Abstract
Two commonly used envelope representations of an electromagnetic field are compared. The analytic signal representation is shown to be preferable in that it leads to a more slowly varying envelope.
© 1981 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
H. A. Kalhor, N. Eshragh, and Ch. Muhammad Aslam
J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71(7) 902-903 (1981)
J. Hubbard
J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71(8) 1029-1032 (1981)
L. Mandel
J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57(5) 613-617 (1967)