under illumination of OAM vortex wave with different orders and incident angles. (a)-(c) l = 0, (d)-(f) l = ±1, (g)-(i) l = ±2, (j)-(l) l = ±3, (m)-(o) l = ±4.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. The PGM with phase difference of π/3.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. The PGM scattering patterns of normalized magnitude and phase under OAM vortex wave with different orders and incident angles. (a)-(d) l = 0, (e)-(h) l = ±1, (i)-(l) l = ±2, (m)-(p) l = ±3, (q)-(t) l = ±4.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. The two-dimensional scattering patterns at plane of φ=0 under the incidence angles of (a) ${\theta _{inc}} = {0^\textrm{o}}$ and (b) ${\theta _{inc}} = {15^\textrm{o}}$.

Equations (6)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

E s ( u ^ ) = m = 0 M 1 n = 0 N 1 E r ( m , n , u ^ )
E r ( m , n , u ^ ) = I ( m , n ) E r a d ( u ^ ) e i ϕ ( m , n ) = I ( m , n ) ( cos q θ e i k r ( m , n ) u ^ ) e i ϕ ( m , n )
[ x y z ] = [ cos φ i n c sin φ i n c 0 sin φ i n c cos φ i n c 0 0 0 1 ] [ cos θ i n c 0 sin θ i n c 0 1 0 sin θ i n c 0 cos θ i n c ] [ x y 0 ]
I ( m , n ) = E i n c O A M ( m , n ) E r e c ( m , n ) = E i n c O A M ( m , n ) cos q θ ( m , n )
E i n c O A M ( m , n ) = cos q e θ ( m , n ) w = 0 W 1 1 | r ( m , n ) r w | e i k | r ( m , n ) r w | e i l φ w cos q e θ ( m , n ) e i k R ( m , n ) R ( m , n ) w = 0 W 1 e i ( k r ( m , n ) r w l φ w ) cos q e θ ( m , n ) W i l e i k R ( m , n ) R ( m , n ) e i l φ ( m , n ) J l ( k a sin θ ( m , n ) )
n i n c sin θ r e f n i n c sin θ i n c = λ 2 π d ϕ d x
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.