Abstract
The oblique focusing defect of spherical lenses, known as coma, is described by Seidel as the second of five correction terms (third order) to the Gauss theory. The concept is clear for a refracting surface that is free of spherical aberration; however, the impossibility of eliminating spherical aberration from a single lens with spherical surfaces can confuse the understanding of the second aberration, coma. A way of understanding the comatic effect even in the presence of spherical aberration is described. Confusion over the sign of coma, as indicated by mistakes in optics textbooks, is addressed. This paper suggests corrections to some interpretations of coma found in the literature.
© 1988 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Maciej Rafalowski
Appl. Opt. 27(14) 3046-3050 (1988)
C. J. Barth and D. Oepts
Appl. Opt. 27(18) 3838-3844 (1988)
Jiandong Lin, Qi An, and Naibo Zhang
Appl. Opt. 63(15) 4192-4200 (2024)