Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Identifying photoelectron releasing order in strong-field dissociative ionization of H2

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Driven by intense laser fields, the outgoing photoelectrons in molecules possess a quiver motion, resulting in the rise of the effective ionization potential. The coupling of the field-dressed ionization potential with abundant molecular dynamics complicates the laser-molecule interactions. Here, we demonstrate an approach to resolve photoelectron releasing order in the dissociative and non-dissociative channels of multiphoton ionization driven by an orthogonally polarized two-color femtosecond laser pulse. The photoelectron kinetic energy releases and the regular nodes in the photoelectron angular distributions due to the participation of different continuum partial waves allow us to deduce the field-dressed ionization potential of various channels. It returns the ponderomotive energy experienced by the outgoing electron and reveals the corresponding photoionization instants within the laser pulse. Our results provide a route to explore the complex strong-field ionization dynamics of molecules using two-dimensional photoelectron momentum spectroscopy.

© 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Photoionization of atoms and molecules is the pioneering process in strong-field physics, where the above-threshold ionization (ATI) illustrates a well-known scenario that the electrons therein can absorb multiple photons from strong laser fields, even beyond the minimum number required to overcome the ionization potential. The ATI photoelectron kinetic energy spectrum was first observed by Agostini et al. in 1979 [1] and has been utilized to investigate photoelectron circular dichroism [2], few-cycle carrier-envelope phase characterization [3], laser-assisted electron scattering [4,5], spin-orbit coupling of noble-gas atoms [68], and laser-induced molecular dissociation [9,10] over the past four decades.

Beyond the energy-resolved spectra, photoelectron angular distributions (PADs) provide abundant dynamical information on the resonant intermediate and continuum states. The fine structures in the PAD, e.g., the multiple concentric circles shaped with regular nodes, have been observed in previous experiments [1115]. The regular nodal structure is related to the significant angular momentum of the freed electron [1620] in the frequency domain, which can also be understood as the intracycle interference of the released electronic wave packets [2125] in the time domain.

As the bound electron is liberated in intense laser fields, it experiences a quiver motion driven by the oscillating electric field, gaining an average quiver energy known as ponderomotive energy (Up). The ponderomotive potential gives rise to the energy up-shift of continuum states of the electron, which results in a field-dressed ionization potential compared to the field-free one. The laser-intensity-dependent effect can be decoupled in single ionization of atoms by considering the peak of the laser pulse at the ionization instant approximately. However, considering subsequent laser interactions towards different reaction pathways, it is hard to identify the ionization instant and thus the absorbed photon number in molecules due to the synergy of the field-strength-dependent ionization-potential rise and the chemical-bond stretching. The two-fold modulation on the photoelectron kinetic energy spectra hinders further investigations on the laser-molecule interaction, such as the attosecond time delay of molecular photoionization [26], electron-nuclear energy sharing of molecules [2729], and charge-resonance-enhanced ionization of molecules [3033].

In this article, we experimentally investigate the photoelectron momentum distributions (PMDs) of different reaction channels in H2 molecules driven by an orthogonally polarized two-color (OTC) laser pulse. The OTC scheme with its sculptured waveform was employed to control the emission direction of photoelectrons and thus the momentum distributions by altering the relative phase [3440]. Here, the two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy upon the OTC scheme takes advantage of different photon energies and transition selection rules, providing a powerful tool to analyze the involved electron continuum partial waves and absorbed photon numbers in the molecule. The comparison between the dissociative and non-dissociative channels shows that an energy shift of ATI peaks and different ionization pathways are deduced from the observed PADs. It is attributed to the fact that the photoionization of the dissociative channel with an extra time advance invoked by the bond stretching occurs at the rising edge of the laser pulse, earlier than that of the non-dissociative channel which mainly occurs at the pulse peak.

2. Experimental method

Experimentally, a linearly polarized fundamental wave (FW) pulse (25 fs, 790 nm, 10 kHz, polarized along the z axis) derived from a multipass Ti:sapphire amplifier was down-collimated into a 150-µm-thick β-barium borate (BBO) crystal to generate a second harmonic (SH, polarized along the y axis) pulse centered at 395 nm. We produced the phase-locked orthogonally polarized two-color laser field in a collinear scheme [41]. The time lag between the FW and SH pulses was compensated by a birefringent α-BBO crystal. A pair of fused silica wedges was used to tune the relative phase between the two-color pulses finely. The experimental results shown throughout the article are integrated over the relative phase of the two colors, which actually does not alter the positions of the discrete ATI peaks in the photoelectron kinetic energy spectrum and the number of nodes in the angular distributions. As shown in Fig. 1(a), the generated OTC laser pulse was tightly focused onto a supersonic gas jet of H2 by a concave silver mirror (f = 7.5 cm) inside an ultrahigh vacuum chamber of the cold-target recoil ion momentum spectrometer [42,43]. The produced photoelectron and nuclear fragments were accelerated and guided by a static electric field (∼ 3.8 V/cm) and a magnetic field (∼ 6.1 G). The positions of the charged particles were detected by two time- and position-sensitive microchannel plate detectors at the opposite ends of the spectrometer, from which the three-dimensional momenta of the electrons and nuclear fragments were reconstructed. The peak intensities of the FW and SH laser pulses in the interaction region were estimated to be IFW ∼ 8.3 × 1013 W/cm2 and ISH ∼ 6.0 × 1012 W/cm2, respectively.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the experiment apparatus. The OTC pulse propagating along the x axis is back-focused by a concave mirror onto the molecular beam propagating along the y axis. The emitting electrons and charged nuclear fragments such as H2+ and H+ are guided by the external electric field and magnetic field and measured by detectors at the ends of the spectrometer. The polarization of FW and SH waves is along the z and y axes, respectively. Measured PMDs of (b) non-dissociative and (c) dissociative single ionization of H2, where the white dashed rings highlight the contribution of the first- and second-order ATI.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Results and discussions

To extract corresponding electron events, we investigate the following two reaction channels [44]. The first one is non-dissociative single ionization of H2 expressed as

$$ \mathrm{H}_2+n \hbar \omega \longrightarrow \mathrm{H}_2^{+}+e, $$
labeled as H2+ channel, where the neutral H2 absorbs n photons (n is an integer) from laser fields, and an electron is released. In order to suppress the false coincidence, a momentum conservation gate of $\left|p_{z, e}+p_{z, i o n}\right|<0.2$ a.u. is applied for the measured electrons and H2+ along the time-of-flight direction of the spectrometer. The second channel is dissociative single ionization of H2 expressed as
$$ \mathrm{H}_2+m \hbar \omega \rightarrow \mathrm{H}_2^{+}+e, $$
$$\mathrm{H}_2^{+}+k \hbar \omega \longrightarrow \mathrm{H}^{+}+\mathrm{H}$$
labeled as H10 channel, where the neutral H2 absorbs k photons and releases an electron, and the photoionization-created nuclear wave packet (NWP) of H2+ absorbs extra m photons and further dissociates as a charged proton and a neutral atom. Among them, only the charged proton H+ and the electron can be accelerated by the electric field of the spectrometer and finally detected. Thus the electron events are chosen by selecting the correlated proton events without the momentum conservation gate.

Figures 1(b) and 1(c) display the measured two-dimensional PMDs of the two channels in the y-z polarization plane. There are many ATI rings existing in the PMDs shaped by multiple nodes. These nodal structures imply that the released photoelectrons emit along these directions, characteristic of partial waves with specific angular momenta [45]. For the PMD of H2+ channel shown in Fig. 1(b), the number of nodes from the first- to fourth-order ATI is 10, 16, 18, and 20, respectively, while the number of nodes from the first- to forth-order ATI in the PMD of H10 channel shown in Fig. 1(c) is 12, 18, 20, and 22, respectively. Both two channels demonstrate the same phenomenon that the number of nodes in each order ATI increases linearly with the order except for the first one. The counterintuitive experimental observation is beyond the previous understanding of the ATI structure, the details of which will be discussed later.

A distinct discrepancy between the two channels occurs that the PAD of each order ATI of H10 channel owns two more nodes than the one of H2+ channel, which, undoubtedly, implies the participation of different partial waves. This finding breaks the well-accepted assumption that the first ionization step of H10 channel happens at the same time as the one of H2+ channel, i.e., the dissociation is regarded as the subsequent process of the observed non-dissociative single ionization event, which is mainly considered as the origin of a semiclassical model [4649].

To further investigate the underlying physics of the experimental observations, we analyze the corresponding photoelectron kinetic energy spectra, as shown in Fig. 2. From the numerical fitting via multiple Gaussian functions, we can extract equidistant ATI peaks with the FW photon energy apart, regardless of the contribution of sharp Freeman resonant peaks [50]. There is an apparent offset in the photoelectron kinetic energy spectra of the two channels, where the ATI peaks of H10 channel are 0.55 eV larger than the ones of H2+ channel. The kinetic energy of the released photoelectron satisfies

$${E_e} = \; n\hbar \omega - {I_p} - {U_p}(t ),$$
where n is the number of photons absorbed during the ionization process, Ip is the field-free ionization potential at the equilibrium internuclear distance of H2. The term of Up (t) is the ponderomotive energy as a function of the ionization instant t, formulated as (here atomic units are used)
$${U_p}(t )= \frac{{{E^2}(t )}}{{4{\omega ^2}}}$$
where E(t) is the envelope of the laser electric field, and $\omega$ is the laser frequency. Considering that the photoelectron kinetic energy spectra are related to the multiphoton ionization and electron-nuclear energy sharing processes, there are two possible physical reasons: one is the intensity-dependent ponderomotive energy experienced by the outgoing photoelectron and the other is the population of different vibrational states of the H2+ upon the photoionization of H2. However, the latter cannot explain the variation of partial waves (different numbers of nodes). Therefore, the energy offset should be attributed to the discrepancy of the field-strength-dependent ponderomotive energy. We note that the observed photoelectron kinetic energy strongly relates to the ponderomotive shift of the ionization potential of the molecule upon the photoionization that may occur via the resonant intermediate state, as discussed below. The node structure in the PAD encodes its orbital angular momentum, which is given by the number of photons absorbed by the molecule.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Measured photoelectron kinetic energy spectra of (a) non-dissociative and (b) dissociative single ionization of H2. Blue circles and violet solid curves indicate the measured kinetic energy spectra and the fitting curves via multiple Gaussian functions, respectively. Violet areas denote the individual ATI regions in the fitting.

Download Full Size | PDF

We now discuss the underlying physics of the non-dissociative single ionization of H2, analogous to the multiphoton ionization of atoms. The single ionization mainly happens at the peak of a femtosecond laser pulse with the Gaussian envelope. Hence, the corresponding ponderomotive energy can be calculated to be 4.9 eV via Eq. (2), taking the peak intensity of the FW wave into account. It is important to mention that the Up of the weak SH wave (∼ 0.08 eV) is negligible compared to the one of the strong FW wave. The effective ionization potential of H2 is 16.2 eV considering the population around the vibrationally excited state (v’ = 3) of the ionization-created H2+ in the Frank-Condon region, different from the conventional ionization potential of 15.4 eV (from v = 0 of H2 to v’ = 0 of H2+) [51], and the photoelectron kinetic energy of the first-order ATI in H2+ channel is 0.6 eV. According to Eq. (1), the energy of 14$\omega$FW is required for the electron to overcome the ionization potential and the ponderomotive energy as well. After confirming the absorbed energy, we further infer the partial wave with the help of phase-dependent measurement. Figure 3 shows the polar plots of PADs of the first- and second-order ATI in two reaction channels integrated over the corresponding energy region. We found that the photoelectron emitting near 90° (along the vertical axis) undergoes a phase step of $\pi$ (not shown here), which is characteristic of the interference between odd-order and even-order partial waves [52,53]. Thus, the quantization axis is determined to be the polarization direction of the SH wave (along the horizontal axis). Based on this, we can refer to the possible partial waves of each order ATI. Taking the first-order ATI in H2+ channel as an example, there are 10 nodes in the PAD shown in Fig. 3(a), sharing the analogous structure with the spherical harmonics function of Y50. According to the selection rule of dipole transitions and the total energy of absorbed photons, we can deduce that the photoelectron of the first-order ATI is generated by resonant multiphoton ionization via intermediate states with the orbital angular momentum of l = 5, where a series of bound states are involved, i.e., Y50, Y52, Y54 (represented by the typical one of Y50 hereafter for convenience). After the population on the resonant state of Y50, the electron further absorbs 2$\omega$FW or 1$\omega$SH and is released to the continuum, giving birth to the partial wave of Y50 or Y40, respectively. For the photoelectron with the same kinetic energy, the absorption of the SH photon with duple photon energy of the FW pulse will alter the orbital angular momentum of the emitted photoelectron and introduce multiple pathways for interference. Figure 3(b) shows the PAD of the second-order ATI in H2+ channel, where the 16-node structure is considered as the interference of Y81 and Y71 via absorbing 3$\omega$FW and 1$\omega$FW + 1$\omega$SH, respectively.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. (a), (b) Polar plots of the PADs of the first- and second-order ATI in non-dissociative ionization integrated over the corresponding energy region. (c), (d) The same as (a), (b) but for dissociative ionization.

Download Full Size | PDF

While for the ionization process of H10 channel, it is more complicated to determine how much photon energy is absorbed considering different ionization instants. According to the PAD of the first-order ATI shown in Fig. 3(c), there are 12 regular nodes, which is related to the partial wave of Y61. Thus, the PADs of H10 channel demonstrate opposite polarity compared to the ones of H2+ channel shown in Fig. 3(a). Regarding the minimum energy around 14$\omega$FW absorbed in H2+ channel, the minimum absorbed energy in the first-step ionization of H10 channel should be an odd number of $\omega$FW to satisfy the polarity, such as 11$\omega$FW, 13$\omega$FW, and 15$\omega$FW. The electron kinetic energy of the first-order ATI is extracted to be 1.15 eV from the fitting in Fig. 2(b). If the electron of H10 channel absorbs the energy less than 11$\omega$FW, a negative ponderomotive energy is deduced according to Eq. (1), which is impossible for the photoelectron occurring in strong laser fields. If a photon energy of more than 15$\omega$FW is absorbed during the ionization process, the corresponding ponderomotive energy is 5.8 eV, which exceeds the maximal ponderomotive energy at the peak intensity in our experimental conditions. Therefore, we can determine that the minimal energy absorbed by the photoelectron in H10 channel is 13$\omega$FW. Hence the ponderomotive energy is deduced to be 2.8 eV, which means that the ionization process in dissociative ionization happens at a lower laser intensity instead of the peak intensity. According to Eq. (2), we can infer two ionization instants from certain ponderomotive energy except for the maximum, i.e., one at the leading edge of the pulse envelope and the other at the falling edge. In addition, since the subsequent dissociation process in H10 channel demands a specific bond-stretching time and enough laser intensity to provide additional photons, the ionization instant mainly populates at the leading edge instead of the falling edge. Considering the 2.1-eV energy difference of the ponderomotive shift of the ionization threshold between the dissociative and non-dissociative single ionization channels, which exceeds the one-FW-photon energy of 1.55 eV, it is hardly possible to observe the same Freeman resonance peak in these two channels.

After determining the photon energy absorbed in H10 channel, we can further investigate the specific ionization pathways. The photoelectron of the first-order ATI is produced via the excitation of the resonant intermediate state with the orbital angular momentum l = 6, where Y61, Y63, and Y65 are involved and represented by the typical one of Y61 hereafter for convenience. After the population on the intermediate state, the ionization pathway is similar to that of the non-dissociative ionization. The electron can absorb 2$\omega$FW or 1$\omega$SH and transit to the continuum, giving birth to the partial wave of Y61 or Y51, respectively. Figure 3(d) shows the PAD of the second-order ATI in H10 channel, where the 18-node structure (not apparent in the energy-integrated PAD) is considered as the interference of Y90 or Y80 via absorbing 3$\omega$FW and 1$\omega$FW + 1$\omega$SH, respectively.

According to the photoelectron kinetic energy spectra and corresponding PMDs, we obtain the possible ionization pathways of the two reaction channels, providing new insight into these ultrafast processes in H2. The schematic illustration of the two channels is depicted in Fig. 4. Figure 4(a) shows that the ionization of H2+ channel happens at the peak intensity of the laser pulse via the resonance of an intermediate state with the orbital angular momentum l = 5. Here the photon energy absorbed from the ground state to the resonant intermediate state is deduced to be 12$\omega$FW, while the excitation pathways with different FW and SH photons are coherently interfered with and thus unable to be determined. The excited electron further absorbs 2$\omega$FW or 1$\omega$SH to overcome the field-dressed ionization potential (including the field-free ionization potential and the ponderomotive energy), being released to the continuum and forming the first-order ATI composed of Y50 and Y40. When the excited electron absorbs 3$\omega$FW or 1$\omega$FW + 1$\omega$SH consecutively, the second-order ATI will be formed via the interference between Y81 and Y71. It is worth mentioning that the second-order ATI cannot be obtained by merely absorbing one more $\omega$FW from the first-order ATI due to the nonlinear variation of the node number.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Schematic illustration of the ionization and subsequent dissociation of H2 molecules. The highlighted ionization pathway diagram of (a) non-dissociative and (b) dissociative single ionization, where the orange shadow indicates the continuum state. (c) The potential energy curves of neutral H2 and ionic $\textrm{H}_2^ + $ molecules, where the 1$\omega$SH − 1$\omega$FW dissociation pathway is depicted. The potential energy curve is adapted from [51], and the dissociation limit of H+ + H is set to zero. (d) Measured nuclear kinetic energy spectrum for the dissociative single ionization of H2. The orange shadow highlights the energy region of the 1$\omega$SH − 1$\omega$FW dissociation pathways. Multiple peaks highlighted with yellow indicate the net-2$\omega$FW dissociation pathway jointly contributed by adjacent vibrational states.

Download Full Size | PDF

However, the bound electron in H10 channel absorbs 11$\omega$FW and transits to an intermediate state with the orbital angular momentum l = 6 at the leading edge of the laser pulse with a smaller ponderomotive energy, as shown in Fig. 4(b). The subsequent ionization pathway is similar to the one of H2+ channel, and here the photoelectrons of the first- and second-order ATI demonstrate the same nonlinear characteristic. For the photoionization-created NWP in H10 channel, it can move outwards along the 1s$\sigma$g curve, absorb extra photons from the OTC field, and generate various dissociation pathways, where the major one is schematically shown in Fig. 4(c). In this 1$\omega$SH − 1$\omega$FW dissociation pathway highlighted with orange in the nuclear kinetic energy spectrum in Fig. 4(d), the stretching H2+ absorbs one SH photon at the resonant internuclear distance, transits to the 2p$\sigma$u state, and moves outwards along the 2p$\sigma$u curve, followed by the emission of one FW photon, transition back to the 1s$\sigma$g state and dissociation along the 1s$\sigma$g curve. It is important to mention that we have examined the minor net-2$\omega$FW dissociation pathway, i.e., 3$\omega$FW − 1$\omega$FW pathway with the three-FW-photon absorption and subsequent one-FW-photon emission, followed by dissociation along the 1s$\sigma$g curve [4648,54], by selecting the energy region around 1.2 eV and only found a slight photoelectron energy shift due to different initial vibrational states according to the well-known electron-nuclear energy sharing.

4. Conclusion

In summary, we experimentally investigate the photoelectron momentum distributions of dissociative and non-dissociative ionization channels of H2 using an OTC laser pulse. Based on the two-dimensional photoelectron spectroscopy and the kinetic energy spectrum, we have distinguished the photoelectron releasing order of two reaction channels in molecular systems and confirmed the participation of partial waves with specific angular momenta. Our results verify that the OTC scheme can be utilized to accurately determine the number of absorbed photons during the ATI and the field-dressed ionization potential in the multiphoton ionization of molecules. The approach presented here is applicable to other atomic and molecular experiments, which helps investigate further strong-field electronic dynamics.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (11834004, 11974114, 12122404, 12227807, 12241407, 91950203).

Disclosures

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. P. Agostini, F. Fabre, G. Mainfray, G. Petite, and N. K. Rahman, “Free-free transitions following six-photon ionization of xenon atoms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 42(17), 1127–1130 (1979). [CrossRef]  

2. S. Beaulieu, A. Comby, A. Clergerie, J. Caillat, D. Descamps, N. Dudovich, B. Fabre, R. Géneaux, F. Légaré, S. Petit, B. Pons, G. Porat, T. Ruchon, R. Täieb, V. Blanchet, and Y. Mairesse, “Attosecond-resolved photoionization of chiral molecules,” Science 358(6368), 1288–1294 (2017). [CrossRef]  

3. G. G. Paulus, F. Grasbon, H. Walther, P. Villoresi, M. Nisoli, S. Stagira, E. Priori, and S. De Silvestri, “Absolute-phase phenomena in photoionization with few-cycle laser pulses,” Nature 414(6860), 182–184 (2001). [CrossRef]  

4. L. Treiber, B. Thaler, P. Heim, M. Stadlhofer, R. Kanya, M. Kitzler-Zeiler, and M. Koch, “Observation of laser-assisted electron scattering in superfluid helium,” Nat. Commun. 12(1), 4204 (2021). [CrossRef]  

5. R. Michiels, M. Abu-samha, L. B. Madsen, et al., “Enhancement of above threshold ionization in resonantly excited helium nanodroplets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(9), 093201 (2021). [CrossRef]  

6. D. Trabert, A. Hartung, S. Eckart, F. Trinter, A. Kalinin, M. Schöffler, L. P. H. Schmidt, T. Jahnke, M. Kunitski, and R. Dörner, “Spin and angular momentum in strong-field ionization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(4), 043202 (2018). [CrossRef]  

7. M.-M. Liu, Y. Shao, M. Han, P. Ge, Y. Deng, C. Wu, Q. Gong, and Y. Liu, “Energy- and momentum-resolved photoelectron spin polarization in multiphoton ionization of Xe by circularly polarized fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(4), 043201 (2018). [CrossRef]  

8. P. Ge, Y. Fang, Z. Guo, X. Ma, X. Yu, M. Han, C. Wu, Q. Gong, and Y. Liu, “Probing the spin-orbit time delay of multiphoton ionization of Kr by bicircular fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(22), 223001 (2021). [CrossRef]  

9. P. Lu, J. Wang, H. Li, K. Lin, X. Gong, Q. Song, Q. Ji, W. Zhang, J. Ma, H. Li, H. Zeng, F. He, and J. Wu, “High-order above-threshold dissociation of molecules,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115(9), 2049–2053 (2018). [CrossRef]  

10. L. Zhou, X. Hu, Y. Peng, J. Qiang, P. Lu, K. Lin, S. Pan, X. Gong, W. Jiang, Z. Jiang, C. Lu, H. Ni, C. Jin, R. Lu, Y. Wu, J. Wang, and J. Wu, “Enhancing strong-field dissociation of H2+ in helium nanodroplets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130(3), 033201 (2023). [CrossRef]  

11. R. Wiehle, B. Witzel, H. Helm, and E. Cormier, “Dynamics of strong-field above-threshold ionization of argon: Comparison between experiment and theory,” Phys. Rev. A 67(6), 063405 (2003). [CrossRef]  

12. T. Morishita, Z. Chen, S. Watanabe, and C. D. Lin, “Two-dimensional electron momentum spectra of argon ionized by short intense lasers: Comparison of theory with experiment,” Phys. Rev. A 75(2), 023407 (2007). [CrossRef]  

13. T. Wilbois and H. Helm, “Strong-field ionization of H2 from ultraviolet to near-infrared wavelengths: Photoelectron energy and angular identifications,” Phys. Rev. A 84(5), 053407 (2011). [CrossRef]  

14. M. Li, Y. Liu, H. Liu, Y. Yang, J. Yuan, X. Liu, Y. Deng, C. Wu, and Q. Gong, “Photoelectron angular distributions of low-order above-threshold ionization of Xe in the multiphoton regime,” Phys. Rev. A 85(1), 013414 (2012). [CrossRef]  

15. X. Gong, P. He, Q. Song, Q. Ji, K. Lin, W. Zhang, P. Lu, H. Pan, J. Ding, H. Zeng, F. He, and J. Wu, “Pathway-resolved photoelectron emission in dissociative ionization of molecules,” Optica 3(6), 643 (2016). [CrossRef]  

16. M. J. Nandor, M. A. Walker, and L. D. Van Woerkom, “Angular distributions of high-intensity ATI and the onset of the plateau,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 31(20), 4617–4629 (1998). [CrossRef]  

17. Z. Chen, T. Morishita, A. T. Le, M. Wickenhauser, X. M. Tong, and C. D. Lin, “Analysis of two-dimensional photoelectron momentum spectra and the effect of the long-range coulomb potential in single ionization of atoms by intense lasers,” Phys. Rev. A 74(5), 053405 (2006). [CrossRef]  

18. D. G. Arbó, S. Yoshida, E. Persson, K. I. Dimitriou, and J. Burgdörfer, “Interference oscillations in the angular distribution of laser-ionized electrons near ionization threshold,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(14), 143003 (2006). [CrossRef]  

19. D. G. Arbó, K. I. Dimitriou, E. Persson, and J. Burgdörfer, “Sub-poissonian angular momentum distribution near threshold in atomic ionization by short laser pulses,” Phys. Rev. A 78(1), 013406 (2008). [CrossRef]  

20. T. Marchenko, H. G. Muller, K. J. Schafer, and M. J. Vrakking, “Electron angular distributions in near-threshold atomic ionization,” J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 43(9), 095601 (2010). [CrossRef]  

21. R. Gopal, K. Simeonidis, R. Moshammer, T. Ergler, M. Dürr, M. Kurka, K.-U. Kühnel, S. Tschuch, C.-D. Schröter, D. Bauer, J. Ullrich, A. Rudenko, O. Herrwerth, T. Uphues, M. Schultze, E. Goulielmakis, M. Uiberacker, M. Lezius, and M. F. Kling, “Three-dimensional momentum imaging of electron wave packet interference in few-cycle laser pulses,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103(5), 053001 (2009). [CrossRef]  

22. D. G. Arbó, K. L. Ishikawa, K. Schiessl, E. Persson, and J. Burgdörfer, “Intracycle and intercycle interferences in above-threshold ionization: The time grating,” Phys. Rev. A 81(2), 021403 (2010). [CrossRef]  

23. T. M. Yan and D. Bauer, “Sub-barrier coulomb effects on the interference pattern in tunneling-ionization photoelectron spectra,” Phys. Rev. A 86(5), 053403 (2012). [CrossRef]  

24. X. Xie, S. Roither, D. Kartashov, E. Persson, D. G. Arbó, L. Zhang, S. Gräfe, M. S. Schöffler, J. Burgdörfer, A. Baltuška, and M. Kitzler, “Attosecond probe of valence-electron wave packets by subcycle sculpted laser fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108(19), 193004 (2012). [CrossRef]  

25. M. Li, J. W. Geng, H. Liu, Y. Deng, C. Wu, L. Y. Peng, Q. Gong, and Y. Liu, “Classical-quantum correspondence for above-threshold ionization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(11), 113002 (2014). [CrossRef]  

26. X. Gong, W. Jiang, J. Tong, J. Qiang, P. Lu, H. Ni, R. Lucchese, K. Ueda, and J. Wu, “Asymmetric attosecond photoionization in molecular shape resonance,” Phys. Rev. X 12(1), 011002 (2022). [CrossRef]  

27. J. Wu, M. Kunitski, M. Pitzer, F. Trinter, L. P. H. Schmidt, T. Jahnke, M. Magrakvelidze, C. B. Madsen, L. B. Madsen, U. Thumm, and R. Dörner, “Electron-nuclear energy sharing in above-threshold multiphoton dissociative ionization of H2,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111(2), 023002 (2013). [CrossRef]  

28. W. Zhang, Z. Li, P. Lu, X. Gong, Q. Song, Q. Ji, K. Lin, J. Ma, F. He, H. Zeng, and J. Wu, “Photon energy deposition in strong-field single ionization of multielectron molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(10), 103002 (2016). [CrossRef]  

29. L. Cattaneo, J. Vos, R. Y. Bello, A. Palacios, S. Heuser, L. Pedrelli, M. Lucchini, C. Cirelli, F. Martín, and U. Keller, “Attosecond coupled electron and nuclear dynamics in dissociative ionization of H2,” Nat. Phys. 14(7), 733–738 (2018). [CrossRef]  

30. T. Zuo and A. D. Bandrauk, “Charge-resonance-enhanced ionization of diatomic molecular ions by intense lasers,” Phys. Rev. A 52(4), R2511–R2514 (1995). [CrossRef]  

31. T. Seideman, M. Y. Ivanov, and P. B. Corkum, “Role of electron localization in intense-field molecular ionization,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75(15), 2819–2822 (1995). [CrossRef]  

32. K. Liu and I. Barth, “Identifying the tunneling site in strong-field ionization of H2+,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(24), 243204 (2017). [CrossRef]  

33. K. Liu and I. Barth, “Distinguishing two mechanisms for enhanced ionization of H2+ using orthogonal two-color laser fields,” Phys. Rev. A 103(1), 013103 (2021). [CrossRef]  

34. M. Richter, M. Kunitski, M. Schöffler, T. Jahnke, L. P. H. Schmidt, M. Li, Y. Liu, and R. Dörner, “Streaking temporal double-slit interference by an orthogonal two-color laser field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(14), 143001 (2015). [CrossRef]  

35. X. Xie, “Two-dimensional attosecond electron wave-packet interferometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(17), 173003 (2015). [CrossRef]  

36. J.-W. Geng, W.-H. Xiong, X.-R. Xiao, L.-Y. Peng, and Q. Gong, “Nonadiabatic electron dynamics in orthogonal two-color laser fields with comparable intensities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115(19), 193001 (2015). [CrossRef]  

37. S. G. Yu, Y. L. Wang, X. Y. Lai, Y. Y. Huang, W. Quan, and X. J. Liu, “Coulomb effect on photoelectron momentum distributions in orthogonal two-color laser fields,” Phys. Rev. A 94(3), 033418 (2016). [CrossRef]  

38. M. Han, P. Ge, Y. Shao, M.-M. Liu, Y. Deng, C. Wu, Q. Gong, and Y. Liu, “Revealing the sub-barrier phase using a spatiotemporal interferometer with orthogonal two-color laser fields of comparable intensity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(7), 073201 (2017). [CrossRef]  

39. X. Xie, T. Wang, S. Yu, X. Lai, S. Roither, D. Kartashov, A. Baltuška, X. Liu, A. Staudte, and M. Kitzler, “Disentangling intracycle interferences in photoelectron momentum distributions using orthogonal two-color laser fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(24), 243201 (2017). [CrossRef]  

40. W. Xie, J. Yan, M. Li, C. Cao, K. Guo, Y. Zhou, and P. Lu, “Picometer-resolved photoemission position within the molecule by strong-field photoelectron holography,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(26), 263202 (2021). [CrossRef]  

41. J. Wu, A. Vredenborg, L. P. H. Schmidt, T. Jahnke, A. Czasch, and R. Dörner, “Comparison of dissociative ionization of H2, N2, Ar2, and CO by elliptically polarized two-color pulses,” Phys. Rev. A 87(2), 023406 (2013). [CrossRef]  

42. R. Dörner, V. Mergel, O. Jagutzki, L. Spielberger, J. Ullrich, R. Moshammer, and H. Schmidt-Böcking, “Cold target recoil ion momentum spectroscopy: A ‘momentum microscope’ to view atomic collision dynamics,” Phys. Rep. 330(2-3), 95–192 (2000). [CrossRef]  

43. J. Ullrich, R. Moshammer, A. Dorn, R. Dörner, L. P. H. Schmidt, and H. Schmidt-Böcking, “Recoil-ion and electron momentum spectroscopy: Reaction-microscopes,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 66(9), 1463–1545 (2003). [CrossRef]  

44. Y. Mi, N. Camus, L. Fechner, M. Laux, R. Moshammer, and T. Pfeifer, “Electron-nuclear coupling through autoionizing states after strong-field excitation of H2 molecules,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(18), 183201 (2017). [CrossRef]  

45. W. Jiang, G. S. Armstrong, J. Tong, Y. Xu, Z. Zuo, J. Qiang, P. Lu, D. D. Clarke, J. Benda, A. Fleischer, H. Ni, K. Ueda, H. W. van der Hart, A. C. Brown, X. Gong, and J. Wu, “Atomic partial wave meter by attosecond coincidence metrology,” Nat. Commun. 13(1), 5072 (2022). [CrossRef]  

46. J. Wu, M. Magrakvelidze, L. P. Schmidt, M. Kunitski, T. Pfeifer, M. Schöffler, M. Pitzer, M. Richter, S. Voss, H. Sann, H. Kim, J. Lower, T. Jahnke, A. Czasch, U. Thumm, and R. Dörner, “Understanding the role of phase in chemical bond breaking with coincidence angular streaking,” Nat. Commun. 4(1), 2177 (2013). [CrossRef]  

47. Q. Ji, S. Pan, P. He, J. Wang, P. Lu, H. Li, X. Gong, K. Lin, W. Zhang, J. Ma, H. Li, C. Duan, P. Liu, Y. Bai, R. Li, F. He, and J. Wu, “Timing dissociative ionization of H2 using a polarization-skewed femtosecond laser pulse,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123(23), 233202 (2019). [CrossRef]  

48. Y. Mi, P. Peng, N. Camus, X. Sun, P. Fross, D. Martinez, Z. Dube, P. B. Corkum, D. M. Villeneuve, A. Staudte, R. Moshammer, and T. Pfeifer, “Clocking enhanced ionization of hydrogen molecules with rotational wave packets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(17), 173201 (2020). [CrossRef]  

49. S. Pan, C. Hu, Z. Zhang, P. Lu, C. Lu, L. Zhou, J. Wang, F. Sun, J. Qiang, H. Li, H. Ni, X. Gong, F. He, and J. Wu, “Low-energy protons in strong-field dissociation of H2+ via dipole-transitions at large bond lengths,” Ultrafast Sci. 2022, 9863548 (2022). [CrossRef]  

50. R. R. Freeman, P. H. Bucksbaum, H. Milchberg, S. Darack, D. Schumacher, and M. E. Geusic, “Above-threshold ionization with subpicosecond laser pulses,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 59(10), 1092–1095 (1987). [CrossRef]  

51. T. E. Sharp, “Potential-energy curves for molecular hydrogen and its ions,” At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 2, 119–169 (1970). [CrossRef]  

52. D. M. Villeneuve, P. Hockett, M. J. Vrakking, and H. Niikura, “Coherent imaging of an attosecond electron wave packet,” Science 356(6343), 1150–1153 (2017). [CrossRef]  

53. M. Han, H. Liang, P. Ge, Y. Fang, Z. Guo, X. Yu, Y. Deng, L. Y. Peng, Q. Gong, and Y. Liu, “Timing angular momentum transfer for parity-unfavored transitions in multiphoton ionization,” Phys. Rev. A 102(6), 061101 (2020). [CrossRef]  

54. S. Pan, W. Zhang, H. Li, C. Lu, W. Zhang, Q. Ji, H. Li, F. Sun, J. Qiang, F. Chen, J. Tong, L. Zhou, W. Jiang, X. Gong, P. Lu, and J. Wu, “Clocking dissociative above-threshold double ionization of H2 in a multicycle laser pulse,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(6), 063201 (2021). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the experiment apparatus. The OTC pulse propagating along the x axis is back-focused by a concave mirror onto the molecular beam propagating along the y axis. The emitting electrons and charged nuclear fragments such as H2+ and H+ are guided by the external electric field and magnetic field and measured by detectors at the ends of the spectrometer. The polarization of FW and SH waves is along the z and y axes, respectively. Measured PMDs of (b) non-dissociative and (c) dissociative single ionization of H2, where the white dashed rings highlight the contribution of the first- and second-order ATI.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Measured photoelectron kinetic energy spectra of (a) non-dissociative and (b) dissociative single ionization of H2. Blue circles and violet solid curves indicate the measured kinetic energy spectra and the fitting curves via multiple Gaussian functions, respectively. Violet areas denote the individual ATI regions in the fitting.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a), (b) Polar plots of the PADs of the first- and second-order ATI in non-dissociative ionization integrated over the corresponding energy region. (c), (d) The same as (a), (b) but for dissociative ionization.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Schematic illustration of the ionization and subsequent dissociation of H2 molecules. The highlighted ionization pathway diagram of (a) non-dissociative and (b) dissociative single ionization, where the orange shadow indicates the continuum state. (c) The potential energy curves of neutral H2 and ionic $\textrm{H}_2^ + $ molecules, where the 1$\omega$SH − 1$\omega$FW dissociation pathway is depicted. The potential energy curve is adapted from [51], and the dissociation limit of H+ + H is set to zero. (d) Measured nuclear kinetic energy spectrum for the dissociative single ionization of H2. The orange shadow highlights the energy region of the 1$\omega$SH − 1$\omega$FW dissociation pathways. Multiple peaks highlighted with yellow indicate the net-2$\omega$FW dissociation pathway jointly contributed by adjacent vibrational states.

Equations (5)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

H 2 + n ω H 2 + + e ,
H 2 + m ω H 2 + + e ,
H 2 + + k ω H + + H
E e = n ω I p U p ( t ) ,
U p ( t ) = E 2 ( t ) 4 ω 2
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.