Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) assessed by combined Doppler and spectroscopic OCT

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

A method of measuring cortical oxygen metabolism in the mouse brain that uses independent quantitative measurements of three key parameters: cerebral blood flow (CBF), arteriovenous oxygen extraction (OE), and hemoglobin concentration ([HbT]) is presented. Measurements were performed using a single visible light spectral/Fourier domain OCT microscope, with Doppler and spectroscopic capabilities, through a thinned-skull cranial window in the mouse brain. Baseline metabolic measurements in mice are shown to be consistent with literature values. Oxygen consumption, as measured by this method, did not change substantially during minor changes either in the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) or in the fraction of inspired carbon dioxide (FiCO2), in spite of larger variations in oxygen saturations. This set of experiments supports, but does not prove, the validity of the proposed method of measuring brain oxygen metabolism.

© 2015 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Oxygen is required to support the energetic needs of the brain, which relies primarily on oxidative metabolism to support neuronal activity [1]. Oxygen metabolism may also be impaired or altered in a number of diseases, among them traumatic brain injury [2], Alzheimer’s disease [3], stroke [4, 5], and retinal pathologies such as diabetic retinopathy [6, 7] and glaucoma [8]. The interplay of cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) underlie blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) [9–11], the basis of which remains poorly understood. Imaging methods that quantify oxygen consumption in vivo therefore have the potential to enable new clinical diagnostics based on metabolism, novel tools for metabolic imaging in preclinical research, and better understanding of the mechanisms of functional neuroimaging methods.

Conventionally, tissue oxygenation has been measured invasively in the brain by Clark-type electrodes [12], however these are invasive and significantly perturb cortical physiology by damaging cells and compressing microvasculature. Quantification of intra- and extra-vascular oxygenation in 3D has been performed by two-photon microscopy combined with phosphorescence quenching [13, 14]. This method can provide micron-scale spatial resolution but requires the use of phosphorescent dyes, raising the prospect of photodamage due to products of the quenching reaction, which include singlet oxygen and other reactive oxygen species. Photoacoustic microscopy has also been demonstrated for quantifying the metabolic rate of oxygen and even imaging oxygen delivery from single red blood cells (RBCs) [15, 16], but requires pulsed lasers and direct acoustic impedance matching between the sample and ultrasonic transducer. Furthermore, quantifying the bulk CBF using either photoacoustic microscopy or two-photon microscopy over a physiologically-relevant large field of view (FOV) is still challenging.

Positron emission tomography (PET) with the 15O labeled gas tracer O15O, while technically complex, remains the closest to a gold standard measure of oxygen consumption in human subjects [17]. As frequent arterial blood sampling is typically required, this approach was not feasible in animal models until recent developments in microPET that enabled simultaneous scanning of the heart to derive the arterial input functions [18]. However, microPET technology is expensive and not widely available. Moreover, PET cannot achieve the fine resolution of optical methods, and therefore its usage remains limited to comparison between brain regions [19]. Ultra-high field magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) using 17O2 as a gas tracer has been shown to measure CMRO2 in the mouse brain with high repeatability [20]. Nevertheless, similar to PET, it is expensive, complex, and possesses relatively poor spatial resolution.

Multimodal diffuse optical methods have been investigated to study oxygen metabolism using independent measurements of flow and oxygenation. However, ambiguities inherent to multiply scattered light limit the quantitative capabilities of these techniques. Laser Doppler flowmetry [21], diffuse correlation spectroscopy [22], and laser speckle flowmetry [23] are sensitive to the motion of scattering cells, especially RBCs in blood vessels. However, although relative flow changes may be quantifiable, the variable and unknown scattering properties of biological tissue (and consequently the number of dynamic vs. static scattering events) make absolute measurements challenging. Moreover, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) [24] and Optical Intrinsic Signal Imaging (OISI) [25] are known to be sensitive to hemoglobin absorption changes, and provide absolute changes in chromophore concentrations if a path length is assumed. However, baseline values are not readily obtained using conventional continuous-wave NIRS techniques, and require specialized and expensive time domain [26–28] or frequency domain [29, 30] methods. Simultaneous measures of flow and oxygenation have been combined to yield relative changes in CMRO2 [31, 32]. However, absolute units (μmol/100g/min for CMRO2 and ml/100g/min for CBF) are essential to perform comparisons across subjects, across brain regions, and over time. Conventional diffuse optical methods are low resolution, do not estimate baseline consumption, and require numerous assumptions even to estimate relative changes. Thus, all-optical measures of metabolism remain challenging.

Microscopic methods of measuring retinal oxygen metabolism, which use different modalities to measure flow and oxygenation, have been presented [33–35]. However, multimodality imaging systems present challenges, including the need for co-registration, increased complexity and cost, and, in some cases, increased exposure levels.

Recent advances in Doppler OCT [36, 37] have enabled quantitative flow measurements through either explicit [38] or implicit [39] calculation of the Doppler angle. More recently, quantitative hematocrit [40] and saturation [40–42] measurements were demonstrated and validated using visible light spectroscopic OCT. Here, we present a method of quantifying oxygen metabolism that combines quantitative Doppler flowmetry with oxygen saturation and hematocrit mapping, using a single visible light spectral/Fourier domain OCT microscope. As the cortex is supplied and drained primarily via superficial pial arteries and veins, oxygen metabolism in cortical tissue beneath the imaged FOV can be estimated from measurements near the cortical surface and the Fick principle. Measurements of baseline oxygen metabolism in anesthetized mice are presented and shown to be consistent with literature. We verify two negative control cases for oxygen metabolism. Firstly, we show that during slight modulation of FiO2, changes in arterial O2 saturation (sO2,a) and venous O2 saturation (sO2,v) compensate each other to keep oxygen metabolism roughly constant. Secondly, we show that during slight modulation of FiCO2, changes in flow and venous oxygen saturation compensate each other to keep oxygen metabolism roughly constant. While the results of these validation experiments do not prove the validity of the proposed oxygen consumption method, a different set of results could have invalidated the method.

2. Methods

2.1 Visible light OCT system

A visible light spectral/Fourier-domain OCT system [40] was used in this study. Briefly, the system used a supercontinuum light source (SuperK EXW-12, NKT Photonics), filtered to achieve a spectrum centered at 575 nm, and a free-space Michelson interferometer in which the sample arm consisted of a 2D galvanometer scanner (6210H, Cambridge Technology) and an achromatic doublet with focal length of 30 mm. The full-width-half-maximum (FWHM) lateral resolution was 21.6 μm, while the axial resolution enabled by the spectrum was 1.05 μm in air. The lateral resolution was chosen to approximately agree with the spectroscopic OCT axial resolution, discussed further in Section 2.5. The output of the interferometer was directed to a custom-built spectrometer, with a spectral sampling interval of 0.061 nm. The full imaging depth was 1.35 mm in air. Each A-scan (axial scan) had 1280 unique pixels after Fourier transformation (2560 points in the raw spectrum) and the line-rate was set to 90 kHz. The acquisition was controlled by a custom LabVIEW program. The average power at the sample for imaging was ~1 mW.

For OCT angiography and spectroscopic fitting, the scanning protocol sampled each y-location with 100 repeated B-scans, each consisting of 512 A-scans. This was repeated at 256 y-locations, yielding a 4D data set with dimensions of 512 × 256 × 2560 × 100 (x × y × z × repetition number). For Doppler OCT, the scanning protocol acquired B-scans consisting of 4096 A-scans. This was repeated at 256 y-locations, yielding a 3D data set with dimensions of 4096 × 256 × 2560 (x × y × z). The imaged FOV was 3.2 mm (x) by 1.6 mm (y). The data was post-processed using Matlab to obtain CBF, total hemoglobin concentration (CHbT), and arteriovenous oxygen saturation difference (OE). A more detailed description of the data processing methods can be found in our previous publications [39, 40].

2.2 Animal preparation

For mouse brain imaging, wild-type mice (C57BL/6, N = 3, male, 24-29 g, age 5-7 weeks, Charles River Lab, MA; Crl:SKH1-Hrhr, N = 1, male, 18-25 g, age 3-5 weeks, Charles River Lab, MA) were used. During the experiment, the mouse was supplied a mixture of isoflurane, medical air, and oxygen through a flow meter and vaporizer (VetEquip. Inc, Pleasanton, CA). The mouse was first anesthetized in an induction chamber with 1.25-1.5% v/v isoflurane in a gas mixture of 80% air and 20% oxygen. After the mouse was anesthetized, it was immobilized on a stereotaxis (Stoelting Co., IL) or a custom-made head mount during both preparation and imaging in order to reduce the motion artifacts caused by breathing. Artificial teardrops were applied to the eyes to prevent corneal dehydration. Then, a round coverslip-reinforced, thinned-skull cranial window of about 3 mm diameter was created over the parietal cortex [43] for imaging. Variability in depth of anesthesia is a factor that can potentially affect neuronal activity and CMRO2. Thus, anesthesia was titrated by an investigator, through monitoring the breathing rate and pattern to maintain optimal anesthetic depth during imaging. All the experiment procedures and protocols were reviewed and approved by UC Davis Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

2.3 Physiological manipulations

Graded hypoxia, achieved by decreasing arterial saturation acutely, is commonly used for validation of sensors of tissue ischemia [34, 44]. During severe hypoxia, oxygen supply from arteries is insufficient to meet metabolic demand, resulting in decreased oxygen consumption. However, during mild hypoxia, metabolic demand can still be met by increased oxygen extraction fraction (reduced venous saturation) or increased blood flow. For this study, mild hypoxia was induced to avoid drops in oxygen consumption due to insufficient supply.

Hypercapnia is commonly used as a negative control, as CMRO2 does not change in response to a mild hypercapnic challenge (~5% FiCO2) that does not cause metabolic acidosis [45]. For a mild hypercapnic challenge, flow is expected to increase, while oxygen extraction is expected to decrease through increased venous saturation, leaving CMRO2 constant.

2.4 Cerebral blood flow (CBF) using Doppler OCT

Using the method described in [39], the absolute flow (ml/100g/min) in each individual vessel (arteriole or venule) was obtained by integrating the velocity axial (z) projection over the area of the vessel in the en face (xy) plane before normalizing to the estimated cortical mass corresponding to the imaged FOV. Flows were summed separately over all arterioles and all venules. The two summed flow values (arteriolar and venular) were used to estimate the mean CBF and the standard deviation. Aliasing or phase wrapping of velocity axial projections greater in magnitude than 9.6 mm/s occurred. Hence, for each vessel, an en face plane with a detectable Doppler shift, but without aliasing, was chosen for the flux measurement, as shown in Fig. 1.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Absolute CBF measurements were obtained from a volumetric Doppler OCT data set acquired from the mouse (C57BL/6) neocortex through a thinned-skull cranial window. (A) OCT angiogram showing vasculature and numbered transverse locations of vessels designated for absolute flow measurements. (B) Synthesized Doppler OCT image showing axial velocity profiles (in mm/s) at all designated transverse locations (obtained at different depths). Flux (F) was determined based on the product of the area in the en face plane (Axy) and average axial velocity (vz) over this area for a particular ascending venule numbered 16 (white arrow). (C) Bar graph shows the flow contributions of individual vessels, at the corresponding numbered locations shown in (A) to the total flow over the field of view (ml/100g/min). Absolute flow was calculated from the flux magnitude assuming a cortical thickness of 1.5 mm and a tissue density of 1.05 g/ml [46]. CBF was estimated as the average of the summed arteriolar flow and summed venular flow.

Download Full Size | PDF

2.5 Oxygen extraction (OE) and hemoglobin ([HbT]) using spectroscopic OCT

Using the spectroscopic fitting method described in [40], equivalent concentrations of oxyhemoglobin ([HbO2]) and deoxyhemoglobin ([Hb]) in microvasculature were estimated. Briefly, a noise bias-corrected absorbance spectrum was estimated using a short-time Fourier transform (STFT) of the dynamic scattering signal at each location. The STFT axial resolution was 22 μm, corresponding to a 7 nm spectral resolution. The absorbance spectrum was fit at each axial position using a model that incorporated the effects of scattering and hemoglobin absorption, yielding LCHbO2 and LCHb (L is the single-pass optical path length through the vessel) [40]. Noting that LCHbT = LCHbO2 + LCHb, and using knowledge of the optical path length, the molar concentration CHbT was determined (both CHbO2 and CHb can be determined similarly). Oxygen saturation (sO2) was determined as sO2 = LCHbO2 / LCHbT. In order to determine oxygen metabolism, concentrations were expressed in units of equivalents ([HbT] = 4 CHbT, [HbO2] = 4 CHbO2, and [Hb] = 4 CHb). Importantly, all concentrations ([HbT], [HbO2], and [Hb]) represent intravascular concentrations per unit blood volume, and not per unit brain volume. Thus, our concentrations are more than one order of magnitude higher than those typically associated with diffuse optical imaging, where concentrations per unit brain volume are used. For these reasons [40], our [HbT] measurements are more directly related to hematocrit (intravascular hemoglobin concentration), rather than cerebral blood volume.

The spectroscopic fitting procedure estimated LCHbT at each intravascular location, forming a three-dimensional data set which could then be displayed as a projection image in two dimensions (Fig. 2(A)). Based on this image, regions of interest (ROIs) were chosen in both arteries and veins, and the slope of LCHbT versus depth was determined (Fig. 2(B)). The slope at the vessel center was found to provide the most robust estimation of CHbT. In Fig. 2(C), estimated CHbT values in the 5 ROIs circled in Fig. 2(A) are shown. The numbers are consistent with typical hematocrit values of 12-16 g/dl [47] in C57BL/6 mice.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Absolute measurements of total intravascular hemoglobin concentration (CHbT) in the mouse (C57BL/6) neocortex through a thinned-skull cranial window. (A) Locations for CHbT measurements. (B) Absolute CHbT values were obtained from the slope of LCHbT versus depth, where LCHbT was obtained by spectroscopic fitting at each depth [40]; the vertical red dotted-lines represent the approximate vessel boundaries. (C) Absolute CHbT measurements at the numbered locations in (A).

Download Full Size | PDF

Next, sO2 values in arteries and veins were obtained, from which the arteriovenous oxygen saturation difference was determined. Arteries and veins were readily distinguishable based on their oxygen saturation profiles and morphology. In particular, sO2 values in arteries and veins (6 ROIs each) were averaged separately to obtain the mean arterial sO2 and the mean venous sO2, respectively. The oxygen extraction (OE) estimate was the arteriovenous sO2 difference (OE = sO2,a - sO2,v), while the OE standard deviation estimate was the square root of the sum of the arterial and venous sO2 variance estimates.

2.6 Cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) estimation

The following expression was used to estimate the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2):

CMRO2=OE×CBF×[HbT]=(sO2,asO2,v)×CBF×[HbT]
We note that other CMRO2 studies typically assume that [HbT] = Hct / (3.0 mL / g × 0.01625 g / μmol) [48], where Hct ~45% is an assumed or measured systemic hematocrit. For this study, we directly determined [HbT] based on local spectroscopic OCT imaging of the cortex. By employing this additional measurement, our method obviates an additional assumption implicit in many CMRO2 estimation methods.

We constructed a histogram of CMRO2 values by applying Eq. (1) to all combinations of the four parameters measured in our experiment; sO2,a, sO2,v, CBF, and [HbT]. Specifically, we combined 6 sO2 measurements from arteries, 6 sO2 measurements from veins, 2 CBF measurements (arterioles and venules), and 10 [HbT] measurements, resulting in 720 CMRO2 values in the histogram. We used the histogram mean and standard deviation (s.d.) for CMRO2 estimation. Alternatively, according to the theory of propagation of error [49], the standard deviation of CMRO2 can be estimated via the relation

σ^CMRO2=(mCBFm[HbT]σOE)2+(mOEm[HbT]σCBF)2+(mCBFmOEσ[HbT])2
where m and σ denote the observed mean and standard deviation, respectively, of the subscripted quantities. The two methods yielded similar estimates for the standard deviation of CMRO2.

3. Results

Figure 3 shows imaging of oxygen saturation in the mouse brain during modulation of FiO2. Microvascular oxygen saturation was mapped using visible light spectroscopic OCT and displayed on a false-color scale (Fig. 3). A uniform reduction in both arterial and venous saturations was observed during mild hypoxia caused by reduction of FiO2 (Fig. 3(B)). As both arterial and venous saturation decreased by the same amount (~7% sO2) during mild hypoxia, oxygen extraction remained unchanged. Moreover, as CBF and CHbT, related to hematocrit, did not change, CMRO2 did not change appreciably during the oxygen modulation experiment.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Imaging of oxygen saturation changes during modulation of FiO2 in the mouse (Crl:SKH1-Hrhr) neocortex through a thinned-skull cranial window. Microvascular oxygen saturation was mapped using visible light spectroscopic OCT and displayed on a false-color scale during (A) 36% FiO2, (B) 16% FiO2. Since arterial and venous oxygen saturation decreased by equal amounts as FiO2 was decreased, oxygen extraction remained approximately constant for this experiment. An artery and vein are labelled as “a” and “v” respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 4 shows imaging of oxygen saturation in the mouse brain during modulation of FiCO2. During hypercapnia (5% FiCO2), venous saturation increased by more than 25% while arterial saturation remained relatively unchanged, reducing oxygen extraction by ~3.3 × relative to baseline (0% FiCO2). Moreover CBF increased by ~2.7 × relative to baseline while CHbT, and thus hematocrit, remained unchanged relative to baseline. Thus, CMRO2 did not change appreciably during the hypercapnia experiment.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Imaging of oxygen saturation changes during modulation of FiCO2 in the mouse (C57BL/6) neocortex through a thinned-skull cranial window. Microvascular oxygen saturation was mapped using visible light spectroscopic OCT and displayed on a false-color scale during (A) 0% FiCO2, (B) 5% FiCO2. A large increase in oxygen saturation was observed in veins, while the sO2 in arteries remained unchanged. The reduced oxygen extraction is a consequence of arterial and arteriolar dilation and subsequently, increased CBF during hypercapnia. Note the heterogeneity of oxygen extraction, as evidenced by regionally varying venous sO2 values both before and after hypercapnia (white and gray arrows). An artery and vein are labeled as “a” and “v” respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

Finally, a range of states were achieved in N = 3 C57BL/6 mice through mild modulation of FiO2 and FiCO2. Due to the fact that manipulations were not severe, CMRO2 was not expected to change for any of these states. OE, CBF and CHbT are shown in Fig. 5(A)-5(C), respectively. Notably, variability in CHbT (Fig. 5(C)) was lower than variability in either OE (Fig. 5(A)) or CBF (Fig. 5(B)). The coefficients of variation for OE, CBF and CHbT were 0.70, 0.44, and 0.10, respectively. In Fig. 5(D), a histogram of CMRO2 values for a single state, calculated from all 720 possible combinations of arterial saturations (different locations), venous saturations (different locations), CBF values (arteriolar and venular), and CHbT values (different locations) is shown. The mean and standard deviation for a given state were determined from this histogram. Based on this procedure, which incorporates biological heterogeneity in the standard deviation estimate, CMRO2 for the example in Fig. 5(D) was determined to be 163.6 ± 67.8 μmol/100g/min (mean ± s.d.). In spite of large variability in OE (Fig. 5(A)), CMRO2 varied less across the investigated states (Fig. 5(E)). This is explained by the observation that OE varied inversely with CBF (Fig. 5(F)), such that a higher CBF is compensated by a lower OE, and vice versa (R2 = 0.95 for OE~1/CBF fit). Therefore, as expected based on Eq. (1), the coefficient of variation for CMRO2 (0.17) was lower than the coefficients of variation for OE (0.70) and CBF (0.44). The lower coefficient of variation of CMRO2 across animals and states, in spite of its higher relative error (Eq. (2)), is notable.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 (A-C) Oxygen extraction (OE), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and hemoglobin concentration (CHbT) were measured in a range of states (achieved by mild modulation of FiO2 and FiCO2) and mice (C57BL/6, N = 3). The OE standard deviation estimate (A) was determined as the square root of the sum of the arterial and venous sO2 variance estimates, obtained from measurements at different locations. The CBF standard deviation estimate (B) was obtained from the summed arteriolar flow and summed venular flow values. (C) The CHbT standard deviation estimate was obtained from measurements at multiple locations. (D) A CMRO2 histogram was generated for each animal and state based on applying Eq. (1) to all possible combinations of arterial saturations (different locations), venous saturations (different locations), CBF values (arteriolar and venular), and CHbT values (different locations). (E) CMRO2 means and standard deviations were estimated from this histogram and shown across states and mice. (F) OE varied inversely with CBF, leading to a lower coefficient of variation for CMRO2 (0.17) as compared with OE (0.70). Error bars in (A-F) are standard deviations.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Discussion

The current manuscript describes and demonstrates the estimation of CMRO2 in the mouse brain in vivo through separate quantification of CBF, OE and [HbT]. As CMRO2 is the product of these three quantities, relative error in CMRO2 was larger than relative error in the individual measurements of CBF, OE, and [HbT] (Fig. 5(D)). However, Fig. 4 suggests that some of this variability may be due to real biological heterogeneity in oxygen saturation in different veins that serve different cortical regions (denoted by arrows). We anticipate that a flow-weighting of the saturation in each venule (as would be required to calculate the oxygen efflux from cortical tissue) might be a more appropriate way to account for this heterogeneity than to merely average the saturations. We will explore flow-weighting of saturations in future work, using a higher optical resolution to quantify oxygen saturation in every venule where flow is measured.

Since CMRO2 values were derived from measurements in supplying and draining vessels at the cortical surface, CMRO2 was not depth-resolved. It is well-known that glucose metabolism in gray matter is 3-fold higher than in white matter [50], and that glucose metabolism varies across different cortical layers [51]. Since oxygen metabolism is expected to parallel glucose metabolism, some of the heterogeneity in venous saturation (Fig. 4) may relate to layer-dependencies in oxygen extraction. Verification of this conjecture would require a vascular graph [52] to ascertain the precise cortical layers drained by each surface venule.

Though CMRO2 estimates in this study (199 ± 35 μmol/100g/min) are physiologically plausible, they are somewhat lower than previous literature values [20, 53]. A recent study using ultrahigh-field 16.4 Tesla 17O MR spectroscopy on mice (FVB, N = 2, male, 35-40 g body weight, age 20-25 weeks; C57B6/CBA, N = 3, male, 27-30 g, age 7-10 weeks) anesthetized with 1.2-2% isoflurane [20] reported an average striatal oxygen consumption rate of 2.6 ± 0.4 μmol/g/min. In another study, 11.7 Tesla 17O MR spectroscopy was applied to measure OEF, CBF, and CMRO2 in stroke mice (C57BL/6, N = 4, male, 18-30 g) anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine/xylazine [53]. In this study, the mean CMRO2 value was 2.63 ± 0.16 μmol/g/min in the contralateral hemisphere to the stroke. Comparisons between studies should be performed with caution since metabolic rate varies across brain regions [54], with age [51, 55], and with depth of anesthesia [56].

Several limitations of our methodology may also contribute to these discrepancies. First, though almost all of the oxygen carried by blood (> 98%) is bound to hemoglobin under normal physiological conditions [57], oxygen dissolved in plasma may contribute significantly to total blood oxygen content at very high or very low oxygen tensions. Dissolved oxygen may be important in calculating OE, which is an arteriovenous difference. In the future, the CMRO2 calculation in Eq. (1), currently based on the assumption of oxygen transport solely by hemoglobin, could, in principle, be corrected to account for dissolved oxygen in the calculation of OE. Second, fringe washout occurs when particles move axially on the order of a wavelength over the exposure time, leading to averaging of the spectral interference fringes in spectral/Fourier domain OCT. On average, fringe washout is more severe at the short wavelength end of the broad spectrum, potentially leading to an artifactually higher absorbance at shorter wavelengths. Nevertheless, in the present study, spectra were measured at the center of vessels that were almost perpendicular to the probe beam, meaning the axial velocities and Doppler shifts were small. Third, the scattering coefficient is known to decrease with wavelength, leading to a higher absorbance at shorter wavelengths, particularly at greater depths. The effects of attenuation due to scattering were mitigated in the present study by selecting superficial ROIs for spectroscopic analysis. Other potential solutions to account for wavelength-dependent scattering include a depth-dependent normalization procedure [40] or employing a model that explicitly includes the wavelength-dependence of scattering [42]. Fourth, both thermal damage thresholds and the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) limit are lower at visible wavelengths than at near-infrared wavelengths. In the present study, the power delivered to the sample was maintained at ~1 mW, and pulses at the sample were too broad and low energy to observe saturation effects. No changes in the brain tissue before were noted during and after the imaging session.

Finally, a cortical thickness was assumed in the present study to achieve absolute cortical CBF and CMRO2 (units of ml/100g/min and μmol/100g/min, respectively). While a cortical thickness of 1.5 mm was used here for consistency with previous studies [39], we have recently observed that the cortical thickness in mice may approach ~1 mm at some locations. The substitution of a smaller cortical thickness, perhaps measured experimentally, would bring our CMRO2 estimates more in line with literature values [20, 53]. Lastly, isoflurane is known to cause reduction of cerebral metabolism and suppression of neural activity [56] at high doses; thus, uncontrolled variability in anesthesia depth may explain some of the variability in our results. Future experiments will therefore employ simultaneous cortical electrophysiology as a more direct correlate of CMRO2.

5. Conclusion

A method of quantifying brain oxygen consumption using three independent optical measurements of cortical blood flow, arteriovenous oxygen saturation difference, and hematocrit, using a single OCT microscope, was presented. Physiologically plausible CMRO2 values were demonstrated, and negative control experiments were performed. While the results of these validation experiments do not prove the accuracy of the CMRO2 measurements, a different set of results could have invalidated the method. To provide more complete validation, these methods will be compared against gold standards such as PET in the future.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support from the National Institutes of Health (R00NS067050, R01NS094681, P30AG010129), the American Heart Association (11IRG5440002), and the Glaucoma Research Foundation Catalyst for a Cure 2. We thank Harsha Radhakrishnan for general support and advice.

References and links

1. C. N. Hall, M. C. Klein-Flügge, C. Howarth, and D. Attwell, “Oxidative phosphorylation, not glycolysis, powers presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms underlying brain information processing,” J. Neurosci. 32(26), 8940–8951 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. L. Østergaard, T. S. Engedal, R. Aamand, R. Mikkelsen, N. K. Iversen, M. Anzabi, E. T. Næss-Schmidt, K. R. Drasbek, V. Bay, J. U. Blicher, A. Tietze, I. K. Mikkelsen, B. Hansen, S. N. Jespersen, N. Juul, J. C. Sørensen, and M. Rasmussen, “Capillary transit time heterogeneity and flow-metabolism coupling after traumatic brain injury,” J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 34(10), 1585–1598 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. C. Iadecola, “Neurovascular regulation in the normal brain and in Alzheimer’s disease,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5(5), 347–360 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. U. Dirnagl, C. Iadecola, and M. A. Moskowitz, “Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view,” Trends Neurosci. 22(9), 391–397 (1999). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. L. Østergaard, S. N. Jespersen, T. Engedahl, E. Gutiérrez Jiménez, M. Ashkanian, M. B. Hansen, S. Eskildsen, and K. Mouridsen, “Capillary dysfunction: its detection and causative role in dementias and stroke,” Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 15(6), 37 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. E. Stefansson, “Oxygen and diabetic eye disease,” Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 228(2), 120–123 (1990). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. D. A. Antonetti, R. Klein, and T. W. Gardner, “Diabetic retinopathy,” N. Engl. J. Med. 366(13), 1227–1239 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. M. Mozaffarieh, M. C. Grieshaber, and J. Flammer, “Oxygen and blood flow: players in the pathogenesis of glaucoma,” Mol. Vis. 14, 224–233 (2008). [PubMed]  

9. J. B. Mandeville, J. J. A. Marota, B. E. Kosofsky, J. R. Keltner, R. Weissleder, B. R. Rosen, and R. M. Weisskoff, “Dynamic functional imaging of relative cerebral blood volume during rat forepaw stimulation,” Magn. Reson. Med. 39(4), 615–624 (1998). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. S. Ogawa, T. M. Lee, A. R. Kay, and D. W. Tank, “Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87(24), 9868–9872 (1990). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. S. Ogawa, R. S. Menon, D. W. Tank, S. G. Kim, H. Merkle, J. M. Ellermann, and K. Ugurbil, “Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model,” Biophys. J. 64(3), 803–812 (1993). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. A. L. Vazquez, K. Masamoto, and S. G. Kim, “Dynamics of oxygen delivery and consumption during evoked neural stimulation using a compartment model and CBF and tissue P(O2) measurements,” Neuroimage 42(1), 49–59 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. A. D. Estrada, A. Ponticorvo, T. N. Ford, and A. K. Dunn, “Microvascular oxygen quantification using two-photon microscopy,” Opt. Lett. 33(10), 1038–1040 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. A. Parpaleix, Y. Houssen, and S. Charpak, “Imaging local neuronal activity by monitoring PO₂ transients in capillaries,” Nat. Med. 19(2), 241–246 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. L. Wang, K. Maslov, and L. V. Wang, “Single-cell label-free photoacoustic flowoxigraphy in vivo,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110(15), 5759–5764 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. J. Yao, K. I. Maslov, Y. Zhang, Y. Xia, and L. V. Wang, “Label-free oxygen-metabolic photoacoustic microscopy in vivo,” J. Biomed. Opt. 16(7), 076003 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. M. A. Mintun, M. E. Raichle, W. R. Martin, and P. Herscovitch, “Brain oxygen utilization measured with O-15 radiotracers and positron emission tomography,” J. Nucl. Med. 25(2), 177–187 (1984). [PubMed]  

18. S. H. Yee, K. Lee, P. A. Jerabek, and P. T. Fox, “Quantitative measurement of oxygen metabolic rate in the rat brain using microPET imaging of briefly inhaled 15O-labelled oxygen gas,” Nucl. Med. Commun. 27(7), 573–581 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. M. E. Raichle, A. M. MacLeod, A. Z. Snyder, W. J. Powers, D. A. Gusnard, and G. L. Shulman, “A default mode of brain function,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98(2), 676–682 (2001). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

20. W. Cui, X. H. Zhu, M. L. Vollmers, E. T. Colonna, G. Adriany, B. Tramm, J. M. Dubinsky, and G. Öz, “Non-invasive measurement of cerebral oxygen metabolism in the mouse brain by ultra-high field (17)O MR spectroscopy,” J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 33(12), 1846–1849 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

21. U. Dirnagl, B. Kaplan, M. Jacewicz, and W. Pulsinelli, “Continuous measurement of cerebral cortical blood flow by laser-Doppler flowmetry in a rat stroke model,” J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 9(5), 589–596 (1989). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. T. Durduran and A. G. Yodh, “Diffuse correlation spectroscopy for non-invasive, micro-vascular cerebral blood flow measurement,” Neuroimage 85(Pt 1), 51–63 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. A. K. Dunn, “Laser speckle contrast imaging of cerebral blood flow,” Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40(2), 367–377 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. A. Villringer, J. Planck, C. Hock, L. Schleinkofer, and U. Dirnagl, “Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS): a new tool to study hemodynamic changes during activation of brain function in human adults,” Neurosci. Lett. 154(1-2), 101–104 (1993). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

25. R. D. Frostig, E. E. Lieke, D. Y. Ts’o, and A. Grinvald, “Cortical functional architecture and local coupling between neuronal activity and the microcirculation revealed by in vivo high-resolution optical imaging of intrinsic signals,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87(16), 6082–6086 (1990). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

26. M. S. Patterson, B. Chance, and B. C. Wilson, “Time resolved reflectance and transmittance for the non-invasive measurement of tissue optical properties,” Appl. Opt. 28(12), 2331–2336 (1989). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

27. D. T. Delpy, S. R. Arridge, M. Cope, D. Edwards, E. O. Reynolds, C. E. Richardson, S. Wray, J. Wyatt, and P. van der Zee, “Quantitation of pathlength in optical spectroscopy,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 248, 41–46 (1989). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

28. A. Torricelli, D. Contini, A. Pifferi, M. Caffini, R. Re, L. Zucchelli, and L. Spinelli, “Time domain functional NIRS imaging for human brain mapping,” Neuroimage 85(Pt 1), 28–50 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

29. J. B. Fishkin, P. T. So, A. E. Cerussi, S. Fantini, M. A. Franceschini, and E. Gratton, “Frequency-domain method for measuring spectral properties in multiple-scattering media: methemoglobin absorption spectrum in a tissuelike phantom,” Appl. Opt. 34(7), 1143–1155 (1995). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

30. B. J. Tromberg, N. Shah, R. Lanning, A. Cerussi, J. Espinoza, T. Pham, L. Svaasand, and J. Butler, “Non-invasive in vivo characterization of breast tumors using photon migration spectroscopy,” Neoplasia 2(1-2), 26–40 (2000). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

31. J. P. Culver, T. Durduran, D. Furuya, C. Cheung, J. H. Greenberg, and A. G. Yodh, “Diffuse optical tomography of cerebral blood flow, oxygenation, and metabolism in rat during focal ischemia,” J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 23(8), 911–924 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

32. A. K. Dunn, A. Devor, A. M. Dale, and D. A. Boas, “Spatial extent of oxygen metabolism and hemodynamic changes during functional activation of the rat somatosensory cortex,” Neuroimage 27(2), 279–290 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

33. W. Song, Q. Wei, W. Liu, T. Liu, J. Yi, N. Sheibani, A. A. Fawzi, R. A. Linsenmeier, S. Jiao, and H. F. Zhang, “A combined method to quantify the retinal metabolic rate of oxygen using photoacoustic ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography,” Sci. Rep. 4, 6525 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

34. J. Wanek, P. Y. Teng, N. P. Blair, and M. Shahidi, “Inner retinal oxygen delivery and metabolism under normoxia and hypoxia in rat,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54(7), 5012–5019 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

35. X. Liu, T. Liu, R. Wen, Y. Li, C. A. Puliafito, H. F. Zhang, and S. Jiao, “Optical coherence photoacoustic microscopy for in vivo multimodal retinal imaging,” Opt. Lett. 40(7), 1370–1373 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

36. J. A. Izatt, M. D. Kulkarni, S. Yazdanfar, J. K. Barton, and A. J. Welch, “In vivo bidirectional color Doppler flow imaging of picoliter blood volumes using optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 22(18), 1439–1441 (1997). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

37. Z. Chen, T. E. Milner, D. Dave, and J. S. Nelson, “Optical Doppler tomographic imaging of fluid flow velocity in highly scattering media,” Opt. Lett. 22(1), 64–66 (1997). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

38. Y. Wang, B. A. Bower, J. A. Izatt, O. Tan, and D. Huang, “In vivo total retinal blood flow measurement by Fourier domain Doppler optical coherence tomography,” J. Biomed. Opt. 12(4), 041215 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

39. V. J. Srinivasan, E. T. Mandeville, A. Can, F. Blasi, M. Climov, A. Daneshmand, J. H. Lee, E. Yu, H. Radhakrishnan, E. H. Lo, S. Sakadžić, K. Eikermann-Haerter, and C. Ayata, “Multiparametric, longitudinal optical coherence tomography imaging reveals acute injury and chronic recovery in experimental ischemic stroke,” PLoS One 8(8), e71478 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

40. S. P. Chong, C. W. Merkle, C. Leahy, H. Radhakrishnan, and V. J. Srinivasan, “Quantitative microvascular hemoglobin mapping using visible light spectroscopic Optical Coherence Tomography,” Biomed. Opt. Express 6(4), 1429–1450 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

41. F. E. Robles, C. Wilson, G. Grant, and A. Wax, “Molecular imaging true-colour spectroscopic optical coherence tomography,” Nat. Photonics 5(12), 744–747 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

42. J. Yi, Q. Wei, W. Liu, V. Backman, and H. F. Zhang, “Visible-light optical coherence tomography for retinal oximetry,” Opt. Lett. 38(11), 1796–1798 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

43. P. J. Drew, A. Y. Shih, J. D. Driscoll, P. M. Knutsen, P. Blinder, D. Davalos, K. Akassoglou, P. S. Tsai, and D. Kleinfeld, “Chronic optical access through a polished and reinforced thinned skull,” Nat. Methods 7(12), 981–984 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

44. K. A. Kasischke, E. M. Lambert, B. Panepento, A. Sun, H. A. Gelbard, R. W. Burgess, T. H. Foster, and M. Nedergaard, “Two-photon NADH imaging exposes boundaries of oxygen diffusion in cortical vascular supply regions,” J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 31(1), 68–81 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

45. T. L. Davis, K. K. Kwong, R. M. Weisskoff, and B. R. Rosen, “Calibrated functional MRI: mapping the dynamics of oxidative metabolism,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95(4), 1834–1839 (1998). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

46. H. J. Kretschmann, G. Kammradt, I. Krauthausen, B. Sauer, and F. Wingert, “Brain growth in man,” Bibl. Anat. 28, 1–26 (1986). [PubMed]  

47. B. M. Raabe, J. E. Artwohl, J. E. Purcell, J. Lovaglio, and J. D. Fortman, “Effects of weekly blood collection in C57BL/6 mice,” J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 50(5), 680–685 (2011). [PubMed]  

48. J. A. Ulatowski, J. M. E. Oja, J. I. Suarez, R. A. Kauppinen, R. J. Traystman, and P. C. M. van Zijl, “In vivo determination of absolute cerebral blood volume using hemoglobin as a natural contrast agent: An MRI study using altered arterial carbon dioxide tension,” J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 19(7), 809–817 (1999). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

49. J. Topping, Errors of Observation and Their Treatment, 3d ed., Science paperbacks, no 62 (Chapman and Hall, 1971), p. 119.

50. J. Karbowski, “Global and regional brain metabolic scaling and its functional consequences,” BMC Biol. 5(1), 18 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

51. C. B. Smith, C. Goochee, S. I. Rapoport, and L. Sokoloff, “Effects of ageing on local rates of cerebral glucose utilization in the rat,” Brain 103(2), 351–365 (1980). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

52. P. Blinder, P. S. Tsai, J. P. Kaufhold, P. M. Knutsen, H. Suhl, and D. Kleinfeld, “The cortical angiome: an interconnected vascular network with noncolumnar patterns of blood flow,” Nat. Neurosci. 16(7), 889–897 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

53. X. H. Zhu, J. M. Chen, T. W. Tu, W. Chen, and S. K. Song, “Simultaneous and noninvasive imaging of cerebral oxygen metabolic rate, blood flow and oxygen extraction fraction in stroke mice,” Neuroimage 64, 437–447 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

54. C. DD and S. L., “Regulation of Cerebral Metabolic Rate,” in Basic Neurochemistry: Molecular, Cellular and Medical Aspects., 6th ed. (Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1999).

55. M. C. Ingvar, P. Maeder, L. Sokoloff, and C. B. Smith, “Effects of ageing on local rates of cerebral protein synthesis in Sprague-Dawley rats,” Brain 108(1), 155–170 (1985). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

56. K. A. Williams, M. Magnuson, W. Majeed, S. M. LaConte, S. J. Peltier, X. Hu, and S. D. Keilholz, “Comparison of alpha-chloralose, medetomidine and isoflurane anesthesia for functional connectivity mapping in the rat,” Magn. Reson. Imaging 28(7), 995–1003 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

57. R. N. Pittman, “Oxygen Transport,” in Regulation of Tissue Oxygenation (San Rafael, CA), 2011).

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Absolute CBF measurements were obtained from a volumetric Doppler OCT data set acquired from the mouse (C57BL/6) neocortex through a thinned-skull cranial window. (A) OCT angiogram showing vasculature and numbered transverse locations of vessels designated for absolute flow measurements. (B) Synthesized Doppler OCT image showing axial velocity profiles (in mm/s) at all designated transverse locations (obtained at different depths). Flux (F) was determined based on the product of the area in the en face plane (Axy) and average axial velocity (vz) over this area for a particular ascending venule numbered 16 (white arrow). (C) Bar graph shows the flow contributions of individual vessels, at the corresponding numbered locations shown in (A) to the total flow over the field of view (ml/100g/min). Absolute flow was calculated from the flux magnitude assuming a cortical thickness of 1.5 mm and a tissue density of 1.05 g/ml [46]. CBF was estimated as the average of the summed arteriolar flow and summed venular flow.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Absolute measurements of total intravascular hemoglobin concentration (CHbT) in the mouse (C57BL/6) neocortex through a thinned-skull cranial window. (A) Locations for CHbT measurements. (B) Absolute CHbT values were obtained from the slope of LCHbT versus depth, where LCHbT was obtained by spectroscopic fitting at each depth [40]; the vertical red dotted-lines represent the approximate vessel boundaries. (C) Absolute CHbT measurements at the numbered locations in (A).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Imaging of oxygen saturation changes during modulation of FiO2 in the mouse (Crl:SKH1-Hrhr) neocortex through a thinned-skull cranial window. Microvascular oxygen saturation was mapped using visible light spectroscopic OCT and displayed on a false-color scale during (A) 36% FiO2, (B) 16% FiO2. Since arterial and venous oxygen saturation decreased by equal amounts as FiO2 was decreased, oxygen extraction remained approximately constant for this experiment. An artery and vein are labelled as “a” and “v” respectively.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Imaging of oxygen saturation changes during modulation of FiCO2 in the mouse (C57BL/6) neocortex through a thinned-skull cranial window. Microvascular oxygen saturation was mapped using visible light spectroscopic OCT and displayed on a false-color scale during (A) 0% FiCO2, (B) 5% FiCO2. A large increase in oxygen saturation was observed in veins, while the sO2 in arteries remained unchanged. The reduced oxygen extraction is a consequence of arterial and arteriolar dilation and subsequently, increased CBF during hypercapnia. Note the heterogeneity of oxygen extraction, as evidenced by regionally varying venous sO2 values both before and after hypercapnia (white and gray arrows). An artery and vein are labeled as “a” and “v” respectively.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 (A-C) Oxygen extraction (OE), cerebral blood flow (CBF), and hemoglobin concentration (CHbT) were measured in a range of states (achieved by mild modulation of FiO2 and FiCO2) and mice (C57BL/6, N = 3). The OE standard deviation estimate (A) was determined as the square root of the sum of the arterial and venous sO2 variance estimates, obtained from measurements at different locations. The CBF standard deviation estimate (B) was obtained from the summed arteriolar flow and summed venular flow values. (C) The CHbT standard deviation estimate was obtained from measurements at multiple locations. (D) A CMRO2 histogram was generated for each animal and state based on applying Eq. (1) to all possible combinations of arterial saturations (different locations), venous saturations (different locations), CBF values (arteriolar and venular), and CHbT values (different locations). (E) CMRO2 means and standard deviations were estimated from this histogram and shown across states and mice. (F) OE varied inversely with CBF, leading to a lower coefficient of variation for CMRO2 (0.17) as compared with OE (0.70). Error bars in (A-F) are standard deviations.

Equations (2)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

CMR O 2 =OE×CBF×[HbT]=( s O 2,a s O 2,v )×CBF×[HbT]
σ ^ CMR O 2 = ( m CBF m [ HbT ] σ OE ) 2 + ( m OE m [ HbT ] σ CBF ) 2 + ( m CBF m OE σ [ HbT ] ) 2
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.