Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Enhanced dual-band absorption of molybdenum disulfide using a plasmonic perfect absorber

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

In order to remarkably enhance its absorption capability, a tunable dual-band MoS2-based perfect absorber inspired by metal-insulator-metal (MIM) metamaterial is proposed. By using the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations, dual-band perfect absorption peaks are realized in the visible light regime, and the absorptions of monolayer MoS2 are enhanced up to 57% and 80.5% at the peak wavelengths. By manipulating related structural parameters, the peak wavelengths of MoS2 absorption can be separately tuned in a wide wavelength range. Furthermore, the proposed absorber can tolerate a relatively wide range of incident angles and demonstrate polarization-dependence.

© 2018 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Over the past decade, two-dimension (2D) materials [1–3], due to their significant electric and optical properties, have attracted extensive attention in nanophotonics and optoelectronics, such as graphene [4,5], transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) [6,7], hexagonal boron nitride [8,9], and GaSe [10]. Among these 2D materials, graphene has been reported to support much stronger binding of surface plasmons in the mid-infrared regions, and the optical response of graphene, originating from its unique gapless band structure, can be tuned in an ultra-wideband range through electrostatic field, magnetic field, and chemical doping [4,5]. Thus, many graphene plasmonic devices and the other graphene-based structures [11,12] have been motivated extensive studied, such as optical absorbers [13–20], filters [21,22], optical sensors [23–28], modulators [29,30], photodetectors [31,32] and antennas [33–36].

Unlike graphene, TMDCs (e.g. MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2) possess special direct band gaps and internal amplification similar to semiconductors, when they are transformed from the multilayers to monolayer, such as the monolayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) with a direct band gap around 1.8 eV [37] for electronic transition. As a special TMDC, MoS2, due to its unique electric and optical properties, has attracted much interest for applications in the photoluminescence [38], photovoltaic devices [39], and the field-effect transistors [40] as well as optoelectronic detectors [41]. However, due to the inherent atomic thickness, monolayer MoS2 encounters a severe challenge for the light-matter interaction, which leads to weak light absorption and emission [42,43]. More specifically, in the visible and near-infrared range, monolayer MoS2 with the thickness of 6-7 Ǻ only absorbs about 10% of light at normal incidence due to its unique electronic band structure [44]. This property is beneficial to develop flexible transparent electrodes, but the weak light-MoS2 interaction limits its further applications in optoelectronic devices. Thus, remarkably enhance the light-MoS2 interaction in monolayer MoS2 will be very useful in future optoelectronic devices, and several physical methods have been reported. Gan et al. demonstrate that by coupling monolayer MoS2 to a planar photonic crystal nanocavity, it is possible to dramatically enhance its internal quantum efficiency for transitions on resonant with the cavity. The experimental results and theoretical calculations reveal that the maximum enhancement of the MoS2 spontaneous emission rate by the cavity modes can be higher than 70, with a suppression factor of about 0.4 due to the planar photonic crystal lattice [45]. Lu et al. designed a novel multilayer architecture and demonstrated that the light absorption of the atomically thin MoS2 layer can reach 96% with a narrow spectral width of 11.5 nm in the visible range due to the generation of highly-confined Tamm plasmons in the structure [46]. Janisch et al. proposed a MoS2-based absorber coupled with a planar nanocavity, which could enhance the light absorption of monolayer MoS2 to nearly 70% at the wavelength of 450 nm [42]. Based on the photonic crystal slab coated on an ultra-thick metal back reflector, Li et al. theoretically and numerically demonstrated that the perfect absorption in monolayer TMDCs can be observed by critical coupling [43]. On the other hand, in order to enhance the light-MoS2 interaction, conventional plasmonic nanostructures based on noble metals can also be combined with monolayer MoS2 for developing novel nanophotonic devices with high performance. However, related researches are rarely reported in MoS2-based absorption devices.

In this paper, in consideration of the atomically thin physical structure of MoS2, we take advantage of the metal-insulator-metal (MIM) plasmonic perfect absorber, which demonstrates tunable zero reflectance due to influences of a plasmon guided mode within a much small dielectric gap [47,48]. Thus, we propose and investigate a MoS2-based optical absorber inspired by MIM metamaterial in the visible region. Moreover, our proposed MoS2-based absorber provides higher absorption efficiency than the other plasmonic nanostructures for MoS2 absorption enhancement [49,50].

2. Structure and model

As shown in Fig. 1, the proposed absorber consists of periodic silver nanoribbons on a silica layer coated with monolayer MoS2 supported by a flat silver substrate, and monolayer MoS2 is sandwiched between two lithium oxide (Li2O, n = 1.65) layers. Compared with only using a silica spacer, the Li2O layers are used as insulating spacers to prevent carrier transport between metal nanoribbons and MoS2, and also retain higher carrier mobility of MoS2 in structure. The thickness (z direction) of each Li2O layer is 5 nm, and the thickness of silica layer is DS = 25nm. Meanwhile, the width (x direction) and thickness of the silver nanoribbon are described by W and t, respectively. The filling factor of silver nanoribbons, which is defined as F=W/P, where P is the period of silver nanoribbons in the x direction. θ is the angle of incident light. In our calculation, the monolayer MoS2 whose wavelength-dependent complex permittivity has been measured experimentally by Li et al. [51], is employed as a thin film with thickness of 0.615 nm in our design. Simultaneously, the permittivity of silver is described by the Drude formula [52]. By using the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations, dual-band perfect absorption peaks are realized in the visible light regime, and the absorptions of monolayer MoS2 are enhanced up to 57% and 80.5% at the peak wavelengths, respectively. Moreover, the peak wavelengths of MoS2 absorption can be separately tuned in a wide wavelength range by manipulating related structural parameters. Furthermore, the proposed absorber tolerates a relatively wide range of incident angles and demonstrates polarization-dependence. In our calculation, the perfectly matched layer absorbing boundary condition is applied along the z direction. The periodic boundary conditions are employed in the x, and y directions, respectively. The non-uniform mesh is adopted, and the minimum mesh size inside the MoS2 monolayer equals 0.1 nm and gradually increases outside the MoS2 sheet, for saving storage space and computational time. Although this work focuses on numerical investigation, the proposed MoS2-based absorber can be relatively easier to realize experimentally compared with the other MoS2-based absorbers. Subwavelength metamaterials based on silica nanostructures is easy for integration to the current CMOS technology, and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) grown MoS2 can be transferred over the Li2O layer using standard transfer techniques [53].

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of the MoS2-based perfect absorber with dimensions specified.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Results and discussion

To clearly illustrate the physical mechanism, we firstly investigate the absorption of the proposed MoS2-based absorber and monolayer MoS2 in the system under illumination of s-polarized and p-polarized normal incident light (θ=0), respectively, as shown in Fig. 2. Since the thickness (D = 300 nm) of the silver substrate is much larger than the penetration depth of electromagnetic waves, the transmission from the proposed structure is very close to zero (T = 0). Then, the absorption of the proposed MoS2-based absorber can be described by A = 1-R, where R is reflection from the proposed structure. Meanwhile, in our calculation, the absorption of monolayer MoS2 represents the power ratio of electromagnetic energy absorbed by monolayer MoS2 in the system and incident electromagnetic energy, which is calculated by the following equation [54]:

A(λ)=4πcλ·Re(N)·Im(N)·Vl|El|2dVl
where c is the speed of light in vacuum, N is the refractive index of monolayer MoS2 [51], λ is the wavelength of incident light, Elis the local electric field, and Vl is the volume of monolayer MoS2. Since the electric field of s-polarized light is parallel to the silver nanoribbons (y-axis), the plasmonic resonance is weakly excited in this condition. Thus, both the absorption of the proposed MoS2-based absorber and monolayer MoS2 under illumination of s-polarized normal incident light are rather weak in the visible range. On the other hand, since the electric field of p-polarized light on the x-z plane induces the localized plasmonic resonance which restrains the reflection from MoS2, dual-band absorption peaks are realized in the visible range, as shown in Fig. 2. The absorption of monolayer MoS2 has been remarkably increased to 57% at λ1 = 560 nm and 80.5% at λ2 = 672 nm, respectively. It is worth noting that the properties of polarization dependent could also be beneficial to polarized light filters. Since s-polarized light makes against the enhancement of absorption in MoS2, we focus on the effects of p-polarized incident light in the following discussion.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Absorption of proposed MoS2-based absorber and monolayer MoS2 in the system under illumination of s-polarized and p-polarized normal incident light, respectively, where W = 300nm, P = 800nm, t = 15nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

In the following, we will illustrate the physical mechanisms of the proposed absorber. As mentioned above, the suppressed reflectance around the resonant wavelength is due to the typical MIM waveguides. In consideration of the metamaterial theory in an MIM plasmonic perfect absorber [55], the absorption peak at the resonance wavelength corresponds to the reflection dip in the MIM waveguide. The reflection dip is due to the matching of the wave impedance between air and the metamaterial, which is further attributed to the superposition of inverse optical fields that are induced by electric and magnetic surface current excited by the incident wave. Thus, we can explain the absorption increment of MoS2 in the proposed absorber by investigating electric and magnetic field distributions, as shown in Figs. 3(a)-3(f). At the absorption peak of λ1 = 560 nm, the complex refractive index of sliver is nAg=0.01722+3.9866i, then the skin depth of sliver is D1λ/2πIm(Ag)22.37nm. Meanwhile, at the absorption peak of λ2 = 672 nm, the complex refractive index of sliver is nAg=0.02485+4.8596i, then the skin depth of sliver is D2λ/2πIm(Ag)22.15nm. Thus, both D1 and D2 are much larger than the thickness of sliver nanoribbons, which is result in electromagnetic coupling of both optical fields at the air/nanoribbon interface and Li2O/nanoribbon interface, respectively. Consequently, as shown in Fig. 3(a) and 3(c), the electric field around the sliver nanoribbons is gathered and enhanced. However, for resonance mode λ1, we can find that parallel electromagnetic field bands stretching along the z-axis are formed, although they are also concentrated around the sliver nanoribbons, as shown in Fig. 3(a) and 3(b). In fact, such electromagnetic field characteristics correspond to the excitation of surface plasmon mode. Simultaneously, for resonance mode λ2, magnetic field is guided between each sliver nanoribbon and the sliver substrate as shown in Fig. 3(d). In other words, resonance mode λ2 enhances the near field and concentrates the light energy, which is trapped surrounding the MoS2 layer as the localized gap-plasmon mode. Therefore, both resonance modes λ1 and λ2 can enhance optical fields surrounding the MoS2 layer. As enhanced optical fields scatter and disappear in the lossy substance, the absorption inside MoS2 layer is increased accordingly. On the contrary, at the wavelength of 500 nm, since it is far away from resonance wavelength, there is no enhanced optical field for increasing the absorption of MoS2 layer, as illustrated in Fig. 3(e) and 3(f).

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Contour profiles of normalized field of the proposed MoS2-based absorber for p-polarized light. (a) Electric field and (b) magnetic field at λ1 = 560 nm. (c) Electric field and (d) magnetic field at λ2 = 672 nm. (e) Electric field and (f) magnetic field at λ3 = 500 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

Next, we investigate the influences of changing the width of sliver nanoribbons on the optical absorption of MoS2, as shown in Fig. 4(a). Since each sliver nanoribbon performances as a Fabry-Perot resonator for the localized gap-plasmon mode, and the resonant wavelength is remarkably sensitive to the width of nanoribbons. Thus, when W is increased, the resonance mode λ2 will be obvious red-shifted due to the increment of effective resonance wavelength of localized gap-plasmon mode. Moreover, the filling factor F will increase with W, which further reinforces the intensity of field enhancement and concentration between neighboring nanoribbons and inside MoS2. Thus, the absorption efficiency will firstly increase with W. However, with the continuous increment of filling factor F, too many areas of MoS2 will be covered by silver nanoribbons. As a result, the absorption efficiency will subsequently decrease with the increment of W. On the other hand, it is worth noting that the resonance mode λ1 almost has no shift with changing the width of sliver nanoribbons. This is because the resonant wavelength of surface plasmon mode is not sensitive to the width of nanoribbons, but mainly depends on the period of silver nanoribbons. As shown in Fig. 4(b), the resonance mode λ1 will also be noticeably red-shifted with the increment of P, because the resonant wavelength of surface plasmon mode becomes larger. However, the resonance mode λ2 almost has no shift with altering the period of sliver nanoribbons, since the resonant wavelength of localized gap-plasmon mode is insensitive to the period of nanoribbons. For the same reason, as mentioned before, the absorption efficiency will increase firstly and then decrease with the increment of P.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Light absorption of monolayer MoS2 under normal incident p-polarized light with different (a) widths W and (b) periods P of silver nanoribbons, respectively. The other parameters are the same as Fig. 2.

Download Full Size | PDF

Then, we consider effects of changing the thickness of sliver nanoribbons on the absorption of MoS2, as shown in Fig. 5(a). When the thickness of sliver nanoribbons is 15 nm, which is much less than the skin depth, the optical fields at the air/nanoribbon interface and Li2O/nanoribbon interface are effectively coupled to each other and enhance the optical absorption of MoS2, as mentioned before. When the thickness of sliver nanoribbons increases from 15 nm to 30 nm, the absorption of MoS2 at λ1 is decreased from 57% to 39.2%, and the absorption of MoS2 at λ2 is decreased from 80.5% to 61%. Moreover, both the absorption peaks of λ1 and λ2 are blue-shifted slightly. This is because the coupling strength between the top and bottom surfaces of sliver nanoribbons is reduced, and the optical loss ratio inside the sliver nanoribbons becomes higher, which reduces the absorption of MoS2. However, the thickness of sliver nanoribbons is too small to effectively enhance the absorption of MoS2. This is because the light diffraction surrounding the sliver nanoribbons is strengthened, and the optical fields surrounding the MoS2 layer is weakened. Thus, when the thickness of sliver nanoribbons decreases to 10 nm, the absorption of MoS2 is drastically reduced. On the other hand, similar to the MIM nanostructure, the absorption characteristics of proposed absorber are significantly sensitive to the thickness change of the silica spacer layer. As shown in Fig. 5(b), when the thickness of silica layer increases from 15 nm to 40 nm, the absorption peak of MoS2 is blue-shifted. Moreover, there is an optimal thickness of silica layer, which makes the absorption peak of MoS2 up to the maximum. As mentioned above, the maximum absorption of MoS2 is consistent with the minimal reflection of the proposed absorber, which depends on the plasmon coupling of near fields between each sliver nanoribbon and the sliver substrate. Furthermore, when sliver nanoribbons are gradually far away from the sliver substrate, the proposed structure cannot be considered as a homogeneous effective medium. Thus, as DS increases, the maximum absorption corresponding to the strongest strength of plasmon coupling is reached at an optimum DS and weakens subsequently.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Light absorption of monolayer MoS2 under normal incident p-polarized light with different thicknesses (a) t and (b) DS, respectively. The other parameters are the same as Fig. 2.

Download Full Size | PDF

In addition, since all the above results are based on normal incident light, however, the proposed absorber should insure high absorption efficiency working on the relatively wide range of incident angles in the application, we illustrate optical absorption of MoS2 as a function of incident light wavelength and angle of incidence, as shown in Fig. 6. When the incident angle increases to 30°, the absorption peaks of MoS2 at λ1 and λ2 are still higher than 25% and 36%, respectively. Thus, the proposed absorber can tolerate a relatively wide range of incident angles in the application.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 Light absorption of monolayer MoS2 as a function of the wavelength and angle of incidence under p-polarized light. The other parameters are the same as Fig. 2.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

To conclude, a dual-band MoS2-based perfect absorber is proposed in the visible light band, and the corresponding absorption characteristics are investigated by using the FDTD method. Simulated results exhibit that the absorptions of monolayer MoS2 are enhanced up to 57% and 80.5% at the related peak wavelengths, respectively. By changing related structural parameters, the peak wavelengths of MoS2 absorption can be separately tuned in a wide wavelength range. Meanwhile, the proposed absorber can tolerate a relatively wide range of incident angles and demonstrates polarization-dependence. Moreover, it is worth noting that the physical mechanism of our proposed absorber could be applied to enhance absorption of the other transition-metal dichalcogenides, not just MoS2. Thus, we believe our designed absorber can find some potential applications in the dual-band and frequency-selective photodetectors working in the visible region.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant Nos. 61775055, 61505052, 61176116, 11074069).

References and links

1. A. K. Geim and I. V. Grigorieva, “Van der Waals heterostructures,” Nature 499(7459), 419–425 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. V. Tran and L. Yang, “Scaling laws for the band gap and optical response of phosphorene nanoribbons,” Phys. Rev. B 89(24), 245407 (2014). [CrossRef]  

3. H. Zhao, Q. Guo, F. Xia, and H. Wang, “Two-dimensional materials for nanophotonics application,” Nanophotonics 4(1), 128 (2015). [CrossRef]  

4. A. Vakil and N. Engheta, “Transformation optics using graphene,” Science 332(6035), 1291–1294 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. F. Rana, “Plasmons get tuned up,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 6(10), 611–612 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. Q. H. Wang, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, A. Kis, J. N. Coleman, and M. S. Strano, “Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 7(11), 699–712 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. K. F. Mak and J. Shan, “Photonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides,” Nat. Photonics 10(4), 216–226 (2016). [CrossRef]  

8. J. Wu, L. Jiang, J. Guo, X. Dai, Y. Xiang, and S. Wen, “Turnable perfect absorption at infrared frequencies by a Graphene-hBN Hyper Crystal,” Opt. Express 24(15), 17103–17114 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. Y. Cai, J. Zhu, and Q. H. Liu, “Tunable enhanced optical absorption of graphene using plasmonic perfect absorbers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 106(4), 043105 (2015). [CrossRef]  

10. X. Gan, C. Zhao, S. Hu, T. Wang, Y. Song, J. Li, Q. Zhao, W. Jie, and J. Zhao, “Microwatts continuous-wave pumped second harmonic generation in few- and mono-layer GaSe,” Light Sci. Appl. 7(1), 17126 (2018). [CrossRef]  

11. X. Gan, K. F. Mak, Y. Gao, Y. You, F. Hatami, J. Hone, T. F. Heinz, and D. Englund, “Strong Enhancement of Light-Matter Interaction in Graphene Coupled to a Photonic Crystal,” Nano Lett. 12(11), 5626–5631 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. X. Gan, R. J. Shiue, Y. Gao, S. Assefa, J. Hone, and D. Englund, “Controlled Light–Matter Interaction in Graphene Electrooptic Devices Using Nanophotonic Cavities and Waveguides,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 20(1), 95–105 (2013).

13. S. Xiao, T. Wang, Y. Liu, C. Xu, X. Han, and X. Yan, “Tunable light trapping and absorption enhancement with graphene ring arrays,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18(38), 26661–26669 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. X. Jiang, T. Wang, S. Xiao, X. Yan, and L. Cheng, “Tunable ultra-high-efficiency light absorption of monolayer graphene using critical coupling with guided resonance,” Opt. Express 25(22), 27028–27036 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. H. Li, L. Wang, and X. Zhai, “Tunable graphene-based mid-infrared plasmonic wide-angle narrowband perfect absorber,” Sci. Rep. 6(1), 36651 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. Y. Zhang, T. Li, Q. Chen, H. Zhang, J. F. O’Hara, E. Abele, A. J. Taylor, H. T. Chen, and A. K. Azad, “Independently tunable dual-band perfect absorber based on graphene at mid-infrared frequencies,” Sci. Rep. 5(1), 18463 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. S. Thongrattanasiri, F. H. L. Koppens, and F. J. García de Abajo, “Complete Optical Absorption in Periodically Patterned Graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108(4), 047401 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. S. X. Xia, X. Zhai, Y. Huang, J. Q. Liu, L. L. Wang, and S. C. Wen, “Multi-band perfect plasmonic absorptions using rectangular graphene gratings,” Opt. Lett. 42(15), 3052–3055 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. P. C. Huo, Y. Z. Liang, S. Zhang, and T. Xu, “Hybrid metasurface for broadband enhancing optical absorption and Raman spectroscopy of graphene,” Opt. Mater. Express 7(10), 3591–3597 (2017). [CrossRef]  

20. Z. J. Zhang, Z. Y. Yu, Y. Z. Liang, and T. Xu, “Dual-band nearly perfect absorber at visible frequencies,” Opt. Mater. Express 8(2), 463–468 (2018). [CrossRef]  

21. H. J. Li, L. L. Wang, H. Zhang, Z. R. Huang, B. Sun, X. Zhai, and S. C. Wen, “Graphene-based mid-infrared, tunable, electrically controlled plasmonic filter,” Appl. Phys. Express 7(2), 024301 (2014). [CrossRef]  

22. X. Luo, X. Zhai, L. Wang, and Q. Lin, “Narrow-band plasmonic filter based on graphene waveguide with asymmetrical structure,” Plasmonics 10(6), 1427–1431 (2015). [CrossRef]  

23. N. Wang, L. B. Bu, Y. Y. Chen, G. G. Zheng, X. J. Zou, L. H. Xu, and J. C. Wang, “Multiband enhanced absorption of monolayer graphene with attenuated total reflectance configuration and sensing application,” Appl. Phys. Express 10(1), 015102 (2017). [CrossRef]  

24. S. Y. Xiao, T. Wang, X. Y. Jiang, X. C. Yan, L. Cheng, B. Y. Wang, and C. Xu, “Strong interaction between graphene layer and Fano resonance in terahertz metamaterials,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 50(19), 195101 (2017). [CrossRef]  

25. T. J. Echtermeyer, L. Britnell, P. K. Jasnos, A. Lombardo, R. V. Gorbachev, A. N. Grigorenko, A. K. Geim, A. C. Ferrari, and K. S. Novoselov, “Strong plasmonic enhancement of photovoltage in graphene,” Nat. Commun. 2(1), 458 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

26. X. Fu, X. Tan, R. Yuan, and S. Chen, “A dual-potential electrochemiluminescence ratiometric sensor for sensitive detection of dopamine based on graphene-CdTe quantum dots and self-enhanced Ru(II) complex,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 90, 61–68 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

27. X. J. Shang, X. Zhai, L. L. Wang, M. D. He, Q. Li, X. Luo, and H. G. Duan, “Asymmetric transmission and polarization conversion of linearly polarized waves with bilayer L-shaped metasurfaces,” Appl. Phys. Express 10(5), 052602 (2017). [CrossRef]  

28. G. D. Liu, X. Zhai, S. X. Xia, Q. Lin, C. J. Zhao, and L. L. Wang, “Toroidal resonance based optical modulator employing hybrid graphene-dielectric metasurface,” Opt. Express 25(21), 26045–26054 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

29. M. Liu, X. Yin, E. Ulin-Avila, B. Geng, T. Zentgraf, L. Ju, F. Wang, and X. Zhang, “A graphene-based broadband optical modulator,” Nature 474(7349), 64–67 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

30. M. Mittendorff, S. Li, and T. E. Murphy, “Graphene-Based Waveguide-Integrated Terahertz Modulator,” ACS Photonics 4(2), 316–321 (2017). [CrossRef]  

31. Q. Bao and K. P. Loh, “Graphene photonics, plasmonics, and broadband optoelectronic devices,” ACS Nano 6(5), 3677–3694 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

32. C. Cheng, B. Huang, X. Mao, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. Geng, P. Xue, and H. Chen, “Frequency conversion with nonlinear graphene photodetectors,” Nanoscale 9(12), 4082–4089 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

33. Z. Fang, Z. Liu, Y. Wang, P. M. Ajayan, P. Nordlander, and N. J. Halas, “Graphene-Antenna Sandwich Photodetector,” Nano Lett. 12(7), 3808–3813 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

34. R. Yu, V. Pruneri, and F. J. García de Abajo, “Active modulation of visible light with graphene-loaded ultrathin metal plasmonic antennas,” Sci. Rep. 6(1), 32144 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

35. X. J. Shang, X. Zhai, J. Yue, X. Luo, J. P. Liu, X. P. Zhu, H. G. Duan, and L. L. Wang, “Broad-band and high-efficiency polarization converters around 1550 nm based on composite structures,” Opt. Express 25(13), 14406–14413 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

36. A. Vakil and N. Engheta, “Transformation Optics Using Graphene,” Science 332(6035), 1291–1294 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

37. S. M. Bahauddin, H. Robatjazi, and I. Thomann, “Broadband absorption engineering to enhance light absorption in monolayer MoS2,” ACS Photonics 3(5), 853–862 (2016). [CrossRef]  

38. A. Sobhani, A. Lauchner, S. Najmaei, C. Ayala-Orozco, F. Wen, J. Lou, and N. J. Halas, “Enhancing the photocurrent and photoluminescence of single crystal monolayer MoS2 with resonant plasmonic nanoshells,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 104(3), 031112 (2014). [CrossRef]  

39. M. Bernardi, M. Palummo, and J. C. Grossman, “Extraordinary sunlight absorption and one nanometer thick photovoltaics using two-dimensional monolayer materials,” Nano Lett. 13(8), 3664–3670 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

40. D. J. Late, B. Liu, H. S. Matte, V. P. Dravid, and C. N. R. Rao, “Hysteresis in single-layer MoS2 field effect transistors,” ACS Nano 6(6), 5635–5641 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

41. O. Lopez-Sanchez, D. Lembke, M. Kayci, A. Radenovic, and A. Kis, “Ultrasensitive photodetectors based on monolayer MoS2,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 8(7), 497–501 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

42. C. Janisch, H. Song, C. Zhou, Z. Lin, A. L. Elías, D. Ji, M. Terrones, Q. Gan, and Z. Liu, “MoS2 monolayers on nanocavities: enhancement in light–matter interaction,” 2D Mater. 3(2), 025017 (2016). [CrossRef]  

43. H. Li, M. Qin, L. Wang, X. Zhai, R. Ren, and J. Hu, “Total absorption of light in monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides by critical coupling,” Opt. Express 25(25), 31612–31621 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

44. J. T. Liu, T. B. Wang, X. J. Li, and N. H. Liu, “Enhanced absorption of monolayer MoS2 with resonant back reflector,” J. Appl. Phys. 115(19), 193511 (2014). [CrossRef]  

45. X. Gan, Y. Gao, K. Fai Mak, X. Yao, R. J. Shiue, A. van der Zande, M. E. Trusheim, F. Hatami, T. F. Heinz, J. Hone, and D. Englund, “Controlling the spontaneous emission rate of monolayer MoS2 in a photonic crystal nanocavity,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 103(18), 181119 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

46. H. Lu, X. Gan, D. Mao, Y. Fan, D. Yang, and J. Zhao, “Nearly perfect absorption of light in monolayer molybdenum disulfide supported by multilayer structures,” Opt. Express 25(18), 21630–21636 (2017). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

47. J. Hao, L. Zhou, and M. Qiu, “Nearly total absorption of light and heat generation by plasmonic metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. B 83(16), 165107 (2011). [CrossRef]  

48. A. Moreau, C. Ciracì, J. J. Mock, R. T. Hill, Q. Wang, B. J. Wiley, A. Chilkoti, and D. R. Smith, “Controlled-reflectance surfaces with film-coupled colloidal nanoantennas,” Nature 492(7427), 86–89 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

49. J. Cao, J. Wang, G. Yang, Y. Lu, R. Sun, P. Yan, and S. Gao, “Enhancement of broad-band light absorption in monolayer MoS2 using Ag grating hybrid with distributed Bragg reflector,” Superlattices Microstruct. 110, 26–30 (2017). [CrossRef]  

50. S. Butun, S. Tongay, and K. Aydin, “Enhanced light emission from large-area monolayer MoS2 using plasmonic nanodisc arrays,” Nano Lett. 15(4), 2700–2704 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

51. Y. Li, A. Chernikov, X. Zhang, A. Rigosi, H. M. Hill, A. M. van der Zande, D. A. Chenet, E.-M. Shih, J. Hone, and T. F. Heinz, “Measurement of the optical dielectric function of monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides: MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2,” Phys. Rev. B 90(20), 205422 (2014). [CrossRef]  

52. P. B. Johnson and R. W. Christy, “Optical Constants of the Noble Metals,” Phys. Rev. B 6(12), 4370–4379 (1972). [CrossRef]  

53. J. W. Suk, A. Kitt, C. W. Magnuson, Y. Hao, S. Ahmed, J. An, A. K. Swan, B. B. Goldberg, and R. S. Ruoff, “Transfer of CVD-grown monolayer graphene onto arbitrary substrates,” ACS Nano 5(9), 6916–6924 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

54. J. D. Jackson, “Classical Electrodynamics,” Wiley , 52, 1–30 (1998).

55. A. Moreau, C. Ciracì, J. J. Mock, R. T. Hill, Q. Wang, B. J. Wiley, A. Chilkoti, and D. R. Smith, “Controlled-reflectance surfaces with film-coupled colloidal nanoantennas,” Nature 492(7427), 86–89 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of the MoS2-based perfect absorber with dimensions specified.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Absorption of proposed MoS2-based absorber and monolayer MoS2 in the system under illumination of s-polarized and p-polarized normal incident light, respectively, where W = 300nm, P = 800nm, t = 15nm.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Contour profiles of normalized field of the proposed MoS2-based absorber for p-polarized light. (a) Electric field and (b) magnetic field at λ1 = 560 nm. (c) Electric field and (d) magnetic field at λ2 = 672 nm. (e) Electric field and (f) magnetic field at λ3 = 500 nm.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Light absorption of monolayer MoS2 under normal incident p-polarized light with different (a) widths W and (b) periods P of silver nanoribbons, respectively. The other parameters are the same as Fig. 2.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Light absorption of monolayer MoS2 under normal incident p-polarized light with different thicknesses (a) t and (b) DS, respectively. The other parameters are the same as Fig. 2.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Light absorption of monolayer MoS2 as a function of the wavelength and angle of incidence under p-polarized light. The other parameters are the same as Fig. 2.

Equations (1)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

A(λ)= 4πc λ ·Re(N)·Im(N)· V l | E l | 2 d V l
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.