Open Access
Add to BibSonomyAbstract
We incorrectly calculated the Strehl ratio in Table 1 in our paper published in [Appl. Opt. 53, 3255–3261 (2014) [CrossRef] ]. Here, we provide the correct values of the Strehl ratio. It should be mentioned that this does not change or affect any other results, techniques, or conclusions presented in the published paper.
© 2014 Optical Society of America
In [1], Table 1 presented values of the Strehl ratio, which were calculated by applying Fourier transforms on the estimated beam. The Fourier transforms of the beam with an aberrated wavefront and with a flat wavefront were compared to obtain the Strehl ratio. The compared values were magnitudes of electric field instead of intensity. This means that the values presented in Table 1 should be squared to obtain the correct result. The whole table with corrected values of the Strehl ratio is presented below.
Table 1. Relations between Number of Actuators in the Array and Parameters of the Residual Wavefront-Like Peak-Valley , Root Mean Square RMS, and Strehl Ratio of the Corrected Beam
Reference
1. J. Pilar, O. Slezak, P. Sikocinski, M. Divoky, M. Sawicka, S. Bonora, A. Lucianetti, T. Mocek, and H. Jelinkova, “Design and optimization of an adaptive optics system for a high-average-power multi-slab laser (HiLASE),” Appl. Opt. 53, 3255–3261 (2014). [CrossRef]