Abstract
Pictorial depth cues such as perspective projection, aspect ratio, and texture gradients can specify mathematically the slant of a planar surface. We performed experiments to measure the accuracy of human perception of surface slant from these cues. We calculated the perceived slant from judgments of the relative lengths of a pair of orthogonal lines embedded in the surface. Our results indicate that slant judgments are accurate to within 3 deg. This level of accuracy was achieved whether the cues were luminance differences or equiluminous color differences. We found no evidence of the recession to the frontal plane that has been reported by Gibson [ J. J. Gibson, The Perception of the Visual World ( Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Mass., 1950)] and others. We did find evidence suggesting that subjects do not make accurate depth estimates of disconnected surfaces. This may be the source of the discrepancy between our measures and those of Gibson and others. This research, combined with previous findings, supports a model of perception that involves at least two and possibly more representations of space: one local veridical representation of surface orientation derived primarily from pictorial cues and another global representation of observer-centered distance derived primarily from binocular disparity and motion parallax.
© 1995 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Xenophon Zabulis and Benjamin T. Backus
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21(11) 2049-2060 (2004)
Pedro Rosas, Johan Wagemans, Marc O. Ernst, and Felix A. Wichmann
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 22(5) 801-809 (2005)
Raymond van Ee, Wendy J. Adams, and Pascal Mamassian
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 20(7) 1398-1406 (2003)