Numerical investigation of mid-infrared single-photon generation

Richard A. McCracken; Francesco Graffitti; Alessandro Fedrizzi

doi:10.1364/JOSAB.35.000C38

1. INTRODUCTION

Single-photon creation with quantum emitters or through parametric downconversion is a mature quantum technology with bright photon sources now routinely available at visible and telecommunications wavelengths. A major application area for single-photon sources is in quantum sensing and metrology, where they can exceed noise limitations intrinsic to classical systems for, e.g., subshot-noise phase estimation [1] or absorption measurements in the few-photon regime [2].

Expanding single-photon technology beyond the near-IR (1 to 2 μm) into the mid-IR spectrum (2 to 20 μm) could enable quantum advantages for a host of mid-IR applications [3], e.g., medical imaging [4,5] at ultra-low light levels. It would further open up access to scatter-free atmospheric windows [6–8] for free-space quantum communication and for quantum remote sensing, e.g., the detection of biological or chemical samples in the few-photon regime, stealth range finding, and in particular quantum lidar [9,10].

The most popular method for generating single-photon pairs is parametric downconversion in crystals such as BBO, BiBO, PPLN, and PPKTP. Owing to their optical properties, they allow access from ultraviolet to near-IR wavelengths. PPLN and PPKTP are suitable for generation of photons up to 5 μm, and single-photon generation and upconversion detection in PPLN has been demonstrated up to 4 μm [11,12]. However, beyond that limit these two materials become opaque. A suite of novel nonlinear materials has recently been explored using widely tunable optical parametric oscillators (OPOs). Four of the most exciting materials are OP-GaP, OP-GaAs, cadmium silicon phosphide ( ${CdSiP}_{2}$ , CSP), and zinc germanium phosphide ( ${ZnGeP}_{2}$ , ZGP), each of which exhibit transparencies that extend well beyond 5 μm.

Here we numerically study mid-IR photon generation in these materials, benchmarking against known results in PPLN and PPKTP. We show that wavelengths up to 13 μm can comfortably be reached with available pump lasers. We identify parameter regimes for type-0, type-I, and type-II phase-matching and highlight a number of special cases for which group-velocity matching between the pump and signal/idler photons can be achieved. This allows for the creation of spectrally pure single photons without spectral filtering—a key requirement for applications requiring high photon-collection efficiency. Finally, we discuss how mid-IR single photons can be detected, with either low band-gap semiconductor avalanche photodetectors, superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors, or frequency upconversion to more conventional wavelengths.

2. PARAMETRIC DOWNCONVERSION AND GROUP-VELOCITY MATCHING

Pump laser photons passing through a nonlinear optical material can interact with the medium, decaying into two lower-energy photons (namely “signa” and “idler”) under the conservation of energy and momentum. This three-wave mixing process is known as parametric downconversion (PDC) and is a widespread technique for generating high-quality single photons for optical quantum technologies. In fact, despite their probabilistic nature, recent schemes have demonstrated that PDC sources can approximate a nearly deterministic photon source with high production rates and photon purity [13–19].

The spectral properties of the downconverted photons reflect the pump spectrum and the crystal nonlinear properties through the dispersion relations in the material. In particular, the PDC photons usually emerge from the crystal in a spectrally correlated state that leads to poor heralded-photon spectral purities [20]: this is inconvenient for most of the photonic quantum applications that indeed require highly pure photons. For this reason, different techniques have been introduced for minimizing the spectral correlations in the PDC photon pair.

The simplest method is applying narrowband spectral filters to the photons. However, this comes at a significant cost in terms of optical loss, compromising the overall efficiency of the source. A more sophisticated approach is tuning the experimental parameters to fulfil the group-velocity matching (GVM) condition [20–24]. This method consists of choosing the group velocities of the three photons involved in the process so that the dispersion parameter $D = - ({GD}_{p} - {GD}_{s}) / ({GD}_{p} - {GD}_{i})$ is greater than 0, where GD are the group delays of the photons (or equivalently, their inverse group velocities) [25,26]. The dispersion parameter is equal to $\tan (θ)$ , where $θ$ is the angle between the phase-matching function and the $x$ axis in the signal-idler frequency space: for a full description of the phase-matching function and the PDC spectral properties we refer the reader to Refs. [20,24,26].

Whenever the GVM condition is satisfied, it is possible to maximize the heralded-photon purity by appropriately tuning the pump spectral width with respect to the crystal length [20,24]. When $D = 0$ or $D = + \infty$ —conditions known as asymmetric GVM, corresponding to $θ = 0 °$ and $θ = 90 °$ , respectively—a spectrally uncorrelated biphoton state is asymptotically achieved for very spectrally broad pump pulses. This condition provides high heralded-photon purities but it is not suitable for multiphoton experiments, as the signal and idler photons have different bandwidths and are therefore distinguishable. $D = 1$ (i.e., $θ = 45 °$ ) corresponds to symmetric GVM: the PDC photons produced under this condition are indistinguishable, but their spectral purity is limited by residual correlations rising from the uniform nonlinearity profile of the crystal [27]. In the case of poled crystals, it is possible to tailor the longitudinal nonlinearity of the crystal by changing its poling structure to further reduce the spectral correlations between the PDC photons [17,23,27–30].

For the purpose of this study, we will identify the group-velocity matching region for a number of crystals generating in the near- and mid-IR, pointing out the distinctive regimes for which the dispersion parameter is either 0, 1, or $+ \infty$ .

3. MID-IR NONLINEAR OPTICAL CRYSTALS

Here we detail key optical properties of promising nonlinear crystals for mid-IR single-photon generation, including material transparency, crystallographic orientation, and the primary nonlinear tensor coefficient $(d_{j k})$ that can be exploited for efficient downconversion [31]. We also provide examples of mid-IR generation in these materials; however, we note that this survey is not exhaustive.

A. Birefringent Oxide Crystals

The most commonly employed nonlinear materials for parametric downconversion are lithium niobate ( ${LiNbO}_{3}$ , LN) and potassium titanyl phosphate ( ${KTiOPO}_{4}$ , KTP)—material properties and Sellmeier equations can be found in Refs. [32–38]. Noncritical quasi-phase-matching (QPM) in these materials typically requires the addition of a periodic structure, achieved by applying a lithographic electrode mask across the crystal, followed by electric field poling of periodic domains of alternating polarity. This poling technology is very mature, enabling highly tailored periodicities such as fan-out gratings, cascaded processes [39], chirped structures [40], and entirely domain-engineered crystals [23,41]. These oxide crystals are transparent across the entire visible and near-IR spectrum and can be pumped by commercial Ti:sapphire (800 nm), Yb:fiber (1040 nm), and Er:fiber (1550 nm) laser sources; however, their use in mid-IR frequency conversion is limited due to the onset of multiphonon absorption losses above 4.5 μm. In contrast, birefringent chalcopyrite crystals and quasi-phase-matched semiconductor materials exhibit strong two-photon absorption at lower wavelengths but excellent transparency into the mid-IR (Fig. 1), along with significantly larger nonlinear coefficients than either LN or KTP (Table 1).

Fig. 1. Optical transparencies of several mid-IR nonlinear crystals, with PPKTP and PPLN included for comparison. Areas shaded in black are transparent but display strong two-photon absorption.

Download Full Size | PDF

Table 1. Effective Nonlinearity Coefficients in All Polarization Configurations for the Six Crystals Discussed in This Paper^a

View Table

B. Birefringent Chalcopyrite Crystals

ZGP is a positive uniaxial crystal ( $n_{e} > n_{o}$ ) with $d_{36} = 75.4 {pmV}^{- 1}$ , enabling type-I ( $o \to e + e$ ) and type-II ( $o \to e + o$ ) birefringent phase-matching [43–45]. The crystal is transparent from 0.7 to 12.3 μm; however, strong two-photon absorption prevents pumping below 1.9 μm, and therefore ZGP OPOs are typically pumped by master-oscillator-power-amplifier systems comprising a thulium-based pump and a holmium-based amplifier [46,47], or with thulium-pumped ${Cr}^{3 +}$ :ZnSe lasers [48]. Alternative pumping schemes have employed a cascaded OPO architecture, utilizing a primary OPO to pump a secondary ZGP OPO [49,50]; however, this can introduce additional noise into the system.

CSP is a negative uniaxial crystal ( $n_{o} > n_{e}$ ) with $d_{36} = 84 {pmV}^{- 1}$ , enabling type-I ( $e \to o + o$ ) and type-II ( $e \to o + e$ ) birefringent phase-matching [51,52]. The crystal is transparent from 0.5 to 9.0 μm, but the band edge is close to 500 nm, implying that two-photon absorption will be present below 1.0 μm. Pulse-energy-dependent two-photon effects have been observed using Yb-doped solid-state sources at 1.064 and 1.053 μm, suggesting that power scaling may require pumping with wavelength-shifted Yb:fiber amplifiers or moving to 1.5 μm Er-based technology. CSP-based OPOs producing picosecond [53–55] and femtosecond [56,57] pulses in the 6 to 7 μm region have been demonstrated when pumped near 1 μm, and an architecture employing intracavity cascaded nonlinear crystals has extended this to 8.1 μm [58]. While the majority of CSP-based OPOs have exploited noncritical phase-matching ( $θ = 90 °$ ), type-I critical phase-matching has recently been demonstrated [59].

C. Quasi-Phase-Matched Semiconductors

Semiconductors offer numerous advantages over traditional oxide crystals, as they have excellent thermal conductivity and high nonlinear coefficients, and can be grown with high purity. Orientation-patterned gallium arsenide (OP-GaAs) was the first quasi-phase-matched semiconductor material [60], offering two-photon-free transparency from 1.73 μm to above 15 μm and a high nonlinearity of $d_{36} = 95 {pmV}^{- 1}$ [61]. As semiconductors do not posses the ferroelectric properties of oxide crystals, conventional poling methods cannot be employed. Instead, a combination of molecular beam epitaxy, photolithography, and selective etching followed by high-growth-rate hydride vapor phase epitaxy produces a “thick-film” ( $> 1.5 mm$ ) layer with good grating integrity [62,63]. Growth, processing, and patterning of semiconductor materials have matured significantly in recent years, with commercial samples available and downconversion demonstrated in several embodiments. Spurred by interest in mid-IR frequency combs, doubly resonant OP-GaAs OPOs were extensively developed in Stanford, pumped by Cr:ZnSe ( $\sim 2.4 μm$ [64,65]) or Tm:fiber ( $\sim 2.0 μm$ [66,67]). A singly resonant (nondegenerate) OP-GaAs OPO pumped by an amplified Tm:fiber laser was demonstrated by Heckl et al. [68] and was tuneable from 3 to 6 μm.

Orientation-patterned gallium phosphide (OP-GaP) was specifically developed to have a nonlinear semiconductor material that could be pumped by mature Yb, Nd, and Er-based sources. The two-photon absorption edge is shifted to 1 μm and the crystals are transparent to 12.5 μm, with $d_{36} = 75 {pmV}^{- 1}$ [69]. The patterning process is similar to that of OP-GaAs, with $> 1 mm$ layer thicknesses achieved repeatably [70]. Parametric downconversion has been demonstrated using a variety of pump lasers, including Yb:fiber [71–73], Er:fiber [74], $Q$ -switched $Nd : {YVO}_{4}$ [75], and Nd:YAG lasers [76], and through difference frequency generation [77,78].

4. NUMERICAL STUDIES FOR PHASE-MATCHING AND GROUP-VELOCITY MATCHING

We now perform phase-matching and group-velocity-matching calculations for collinear type-0, type-I, and type-II interactions in the nonlinear materials described in the previous section, with calculations verified against published OPO results. Using a range of pump wavelengths, we numerically solve the phase-matching equation

Δ k = 2 π (\frac{n (λ_{p})}{λ_{p}} - \frac{n (λ_{s})}{λ_{s}} - \frac{n (λ_{i})}{λ_{i}} - \frac{1}{Λ}),

where

Δ k

is the wave-vector mismatch and

n (λ)

is the wavelength-dependent refractive index for the pump, signal, and idler photons, determined from the Sellmeier equations for each crystal. Where temperature-dependent Sellmeier equations are available, we perform our calculations at 300 K. Where multiple Sellmeier equations exist, an average is taken. For each wavelength we calculate the grating period

Λ

(or equivalent birefringently phase-matched crystal length) required to achieve

Δ k = 0

, maximizing the phase-matching efficiency. Similarly, we calculate the dispersion parameter

D

described previously, displaying our results as group-velocity mismatch angle

θ

as detailed in Refs. [20,24–26]. We restrict our analysis to pump wavelengths above the two-photon absorption limit and idler wavelengths below the transparency cutoff.

A. Type-0 Downconversion

Type-0 downconversion provides access to the highest nonlinearities for grating-based crystals, yielding increased photon-pair generation rates and enabling efficient system architectures. GVM angle $θ$ and grating period $Λ$ are calculated for OP-GaP and OP-GaAs, using PPKTP and PPLN as illustrative comparisons, and results are displayed in Figs. 2–5. In the case of type-0 phase-matching it is important to note that degenerate (spectrally symmetric) downconversion does not provide high spectral purity or indistinguishability due to a singularity in $θ$ ; however, nondegenerate downconversion is readily achievable.

Fig. 2. Signal wavelength versus pump wavelength with corresponding (left) GVM angle $θ$ and (right) grating period $Λ$ for type-0 ( $e \to e + e$ ) downconversion in PPKTP. The dashed line indicates degeneracy, i.e., spectrally symmetric downconversion. The black line indicates wavelength configurations for high indistinguishability ( $θ = 45 °$ ), while the plotted boundaries indicate areas of high spectral purity ( $θ = 0, 90 °$ ).

Download Full Size | PDF

Fig. 3. Signal wavelength versus pump wavelength with corresponding (left) GVM angle $θ$ and (right) grating period $Λ$ for type-0 ( $e \to e + e$ ) downconversion in PPLN.

Download Full Size | PDF

Fig. 4. Signal wavelength versus pump wavelength with corresponding (left) GVM angle $θ$ and (right) grating period $Λ$ for type-0 ( $e \to e + e$ ) downconversion in OP-GaP.

Download Full Size | PDF

Fig. 5. Signal wavelength versus pump wavelength with corresponding (left) GVM angle $θ$ and (right) grating period $Λ$ for type-0 ( $e \to e + e$ ) downconversion in OP-GaAs.

Download Full Size | PDF

B. Type-I Downconversion

Type-I downconversion provides parallel polarization states for the signal and idler photons, which are orthogonal to the pump polarization. This process is ideal for high-purity photons with low spectral correlation; however, degenerate phase-matching with GVM is not achievable in bulk crystals due to a singularity in the GVM condition. Type-I degenerate downconversion has been achieved in waveguides in a backward-propagating regime [79]; however, the additional phase-matching terms introduced by waveguide dispersion are outside the scope of this investigation. Figure 6 displays our calculations for PPLN ( $e \to o + o$ ), in which we highlight cases of high spectral purity ( $θ = 0, 90 °$ ) and indistinguishability ( $θ = 45 °$ ). While noncritical-phase-matching calculations for ZGP ( $o \to e + e$ ) and CSP ( $e \to o + o$ ) indicate regions of high purity, the required crystal lengths for efficient GVM are $< 100 μm$ and are therefore unlikely to allow for generation of single photons at reasonable brightness. PPKTP type-I phase-matching does not permit the generation of spectrally pure heralded photons.

Fig. 6. Signal wavelength versus pump wavelength with corresponding (left) GVM angle $θ$ and (right) grating period $Λ$ for type-I ( $e \to o + o$ ) downconversion in PPLN.

Download Full Size | PDF

C. Type-II Downconversion

Type-II downconversion provides orthogonal polarization states for the signal and idler photons, ideal for experiments requiring downstream spatial separation or polarization entanglement. Figures 7–10 display our calculations for ZGP ( $o \to e + o$ or $o + e$ ) and CSP ( $e \to o + e$ or $e + o$ ), with PPLN and PPKTP as illustrative comparisons ( $o \to e + o$ or $o + e$ ).

Fig. 7. Signal wavelength versus pump wavelength with corresponding (left) GVM angle $θ$ and (right) grating period $Λ$ for (a) type-II ( $o \to e + o$ ) and (b) type-II ( $o \to o + e$ ) downconversion in PPKTP. Solid red areas in the right plot indicate grating periods longer than 250 μm, where birefringent QPM is possible.

Download Full Size | PDF

Fig. 8. Signal wavelength versus pump wavelength with corresponding (left) GVM angle $θ$ and (right) grating period $Λ$ for (a) type-II ( $o \to e + o$ ) and (b) type-II ( $o \to o + e$ ) downconversion in PPLN.

Download Full Size | PDF

Fig. 9. Signal wavelength versus pump wavelength with corresponding (left) GVM angle $θ$ and (right) grating period $Λ$ for (a) type-II ( $e \to o + e$ ) and (b) type-II ( $e \to e + o$ ) downconversion in CSP. Solid red areas in the right plot indicate grating periods longer than 500 μm, where birefringent QPM is possible.

Download Full Size | PDF

Fig. 10. Signal wavelength versus pump wavelength with corresponding (left) GVM angle $θ$ and (right) grating period $Λ$ for (a) type-II ( $o \to e + o$ ) and (b) type-II ( $o \to o + e$ ) downconversion in ZGP. Solid red areas in the right plot indicate grating periods longer than 500 μm, where birefringent QPM is possible.

Download Full Size | PDF

5. HIGHLIGHTED EXAMPLES OF MID-IR QUANTUM LIGHT CREATION

From these numerical results it is apparent that mid-IR single photons can be generated at wavelengths of up to 13 μm in nondegenerate PDC (type-0 QPM in OP-GaAs) and up to 7.4 μm in a degenerate configuration (type-II birefringent phase-matching in ZGP). We can further identify a number of phase-matching conditions for the creation of spectrally uncorrelated, wavelength-degenerate photons. This PDC scenario is relevant for quantum-enhanced applications requiring nonclassical two-photon interference, e.g., for the creation of photon-number entangled states (so-called N00N states) for phase estimation, that in the mid-IR might be of interest for nonintrusive chemical or biological sensing with a quantum advantage (see, e.g., Ref. [80]).

For type-II phase-matching in PPKTP, we reproduce the well-known GVM conditions from $791 nm \to 1582 nm$ with $θ = 45 °$ , for the creation of spectrally pure, indistinguishable photons in the telecom regime as, e.g., implemented in Ref. [17].

Moving further into the mid-IR, phase-matching is possible for degenerate PDC from $1200 \to 2400 nm$ with $θ = 0$ . Nondegenerate type-II PDC from $745.6 \to 1071.4 + 2451.8 nm$ can be achieved in 5-mm-long birefringently phase-matched KTP with $θ = 45 °$ .

Type-I degenerate PDC is possible in PPLN from $784 \to 1568 nm$ , providing broadband phase-matching in the telecom region. Favorable GVM conditions exist for type-II degenerate PDC from $1775 nm \to 3550 nm$ with $θ = 45 °$ , achievable through OPO pumping.

The chalcopyrite crystals CSP and ZGP cannot be poled and therefore GVM conditions offering high purity and indistinguishability also require birefringent phase-matching to be of practical use. In CSP we identify degenerate type-II PDC in a 1.6-mm-long crystal from $2573 \to 5146 nm$ where $θ = 45 °$ . We also identify regions of high purity with $θ = 0 °$ for $2090 \to 4180 nm$ ( $L_{crystal} = 1.9 mm$ ) and $3310 \to 6620 nm$ ( $L_{crystal} = 2.2 mm$ ), which can be pumped by holmium lasers and Yb-pumped OPOs, respectively. Similarly, in ZGP we find high-purity degenerate type-II PDC with $θ = 0 °$ from $3014 \to 6028 nm$ ( $L_{crystal} = 8.6 mm$ ), along with $θ = 0 °$ cases from $2520 \to 5040 nm$ ( $L_{crystal} = 1.3 mm$ ) and $3692 \to 7384 nm$ ( $L_{crystal} = 1.5 mm$ ).

Optically isotropic semiconductors exhibit no birefringence; therefore, only type-0 QPM is achievable in OP-GaP and OP-GaAs. The high symmetry in the nonlinear susceptibility tensor of these materials enables QPM without relying on specific pump polarization states or crystal orientations, providing linear and circularly polarized signal and idler waves [81,82]. Applications of these polarization states to single-photon generation will be detailed in a further study.

6. DETECTION

A key question is how to detect mid-IR single photons. In principle, suitable detectors for this spectral range can broadly be grouped into superconducting detectors—either nanowire or transition edge sensors, narrow band-gap semiconductor photodiodes based on materials such as HgCdTe, or nonlinear upconversion detectors which convert mid-IR single photons to wavelengths for which superconducting or semiconductor detectors are readily available.

Superconducting transition edge sensors based on tungsten have an absorption range of up to 2.5 μm [83]. They offer near unity single-photon detection efficiency and photon number resolution but are quite slow and require mK cryogenic temperatures. Furthermore, the limited energy resolution of these devices restricts the wavelength range in practice to 1.5 μm [84].

Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) [85] offer slightly less efficiency but are much faster and operate at less demanding temperatures of 1 to 2 K. SNSPDs based on WSi have been demonstrated for up to 5.5 μm detection [86,87], with work ongoing to extend this up to 10 μm. Challenges for SNSPDs include that the typical active area of these detectors is smaller than the mode field diameter required for mid-IR photons at 10 μm. Large-area free-space WSi SNSPDs are under development in particular for long-distance free-space communication at the single-photon level [8]. However, these options are not yet available commercially.

Semiconductor photodiodes based on InGaAs are now mature technology for 1.55 μm detection. They require cryogenic temperatures to suppress intrinsic photon-counting noise and have comparably low detection efficiency but are still widely deployed for single-photon detection in the telecommunications regime. While in principle offering a high photoresponse of up to 2.6 μm, commercial options usually cover a range of no more than up to 1.7 μm. There is an ongoing effort to develop semiconductor photodetectors based on materials with smaller band gaps to push the detection regime into the mid-IR for applications such as space-borne astronomy or lidar. An early contender that has now reached some maturity is HgCdTe. A material notoriously hard to work with because of its toxicity among other reasons, it is now more widely available. Depending on the Cd admixture, the spectral response can be tailored to cover the entire mid-IR, from 2 to 14 μm, with the highest response at 10 μm [88]. More exotic materials for which single-photon gain has been demonstrated include black arsenic phosphorus [89] or ultra-broadband 2D materials such as graphene [90].

Upconversion detectors were originally developed as an alternative to InGaAs detectors to improve single-photon detection characteristics at 1.55 μm [91,92]. The IR signal photon is mixed with a strong pump beam in a nonlinear crystal and converted to a shorter wavelength. For mid-IR single-photon pairs at 3.3 μm this has recently been demonstrated in PPLN [12].

Upconversion detection is a natural choice in the context of this paper because the materials we discussed and the OPO pump lasers likely to be used for PDC generation would be equally suitable for the upconversion task. For example, for the specific use cases we identified in the previous section, to produce pure single photons at 6028, 6620, and 7384 nm, upconversion to 1550 nm could be achieved in OP-GaP with a 1250 nm seed wavelength (see Fig. 11). Similarly, upconversion of single photons in the 3000 to 5000 nm band to the Si-SPAD operating region of 700 to 900 nm could be achieved in PPLN with a 660 nm seed wavelength. Such seed sources are available commercially or can be generated from OPOs.

Fig. 11. Upconversion of mid-IR single photons to Si and InGaAs detector bands can be achieved through type-0 DFG in PPLN or OP-GaP.

Download Full Size | PDF

Whichever option is employed, a major challenge to overcome is the thermal radiation background in the mid-IR. For example, for the mid-IR free-space SNSPD system proposed in Ref. [8], it is estimated that even with a 1 μm bandpass filter, stray background radiation at 10 μm would amount to more than $10^{8}$ noise photons per second, drowning out the signal. For upconversion detection, it has been shown that a significant amount of broadband thermal background is converted along with the signal [93]. Potential solutions to this obstacle are narrow-band filtering—although narrowband filters at the desired wavelength might not be readily available—optical gating, which for photon-pair production is standard practice anyway, and optical shuttering, which for heralded photon pairs can be done on nanosecond time scales [94].

Single-photon upconversion is most efficient in waveguides and therefore conventionally limited to the single-mode regime, which provides a challenge for mid-IR single-photon imaging applications such as long-range depth imaging [95]. However, a 2D imaging upconversion system based on PPLN has been demonstrated for up to 5.5 μm [96]. Alternatively, this could be addressed with photonic lanterns, which adiabatically transform a multimode pixel array to linear single-mode arrays [97].

7. CONCLUSION

As we have shown, recent advances in nonlinear materials allow for the creation and detection of correlated photon pairs or heralded single photons at mid-IR wavelengths via parametric downconversion. The materials we discussed are not quite yet of the high optical quality expected for mature nonlinear crystals such as PPLN and PPKTP; however, rapid progress is being made toward closing this gap. Waveguide integration is not straightforward—ZGP and CSP do not lend themselves to refractive index modification, while OP-GaAs waveguides suffer from high propagation losses. OP-GaP waveguide structures are being actively developed but have not been demonstrated [98]. Research is also going on into even more exotic crystals such as orientation-patterned zinc selenide (OP-ZnSe), barium thiogallate ( ${BaGa}_{4} S_{7}$ ), and barium sellenogallate ( ${BaGa}_{4} {Se}_{7}$ ), potentially extending the accessible single-photon PDC regime beyond 13 μm. Many challenges remain to create wavelength-agile quantum light sources and the corresponding detectors; however, there is also a large payoff in enabling quantum enhancements for mid-IR applications.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (EP/L015110/1, EP/N002962/1).

Acknowledgment

R. M. acknowledges support from a Heriot-Watt University Research Fellowship.

REFERENCES

1. S. Slussarenko, M. M. Weston, H. M. Chrzanowski, L. K. Shalm, V. B. Verma, S. W. Nam, and G. J. Pryde, “Unconditional violation of the shot-noise limit in photonic quantum metrology,” Nat. Photonics 11, 700–703 (2017). [CrossRef]

2. P.-A. Moreau, J. Sabines-Chesterking, R. Whittaker, S. K. Joshi, P. M. Birchall, A. McMillan, J. G. Rarity, and J. C. F. Matthews, “Demonstrating an absolute quantum advantage in direct absorption measurement,” Sci. Rep. 7, 6256 (2017). [CrossRef]

3. M. Ebrahim-Zadeh and I. T. Sorokina, Mid-Infrared Coherent Sources and Applications (Springer, 2007).

4. D. C. Fernandez, R. Bhargava, S. M. Hewitt, and I. W. Levin, “Infrared spectroscopic imaging for histopathologic recognition,” Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 469–474 (2005). [CrossRef]

5. H. Amrania, G. Antonacci, C.-H. Chan, L. Drummond, W. R. Otto, N. A. Wright, and C. Phillips, “Digistain: a digital staining instrument for histopathology,” Opt. Express 20, 7290–7299 (2012). [CrossRef]

6. R. Martini, C. Bethea, F. Capasso, C. Gmachl, R. Paiella, E. A. Whittaker, H. Y. Hwang, D. L. Sivco, J. N. Baillargeon, and A. Y. Cho, “Free-space optical transmission of multimedia satellite data streams using mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers,” Electron. Lett. 38, 181–183 (2002). [CrossRef]

7. G. Temporao, H. Zbinden, S. Tanzilli, N. Gisin, T. Aellen, M. Giovannini, J. Faist, and J. P. Von der Weid, “Feasibility study of free-space quantum key distribution in the mid-infrared,” Quantum Inf. Comput. 8, 1–11 (2008).

8. F. Bellei, A. P. Cartwright, A. N. McCaughan, A. E. Dane, F. Najafi, Q. Zhao, and K. K. Berggren, “Free-space-coupled superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors for infrared optical communications,” Opt. Express 24, 3248–3257 (2016). [CrossRef]

9. S.-H. Tan, B. I. Erkmen, V. Giovannetti, S. Guha, S. Lloyd, L. Maccone, S. Pirandola, and J. H. Shapiro, “Quantum illumination with Gaussian states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 253601 (2008). [CrossRef]

10. Q. Wang, L. Hao, Y. Zhang, L. Xu, C. Yang, X. Yang, and Y. Zhao, “Super-resolving quantum lidar: entangled coherent-state sources with binary-outcome photon counting measurement suffice to beat the shot-noise limit,” Opt. Express 24, 5045–5056 (2016). [CrossRef]

11. Y. M. Sua, H. Fan, A. Shahverdi, J.-Y. Chen, and Y.-P. Huang, “Direct generation and detection of quantum correlated photons with 3.2 um wavelength spacing,” Sci. Rep. 7, 17494 (2017). [CrossRef]

12. M. Mancinelli, A. Trenti, S. Piccione, G. Fontana, J. S. Dam, P. Tidemand-Lichtenberg, C. Pedersen, and L. Pavesi, “Mid-infrared coincidence measurements on twin photons at room temperature,” Nat. Commun. 8, 15184 (2017). [CrossRef]

13. M. A. Broome, M. P. Almeida, A. Fedrizzi, and A. G. White, “Reducing multi-photon rates in pulsed down-conversion by temporal multiplexing,” Opt. Express 19, 22698–22708 (2011). [CrossRef]

14. M. J. Collins, C. Xiong, I. H. Rey, T. D. Vo, J. He, S. Shahnia, C. Reardon, T. F. Krauss, M. J. Steel, A. S. Clark, and B. J. Eggleton, “Integrated spatial multiplexing of heralded single-photon sources,” Nat. Commun. 4, 2582 (2013). [CrossRef]

15. C. Xiong, X. Zhang, Z. Liu, M. J. Collins, A. Mahendra, L. G. Helt, M. J. Steel, D.-Y. Choi, C. J. Chae, P. H. W. Leong, and B. J. Eggleton, “Active temporal multiplexing of indistinguishable heralded single photons,” Nat. Commun. 7, 10853 (2016). [CrossRef]

16. F. Kaneda, F. Xu, J. Chapman, and P. G. Kwiat, “Quantum-memory-assisted multi-photon generation for efficient quantum information processing,” Optica 4, 1034–1037 (2017). [CrossRef]

17. F. Graffitti, P. Barrow, M. Proietti, D. Kundys, and A. Fedrizzi, “Independent high-purity photons created in domain-engineered crystals,” Optica 5, 514–517 (2018). [CrossRef]

18. X. S. Ma, S. Zotter, J. Kofler, T. Jennewein, and A. Zeilinger, “Experimental generation of single photons via active multiplexing,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 043814 (2011). [CrossRef]

19. R. J. A. Francis-Jones, R. A. Hoggarth, and P. J. Mosley, “All-fiber multiplexed source of high-purity single photons,” Optica 3, 1270–1273 (2016). [CrossRef]

20. A. B. U’Ren, C. Silberhorn, R. Erdmann, K. Banaszek, W. P. Grice, I. A. Walmsley, and M. G. Raymer, “Generation of pure single photon wavepackets by conditional preparation based on spontaneous parametric downconversion,” arXiv:quant-ph/0611019v1 (2006).

21. W. P. Grice, A. B. U’Ren, and I. A. Walmsley, “Eliminating frequency and space-time correlations in multiphoton states,” Phys. Rev. A 64, 063815 (2001). [CrossRef]

22. P. J. Mosley, J. S. Lundeen, B. J. Smith, P. Wasylczyk, A. B. U’Ren, C. Silberhorn, and I. A. Walmsley, “Heralded generation of ultrafast single photons in pure quantum states,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 133601 (2008). [CrossRef]

23. F. Graffitti, D. Kundys, D. T. Reid, A. M. Branczyk, and A. Fedrizzi, “Pure down-conversion photons through sub-coherence-length domain engineering,” Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 035001 (2017). [CrossRef]

24. N. Quesada and A. M. Brańczyk, “Gaussian functions are optimal for waveguided nonlinear-quantum-optical processes,” Phys. Rev. A 98, 043813 (2018). [CrossRef]

25. F. Kaneda, K. Garay-Palmett, A. B. U’Ren, and P. G. Kwiat, “Heralded single-photon source utilizing highly nondegenerate, spectrally factorable spontaneous parametric downconversion,” Opt. Express 24, 10733–10747 (2016). [CrossRef]

26. F. Laudenbach, R.-B. Jin, C. Greganti, M. Hentschel, P. Walther, and H. Hübel, “Numerical investigation of photon-pair generation in periodically poled MTiOX₄ (M = K, Rb, Cs; X = P, As),” Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 024035 (2017). [CrossRef]

27. A. M. Brańczyk, A. Fedrizzi, T. M. Stace, T. C. Ralph, and A. G. White, “Engineered optical nonlinearity for quantum light sources,” Opt. Express 19, 55–65 (2011). [CrossRef]

28. P. B. Dixon, J. H. Shapito, and F. N. C. Wong, “Spectral engineering by Gaussian phase-matching for quantum photonics,” Opt. Express 21, 5879–5890 (2013). [CrossRef]

29. J.-L. Tambasco, A. Boes, L. G. Helt, M. J. Steel, and A. Mitchell, “Domain engineering algorithm for practical and effective photon sources,” Opt. Express 24, 19616–19626 (2016). [CrossRef]

30. A. Dosseva, Ł. Cincio, and A. M. Brańczyk, “Shaping the joint spectrum of down-converted photons through optimized custom poling,” Phys. Rev. A 93, 013801 (2016). [CrossRef]

31. R. W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, 3rd ed. (Academic, 2009).

32. D. N. Nikogosyan, Nonlinear Optical Crystals: A Complete Survey, 1st ed. (Springer, 2005).

33. V. G. Dmitriev, G. G. Gurzadyan, and D. N. Nikogosyan, Handbook of Nonlinear Optical Crystals, 3rd ed. (Springer, 1999).

34. O. Gayer, Z. Sacks, E. Galun, and A. Arie, “Temperature and wavelength dependent refractive index equations for MgO-doped congruent and stoichiometric LiNbO₃,” Appl. Phys. B 91, 343–348 (2008). [CrossRef]

35. O. Gayer, Z. Sacks, E. Galun, and A. Arie, “Erratum to: temperature and wavelength dependent refractive index equations for MgO-doped congruent and stoichiometric LiNbO₃,” Appl. Phys. B 101, 481 (2010). [CrossRef]

36. H. Zhao, I. T. Lima Jr., and A. Major, “Near-infrared properties of periodically poled KTiOPO₄ and stoichiometric MgO-doped LiTaO₃ crystals for high power optical parametric oscillation with femtosecond pulses,” Laser Phys. 20, 1404–1409 (2010). [CrossRef]

37. K. Fradkin, A. Arie, A. Skliar, and G. Rosenman, “Tunable midinfrared source by difference frequency generation in bulk periodically poled KTiOPO₄,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 914–916 (1999). [CrossRef]

38. K. Kato and E. Takaoka, “Sellmeier and thermo-optic dispersion formulas for KTP,” Appl. Opt. 41, 5040–5044 (2002). [CrossRef]

39. K. Balskus, Z. Zhang, R. A. McCracken, and D. T. Reid, “Mid-infrared 333 MHz frequency comb continuously tunable from 1.95 to 4.0 μm,” Opt. Lett. 40, 4178–4181 (2015). [CrossRef]

40. K. A. Tillman, D. T. Reid, D. Artigas, J. Hellström, V. Pasiskevicius, and F. Laurell, “Low-threshold, high-repetition-frequency femtosecond optical parametric oscillator based on chirped-pulse frequency conversion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 20, 1309–1316 (2003). [CrossRef]

41. Ł. Kornaszewski, M. Kohler, U. K. Sapaev, and D. T. Reid, “Designer femtosecond pulse shaping using grating-engineered quasi-phasematching in lithium niobate,” Opt. Lett. 33, 378–380 (2008). [CrossRef]

42. A. V. Smith, “SNLO nonlinear optics code,” AS-Photonics, Albuquerque, New Mexico (2018).

43. G. Boyd, E. Buehler, F. Storz, and J. Wernick, “Linear and nonlinear optical properties of ternary A^IIB^IVC2^V chalcopyrite semiconductors,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 8, 419–426 (1972). [CrossRef]

44. P. G. Schunemann and T. M. Pollak, “Ultralow gradient HGF-Grown ZnGeP₂ and CdGeAs₂ and their optical properties,” MRS Bull. 23(7), 23–27 (1998). [CrossRef]

45. D. E. Zelmon, E. A. Hanning, and P. G. Schunemann, “Refractive-index measurements and Sellmeier coefficients for zinc germanium phosphide from 2 to 9 μm with implications for phase matching in optical frequency-conversion devices,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 18, 1307–1310 (2001). [CrossRef]

46. A. Hemming, J. Richards, A. Davidson, N. Carmody, S. Bennetts, N. Simakov, and J. Haub, “99 W mid-IR operation of a ZGP OPO at 25% duty cycle,” Opt. Express 21, 10062–10069 (2013). [CrossRef]

47. L. Wang, T. Xing, S. Hu, X. Wu, H. Wu, J. Wang, and H. Jiang, “Mid-infrared ZGP-OPO with a high optical-to-optical conversion efficiency of 75.7%,” Opt. Express 25, 3373–3380 (2017). [CrossRef]

48. I. T. McKinnie, G. J. Wagner, S. Christensen, T. J. Carrig, and C. B. Rawle, “Dual-band mid-wave/long-wave ZGP OPO pump-tuned by a Cr:ZnSe laser,” in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) (2002), paper CTuH1.

49. F. Ganikhanov, T. Caughey, and K. L. Vodopyanov, “Narrow-linewidth middle-infrared ZnGeP₂ optical parametric oscillator,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 18, 818–822 (2001). [CrossRef]

50. M. Henriksson, M. Tiihonen, V. Pasiskevicius, and F. Laurell, “Mid-infrared ZGP OPO pumped by near-degenerate narrowband type-I PPKTP parametric oscillator,” Appl. Phys. B 88, 37–41 (2007). [CrossRef]

51. V. Kemlin, B. Boulanger, V. Petrov, P. Segonds, B. Ménaert, P. G. Schunemann, and K. T. Zawilski, “Nonlinear, dispersive and phase-matching properties of the new chalcopyrite CdSiP₂,” Opt. Mater. Express 1, 1292–1300 (2011). [CrossRef]

52. J. Wei, J. M. Murray, F. K. Hopkins, D. M. Krein, K. T. Zawilski, P. G. Schunemann, and S. Guha, “Measurement of refractive indices of CdSiP₂ at temperatures from 90 to 450 K,” Opt. Mater. Express 8, 235–244 (2018). [CrossRef]

53. A. Peremans, D. Lis, F. Cecchet, P. G. Schunemann, K. T. Zawilski, and V. Petrov, “Noncritical singly resonant synchronously pumped OPO for generation of picosecond pulses in the mid-infrared near 6.4 μm,” Opt. Lett. 34, 3053–3055 (2009). [CrossRef]

54. S. Chaitanya Kumar, A. Agnesi, P. Dallocchio, F. Pirzio, G. Reali, K. T. Zawilski, P. G. Schunemann, and M. Ebrahim-Zadeh, “Compact, 1.5 mJ, 450 MHz, CdSiP₂ picosecond optical parametric oscillator near 6.3 μm,” Opt. Lett. 36, 3236–3238 (2011). [CrossRef]

55. S. Chaitanya Kumar, J. Canals Casals, S. Parsa, K. T. Zawilski, P. G. Schunemann, and M. Ebrahim-Zadeh, “Yb-fiber-pumped mid-infrared picosecond optical parametric oscillator tunable across 6.2–6.7 μm,” Appl. Phys. B 124, 100 (2018). [CrossRef]

56. S. Chaitanya Kumar, J. Krauth, A. Steinmann, K. T. Zawilski, P. G. Schunemann, H. Giessen, and M. Ebrahim-Zadeh, “High-power femtosecond mid-infrared optical parametric oscillator at 7 μm based on CdSiP₂,” Opt. Lett. 40, 1398–1401 (2015). [CrossRef]

57. Z. Zhang, T. Gardiner, and D. T. Reid, “Mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy with an optical parametric oscillator,” Opt. Lett. 38, 3148–3150 (2013). [CrossRef]

58. V. Ramaiah-Badarla, S. Chaitanya Kumar, A. Esteban-Martin, K. Devi, K. T. Zawilski, P. G. Schunemann, and M. Ebrahim-Zadeh, “Ti: sapphire-pumped deep-infrared femtosecond optical parametric oscillator based on CdSiP₂,” Opt. Lett. 41, 1708–1711 (2016). [CrossRef]

59. C. F. O’Donnell, S. Chaitanya Kumar, K. T. Zawilski, P. G. Schunemann, and M. Ebrahim-Zadeh, “Critically phase-matched Ti:sapphire-laser-pumped deep-infrared femtosecond optical parametric oscillator based on CdSiP₂,” Opt. Lett. 43, 1507–1510 (2018). [CrossRef]

60. L. Eyres, P. J. Tourreau, T. J. Pinguet, C. B. Ebert, J. S. Harris, M. M. Fejer, B. Gerard, L. Becouarn, and E. Lallier, “Quasi-phase matched frequency conversion in thick all-epitaxial, orientation-patterned GaAs films,” in Advanced Solid State Lasers (2000), paper TuA2.

61. T. Skauli, P. S. Kuo, K. L. Vodopyanov, T. J. Pinguet, O. Levi, L. A. Eyres, J. S. Harris, M. M. Fejer, B. Gerard, and E. Lallier, “Improved dispersion relations for GaAs and applications to nonlinear optics,” J. Appl. Phys. 94, 6447–6455 (2003). [CrossRef]

62. P. G. Schunemann, K. T. Zawilski, L. A. Pomeranz, D. J. Creeden, and P. A. Budni, “Advances in nonlinear optical crystals for mid-infrared coherent sources,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 33, D36–D43 (2016). [CrossRef]

63. C. Lynch, D. F. Bliss, T. Zens, A. Lin, J. S. Harris, P. S. Kuo, and M. M. Fejer, “Growth of mm-thick orientation-patterned GaAs for IR and THZ generation,” J. Cryst. Growth 310, 5241–5247 (2008). [CrossRef]

64. K. L. Vodopyanov, E. Sorokin, I. T. Sorokina, and P. G. Schunemann, “Mid-IR frequency comb source spanning 4.4–5.4 μm based on subharmonic GaAs optical parametric oscillator,” Opt. Lett. 36, 2275–2277 (2011). [CrossRef]

65. V. O. Smolski, S. Vasilyev, P. G. Schunemann, S. B. Mirov, and K. L. Vodopyanov, “Cr:ZnS laser-pumped subharmonic GaAs optical parametric oscillator with the spectrum spanning 3.6–5.6 μm,” Opt. Lett. 40, 2906–2908 (2015). [CrossRef]

66. K. F. Lee, J. Jiang, C. Mohr, J. Bethge, M. E. Fermann, N. Leindecker, K. L. Vodopyanov, P. G. Schunemann, and I. Hartl, “Carrier envelope offset frequency of a doubly resonant, nondegenerate, mid-infrared GaAs optical parametric oscillator,” Opt. Lett. 38, 1191–1193 (2013). [CrossRef]

67. N. Leindecker, A. Marandi, R. L. Byer, K. L. Vodopyanov, J. Jiang, I. Hartl, M. Fermann, and P. G. Schunemann, “Octave-spanning ultrafast OPO with 2.6–6.1 μm instantaneous bandwidth pumped by femtosecond Tm-fiber laser,” Opt. Express 20, 7046–7053 (2012). [CrossRef]

68. O. H. Heckl, B. J. Bjork, G. Winkler, P. B. Changala, B. Spaun, G. Porat, T. Q. Bui, K. F. Lee, J. Jiang, M. E. Fermann, P. G. Schunemann, and J. Ye, “Three-photon absorption in optical parametric oscillators based on OP-GaAs,” Opt. Lett. 41, 5405–5408 (2016). [CrossRef]

69. J. Wei, J. M. Murray, J. O. Barnes, D. M. Krein, P. G. Schunemann, and S. Guha, “Temperature dependent Sellmeier equation for the refractive index of GaP,” Opt. Mater. Express 8, 485–490 (2018). [CrossRef]

70. V. Tassev, M. Snure, R. Petterson, K. Schepler, R. Bedford, M. Mann, S. Vangala, W. Goodhue, A. Lin, J. Harris, M. Fejer, and P. Schunemann, “Recent progress in development orientation-patterned GaP for next-generation frequency conversion devices,” in Conference of Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) (2013), paper JM4K.5.

71. L. Maidment, P. G. Schunemann, and D. T. Reid, “Molecular fingerprint-region spectroscopy from 5 to 12 μm using an orientation-patterned gallium phosphide optical parametric oscillator,” Opt. Lett. 41, 4261–4264 (2016). [CrossRef]

72. O. Kara, L. Maidment, T. Gardiner, P. G. Schunemann, and D. T. Reid, “Dual-comb spectroscopy in the spectral fingerprint region using OPGaP optical parametric oscillators,” Opt. Express 25, 32713–32721 (2017). [CrossRef]

73. E. Sorokin, A. Marandi, P. G. Schunemann, M. M. Fejer, R. L. Byer, and I. T. Sorokina, “Efficient half-harmonic generation of three-optical-cycle mid-IR frequency comb around 4 μm using OP-GaP,” Opt. Express 26, 9963–9971 (2018). [CrossRef]

74. Q. Ru, Z. E. Loparo, X. Zhang, S. Crystal, S. Vasu, P. G. Schunemann, and K. L. Vodopyanov, “Self-referenced octave-wide subharmonic GaP optical parametric oscillator centered at 3 μm and pumped by an Er-fiber laser,” Opt. Lett. 42, 4756–4759 (2017). [CrossRef]

75. L. A. Pomeranz, P. G. Schunemann, D. J. Magarrell, J. C. McCarthy, K. T. Zawilski, and D. E. Zelmon, “1-μm-pumped OPO based on orientation-patterned GaP,” Proc. SPIE 9347, 93470K (2015). [CrossRef]

76. H. Ye, S. Chaitanya Kumar, J. Wei, P. G. Schunemann, and M. Ebrahim-Zadeh, “Optical parametric generation in orientation-patterned gallium phosphide,” Opt. Lett. 42, 3694–3697 (2017). [CrossRef]

77. K. F. Lee, C. J. Hensley, P. G. Schunemann, and M. E. Fermann, “Midinfrared frequency comb by difference frequency of erbium and thulium fiber lasers in orientation-patterned gallium phosphide,” Opt. Express 25, 17411–17416 (2017). [CrossRef]

78. J. Sotor, T. Martynkien, P. G. Schunemann, P. Mergo, L. Rutkowski, and G. Soboń, “All-fiber mid-infrared source tunable from 6 to 9 μm based on difference frequency generation in OP-GaP crystal,” Opt. Express 26, 11756–11763 (2018). [CrossRef]

79. A. Christ, A. Eckstein, P. J. Mosley, and C. Silberhorn, “Pure single photon generation by type-I PDC with backward-wave amplification,” Opt. Express 17, 3441–3446 (2009). [CrossRef]

80. A. Crespi, M. Lobino, J. C. F. Matthews, A. Politi, C. R. Neal, R. Ramponi, R. Osellame, and J. L. O’Brien, “Measuring protein concentration with entangled photons,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 233704 (2012). [CrossRef]

81. K. L. Vodopyanov, O. Levi, P. S. Kuo, T. J. Pinguet, J. S. Harris, M. M. Fejer, B. Gerard, L. Becouarn, and E. Lallier, “Optical parametric oscillation in quasi-phase-matched GaAs,” Opt. Lett. 29, 1912–1914 (2004). [CrossRef]

82. P. S. Kuo and M. M. Fejer, “Mixing of polarization states in zincblende nonlinear optical crystals,” Opt. Express 26, 26971–26984 (2018). [CrossRef]

83. A. E. Lita, A. J. Miller, and S. W. Nam, “Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency,” Opt. Express 16, 3032–3040 (2008). [CrossRef]

84. T. Gerrits (personal communication, 2018).

85. C. M. Natarajan, M. G. Tanner, and R. H. Hadfield, “Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: physics and applications,” Supercond. Sci. Technol. 25, 063001 (2012). [CrossRef]

86. F. Marsili, F. Bellei, F. Najafi, A. E. Dane, E. A. Dauler, R. J. Molnar, and K. K. Berggren, “Efficient single photon detection from 500 nm to 5 μm wavelength,” Nano Lett. 12, 4799–4804 (2012). [CrossRef]

87. F. Marsili, V. B. Verma, M. J. Stevens, J. A. Stern, M. D. Shaw, A. J. Miller, D. Schwarzer, A. Wodtke, R. P. Mirin, and S. W. Nam, “Mid-infrared single-photon detection with tungsten silicide superconducting nanowires,” in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO) (2013), paper CTu1H.1.

88. I. Baker, C. Maxey, L. Hipwood, and K. Barnes, “Leonardo (formerly Selex ES) infrared sensors for astronomy: present and future,” Proc. SPIE 9915, 991505 (2016). [CrossRef]

89. M. Long, A. Gao, P. Wang, H. Xia, C. Ott, C. Pan, Y. Fu, E. Liu, X. Chen, W. Lu, T. Nilges, J. Xu, X. Wang, W. Hu, and F. Miao, “Room temperature high-detectivity mid-infrared photodetectors based on black arsenic phosphorus,” Sci. Adv. 3, e1700589 (2017). [CrossRef]

90. C.-H. Liu, Y.-C. Chang, T. B. Norris, and Z. Zhong, “Graphene photodetectors with ultra-broadband and high responsivity at room temperature,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 273–278 (2014). [CrossRef]

91. R. T. Thew, S. Tanzilli, L. Krainer, S. C. Zeller, A. Rochas, I. Rech, S. Cova, H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, “Low jitter up-conversion detectors for telecom wavelength GHz QKD,” New J. Phys. 8, 32 (2006). [CrossRef]

92. A. P. Vandevender and P. G. Kwiat, “Quantum transduction via frequency upconversion,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 295–299 (2007). [CrossRef]

93. A. Barh, P. Tidemand-Lichtenberg, and C. Pedersen, “Thermal noise in mid-infrared broadband upconversion detectors,” Opt. Express 26, 3249–3259 (2018). [CrossRef]

94. G. Brida, I. P. Degiovanni, M. Genovese, A. Migdall, F. Piacentini, S. V. Polyakov, and I. Ruo Berchera, “Experimental realization of a low-noise heralded single-photon source,” Opt. Express 19, 1484–1492 (2011). [CrossRef]

95. A. M. Pawlikowska, A. Halimi, R. A. Lamb, and G. S. Buller, “Single-photon three-dimensional imaging at up to 10 kilometers range,” Opt. Express 25, 11919–11931 (2017). [CrossRef]

96. J. S. Dam, P. Tidemand-Lichtenberg, and C. Pedersen, “Room-temperature mid-infrared single-photon spectral imaging,” Nat. Photonics 6, 788–793 (2012). [CrossRef]

97. R. R. Thomson, T. A. Birks, S. Leon-Saval, A. K. Kar, and J. Bland-Hawthorn, “Ultrafast laser inscription of an integrated photonic lantern,” Opt. Express 19, 5698–5705 (2011). [CrossRef]

98. P. Schunemann (personal communication, 2018).

Phase- Matching Type		Maximum Effective Nonlinear $∥ d_{eff} ∥ [{pmV}^{- 1}]$
Phase- Matching Type		PPKTP	PPLN	OP-GaP	OP-GaAs	CSP	ZGP
0	$o \to o + o$	0	0	0	0	N/A	N/A
0	$e \to e + e$	15.3	25	75	95	N/A	N/A
I	$o \to e + e$	0	0	N/A	N/A	0	75.4
I	$e \to o + o$	3.9	4.6	N/A	N/A	84	0
II	$o \to e + o$	3.9	4.6	N/A	N/A	0	75.4
II	$e \to o + e$	0	0	N/A	N/A	84	0

Numerical investigation of mid-infrared single-photon generation

Abstract

1. INTRODUCTION

2. PARAMETRIC DOWNCONVERSION AND GROUP-VELOCITY MATCHING

3. MID-IR NONLINEAR OPTICAL CRYSTALS

A. Birefringent Oxide Crystals

B. Birefringent Chalcopyrite Crystals

C. Quasi-Phase-Matched Semiconductors

4. NUMERICAL STUDIES FOR PHASE-MATCHING AND GROUP-VELOCITY MATCHING

A. Type-0 Downconversion

B. Type-I Downconversion

C. Type-II Downconversion

5. HIGHLIGHTED EXAMPLES OF MID-IR QUANTUM LIGHT CREATION

6. DETECTION

7. CONCLUSION

Funding

Acknowledgment

REFERENCES

Cited By

Figures (11)

Tables (1)

Equations (1)

Journal of the Optical Society of America B

Richard A. McCracken	https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9294-1910
Francesco Graffitti	https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8802-8360
Alessandro Fedrizzi	https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5089-3148