Equation 5(c) of the original publication [1] was wrong; the correct form is presented here as Eq. (1):

Consequently, the $z$ axis of figures showing the xDNA curves was also affected. Figures 2(b), 4(a), 6(b), 8(a), 9(b), 9(d), 10(b), 12(a), 13(b), 13(d), 14(b), and 14(d) from [1] undergo negligible changes; thus they are not presented here. More changes were needed for Fig. 3(b); the corrected form is presented here as Fig. 1. The correct $z$ values are smaller, which is more evident when the surface coverage is lower (smaller $C$ value). Figures 7 and 11 from [1] show differences analogous to Fig. 3(b) from [1]; therefore they are not presented here.

 

Fig. 1. Corrected Fig. 3(b) on page 126.

Download Full Size | PDF

The corrected version of Fig. 5(a) from [1] is shown here as Fig. 2. The most noticeable effects are smaller $z$ values, which become important at high values of mean flake tilt angle. Figures 8(b) and 12(b) from [1] show the same differences as Fig. 5(a) from [1]; therefore they are not presented here.

 

Fig. 2. Corrected Fig. 5(a) on page 127.

Download Full Size | PDF

Although there was an error in Eq. 5(c) of the original publication [1], all the conclusions stay valid. The corrected version with all the affected figures is available on request at marta.k.gunde@ki.si.